Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and a first venous or arterial thrombotic event: clinical characteristics, antibody profiles and estimate of the risk of recurrence.

OBJECTIVES: Thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) involves in most cases the venous circulation. Why in some patients thrombotic APS affects the arterial circulation and in particular cerebral circulation is unknown. In previous studies, both patient characteristics and antiphospholipid antibody types and titers have been associated with arterial thrombosis. Aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of venous and arterial thrombotic APS from a large series of patients. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the Start 2 antiphospholipid, a multicenter prospective register of long-term collected data from Thrombosis Centers in Italy. RESULTS: Of 167 patients with thrombotic APS, 114 (68 %) had a venous and 53 (32 %) had an arterial event as first clinical manifestation. Several clinical characteristics and risk factors were different among groups in univariate analysis. Using logistic regression analysis, reduced creatinine clearance and hyperlipidemia were independent variable for the occurrence of arterial APS. Notably, no difference in antiphospholipid antibody profiles and aß2-Glycoprotein I levels were found between groups. A higher adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) was found in arterial group indicating a possible high recurrence rate in arterial APS. CONCLUSIONS: These data have pathophysiological and clinical implication since associated conditions might predispose patients to arterial rather than venous events and call to a close monitoring and treatment of arterial APS due to their increased tendency to recurrence.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Unprovoked (or provoked by mild risk factors) venous thromboembolism (VTE) in young patients, VTE in uncommon sites, or cases of unexplained VTE recurrence may be positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and thus may be diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The evaluation of aPL is standardized using immunological tests for anticardiolipin and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I. The determination of functional antibodies (lupus anticoagulant) is less standardized, especially in patients on anticoagulant treatment. Patients positive for all the three tests are at high risk of recurrence, which, in turn, might lead to chronic obstruction of pulmonary vessels (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension). Randomized clinical trials have shown that triple-positive patients should be treated with vitamin K antagonists maintaining an international normalized ratio between 2 and 3. Whether patients with VTE and incomplete aPL profile can be treated with direct oral anticoagulants should be further investigated.

Impact of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination on high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with APS and triple-positive for aPL are at high risk of recurrent events. As COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination may induce thrombotic complications, the objective of the study was to assess the course of COVID-19 and adverse events after vaccination in these patients. METHODS: This is a nationwide multicentre survey conducted in nine APS referral centres by means of a questionnaire. Included patients are thrombotic APS with triple-positive aPL confirmed 12 weeks apart. Reference specialist physicians used a four-graded scale of severity for COVID-19 [from 0 (asymptomatic) to 3 (hospitalization in intensive care unit)] and a six-graded scale for adverse reactions to vaccination [from 0 (transient local injection site sign/symptoms) to 5 (potentially life-threatening reactions)]. Outcomes were considered within a 30-day period. RESULTS: Out of 161 patients interviewed, 18 (11%) had COVID-19. All of them fully recovered without any progression to severe disease nor thromboembolic event. A total of 146 patients received the first (92%) and 129 (80%) the second dose of vaccine; side effects were minimal and, in most cases (83% after the first and 68% after the second vaccination) limited to a sore arm. Fifteen patients (9%) were unvaccinated. Most of them raised doubts on the need for vaccination, complained of poor safety and in general were reluctant about COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSION: Patients with triple-positive thrombotic APS did not suffer from severe COVID-19 outcomes. Importantly, COVID-19 vaccination was well tolerated. These data may reassure patients and physicians and contribute to reducing hesitancy in unvaccinated patients.

Platelet- and endothelial-derived microparticles in the context of different antiphospholipid antibody profiles.

