Tumour biomarkers: association with heart failure outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition that heart failure (HF) and cancer are conditions with a number of shared characteristics. OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between tumour biomarkers and HF outcomes. METHODS: In 2,079 patients of BIOSTAT-CHF cohort, we measured six established tumour biomarkers: CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9, CEA, CYFRA 21-1 and AFP. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 21 months, 555 (27%) patients reached the primary end-point of all-cause mortality. CA125, CYFRA 21-1, CEA and CA19-9 levels were positively correlated with NT-proBNP quartiles (all P < 0.001, P for trend < 0.001) and were, respectively, associated with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% CI 1.12-1.23; P < 0.0001), 1.45 (95% CI 1.30-1.61; P < 0.0001), 1.19 (95% CI 1.09-1.30; P = 0.006) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.05-1.16; P < 0.001) for all-cause mortality after correction for BIOSTAT risk model (age, BUN, NT-proBNP, haemoglobin and beta blocker). All tumour biomarkers (except AFP) had significant associations with secondary end-points (composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and non-CV mortality). ROC curves showed the AUC of CYFRA 21-1 (0.64) had a noninferior AUC compared with NT-proBNP (0.68) for all-cause mortality (P = 0.08). A combination of CYFRA 21-1 and NT-proBNP (AUC = 0.71) improved the predictive value of the model for all-cause mortality (P = 0.0002 compared with NT-proBNP). CONCLUSIONS: Several established tumour biomarkers showed independent associations with indices of severity of HF and independent prognostic value for HF outcomes. This demonstrates that pathophysiological pathways sensed by these tumour biomarkers are also dysregulated in HF.

Novel endotypes in heart failure: effects on guideline-directed medical therapy.

Aims: We sought to determine subtypes of patients with heart failure (HF) with a distinct clinical profile and treatment response, using a wide range of biomarkers from various pathophysiological domains. Methods and results: We performed unsupervised cluster analysis using 92 established cardiovascular biomarkers to identify mutually exclusive subgroups (endotypes) of 1802 patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from the BIOSTAT-CHF project. We validated our findings in an independent cohort of 813 patients. Based on their biomarker profile, six endotypes were identified. Patients with endotype 1 were youngest, less symptomatic, had the lowest N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and lowest risk for all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF. Patients with endotype 4 had more severe symptoms and signs of HF, higher NT-proBNP levels and were at highest risk for all-cause mortality or hospitalization for HF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.8]. Patients with endotypes 2, 3, and 5 were better uptitrated to target doses of beta-blockers (P < 0.02 for all). In contrast to other endotypes, patients with endotype 5 derived no potential survival benefit from uptitration of angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin-II receptor blocker and beta-blockers (Pinteraction <0.001). Patients with endotype 2 (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.10-1.42) experienced possible harm from uptitration of beta-blockers in contrast to patients with endotype 4 and 6 that experienced benefit (Pinteraction for all <0.001). Results were strikingly similar in the independent validation cohort. Conclusion: Using unsupervised cluster analysis, solely based on biomarker profiles, six distinct endotypes were identified with remarkable differences in characteristics, clinical outcome, and response to uptitration of guideline directed medical therapy.

EUROPEAN CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY SURVEY II: COMPARISON OF RESULTS IN GEORGIA WITH OTHER COUNTRIES.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important treatment modality for patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction and interventricular conduction delay which is supported by current guidelines from major medical societies. One of the largest international clinical practice surveys regarding the CRT - CRT Survey II was conducted from October 2015 to December 2016 in 42 ESC member countries. We compared the outcome data of the CRT Survey II with the Georgian cohort, where 24 patients were enrolled from 2 participating medical centers of Georgia. Despite CRT II Survey analysis did show us some similarities, there were also multiple, notable differencies between Georgian population and all other European countries' data, which can be explained by a number of socio-economic or healthcare-related factors.

