RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) may disproportionately affect people with cardiovascular disease. Concern has been aroused regarding a potential harmful effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in this clinical context. METHODS: Using an observational database from 169 hospitals in Asia, Europe, and North America, we evaluated the relationship of cardiovascular disease and drug therapy with in-hospital death among hospitalized patients with Covid-19 who were admitted between December 20, 2019, and March 15, 2020, and were recorded in the Surgical Outcomes Collaborative registry as having either died in the hospital or survived to discharge as of March 28, 2020. RESULTS: Of the 8910 patients with Covid-19 for whom discharge status was available at the time of the analysis, a total of 515 died in the hospital (5.8%) and 8395 survived to discharge. The factors we found to be independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death were an age greater than 65 years (mortality of 10.0%, vs. 4.9% among those ≤65 years of age; odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 2.41), coronary artery disease (10.2%, vs. 5.2% among those without disease; odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.08 to 3.51), heart failure (15.3%, vs. 5.6% among those without heart failure; odds ratio, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.62 to 3.79), cardiac arrhythmia (11.5%, vs. 5.6% among those without arrhythmia; odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.86), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.2%, vs. 5.6% among those without disease; odds ratio, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.00 to 4.40), and current smoking (9.4%, vs. 5.6% among former smokers or nonsmokers; odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.47). No increased risk of in-hospital death was found to be associated with the use of ACE inhibitors (2.1% vs. 6.1%; odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.54) or the use of ARBs (6.8% vs. 5.7%; odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.74). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed previous observations suggesting that underlying cardiovascular disease is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death among patients hospitalized with Covid-19. Our results did not confirm previous concerns regarding a potential harmful association of ACE inhibitors or ARBs with in-hospital death in this clinical context. (Funded by the William Harvey Distinguished Chair in Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital.).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, often in combination with a second-generation macrolide, are being widely used for treatment of COVID-19, despite no conclusive evidence of their benefit. Although generally safe when used for approved indications such as autoimmune disease or malaria, the safety and benefit of these treatment regimens are poorly evaluated in COVID-19. METHODS: We did a multinational registry analysis of the use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19. The registry comprised data from 671 hospitals in six continents. We included patients hospitalised between Dec 20, 2019, and April 14, 2020, with a positive laboratory finding for SARS-CoV-2. Patients who received one of the treatments of interest within 48 h of diagnosis were included in one of four treatment groups (chloroquine alone, chloroquine with a macrolide, hydroxychloroquine alone, or hydroxychloroquine with a macrolide), and patients who received none of these treatments formed the control group. Patients for whom one of the treatments of interest was initiated more than 48 h after diagnosis or while they were on mechanical ventilation, as well as patients who received remdesivir, were excluded. The main outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and the occurrence of de-novo ventricular arrhythmias (non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation). FINDINGS: 96â032 patients (mean age 53·8 years, 46·3% women) with COVID-19 were hospitalised during the study period and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14â888 patients were in the treatment groups (1868 received chloroquine, 3783 received chloroquine with a macrolide, 3016 received hydroxychloroquine, and 6221 received hydroxychloroquine with a macrolide) and 81â144 patients were in the control group. 10â698 (11·1%) patients died in hospital. After controlling for multiple confounding factors (age, sex, race or ethnicity, body-mass index, underlying cardiovascular disease and its risk factors, diabetes, underlying lung disease, smoking, immunosuppressed condition, and baseline disease severity), when compared with mortality in the control group (9·3%), hydroxychloroquine (18·0%; hazard ratio 1·335, 95% CI 1·223-1·457), hydroxychloroquine with a macrolide (23·8%; 1·447, 1·368-1·531), chloroquine (16·4%; 1·365, 1·218-1·531), and chloroquine with a macrolide (22·2%; 1·368, 1·273-1·469) were each independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Compared with the control group (0·3%), hydroxychloroquine (6·1%; 2·369, 1·935-2·900), hydroxychloroquine with a macrolide (8·1%; 5·106, 4·106-5·983), chloroquine (4·3%; 3·561, 2·760-4·596), and chloroquine with a macrolide (6·5%; 4·011, 3·344-4·812) were independently associated with an increased risk of de-novo ventricular arrhythmia during hospitalisation. INTERPRETATION: We were unable to confirm a benefit of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, when used alone or with a macrolide, on in-hospital outcomes for COVID-19. Each of these drug regimens was associated with decreased in-hospital survival and an increased frequency of ventricular arrhythmias when used for treatment of COVID-19. FUNDING: William Harvey Distinguished Chair in Advanced Cardiovascular Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital.