OBJECTIVES: Studies on microparticles (MPs) in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are sparse and inconclusive. The relation between MPs and different aPL antibody profiles has never been tested. We evaluated the presence of platelet and endothelial microparticles in patients positive for IgG anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies according to triple, double and single positive aPL profiles. METHODS: Megamix (Biocytex) was used to set up the MPs gating according to the datasheet. Markers of Platelet Microparticles (PMPs) were CD41a-PE and annexin-V-FITC that was used to determine phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure. CD144-FITC was used as a marker of Endothelial Microparticles (EMPs). RESULTS: The number of total MPs and EMPs was significantly higher in triple positive groups with respect to single positive group and showed a significant correlation with IgG aß2GPI titers. The number PMPs was the lowest in triple positive group and inversely correlated with IgG aß2GPI titers. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated levels of total MPs and EMPs suggest a state of vascular activation in IgG aß2GPI positive individuals according to the number of positive tests. PMPs may be fast cleared from circulation in high risk triple positive patients.

Anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) in isolated lupus anticoagulant (LA): is their presence linked to dual test positivity?

OBJECTIVES: Anti phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) are often present in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and might be relevant in the pathogenesis of this condition. They are major determinant of lupus anticoagulant (LA) in triple-positive antiphospholipid (aPL) profile. Whether they are present and pathogenic in patients with isolated LA [negative anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI) antibodies] is a matter of debate. METHODS: We measured aPS/PT in a large number of isolated LA with the aim to ascertain whether there is a link between the way isolated LA is assessed and the presence of these antibodies. APS/PT were measured in 86 patients with isolated LA (aCL- and abeta2GPI-). LA was assessed by two test systems, the dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) and the Silica Clotting Time (SCT). RESULTS: Sixty-six (77%) individuals with isolated LA were positive for aPS/PT (IgM 44, IgG and IgM 15, IgG in 7). Diagnosis of LA was made based on positive results in both dRVVT and SCT in 40 patients (Group 1) and based on only one positive test in the remaining 46 patients (Group 2). The rate of positive aPS/PT antibodies was significantly higher in Group 1 (OR=7.2, 95% CI 1.9-27.0, p<0.002). Moreover, the titre of IgM aPS/PT was significantly increased in Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (137 U, IQR 64-179 vs. 43 U, IQR 11-120, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate an association between LA based on two positive coagulation tests and the presence of aPS/PT antibodies, especially of IgM isotype.

Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Rivaroxaban is an effective and safe alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. We tested the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in high-risk patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. This is a randomized open-label multicenter noninferiority study with blinded end point adjudication. Rivaroxaban, 20 mg once daily (15 mg once daily based on kidney function) was compared with warfarin (international normalized ratio target 2.5) for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and vascular death in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Only high-risk patients triple positive for lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies of the same isotype (triple positivity) were included in the study. The trial was terminated prematurely after the enrollment of 120 patients (59 randomized to rivaroxaban and 61 to warfarin) because of an excess of events among patients in the rivaroxaban arm. Mean follow-up was 569 days. There were 11 (19%) events in the rivaroxaban group, and 2 (3%) events in the warfarin group. Thromboembolic events occurred in 7 (12%) patients randomized to rivaroxaban (4 ischemic stroke and 3 myocardial infarction), whereas no event was recorded in those randomized to warfarin. Major bleeding occurred in 6 patients: 4 (7%) in the rivaroxaban group and 2 (3%) in the warfarin group. No death was reported. The use of rivaroxaban in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome was associated with an increased rate of events compared with warfarin, thus showing no benefit and excess risk. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02157272.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension　- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is a percutaneous treatment option for patients affected by chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and either judged inoperable or with persistent symptoms after pulmonary endoarteriectomy. Current data regarding BPA are sparse and results vary according to local center experience. A systematic review of the literature was performed to better understand the effectiveness and safety of BPA in the treatment of CTEPH.Methods and Results:PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting BPA results in patients with CTEPH. Differences in clinical and hemodynamic parameters before and after the procedure were analyzed. Weighted mean proportion and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of adverse events were calculated. In total, 14 studies were included (725 patients). BPA was associated with a reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (from 43 to 32.5 mmHg), reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance (from 9.94 to 5.06 Woods units), increase in cardiac index (from 2.35 to 2.62 L/min/m2), and improvement of 6-minute walking distance (from 345 to 442 m). Periprocedural mortality occurred in 2.1% of patients (95% CoI 0.8-4.1) while reperfusion and pulmonary vessel injuries occurred in 9.3% (95% CoI 3.1-18.4) and 2.3% (95% CoI 0.9-4.5) of total BPA sessions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review suggested that BPA for CTEPH patients was an effective and relatively safe treatment option.

