Single- and multiple-dose administration of caspofungin in patients with hepatic insufficiency: implications for safety and dosing recommendations.

This report investigated safety and dosing recommendations of intravenous caspofungin in hepatic insufficiency. In the single-dose study, 8 patients each with mild and moderate hepatic insufficiency received 70 mg of caspofungin. In the multiple-dose study, 8 patients with mild hepatic insufficiency and 13 healthy matched controls received 70 mg on day 1 and 50 mg daily on days 2 through 14. Eight patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency received 70 mg on day 1 and 35 mg daily on days 2 through 14. Caspofungin was generally well tolerated with no discontinuations due to serious or nonserious adverse experiences. The area under the concentration-time profile over the interval of last quantifiable point to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) for mild hepatic insufficiency/historical controls was 1.55 (1.32-1.86) in the single-dose study and for mild hepatic insufficiency/concurrent controls was 1.21 (1.04-1.39) for day 14 area under the concentration-time profile calculated over the interval 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24h)) following multidose. The AUC(0-infinity) GMR (90% CI) for moderate hepatic insufficiency/historical controls was 1.76 (1.51-2.06) following 70 mg; AUC(0-24h) GMR (90% CI) for moderate hepatic insufficiency/concurrent controls was 1.07 (0.90-1.28) on day 14 after 35 mg daily. No dosage adjustment is recommended for patients with mild hepatic insufficiency. A dosage reduction to 35 mg daily following the 70-mg loading dose is recommended for patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency.

Pharmacokinetics of ertapenem in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency and in patients on hemodialysis.

Ertapenem is a parenteral beta-lactam carbapenem antibiotic. This open-label study examined the pharmacokinetics of single 1-g intravenous doses of ertapenem, administered over 30 minutes, in patients with mild, moderate, and advanced renal insufficiency (RI) and in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis. Pharmacokinetics were compared with historical controls pooled across healthy young and elderly subjects. Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity increased 7% in mild, 53% in moderate, 158% in advanced RI, and 192% in ESRD; end of infusion concentration changed minimally; half-life was 4.5 hours in the historical control group and 4.4, 6.1, 10.6, and 14.1 hours in mild RI, moderate RI, advanced RI, and ESRD, respectively. Hemodialysis cleared approximately 30% of the dose. The recommended dose in mild to moderate RI and after hemodialysis is unchanged at 1 g daily; and in advanced RI and ESRD is reduced to 0.5 g daily. If the daily dose is given 6 hours prior to hemodialysis, a supplementary 150-mg dose (30% of the daily dose) is recommended postdialysis.

Preclinical and clinical pharmacodynamic assessment of L-778,123, a dual inhibitor of farnesyl:protein transferase and geranylgeranyl:protein transferase type-I.

Farnesyl:protein transferase (FPTase) inhibitors were developed as anti-Ras drugs, but they fail to inhibit Ki-Ras activity because Ki-Ras can be modified by geranylgeranyl:protein transferase type-I (GGPTase-I). L-778,123, an inhibitor of FPTase and GGPTase-I, was developed in part because it can completely inhibit Ki-Ras prenylation. To support the clinical development of L-778,123, we developed pharmacodynamic assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to measure the inhibition of prenylation of HDJ2 and Rap1A, proteins that are FPTase- and GGPTase-I substrates, respectively. We validated these assays in animal models and show that inhibition of HDJ2 prenylation in mouse PBMCs correlates with the concentration of FPTase inhibitors in blood. In dogs, continuous infusion of L-778,123 inhibited both HDJ2 and Rap1A prenylation in PBMCs, but we did not detect inhibition of Ki-Ras prenylation. We reported previously results from the first L-778,123 Phase I trial that showed a dose-dependent inhibition of HDJ2 farnesylation in PBMCs. In this report, we present additional analysis of patient samples from this trial and a second Phase I trial of L-778,123, and demonstrate the inhibition of both HDJ2 and Rap1A prenylation in PBMC samples. This study represents the first demonstration of GGPTase-I inhibition in humans. However, no inhibition of Ki-Ras prenylation by L-778,123 was detected in patient samples. These results confirm the pharmacologic profile of L-778,123 in humans as a dual inhibitor of FPTase and GGPTase-I, but indicate that the intended target of the drug, Ki-Ras, was not inhibited.

Effects of the neurokinin1 receptor antagonist aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone.