RESUMO
This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pneumatic compression therapy is one of several options for the management of lymphedema. The lack of clarity around clinical outcomes, quality of life, cost of care, and its proper application, as a function of lymphedema complexity, limit its use in clinical practice. This is compounded by difficulties associated with insurance approval and uncertainty about the role of this modality in the treatment algorithm. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the healthcare economics and value of pneumatic compression therapy for lymphedema. METHODS: All patients who underwent treatment for lymphedema at a single institution were followed prospectively over a 2-year period. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treatment modality, and treatment efficacy were determined. Direct costs over the 2-year period, inclusive of hospitalization and device costs, SF-36 quality of life, and leg lymphedema complexity score (LLCS), were measured. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were enrolled over a period of 3 years for a total of 232 extremities treated for secondary lymphedema. Pneumatic compression therapy was utilized for all patients and led to a 28% decrease in absolute limb volume (P < 0.001), decrease in body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001), significant improvement in SF-36 quality of life in 7 out of 8 domains (P < 0.001), and a significant improvement in LLCS (P < 0.001) at 1 year. A subsequent decrease in hospitalization for lymphedema-associated complications saved over $3,200 per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumatic compression therapy leads to improved clinical outcomes, quality of life, and functional status for clinically significant lymphedema. Significant per capita direct cost savings, a beneficial impact on pay for performance measures, and a reduction in lymphedema-related complications suggest that earlier adoption of this treatment modality may offer a superior value proposition to patients, physicians, hospitals, and the healthcare system.
Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Dispositivos de Compressão Pneumática Intermitente/economia , Linfedema/economia , Linfedema/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Dispositivos de Compressão Pneumática Intermitente/efeitos adversos , Linfedema/fisiopatologia , Linfedema/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal
RESUMO
There is presently a lack of organization and standardized reporting schema for arteriovenous graft (AVG) infections. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the various types of treatment modalities for access site infections through an analysis of current publications on AVG. Key proposals are made to support standardization in a data-driven manner to make infection reporting more uniform and thereby facilitate more meaningful comparisons between various dialysis modalities and AVG technologies.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/normas , Drenagem/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Registros Públicos de Dados de Cuidados de Saúde , Diálise Renal , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Almost 80% of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) initiate dialysis via a central venous catheter (CVC). CVCs are associated with multiple complications and a high cost of care. The purpose of our project is to determine the impact of early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ECAVGs) on quality of care and costs. METHODS: The dialysis access modality, complications, secondary interventions, hospital outcomes, and detailed costs were tracked for 397 sequential patients who underwent access creation between July 2014 and October 2018. Complications were grouped into deep vein thrombosis, line infections, sepsis, pneumothorax, and other. Secondary interventions included angioplasty, angioplasty and stent grafting, thrombectomy, surgical revision, and explantation. Hospital outcomes included length of stay, inpatient mortality, 30-day readmission, and discharge disposition. Costs included supplies, medications, laboratory tests, labor, and other direct costs. All variables were measured at the time of the index procedure, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, 270 days, 1 year, 18 months, and 2 years. RESULTS: There were 131 patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and 266 who received ECAVG for dialysis access. The total cost of care per patient was $17,523 for AVF and $5,894 for ECAVG at 1 year (P < 0.01). Primary-assisted patency for AVF was 49.3% versus 81.4% for ECAVG (P = 0.027), and secondary-assisted patency for AVF was 63.8% versus 85.4% for ECAVG at 1 year (P = 0.011). There was a survival advantage for ECAVGs at 1 year (78.6% for AVF vs 85.0% for ECAVG, P = 0.034). Patients who received ECAVG had fewer CVC days (2.3% vs 19.1% for AVF, P < 0.001), fewer complications (1.6% vs. 21.5% for AVF, P < 0.001), and fewer secondary interventions (17.0% vs 52.5% for AVF, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study on patients with ESRD to report detailed outcomes and cost analysis as it relates to AVF versus ECAVG. ECAVGs have an advantage over AVFs due to lower overall cost and better clinical outcomes at 1 year. Implementation of an urgent start dialysis access program centered around ECAVGs may help achieve the national goal of better health care at a lower cost for patients with ESRD.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Cateterismo , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Diálise Renal , Enxerto Vascular , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/economia , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/normas , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo/economia , Cateterismo/mortalidade , Cateterismo/normas , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/economia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Diálise Renal/normas , Retratamento , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Enxerto Vascular/efeitos adversos , Enxerto Vascular/economia , Enxerto Vascular/mortalidade , Enxerto Vascular/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The annual cost of care associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) per patient on hemodialysis is approaching $100,000, with nearly $42 billion in national spend per year. Early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ECAVGs) help decrease the use of central venous catheters (CVCs), thus potentially decreasing the cost of care. However, a formal financial analysis that also includes the cost of CVC-related complications and secondary interventions has not been completed. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the overall financial costs associated with ECAVGs on patients with ESRD during a one-year period. METHODS: Access modality, complications, secondary interventions, hospital outcomes, and cost of care were determined for 397 sequential patients who underwent access creation between July 2014 and October 2018. A detailed financial analysis was completed, including an evaluation of implant, supplies, medications, laboratories, labor, and other direct costs. All variables were measured at the time of the index procedure, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, 270 days, and one year. RESULTS: There were 131 patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and 266 who underwent ECAVG for dialysis access. The average cost of care was $17,523 for AVF and $5,894 for ECAVG at one year (P < 0.01). Fewer CVC-related complications and secondary interventions associated with ECAVGs saved $11,630 per patient with ESRD, primarily in the form of supply costs. Fewer CVCs in the patients receiving ECAVGs led to an additional $1,083 decrease in cost associated with sepsis reduction at one year. A subsequent decrease in length of stay and ICU utilization led to an additional $2.0 million decrease in annual cost of care for patients with ESRD. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ECAVGs has significant cost savings over using an AVF and CVC for urgent-start dialysis in patients with ESRD. This cost savings is secondary to decreased CVC-related complications and fewer secondary interventions. Significant national savings are possible with appropriate use of ECAVGs in patients with ESRD.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/economia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/economia , Prótese Vascular/economia , Cateterismo/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Diálise Renal/economia , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Desenho de Prótese , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state associated with a fivefold increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism. Thrombolysis is the preferred level of care for patients with acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT); however, most studies exclude pregnant patients, highlighting the lack of data regarding the efficacy and safety of thrombolytic therapy for mother and fetus. METHODS: We describe the successful use of thrombolytic therapy in conjunction with ultrasound to remove a large ileofemoral DVT in a first-trimester patient with phlegmasia cerulea dolens. The procedure was performed safely for both mother and fetus. RESULTS: No radiation or contrast dye was used, and intravascular ultrasound confirmed patency of the entirety of the venous system. She delivered a healthy term baby after the procedure and had no further sequalae. CONCLUSION: Thrombolysis with intravascular ultrasound may be considered in first-trimester pregnant patients with threatened limb due to DVT.
Assuntos
Veia Femoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Veia Ilíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica , Tromboflebite/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Veia Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Femoral/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Veia Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Ilíaca/fisiopatologia , Nascido Vivo , Gravidez , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Tromboflebite/diagnóstico por imagem , Tromboflebite/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/métodos , Grau de Desobstrução VascularRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services financially penalizes providers who fail to meet expected quality of care measures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the factors that predict failure to meet PQRS measures for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: PQRS measure 260 (discharge by postoperative day 2 following CEA in asymptomatic patients) and 346 (rate of postoperative stroke or death following CEA in asymptomatic patients) were evaluated using hospital records from the state of Florida from 2008 to 2012. The impact of demographics, comorbidities, hospital factors, admission variables, and individual practitioner data upon timely discharge, and postoperative stroke and death. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and significance (P < 0.05) were determined through the development of a logistic regression model. Surgeons were identified by national provider identifier number, and practitioner data obtained from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. RESULTS: A total of 34,235 patient records and 701 providers were identified over the 5-year period. Significant negative predictors for PQRS measure 260 included weekend admission (odds ratio [OR], 2.9), Medicaid (OR, 2.4), surgeon historical postoperative stroke rate >2.0% (OR, 1.7), African-American race (OR, 2.0), and female gender (OR, 1.3). The presence of any of these factors was associated with a 13.5% rate of failure. The most significant negative predictor for PQRS measure 346 was surgeon postoperative stroke rate >2.0% (OR, 6.2 for stroke and OR, 29.0 for death). Surgeons in this underperforming group had worse outcomes compared to their peers despite having patients with fewer risk factors for poor outcomes. Surgeon specialty, board certification, and case volume do not impact either PQRS measures. CONCLUSIONS: Selected groups of patients and surgeons with a disproportionately high rate of postoperative stroke are at risk of failing to meet PQRS pay for performance quality measures. Awareness of these risk factors may help mitigate and minimize the risk of adversely impacting the value stream. Further evaluation of the causative factors that lead to surgeon underperformance could help to improve the quality of care.