Laboratory Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) lies in the recognition of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). As standardization of tests for the detection of aPL is far from being optimal and reference material is not available, inappropriate diagnoses of APS are not unusual. In the last few years, the concept of triple test positivity has emerged as a useful tool to identify patients with APS. Clinical studies on patients and carriers of triple positivity clearly show that these individuals are at high risk of thromboembolic events and pregnancy loss. Moreover, triple positivity arises from a single (probably pathogenic) antibody directed to domain 1 of ß2-glycoprotein I, a protein whose function is still unknown. Studies on homogenous group of patients with single or double positivity are scant, and uncertainties arise on their association with clinical events. Promising but undetermined results come also from the determination of antibodies directed to phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex. Interpretation of laboratory profile in APS is challenging, and the collaboration between clinical pathologists and clinicians is highly desirable.

The paradox of the lupus anticoagulant: history and perspectives.

A unique coagulation inhibitor prolonging whole-blood clotting time was described more than 50 years ago in two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The immunoglobulin nature of the inhibitor and its interaction with antiphospholipid antibodies was later demonstrated and the term "lupus anticoagulant (LA)" was coined to describe this laboratory finding. It soon became apparent that LA was a misnomer as it is often found in plasma from patients with clinical conditions other than SLE and is associated with thromboembolic events that may occur in otherwise healthy individuals. Individuals with LA have circulating autoantibodies that inhibits blood coagulation. These are mostly of IgG or IgM class and mainly directed against a phospholipid (PL)-binding plasma protein, ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2GPI). The presence of ß2GPI-dependent LA represents a well-recognized risk factor for venous and arterial thromboembolism, as well as pregnancy loss and morbidity. ß2GPI-dependent LA in the presence of documented previous thromboembolism, or history of pregnancy loss/morbidity, identifies definite anti-PL syndrome. Laboratory diagnosis of LA is thus of particular importance, as it may assign patients with a common event (thrombosis) to a group with a high risk for recurrence, which is a prerequisite for long-term oral antithrombotic treatment.

An approach to differential diagnosis of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome and related conditions.

The antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is a systemic, acquired, immune-mediated disorder characterized by episodes of venous, arterial, or microcirculation thrombosis and/or pregnancy abnormalities, associated with the persistent presence of autoantibodies, confirmed at least in two occasions 12 weeks apart, directed to molecular complexes consisting of phospholipids and proteins. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome should always be considered as a potential diagnosis especially for young patients presenting with a history of thrombotic events, in particular when they occur without any obvious external trigger or any inherited thrombophilic mutation (even if 2006 criteria do not exclude antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in patients with other inherited or acquired prothrombotic conditions), or for women with recurrent pregnancy losses or later fetal deaths. Many other disorders are able to mimic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, so a broad range of alternative diagnoses should be investigated and ruled out during clinical workup.

Long-term use of vitamin K antagonists and incidence of cancer: a population-based study.

Whether long-term use of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) might affect the incidence of cancer is a longstanding hypothesis. We conducted a population-based study including all cancer- and thromboembolism-free patients of our health area; study groups were defined according to chronic anticoagulant use to VKA-exposed and control groups. Cancer incidence and cancer-related and overall mortality was assessed in both groups. 76 008 patients (3231 VKA-exposed and 72 777 control subjects) were followed-up for 8.2 (± 3.2) years. After adjusting for age, sex, and time-to-event, the hazard ratio of newly diagnosed cancer in the exposed group was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.80-0.98; P < .015). VKA-exposed patients were less likely to develop prostate cancer, 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.97; P = .008). The adjusted hazard ratio for cancer-related and overall mortality was 1.07 (95% CI 0.92-1.24) and 1.12 (95% CI 1.05-1.19), respectively. These results support the hypothesis that anticoagulation might have a protective effect on cancer development, especially prostate cancer.