BACKGROUND: Aprepitant is a neurokinin(1) receptor antagonist that, in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) receptor antagonist, has been shown to be very effective in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. At doses used for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, aprepitant is a moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A4 and may be used in conjunction with corticosteroids such as dexamethasone and methylprednisolone, which are substrates of cytochrome P4503A4. The effects of aprepitant on the these 2 corticosteroids were evaluated. METHODS: Study 1 was an open-label, randomized, incomplete-block, 3-period crossover study with 20 subjects. Treatment A consisted of a standard oral dexamethasone regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (20 mg dexamethasone on day 1, 8 mg dexamethasone on days 2 to 5). Treatment B was used to examine the effects of oral aprepitant (125 mg aprepitant on day 1, 80 mg aprepitant on days 2 to 5) on the standard dexamethasone regimen. Treatment C was used to examine the effects of aprepitant on a modified dexamethasone regimen (12 mg dexamethasone on day 1, 4 mg dexamethasone on days 2 to 5). All subjects also received 32 mg ondansetron intravenously on day 1 only. Study 2 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study with 10 subjects. Subjects in one group received a regimen consisting of 125 mg methylprednisolone intravenously on day 1 and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally on days 2 to 3. Subjects in the other group received oral aprepitant (125 mg aprepitant on day 1, 80 mg aprepitant on days 2 to 3) in addition to the methylprednisolone regimen. RESULTS: In study 1, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24)) of oral dexamethasone on days 1 and 5 after the standard dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment A) was increased 2.2-fold (P <.010) with coadministration of aprepitant (treatment B). Coadministration of aprepitant with the modified dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment C) resulted in an AUC0-24 for dexamethasone similar to that observed after the standard dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment A). In study 2, aprepitant increased the AUC0-24 of intravenous methylprednisolone 1.3-fold on day 1 (P <.010) and increased the AUC0-24 of oral methylprednisolone 2.5-fold on day 3 (P <.010). CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of aprepitant with dexamethasone or methylprednisolone resulted in increased plasma concentrations of the corticosteroids. These findings suggest that the dose of these corticosteroids should be adjusted when given with aprepitant.

Indinavir and rifabutin drug interactions in healthy volunteers.

Two studies examined the pharmacokinetics of indinavir and rifabutin when coadministered in healthy subjects. Rifabutin, which induces the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and indinavir, which inhibits that enzyme system, are frequently coadministered in patients infected with HIV. The second study was undertaken to determine if altering the dose of rifabutin coadministered with indinavir would minimize the drug interaction observed in the first study. Two studies, each with a three-period crossover design, were performed. In study 1, standard doses of rifabutin and indinavir (300 mg of rifabutin qd and 800 mg indinavir q8h) were administered as monotherapy (with placebo to the other drug) or in combination to 10 volunteers for 10 days. In study 2, 150 mg qd of rifabutin together with 800 mg q8h of indinavir, 300 mg qd of rifabutin alone, or 800 mg q8h of indinavir alone was administered to 14 volunteers for 10 days. In study 1, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) of the AUC((0-8h)) of indinavir, coadministered with rifabutin 300 mg qd compared to indinavir alone (with rifabutin placebo), was 0.66 (0.56, 0.77), while that of the AUC((0-24h)) of rifabutin, coadministered with indinavir compared to rifabutin alone (with indinavir placebo), was 2.73 (1.99, 3.77). In study 2, the GMR (90% CI) of the AUC((0-8h)) of indinavir, coadministered with rifabutin 150 mg qd compared to indinavir alone, was 0.68 (0.60, 0.76), while that of the AUC((0-24h)) of rifabutin, when rifabutin 150 mg qd was coadministered with indinavir compared to rifabutin 300 mg qd alone, was 1.54 (1.33, 1.79). For both studies 1 and 2, indinavir and rifabutin administered alone or in combination were generally well tolerated. No clinical or laboratory adverse experience was serious. These data demonstrate the important pharmacokinetic interactions between indinavir and rifabutin when they are coadministered. Indeed, these observations formed the basis for the subsequent ACTG 365 study that explored dose adjustments for these agents in combination regimens to preserve the sustained antiviral activity of indinavir in the absence of adverse events as a result of elevated circulating levels of rifabutin.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of higher doses of caspofungin in healthy adult participants.

Caspofungin was the first in a new class of antifungal agents (echinocandins) indicated for the treatment of primary and refractory fungal infections. Higher doses of caspofungin may provide another option for patients who have failed caspofungin or other antifungal therapy. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single 150- and 210-mg doses of caspofungin in 16 healthy participants and 100 mg/d for 21 days in 20 healthy participants. Other than infusion site reactions and 1 reversible elevation in alanine aminotransferase (≥2× and <4× upper limit of normal), caspofungin was generally well tolerated. Geometric mean AUC(0-∞) after single 150- and 210-mg doses was 279.7 and 374.9 µg·h/mL, respectively; peak concentrations were 29.4 and 33.5 µg/mL, respectively; and 24-hour postdose concentrations were 2.8 and 4.2 µg/mL, respectively. Steady state was achieved in the third week of dosing. Following multiple 100-mg doses of caspofungin, day 21 geometric mean AUC(0-24) was 227.4 µg·h/mL, peak concentration was 20.9 µg/mL, and trough concentration was 4.7 µg/mL. Beta-phase t(1/2) was ~8 to ~13 hours. Caspofungin pharmacokinetics at these higher doses were dose proportional to and consistent with those observed at lower doses, suggesting a modest nonlinearity of increased accumulation with dose, which was considered not clinically meaningful.