Assuntos
Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/economia , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/cirurgia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/economia , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/economia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças Assintomáticas , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/diagnóstico , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/mortalidade , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/normas , Feminino , Florida , Custos Hospitalares/normas , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Planos de Incentivos Médicos/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Reembolso de Incentivo/normas , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study details 2-year outcomes of a modified gracilis muscle flap (GMF) technique in providing tissue coverage for groin complications after arterial bypass surgery with synthetic graft. METHODS: All patients who developed groin infections after lower extremity arterial bypass with synthetic graft who underwent a GMF technique were included from June 2014 to March 2017 from a prospectively collected, purpose-built institutional database. Modifications to the standard technique included identification of the muscle using ultrasound to ensure precise skip incisions, preservation of the segmental blood supply, widening of the tunnel through which the muscle is retroflexed, placement of a wound vacuum-assisted closure for healing, and lifelong antibiotics. Demographics, laboratory values, bypass procedure, length of stay (LOS), disposition, and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up data were collected. Analysis was performed via descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Over the 3-year study period, 22 patients underwent GMF after complications resulted from arterial bypass surgery. Types of bypass included aortobifemoral (32%), axillobifemoral (14%), femoral-femoral (23%), femoral-popliteal or mixed distal (27%), and thigh graft for dialysis (4%). Forty-five percentage of patients presented with graft infection, 50% with wound dehiscence, and 5% with graft disruption and bleeding. Only 23% of patients were candidates for sartorius muscle flap at the time of their initial procedure. The average case length was 64 + 19 min. Sixty-four percentage of patients were discharged home with home health care and the remainder to a skilled nursing facility. The average LOS was 6.1 + 3.4 days. Fifty-four percentages of wounds were healed at 1 month and 100% at 3 months with adjunctive vacuum-assisted closure therapy and lifelong antibiotics. Sixty percentage of patients were still alive at 24 months, with 33% of grafts still patent at that time. Median survival was 18.1 months, and median graft patency was 17.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: GMF is a safe and effective treatment for groin complications after arterial bypass surgery with synthetic graft. Owing to its versatility, area of coverage, ease of use, and durability, it potentially should be considered as a primary form of muscle coverage for groin complications.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Músculo Grácil/cirurgia , Virilha/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Retalho Miocutâneo/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Femoral/microbiologia , Artéria Femoral/fisiopatologia , Músculo Grácil/diagnóstico por imagem , Virilha/microbiologia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Alta do Paciente , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , CicatrizaçãoRESUMO
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are associated with a 90% overall mortality and $150 000 cost of care per patient. Despite improvements in intensive care and surgical technology, morbidity and mortality remain unchanged over the past 20 years. The most significant predictor of survival is time from the door of the hospital to the operating room. To streamline operational efficiency, a team utilized Lean Six Sigma methodologies, team training, and intentional clinical process design to institute changes in our clinical processes, enhance care coordination, and improve communication. Changes led to a $1.8 million profit on operations, 10-day reduction in length of stay, and 89% survival rate among patients with ruptured AAA.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/enfermagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/normas , Enfermagem em Emergência/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2014, we published a series of articles in the Journal of Vascular Surgery that detailed the decrease in volume of open aneurysm repair (OAR) completed for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by vascular surgery trainees. At that time, only data points from 2000 through 2011 were available, and reliable predictions could only be made through 2015. Lack of data on endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using fenestrated (FEVAR) and branched (BrEVAR) endografts also affected our findings. Despite these limitations, our predictions for OAR completed by vascular trainees were accurate for 2012 to 2014. This report uses updated data points through 2014 in conjunction with data on FEVAR and BrEVAR obtained from industry to predict trends in OAR and how it will affect vascular surgery training through 2020. METHODS: An S-curve modified logistic function was used to model the effect of introducing new technologies (EVAR, FEVAR, BrEVAR) on the standard management of AAA with OAR starting in the year 2000, similar to the technique that we have previously described. Weighted samples and data from the United States Census Bureau were used in conjunction with volume estimates derived from the National Inpatient Sample, State Inpatient Databases, and industry sources to determine trends in OAR and EVAR. The number of cases completed at teaching hospitals was calculated using the National Inpatient Sample, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs were used to forecast the number of cases completed by vascular surgery trainees through 2020. Sensitivity analysis and trend analysis were completed. RESULTS: Approximately 45,000 AAA repairs are completed annually in the United States, but only 15% of these are now completed using OAR compared with >50% just a decade ago. Further, with the accelerating adoption of FEVAR and BrEVAR, and expanding indications for standard EVAR, our model predicts that <3000 OARs will be completed annually by 2020. Because only a subset of these cases are completed at teaching institutions, our model predicts that a vascular surgery trainee in a fellowship program will complete only one to two OARs, whereas trainees in a 0+5 program may complete two to three OARs. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial prediction in the 2014 report was that vascular trainees would complete approximately five OARs by 2020. After incorporating new data on BrEVAR, FEVAR, and the accelerating pace of EVAR use between 2012 and 2014, it now appears that vascular trainees will complete one to three OARs during their training.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/educação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/educação , Internato e Residência , Cirurgiões/educação , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese Vascular/tendências , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Bases de Dados Factuais , Difusão de Inovações , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/tendências , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/tendências , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Internato e Residência/tendências , Curva de Aprendizado , Modelos Logísticos , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Cirurgiões/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) are associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Advances in DVT prophylaxis over the past decade have led to a decrease in DVT-related morbidity, but gender, racial, and other demographic factors that contribute to a higher risk of DVT are incompletely characterized. This study aimed to determine the incidence of DVT over the past decade and identify factors that were associated with an increased risk of DVT. METHODS: Patients who underwent TKR or THR between 2001 and 2011 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. For patients who developed a DVT, their demographics (including age, gender, and race), comorbidities, and subsequent outcomes (including length of stay [LOS] and mortality) were determined. Differences between patients who developed a DVT and those who did not were determined using multivariate regression analysis. A Mann-Kendall analysis was done to evaluate all trends. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2011, a total of 1.1 million patients underwent TKR, and 550,000 underwent THR. The overall incidence of DVT decreased for TKR from 0.86% in 2001 to 0.45% in 2011 and decreased for THR from 0.55% to 0.24% for the same period. Patients who developed a DVT after TKR were older (67.7 vs. 66.8, P < 0.001); more likely to be African American (P < 0.001); and more likely to have significant comorbidities including congestive heart failure, peripheral artery disease, and end-stage renal disease. Findings were similar for patients who developed a DVT after THR. Mortality was significantly greater for patients who developed a DVT (0.4% for TKR and 1.7% for THR), with an almost double LOS. CONCLUSIONS: A focus on DVT prophylaxis may have decreased national rates of DVT after TKR and THR. Older patients, African Americans, and patients with more comorbidities appear to be especially at risk for DVT. Mortality is almost 4 to 8 times higher for patients with DVT, and LOS is double. A focus on DVT prophylaxis and perhaps more aggressive management of the at-risk population may further help decrease the rate of DVT.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril/mortalidade , Artroplastia do Joelho/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico , Trombose Venosa/mortalidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary embolism is the third most common cause of death in hospitalized patients. Vena cava filters (VCFs) are indicated in patients with venous thromboembolism with a contraindication to anticoagulation. Prophylactic indications are still controversial. However, the utilization of VCFs during the past 15 years may have been affected by societal recommendations and reimbursement rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of societal guidelines and reimbursement on national trends in VCF placement from 1998 to 2012. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent VCF placement between 1998 and 2012. VCF placement yearly rates were evaluated. Societal guidelines and consensus statements were identified using a PubMed search. Reimbursement rates for VCF were determined on the basis of published Medicare reports. Statistical analysis was completed using descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, and trend analysis using the Mann-Kendall test and considered significant for P < .05. RESULTS: The use of VCFs increased 350% between January 1998 and January 2008. Consensus statements in favor of VCFs published by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (July 2002) and the Society of Interventional Radiology (March 2006) were temporally associated with a significant 138% and 122% increase in the use of VCFs, respectively (P = .014 and P = .023, respectively). The American College of Chest Physicians guidelines (February 2008 and 2012) discouraging the use of VCFs were preceded by an initial stabilization in the use of VCFs between 2008 and 2012, followed by a 16% decrease in use starting in March 2012 (P = .38). Changes in Medicare reimbursement were not followed by a change in VCF implantation rates. CONCLUSIONS: There is a temporal association between the societal guidelines' recommendations regarding VCF placement and the actual rates of insertion. More uniform consensus statements from multiple societies along with the use of level I evidence may be required to lead to a definitive change in practice.