Incidence of a first thromboembolic event in asymptomatic carriers of high-risk antiphospholipid antibody profile: a multicenter prospective study.

Persistent antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies are occasionally found in subjects without prior history of thromboembolic events (TEs), raising the dilemma of whether to initiate or not a primary thromboprophylaxis. A first TE is considered rare in aPL carriers, but previous studies did not consider the aPL profile nor was the test positivity confirmed in a reference laboratory. In this study, 104 subjects with high-risk aPL profile (positive lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-ß(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies, triple positivity) confirmed in a reference laboratory, were followed up for a mean of 4.5 years. There were 25 first TEs (5.3% per year): the cumulative incidence after 10 years was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.9%-54.3%). On multivariate analysis, male sex (hazard ratio = 4.4; 95% CI, 1.5-13.1, P = .007) and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (hazard ratio = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3-8.5, P = .01) were independent predictors for TEs. Aspirin did not significantly affect the incidence of TE. In conclusion, the occurrence of a first TE in carriers of high-risk aPL profile is considerable; it is more frequent among male subjects and in the presence of additional risk factors for venous TE. These data can help in the decision to initiate primary thromboprophylaxis in these subjects.

New pharmacotherapeutic options for oral anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation patients aged 65 and older: factor XIa inhibitors and beyond.

INTRODUCTION: Although much progress has been made using anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, bleeding is still a major concern. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews current pharmacotherapeutic options in this setting. Particular emphasis is placed on the ability of the new molecules to minimize the bleeding risk in elderly patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2023 was carried out. EXPERT OPINION: Contact phase of coagulation is a possible new target for anticoagulant therapy. Indeed, congenital or acquired deficiency of contact phase factors is associated with reduced thrombotic burden and limited risk of spontaneous bleeding. These new drugs seem particularly suitable for stroke prevention in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in whom the hemorrhagic risk is high. Most of anti Factor XI (FXI) drugs are for parenteral use only. A group of small molecules are for oral use and therefore are candidates to substitute direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Doubts remain on the possibility of impaired hemostasis. Indeed, a fine calibration of inhibition of contact phase factors is crucial for an effective and safe treatment.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Acquired thrombophilia and in particular the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may play an important role in the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Young patients suffering from an episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism (PE), or PE provoked by mild risk factors, should be tested for aPL. In case of a positive result, they should be closely followed up and lifelong anticoagulant treatment should be considered. Indeed, aPL-induced thrombophilia may favor PE recurrence with the consequence of possible CTEPH development. The aPL profiles play an important role in this pathway. Patients with PE and triple positivity (lupus anticoagulant, LAC, anti-cardiolipin, aCL, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I, aß2GPI) are at the highest risk of recurrence and deserve maximum protection by anticoagulant treatment with warfarin.

Close link between antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, and activated protein C resistance in tetra antiphospholipid antibody-positive subjects.

BACKGROUND: Most of the carriers/patients triple-positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC], immunoglobulin G [IgG]/immunoglobulin M [IgM] anticardiolipin, and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies) are tetra-positive, being positive for antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. The relationship between aPS/PT titer, LAC potency, and resistance to activated protein C (aPC-R) has not been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to clarify the mutual interdependence of these parameters in tetra-positive subjects. METHODS: Twenty-three carriers and 30 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, none of whom were being treated with anticoagulants, and 30 age- and sex-matched controls were studied. Detection of aPS/PT, LAC, and aPC-R in each individual was performed with established methods in our laboratory. Carriers and patients were positive for IgG or IgM aPS/PT or for both isotypes without significant difference. Since both IgG and IgM aPS/PT have anticoagulant activity, we used the sum of their titers (total aPS/PT) for the correlation studies. RESULTS: Total aPS/PT in all individuals studied exceeded that in controls. There was no difference in total aPS/PT titers (P = .72), LAC potency (P = .56), and aPC-R (P = .82) between antiphospholipid antibody-carriers and patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. There was a significant correlation between total aPS/PT and LAC potency (r = 0.78; P < .0001) and between total aPS/PT titers and aPC-R (r = 0.80; P < .0001). LAC potency also was correlated significantly with aPC-R (r = 0.72; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is interdependence between aPS/PT, LAC potency, and aPC-R.

