RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of deantigenated equine bone (DEB) grafts in a series of patients treated with DEB at six months postaugmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred DEB grafts were inserted in 81 patients between January 2004 and December 2006. Thirty-two DEBs were blocks and 68 were granules (52 sinus lift and 16 guided bone regeneration [GBR] procedures performed). A total of 147 implants were inserted. A Pearson chi-square test was used to detect any statistically significant correlation between the studied variables and early and/or late failures. RESULTS: There were 6 early and 26 late graft failures and another 16 failures after prosthesis placement. The overall failure rate was 25% in the GBR procedures, 31.9% in sinus lift, and 54.3% with blocks, for a total complication rate of 39.5%. A statistically significant relation was detected with respect to graft type and early complications (p = .005), with a worse outcome for DEB blocks compared to granules. After provisional prosthesis restoration, 23 implants were lost, and another 41 failed after definitive prosthesis delivery, for an overall failure rate of 43.5%. The follow-up period was 3 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: DEB grafting material had a very high rate of complications. Blocks had more than 50% failures, mainly in the immediate postoperative period. Other procedures such as GBR and sinus lift also showed more than 25% infections and resorption, and late failures (i.e., after-implant placement) were also common. Our results show that DEB is less than ideal for crestal bone reconstruction.
Assuntos
Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar , Implantes Dentários , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar/métodos , Animais , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Seguimentos , Cavalos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Implant stability is one of the key factors for a successful osseointegration. At present, several techniques are available to regenerate bone tissue, but it is not clear whether implants placed in grafted bone are as stable as implants in native bone over time. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare, by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA), the stability of implants placed in sinus-grafted and -nongrafted sites during 12-month follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-five patients received a total of 38 implants. Nineteen implants were placed in maxillary native bone (group A) and 19 implants following maxillary sinus floor augmentation using anorganic bovine bone and autogenous bone (group B) in a 50:50 ratio. Group B was divided into groups B1 and B2 depending on the timing of implant insertion, that is, B1 simultaneously and B2 6 months after sinus lift. The implants were inserted according to a two-stage procedure. RFA values were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months after implant placement. RESULTS: Between the tested groups, no statistically significant difference was found in RFA values of implants placed in sinus-grafted and -nongrafted sites after the surgery as well as at 6 and 12 months, while a significant difference was recorded in group B1 (p = .0297) when RFA values were compared over time. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that regenerated bone can offer good stability for dental implants.