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Filtros de Veia Cava/tendências , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia , Consenso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/economia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/tendências , Humanos , Medicare/economia , Medicare/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Embolia Pulmonar/economia , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos , Filtros de Veia Cava/economia , Filtros de Veia Cava/estatística & dados numéricos , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicações , Tromboembolia Venosa/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A variety of patient factors are known to adversely impact outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS). However, their specific impact on complications and mortality and how they differ between CEA and CAS is unknown. The purpose of this study is to identify patient and hospital factors that adversely impact outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent CEA or CAS between 1998 and 2012 (N = 1,756,445) were identified using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Inpatient Sample and State Ambulatory Services Databases. A multivariate analysis was completed to evaluate the impact of demographics, patient factors, type of symptoms (transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident), volume of cases (3 per year vs 1-2 interventions), and interventions upon outcomes, perioperative complications (stroke, myocardial infarction, and bleeding), duration of stay, inpatient mortality, and cost. Significant factors were then used as part of a multivariate regression analysis to determine odds ratios. A subgroup analysis using propensity matching evaluating 1:1 risk-matched asymptomatic and symptomatic patients was completed. Patient cohorts were matched on the basis of Charlson scores. RESULTS: Over the study period a total of 1,583,614 asymptomatic CEA, 7317 asymptomatic CAS, 162,362 symptomatic CEA, and 3149 symptomatic CAS patients were included. Symptomatic disease portends a worse outlook after either CEA or CAS. Costs of the procedure increased with complications with stroke adding the most significant cost burden. For risk-matched asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, female gender (P < .001) and performing one or two cases per year (P < .05) were associated with higher cerebrovascular accident risk. In asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, predictors of myocardial infarction included congestive heart failure (P < .001) and peripheral artery disease (P < .05) and predictors of bleeding included peripheral artery disease (P < .05) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01) for symptomatic patients only. For both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, predictors of mortality included female gender (P < .001) and performing one or two cases per year (P < .01). Female gender was one of the strongest overall predictors of adverse outcome after CAS (odds ratio, 21.39 for death; P < .001). Low volume (<3 cases per year per practitioner) is a predictor of adverse outcome after CAS only. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of postoperative stroke and inpatient mortality for women undergoing CAS is an unexpected finding, and may indicate that this population is vulnerable to complications after endovascular management. Low volume is a predictor of complications and subsequent mortality primarily for CAS. Patients who undergo CEA continue to have superior outcomes compared with matched cohorts who undergo CAS.
Assuntos
Angioplastia/efeitos adversos , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/terapia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia/economia , Angioplastia/instrumentação , Angioplastia/mortalidade , Doenças Assintomáticas , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/complicações , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/economia , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/economia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Stents , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to determine the association between race and patient variables, hospital covariates, and outcomes in patients presenting with advanced chronic venous insufficiency. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all Caucasian and African-American patients with a primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis code for venous stasis with ulceration (454.0), inflammation (454.1), or complications (454.2) from 1998 to 2011. CEAP scores were correlated with ICD-9 diagnosis. Demographics, CEAP classification, management, cost of care, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient mortality were compared between races. Statistical analysis was via descriptive statistics, Student's t-test, and the Fisher's exact test. Trend analysis was completed using the Mann-Kendall test. RESULTS: A total of 20,648 patients were identified of which 85% were Caucasian and 15% were African-American. Debridement procedures had the highest costs at $6,096 followed by skin grafting at $4,089. There was an overall decrease in the number of ulcer debridements, vein stripping, and sclerotherapy procedures between 1998 and 2011 (P < 0.05) for both groups. However, African-American patients had significantly more ulcer debridements than their Caucasian counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: African-American patients with a primary diagnosis of venous stasis present with more advanced venous disease at a younger age compared with their Caucasian counterparts. This is associated with increased ulcer debridement, deep vein thrombosis rates and hospital charges in the African-American cohort. There are no differences in sclerotherapy or skin grafting procedures, LOS or inpatient mortality between races.