Determinants and clinical outcome of uptitration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients with heart failure: a prospective European study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite clear guidelines recommendations, most patients with heart failure and reduced ejection-fraction (HFrEF) do not attain guideline-recommended target doses. We aimed to investigate characteristics and for treatment-indication-bias corrected clinical outcome of patients with HFrEF that did not reach recommended treatment doses of ACE-inhibitors/Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and/or beta-blockers. METHODS AND RESULTS: BIOSTAT-CHF was specifically designed to study uptitration of ACE-inhibitors/ARBs and/or beta-blockers in 2516 heart failure patients from 69 centres in 11 European countries who were selected if they were suboptimally treated while initiation or uptitration was anticipated and encouraged. Patients who died during the uptitration period (n = 151) and patients with a LVEF > 40% (n = 242) were excluded. Median follow up was 21 months. We studied 2100 HFrEF patients (76% male; mean age 68 ±12), of which 22% achieved the recommended treatment dose for ACE-inhibitor/ARB and 12% of beta-blocker. There were marked differences between European countries. Reaching <50% of the recommended ACE-inhibitor/ARB and beta-blocker dose was associated with an increased risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization. Patients reaching 50-99% of the recommended ACE-inhibitor/ARB and/or beta-blocker dose had comparable risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization to those reaching ≥100%. Patients not reaching recommended dose because of symptoms, side effects and non-cardiac organ dysfunction had the highest mortality rate (for ACE-inhibitor/ARB: HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.43-2.01; for beta-blocker: HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.36-2.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with HFrEF who were treated with less than 50% of recommended dose of ACE-inhibitors/ARBs and beta-blockers seemed to have a greater risk of death and/or heart failure hospitalization compared with patients reaching ≥100%.

Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Nesiritide is approved in the United States for early relief of dyspnea in patients with acute heart failure. Previous meta-analyses have raised questions regarding renal toxicity and the mortality associated with this agent. METHODS: We randomly assigned 7141 patients who were hospitalized with acute heart failure to receive either nesiritide or placebo for 24 to 168 hours in addition to standard care. Coprimary end points were the change in dyspnea at 6 and 24 hours, as measured on a 7-point Likert scale, and the composite end point of rehospitalization for heart failure or death within 30 days. RESULTS: Patients randomly assigned to nesiritide, as compared with those assigned to placebo, more frequently reported markedly or moderately improved dyspnea at 6 hours (44.5% vs. 42.1%, P=0.03) and 24 hours (68.2% vs. 66.1%, P=0.007), but the prespecified level for significance (P≤0.005 for both assessments or P≤0.0025 for either) was not met. The rate of rehospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause within 30 days was 9.4% in the nesiritide group versus 10.1% in the placebo group (absolute difference, -0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 0.7; P=0.31). There were no significant differences in rates of death from any cause at 30 days (3.6% with nesiritide vs. 4.0% with placebo; absolute difference, -0.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.3 to 0.5) or rates of worsening renal function, defined by more than a 25% decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (31.4% vs. 29.5%; odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.21; P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Nesiritide was not associated with an increase or a decrease in the rate of death and rehospitalization and had a small, nonsignificant effect on dyspnea when used in combination with other therapies. It was not associated with a worsening of renal function, but it was associated with an increase in rates of hypotension. On the basis of these results, nesiritide cannot be recommended for routine use in the broad population of patients with acute heart failure. (Funded by Scios; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00475852.).

Increased interleukin-1ß levels are associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and remodelling following acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between interleukin (IL)-1-related molecules, infarct size and left ventricular (LV) remodelling following acute myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Forty-two patients with first-time diagnosis of ST segment elevation MI (STEMI), with a single occluded vessel successfully revascularized by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were recruited to this observational study conducted at a university teaching hospital and followed for 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma levels of IL-1ß, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-18 and caspase-1 were analysed before and 2 days, 1 week and 2 months after PCI. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was used for the assessment of infarct size and LV remodelling. CMR findings at 1 year was the primary outcome variable. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that IL-1-related mediators were strongly (IL-1 ß), moderately (caspase-1) and weakly (IL-1Ra) associated with impaired myocardial function and noninfarct mass, but not infarct size, 1 year after reperfused STEMI. In multivariate analyses, troponin T predicted LV ejection fraction (LVEF), infarct size and LV end-diastolic (LVEDVi) and end-systolic volume index (LVESVi). However, significant additional variance was explained by IL-1ß, IL-18 and caspase-1. IL-1ß levels at 2 months, IL-18 at 2 days and pre-PCI caspase-1 were predictors of LVEF. Caspase-1 and in particular IL-1ß at 2 days were the only predictors of noninfarct mass. IL-1ß and IL-18 at 2 days were predictors of LVEDVi, whilst pre-PCI levels of IL-1ß contributed to prediction of LVESVi. By contrast, pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, IL-6 and transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) had no or only a weak (TGF-ß1) association with these CMR parameters in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: IL-1ß levels after STEMI were strongly associated with impaired myocardial function and noninfarct LV mass after 1 year, suggesting a potential role for IL-1ß as a predictor of maladaptive myocardial remodelling following reperfused MI.