Potential for interactions between caspofungin and nelfinavir or rifampin.

The potential for interactions between caspofungin and nelfinavir or rifampin was evaluated in two parallel-panel studies. In study A, healthy subjects received a 14-day course of caspofungin alone (50 mg administered intravenously [IV] once daily) (n = 10) or with nelfinavir (1,250 mg administered orally twice daily) (n = 9) or rifampin (600 mg administered orally once daily) (n = 10). In study B, 14 subjects received a 28-day course of rifampin (600 mg administered orally once daily), with caspofungin (50 mg administered IV once daily) coadministered on the last 14 days, and 12 subjects received a 14-day course of caspofungin alone (50 mg administered IV once daily). The coadministration/administration alone geometric mean ratio for the caspofungin area under the time-concentration profile calculated for the 24-h period following dosing [AUC(0-24)] was as follows (values in parentheses are 90% confidence intervals [CIs]): 1.08 (0.93-1.26) for nelfinavir, 1.12 (0.97-1.30) for rifampin (study A), and 1.01 (0.91-1.11) for rifampin (study B). The shape of the caspofungin plasma profile was altered by rifampin, resulting in a 14 to 31% reduction in the trough concentration at 24 h after dosing (C(24h)), consistent with a net induction effect at steady state. Both the AUC and the C(24h) were elevated in the initial days of rifampin coadministration in study A (61 and 170% elevations, respectively, on day 1) but not in study B, consistent with transient net inhibition prior to full induction. The coadministration/administration alone geometric mean ratio for the rifampin AUC(0-24) on day 14 was 1.07 (90% CI, 0.83-1.38). Nelfinavir does not meaningfully alter caspofungin pharmacokinetics. Rifampin both inhibits and induces caspofungin disposition, resulting in a reduced C(24h) at steady state. An increase in the caspofungin dose to 70 mg, administered daily, should be considered when the drug is coadministered with rifampin.

Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma.

The disposition of caspofungin, a parenteral antifungal drug, was investigated. Following a single, 1-h, intravenous infusion of 70 mg (200 microCi) of [(3)H]caspofungin to healthy men, plasma, urine, and feces were collected over 27 days in study A (n = 6) and plasma was collected over 26 weeks in study B (n = 7). Supportive data were obtained from a single-dose [(3)H]caspofungin tissue distribution study in rats (n = 3 animals/time point). Over 27 days in humans, 75.4% of radioactivity was recovered in urine (40.7%) and feces (34.4%). A long terminal phase (t(1/2) = 14.6 days) characterized much of the plasma drug profile of radioactivity, which remained quantifiable to 22.3 weeks. Mass balance calculations indicated that radioactivity in tissues peaked at 1.5 to 2 days at approximately 92% of the dose, and the rate of radioactivity excretion peaked at 6 to 7 days. Metabolism and excretion of caspofungin were very slow processes, and very little excretion or biotransformation occurred in the first 24 to 30 h postdose. Most of the area under the concentration-time curve of caspofungin was accounted for during this period, consistent with distribution-controlled clearance. The apparent distribution volume during this period indicated that this distribution process is uptake into tissue cells. Radioactivity was widely distributed in rats, with the highest concentrations in liver, kidney, lung, and spleen. Liver exhibited an extended uptake phase, peaking at 24 h with 35% of total dose in liver. The plasma profile of caspofungin is determined primarily by the rate of distribution of caspofungin from plasma into tissues.

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in healthy men.

Caspofungin, a glucan synthesis inhibitor, is being developed as a parenteral antifungal agent. The pharmacokinetics of caspofungin following 1-h intravenous infusions in healthy men was investigated in four phase I studies. In an alternating two-panel (six men each), rising-single-dose study, plasma drug concentrations increased proportionally with the dose following infusions of 5 to 100 mg. The beta-phase half-life was 9 to 10 h. The plasma drug clearance rate averaged 10 to 12 ml/min. Renal clearance of unchanged drug was a minor pathway of elimination (approximately 2% of the dose). Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics were investigated in a 2-week, serial-panel (5 or 6 men per panel) study of doses of 15, 35, and 70 mg administered daily; a 3-week, single-panel (10 men) study of a dose of 70 mg administered daily; and a parallel panel study (8 men) of a dose of 50 mg administered daily with or without a 70-mg loading dose on day 1. Moderate accumulation was observed with daily dosing. The degree of drug accumulation and the time to steady state were somewhat dose dependent. Accumulation averaged 24% at 15 mg daily and approximately 50% at 50 and 70 mg daily. Mean plasma drug concentrations were maintained above 1.0 microg/ml, a target selected to exceed the MIC at which 90% of the isolates of the most clinically relevant species of Candida were inhibited, throughout therapy with daily treatments of 70 or 50 mg plus the loading dose, while they fell below the target for the first 2 days of a daily treatment of 50 mg without the loading dose. Caspofungin infused intravenously as a single dose or as multiple doses was generally well tolerated. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin supports the clinical evaluation of once-daily dosing regimens for efficacy against fungal infections.