RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: An extra haplotype is infrequently encountered in single nucleotide polymorphism(SNP)-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and is usually attributed to an undetected twin or triploidy. We reviewed a large series to establish relative frequencies of these outcomes and identify alternative causes. METHODS: In 515,804 women receiving NIPT from September 2017 through March 2019, all results with an extra haplotype were reviewed. Known viable and vanished twin pregnancies were excluded. For positive cases, pregnancy outcome information was sought. RESULTS: Of 1005 results with an extra haplotype (1 in 513), pregnancy outcome was available for 773 cases: 11% were confirmed or suspected triploidy; 65% to vanished twin; 10% with pregnancy loss. Rare explanations included complete mole, chimera, undisclosed donor egg pregnancy, maternal organ transplant and one instance of maternal neoplasm. Among triploid cases that were detected and independently confirmed, 23/27 (85%) were diandric. CONCLUSION: SNP-based NIPT, with detection of an extra haplotype, is 11% predictive of triploidy. For results with an extra haplotype, ultrasound is recommended to establish viability, evaluate for twins (viable or vanished), and detect findings consistent with triploidy. Review of patient history, serum screening, and ultrasound will reduce the number of CVS or amniocenteses necessary to confirm a diagnosis of triploidy.
Assuntos
Triploidia , Neoplasias Uterinas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Haplótipos , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Twins account for approximately 1 in 30 live births in the United States. However, there are limited clinical experience studies published in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting aneuploidies in twins. This study reports the performance of an SNP-based NIPT in the largest cohort with known outcomes for high-risk aneuploidy results. METHOD: This is a retrospective analysis of 18,984 results from commercial single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPT tests performed in twins between October 2, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Follow-up for all 211 high-risk cases was solicited. RESULTS: Follow-up outcomes were obtained in 105 cases. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for high-risk results were 88.7% (63/71, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 79.0%-95.0%) for trisomy 21% and 72.7% (8/11, 95% CI: 39.0%-94.0%) for trisomy 18. The results were stratified into monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ). The PPVs in MZ were 100% for both trisomy 21 (4/4, 95% CI: 40%-100%) and trisomy 18 (1/1, 95% CI: 2.5%-100%). No trisomy 13 cases were detected in the MZ group. The PPVs in DZ were 88.1% (59/67, 95% CI: 77.8%-94.7%), 70.0% (7/10, 95% CI: 34.8%-93.3%), and 66.7% (2/3, 95% CI: 9.4%-99.2%) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13, respectively. CONCLUSION: The performance of SNP-based NIPT in this large twin cohort was comparable to previously reported twin NIPT studies. SNP-based NIPT allows for zygosity-based PPV assessment.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Down , Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo , Gêmeos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Aneuploidia , Síndrome de Down/diagnóstico , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome da Trissomia do Cromossomo 13/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Trissomia do Cromossomo 13/genética , Síndrome da Trissomía do Cromossomo 18/diagnóstico , Síndrome da Trissomía do Cromossomo 18/genética , Gêmeos/genéticaRESUMO
Collagen prolyl 4-hydroxylases (C-P4Hs) play a central role in the formation and stabilization of the triple helical domain of collagens. P4HA1 encodes the catalytic α(I) subunit of the main C-P4H isoenzyme (C-P4H-I). We now report human bi-allelic P4HA1 mutations in a family with a congenital-onset disorder of connective tissue, manifesting as early-onset joint hypermobility, joint contractures, muscle weakness and bone dysplasia as well as high myopia, with evidence of clinical improvement of motor function over time in the surviving patient. Similar to P4ha1 null mice, which die prenatally, the muscle tissue from P1 and P2 was found to have reduced collagen IV immunoreactivity at the muscle basement membrane. Patients were compound heterozygous for frameshift and splice site mutations leading to reduced, but not absent, P4HA1 protein level and C-P4H activity in dermal fibroblasts compared to age-matched control samples. Differential scanning calorimetry revealed reduced thermal stability of collagen in patient-derived dermal fibroblasts versus age-matched control samples. Mutations affecting the family of C-P4Hs, and in particular C-P4H-I, should be considered in patients presenting with congenital connective tissue/myopathy overlap disorders with joint hypermobility, contractures, mild skeletal dysplasia and high myopia.
Assuntos
Pró-Colágeno-Prolina Dioxigenase/genética , Pró-Colágeno-Prolina Dioxigenase/metabolismo , Prolil Hidroxilases/genética , Animais , Membrana Basal/metabolismo , Osso e Ossos/metabolismo , Criança , Colágeno Tipo IV/genética , Tecido Conjuntivo , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Knockout , Músculos/metabolismo , Mutação , Osteocondrodisplasias/genética , Prolil Hidroxilases/metabolismo , Tendões/metabolismoRESUMO
The prenatal genetic counseling process may be influenced by the patient's insurance coverage for both prenatal testing and termination. Major commercial insurance providers have different policies. TRICARE is the United States Department of Defense health program for uniformed service members. TRICARE provides coverage to approximately 9.4 million beneficiaries, including health plans, special programs, prescriptions, and dental plans. TRICARE's covered medical expenses are outlined in their policies, including those pertaining to genetic testing and termination. This qualitative study aimed to explore the extent to which insurance coverage of prenatal genetic testing and termination of pregnancy affect the genetic counseling process by exploring genetic counselors' experience with TRICARE. The majority of counselors stated that they did not change their overall counseling process for TRICARE patients. However, several counselors expressed that they changed the way they discussed cost with TRICARE patients, specifically in regard to genetic testing. Additionally, counselors provided their perceptions of their patients' emotional experiences. With the recent consolidation of the three TRICARE regions into two TRICARE Regional Office (TRO) regions and the renewal of the Laboratory Developed Tests Demonstration Project, the findings of this study are valuable in the evaluation of TRICARE's coverage of prenatal genetic services.