The effect of altering haemodynamics on the plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Natriuretic peptide levels reflect haemodynamics in patients with heart failure and may serve as biochemical markers of cardiac filling pressures. The purpose of this study was to detect differences in the kinetic profile between atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and their N-terminal fragments N-ANP and N-BNP, in response to rapid and persistent vasodilatation. METHODS: Sixteen men and four women aged 63.0+/-10.4 (mean+/-S.D.) with symptomatic congestive heart failure (NYHA III) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)>18 mm Hg, received a 24-h infusion of nitroglycerin (N=8) or nicorandil (N=12). A reduction of PCWP was achieved for the duration of the study. Natriuretic peptides were measured by radioimmunoassay at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. RESULTS: PCWP and right atrial pressure fell rapidly and then increased modestly. ANP and N-ANP demonstrated a similar pattern. In contrast, BNP and N-BNP levels fell steadily throughout the observation period. This was accompanied by a continuous reduction of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). PCWP was highly correlated to the levels of all the natriuretic peptides. Using a longitudinal regression model evaluating responses over time, we found separate, significant relationships between all peptides and haemodynamic variables CONCLUSION: The atrial natriuretic peptides reflect rapid changes in filling pressures while the B-type peptides respond much slower. B-type peptides are less sensitive to short-term changes in filling pressures, but should reflect changes in SVR better during vasodilator therapy.

Effect on exercise performance of enalapril therapy initiated early after myocardial infarction. Nordic Enalapril exercise Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The Nordic Enalapril Exercise Trial was a multicenter subtrial of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS II) designed to evaluate the effect on maximal exercise performance of a 6-month period of enalapril treatment initiated early after myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: When begun early after myocardial infarction, converting enzyme inhibition therapy has been shown to attenuate infarct expansion and reduce left ventricular volume. Therapy has been associated with improved exercise performance. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-seven men (mean age 63.3 +/- 10.9 years) with documented acute myocardial infarction were randomized to treatment with enalapril or placebo on a double-blind basis. Intravenous enalaprilat or placebo therapy was initiated within 24 h after the onset of symptoms. Oral therapy was continued at a target dose of 20 mg/day. Patients exercised maximally at 1 month and 6 months after infarction to symptom-limited end points on a cycle ergometer with a 20 W/min incremental protocol. RESULTS: The treatment and control groups were comparable in patient age, concurrent therapy and type and site of infarction. At 1 month, for all patients, mean total work performed was 34.9 +/- 20.9 kJ in the enalapril group (n = 169) versus 28.5 +/- 20.6 kJ in the placebo group (n = 158) (difference = 18.4%, p < 0.01). This between-group difference in favor of enalapril was greatest in patients > 70 years old (difference = 41.4%, p < 0.01, n = 105) and those with clinical evidence of heart failure (difference = 33.0%, p < 0.01, n = 122). At 6 months for all patients, mean total work performed was 35.4 +/- 23.8 kJ in the enalapril group versus 34.0 +/- 23.9 kJ in the placebo group (difference = 4.1%, NS). CONCLUSIONS: This trial found that chronic converting enzyme inhibition initiated early after myocardial infarction was associated with significantly greater exercise capacity in men tested at 1 month. This difference was independent of type or site of infarction, patient age or the presence of clinical heart failure. The difference between the treatment and control groups was not significant at 6 months because of improvement in the placebo group. Further research is needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms involved, profile those patients most likely to profit from early therapy and establish the optimal timing and duration for intervention.

Effect of long-term enalapril therapy on cardiopulmonary exercise performance in men with mild heart failure and previous myocardial infarction.