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Insuficiência Venosa/etnologia , População Branca , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença Crônica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Desbridamento/tendências , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Preços Hospitalares/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escleroterapia/tendências , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transplante de Pele/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Venosa/economia , Insuficiência Venosa/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are commonly performed by interventional radiologists, cardiologists, general surgeons, cardiothoracic surgeons, and vascular surgeons, with each specialty having differences in residency structure, operative experience, and subspecialty training. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of surgeon specialty on outcomes following EVAR and TEVAR. METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR and TEVAR were identified from the 2007 to 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Physician identifiers in the NIS were used to determine surgical specialty and operative experience. Multivariate analysis adjusted for mortality risk was used to compare differences in demographics, complications, outcomes, and hospital covariates. RESULTS: A total of 5147 EVARs were identified within the NIS, of which 88.3% were completed by vascular surgeons. There were no significant differences in demographics between the specialties. Cardiothoracic surgeons were more likely to have a postoperative stroke (3.1% vs. 0.2%, odds ratio [OR] 14.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-117.8, P < 0.05) and cardiac complications (9.4% vs. 2.0%, OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.5-16.6, P < 0.01) compared with other specialties. Costs were lowest for vascular surgeons ($32,094), and highest for cardiothoracic surgeons ($41,663, P < 0.05). Only vascular surgeons completed more than 10 EVARs per year. A total of 2531 TEVAR cases were completed during the study period, of which 73.8% were completed by vascular surgeons, 15.8% by cardiothoracic surgeons, 8.0% by interventional radiologists, and the remainder by interventional cardiologists and general surgeons. Interventional radiologists had significantly more elective cases (77.8%, P < 0.001) than cardiothoracic surgeons (47.2%) or vascular surgeons (53.8%), but had a significantly higher rate of stroke (7.6% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001) and cardiac events (7.2% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.001). Length of stay (LOS, 10.7 days) and median costs ($52,156) were similar across specialties. Vascular surgeons have a low stroke rate (1.1%, P < 0.05 vs. interventional radiologists) and lower rate of cardiac events (3.6% vs. 6.1%, P < 0.01) despite caring for patients with higher diagnosis-related group mortality scores (3.6 vs. 3.4, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons appear to have a comparative advantage over other specialties for EVAR because not only are their complication and mortality rates comparable but overall LOS and hospital charges are lower. Furthermore, primarily only vascular surgeons are performing the high volume of annual EVARs necessary to ensure optimal patient outcomes. For TEVAR, vascular surgeons have the lowest overall morbidity compared with the other specialties, and lower mortality compared with cardiothoracic surgeons. These findings may impact patient referral patterns and hospital privileges for providers.
Assuntos
Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Especialização , Cirurgiões , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/economia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/economia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/economia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Preços Hospitalares , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Especialização/economia , Cirurgiões/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the association between geniculate artery flow on admission computed tomography (CT) angiography and limb salvage outcomes in patients with lower extremity arterial injury. METHODS: All injured patients at a level I trauma center with CT angiogram (CTA) confirmed limited or no flow to the tibial vessels were included. Demographics, injury severity score (ISS), mechanism of injury, physiological parameters, the presence of geniculate artery collateral circulation (superior medial, superior lateral, medial, inferior medial, inferior lateral), and 30-day limb salvage outcome were recorded. Statistical analysis was completed using descriptive statistics and the chi-squared tests. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2012, a total of 84 patients with lower extremity arterial injury underwent diagnostic evaluation with CTA on admission that confirmed limited or no flow to the tibial vessels. A total of 10 patients (12%) underwent amputation. Primary amputation was performed in 3 (4%) patients, and secondary amputation was performed in 7 (8%) patients. There was no difference in age, gender, ISS, extremity abbreviated injury score, mechanism of injury, admission systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, transfusion volume, or type of vascular interventions between patients who had successful limb salvage and those who received an amputation. The number of patent geniculate arterial vessels was inversely associated with amputation with 3.3 patent geniculate arteries in the limb salvage group compared to 2.1 in the amputation group (P < 0.05). The 2 geniculate artery vessels that were significantly associated with limb salvage were the superior lateral geniculate and the inferior medial geniculate arteries (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Geniculate collateral circulation may have an important role in limb salvage after lower extremity vascular injury. The geniculate arteries that are associated with the highest rates of limb salvage appear to be the superior lateral geniculate and the inferior medical geniculate artery.