RESUMO
UNLABELLED: There are no large studies available to guide the selection of thallium (Tl), methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) or tetrofosmin (Tf) for myocardial perfusion imaging. Our objective was to compare the technical and clinical performance of the three in routine clinical practice. We randomised 2,560 patients to receive Tl, MIBI or Tf. A 1-day stress/rest protocol was used for MIBI and Tf. Tracer uptake was scored using a 17-segment model, quality and artefact scores were assigned, and ratios of heart (H), liver (L), subdiaphragmatic (S) and lung activity were measured. Mean quality scores (stress/rest) were Tl 2.13/2.16, MIBI 2.18/2.39, Tf 2.18/2.42 ( P=ns stress and <0.00001 rest). For attenuation artefact, Tl>MIBI=Tf ( P<0.05) and for low-count artefact Tl>MIBI>Tf ( P<0.001). For H/S, Tl>MIBI=Tf, for H/L Tl>MIBI=Tf, and for H/lung TlAssuntos
Cardiopatias/diagnóstico por imagem
, Coração/diagnóstico por imagem
, Compostos Organofosforados
, Compostos de Organotecnécio
, Tecnécio Tc 99m Sestamibi
, Tálio
, Adenosina
, Artefatos
, Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico por imagem
, Estudos Transversais
, Dobutamina
, Teste de Esforço
, Humanos
, Miocárdio/metabolismo
, Compostos Organofosforados/farmacocinética
, Compostos de Organotecnécio/farmacocinética
, Controle de Qualidade
, Radiografia
, Cintilografia
, Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/farmacocinética
, Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
, Sensibilidade e Especificidade
, Tecnécio Tc 99m Sestamibi/farmacocinética
, Tálio/farmacocinética
, Reino Unido