Assuntos
Conselheiros , Aconselhamento Genético/provisão & distribuição , Cobertura do Seguro , Saúde Militar/economia , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Prática Profissional , Aborto Eugênico/economia , Aborto Eugênico/estatística & dados numéricos , Conselheiros/psicologia , Conselheiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Conselheiros/provisão & distribuição , Feminino , Frustração , Aconselhamento Genético/economia , Aconselhamento Genético/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Genéticos/economia , Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Saúde Militar/estatística & dados numéricos , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/economia , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Prática Profissional/normas , Prática Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Department of Defense/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of cell-free DNA results suspicious for maternal malignancy on prenatal cell-free DNA screening with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based technology. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included data from SNP-based, noninvasive prenatal screening samples from a commercial laboratory from January 2015 to October 2021. Maternal plasma was screened for trisomy 21, 18, and 13; monosomy X; and triploidy. Cases were considered suspicious for maternal malignancy if retrospective bioinformatics and visual inspection of the SNP plot were suggestive of multiple maternal copy number variants across at least two of the tested chromosomes. Clinical follow-up on patients was obtained by contacting individual referring clinician offices by telephone, facsimile, or email. RESULTS: A total of 2,004,428 noninvasive prenatal screening samples during the study period met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Of these, 38 samples (0.002% or 1 in 52,748, 95% CI 1:74,539-1:38,430) had SNP-plot results that were suspicious for maternal malignancy. Maternal health outcomes were obtained in 30 of these patients (78.9%); eight were lost to follow-up. Maternal malignancy or suspected malignancy was identified in 66.7% (20/30) of the 30 patients with clinical follow-up provided by the clinic. The most common maternal malignancies were lymphoma (n=10), breast cancer (n=5), and colon cancer (n=3). CONCLUSION: Results suspicious for maternal malignancy are rare with SNP-based noninvasive prenatal screening (1:53,000), but two thirds of patients who had a noninvasive prenatal screening result concerning for malignancy in this study had a cancer diagnosis. Investigation for malignancy should be recommended for all pregnant patients with this type of result. FUNDING SOURCE: This study was funded by Natera, Inc.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , AneuploidiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the causes of reported discordance between noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and ultrasound or other clinical information. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational study, all cases in which single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based NIPT reported normal sex chromosomes and the laboratory was notified by the patient or health care provider of discordance between NIPT and observed or expected fetal sex from clinical information were reviewed. When discordances were unresolved after internal and external laboratory clerical data review or repeat ultrasound imaging, additional clinical records, genetic testing results and pregnancy outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 1,301,117 eligible NIPT cases, fetal sex discordances were reported in 91 (0.007%; 1:14,300; 95% CI 1:11,600-1:17,800); partial or complete outcome information was available for 83 of 91 cases. In 30 of 83 (36%) cases, karyotyping was performed, and sufficient clinical information was provided to establish the diagnosis of disorders of sexual development. The disorders of sexual development were classified into three categories: 46,XY disorders of sexual development (n=19), 46,XX disorders of sexual development (n=4), and sex chromosome disorders of sexual development (n=7). In 28 of 83 (34%) cases, the cause of the apparent discrepancy was attributable to human error, predominantly phlebotomy labeling or ultrasound misassignment. In 25 of 83 cases, a diagnosis was not possible; the outcome reported was either abnormal (18/83, 22%) or no abnormalities were reported (7/83, 8%). When normal sex chromosomes were predicted by SNP-based NIPT and clinical information was discordant, disorders of sexual development were common. Internal laboratory clerical data review and re-imaging confirmed the NIPT fetal sex reports in 34% cases, providing reassurance that no further evaluation was necessary. CONCLUSION: Identification of apparent fetal sex discordances with NIPT results, and reporting this suspicion to the laboratory, provides an opportunity for further evaluation to identify the cause of apparent discordances and the involvement of a multi-disciplinary team, as necessary to prepare for postnatal care. We propose a protocol for evaluation of these cases. FUNDING SOURCE: This study was funded by Natera, Inc.
Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos do Desenvolvimento Sexual/diagnóstico , Teste Pré-Natal não Invasivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise para Determinação do Sexo/estatística & dados numéricos , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Transtornos do Desenvolvimento Sexual/embriologia , Transtornos do Desenvolvimento Sexual/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Cariotipagem , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise para Determinação do Sexo/métodosRESUMO
Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity. We gathered follow-up information for pregnancies in women with test-positive NIPS results from 2014-2017 with quarterly assessments of positive predictive values (PPVs). A non-inferiority analysis with a minimum requirement of 70%/80% of expected performance for trisomy 21 and 18 was used to ensure testing met expectations. PPVs were evaluated in the context of changes in the population receiving testing. For all quarters, PPVs for trisomies 21 and 18 exceeded the requirement of > 70% of the reference PPV. Overall observed PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X were similar for women aged <35 (90.9%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 88.6-92.7%) compared to women with advanced maternal age (94.5%, 95% CI 93.1-95.6%). Despite significant declines in test-positive rates from 1.18% to 0.62% for trisomy 21, and from 0.75% to 0.48% for trisomies 18, 13 and monosomy X combined, PPVs remained stable through the four-year interval. We conclude that quarterly evaluation of PPV provides an overview of past testing and helps demonstrate long-term consistency in test performance, even in the setting of increasing use by women with lower a priori risks.