Very Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Edoxaban: Impact of Frailty on Outcomes.

Background: Age and frailty are associated with underuse of anticoagulation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Objectives: This study aimed at assessing major clinical outcomes in very elderly patients with AF treated with recommended dose edoxaban and look for a possible relation with frailty measured by a validated score. Methods: This prospective multicenter cohort study enrolled consecutive very elderly (age ≥80 years) anticoagulation-naïve patients starting recommended doses of edoxaban. Upon entry into the study, patients were categorized into nonfrail, prefrail and frail with the SHARE-FI (Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe-Frailty Index) score. The primary outcome was a composite incidence of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and death between frail and fitter patients over 2 years follow-up. Secondary outcomes were frailty-related incidence of the individual components part of the composite outcome. Results: Of the 180 screened patients, 176 were enrolled in the study. Of these, 58 (32.9%) were frail, 35 (19.8%) prefrail, and 83 (47.2%) nonfrail. The composite outcome occurred in 49 patients (18.9% per patient-year). No difference in the primary endpoint between frail and fitter patients (incidence rate ratio: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.6-2.2) was observed. On multivariable analysis, anemia was significantly related to the primary outcome (HR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.8-7.3; P < 0.001), while frailty was not (frail vs nonfrail HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.5-1.8). No difference across frailty categories of the individual components of composite events was observed, except for death. Conclusions: Anticoagulation with recommended dose edoxaban is feasible in very elderly patients with AF even if frail. (ESCAPE [Edoxaban and Frailty in Senior Individuals]; NCT03524924).

What have we learned about antiphospholipid syndrome from patients and antiphospholipid carrier cohorts?

Venous or arterial thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) define the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In terms of accepted APS criteria, aPL are detected by one coagulation test (lupus anticoagulant; LAC) and two immunoassays (anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-ß2-glycoptrotein I antibodies). In patients with APS, a single positive test carries a much lower risk of thrombosis recurrence or new pregnancy loss than does multiple (or triple) positivity. The same holds true for aPL carriers, namely subjects with laboratory tests but without clinical criteria for APS. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as in carriers of aPL. Triple positivity apparently identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (antidomain I-II of ß2-glycoptrotein I); it is in this category of patients that trials on new therapeutic strategies should focus.

Prevalence of aPhosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies and association with antiphospholipid antibody profiles in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and thrombotic events. The association of aPLs with thrombotic events depends on the number of positive tests. Besides the three classical tests to classify APS, phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex autoantibodies (aPS/PT) are increasingly used to better define this condition. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence of aPS/PT in general and according to antiphospholipid antibody profiles in patients with APS. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to September 2021 was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. Publication biases were evaluated via visualization of funnel plots along with Egger's and Begg's tests. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles about the prevalence of aPS/PT in 1853 patients with APS were deemed eligible and analyzed according to the inclusion criteria. Pooled prevalence of aPS/PT IgG alone, IgM alone, and IgG/M were 50.0%, 45.0%, and 65.0%, respectively. No significant publication bias was detected from funnel plots or Egger's and Begg's tests. When the prevalence of aPS/PT was calculated in homogeneous aPLs, a much higher rate of pooled prevalence of aPS/PT IgG/M in patients positive for Lupus Anticoagulant (84.5%) and in those with triple positivity (83.4%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: These data show a high rate of aPS/PT positivity in patients with APS (especially in those positive for LAC) but further studies are needed to ascertain whether this test might be useful in the laboratory classification criteria of APS.