Forty-one men with documented myocardial infarction greater than 6 months previously were randomized to long-term (48 weeks) therapy with placebo or enalapril on a double-blind basis. All patients were receiving concurrent therapy with digitalis and a diuretic drug for symptomatic heart failure (functional class II or III). The mean age was 64 +/- 7.3 years and no patient suffered from exertional chest pain. Patients underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exertional chest pain. Patients underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing to exhaustion on an ergometer cycle nine times over the course of 48 weeks. Gas exchange data were collected on a breath by breath basis with use of a continuous ramp protocol. In the placebo group (n = 21), the mean (+/- SD) peak oxygen consumption (VO2) at baseline was 18.8 +/- 5.2 versus 18.5 +/- 5.5 ml/kg per min at 48 weeks (-1.4%, p = NS). In the enalapril group (n = 20), the corresponding values were 18.1 +/- 3.1 versus 18.3 +/- 2.6 ml/kg per min (+2.8%, p = NS). The mean VO2 at the anaerobic threshold for the placebo group at baseline study was 13.1 +/- 3.5 versus 12.8 +/- 2.1 ml/kg per min at 48 weeks (-2.2%, p = NS). The corresponding values for the enalapril group were 11.8 +/- 2.3 versus 11.8 +/- 2.4 ml/kg per min (+1.4%, p = NS). The mean total exercise duration in the placebo group at baseline study was 589 +/- 153 versus 620 +/- 181 s at 48 weeks (+5.4%, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of moxonidine, a novel imidazoline, on plasma norepinephrine in patients with congestive heart failure. Moxonidine Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose response relationship of moxonidine on plasma concentration of norepinephrine during acute and chronic administration in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Sympathetic activation is increased in heart failure. Moxonidine is an imidazoline ligand acting on the central nervous system (CNS) receptors to decrease sympathetic activation. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with heart failure and New York Heart Association class II-III symptoms and ejection fraction <40% were randomized to placebo or one of three target doses of moxonidine, 0.1, 0.2 or 0.3 mg administered twice daily. An initial dose of moxonidine 0.1 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) was followed by weekly increments of 0.1 mg b.i.d. until target dose. The second and third study days occurred after four weeks (at target dose) and after 12 weeks, respectively. At each study day, repeated blood samples were drawn. RESULTS: There was a significant dose-related decrease of systolic blood pressure across all three study days. Heart rate decreased significantly on study day 3 in a dose-related manner. The acute 2 h decrease in plasma norepinephrine in response to all three doses of moxonidine was significantly different compared with placebo after four and 12 weeks. There was a significant linear relation between dose and plasma norepinephrine after four and 12 weeks in both 2 h peak and the time averaged effect (>8 h). The number of adverse events was similar in the moxonidine and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: The increased sympathetic activation in CHF can be reduced by moxonidine through CNS inhibition.

Comparison of the effects of losartan and enalapril on clinical status and exercise performance in patients with moderate or severe chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the feasibility of an efficacy trial comparing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor antagonism in heart failure. Patients with moderate or severe heart failure whose condition had previously been stabilized by treatment with a converting enzyme inhibitor were randomly assigned to receive enalapril or losartan. The study was designed to detect any signs of clinical deterioration during double-blind treatment. BACKGROUND: Losartan is a specific, nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor-1 antagonist with a vasodilator hemodynamic profile similar to that of converting enzyme inhibitors. Although therapy with specific receptor blockade has certain theoretic advantages over nonspecific converting enzyme inhibition, demonstration of a comparable therapeutic effect in patients with congestive heart failure will require a major effort comparing two active agents. METHODS: One hundred sixty-six patients with stable heart failure in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV and an ejection fraction < or = 35% were included in a multicenter, double-blind, parallel, enalapril-controlled trial. After a 3-week stabilization period with optimal therapy, including digitalis, diuretic drugs and a converting enzyme inhibitor, patients were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of therapy with losartan, 25 mg/day (n = 52); losartan, 50 mg/day (n = 56); or enalapril, 20 mg/day (n = 58). Patients were assessed with frequent clinical and laboratory evaluation and exercise testing. RESULTS: No significant differences between groups in terms of changes in exercise capacity (6-min walk test), clinical status (dyspnea-fatigue index), neurohumoral activation (norepinephrine, N-terminal atrial natriuretic factor), laboratory evaluation or incidence of adverse experience were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that losartan and enalapril are of comparable efficacy and tolerability in the short-term treatment of moderate or severe congestive heart failure. A trial designed to compare the efficacy, tolerability and effect on mortality of long-term angiotensin II receptor blockade with converting enzyme inhibition is both feasible and ethically responsible.

Exercise training in congestive heart failure. A review of the current status.

Traditionally exercise training was considered contraindicated in heart failure patients. However, during the last 15 years numerous small studies have demonstrated that training is safe in stable heart failure patients and that this intervention improves quality of life in this population. The beneficial effects include improved autonomic balance, reduced neurohumoral activation and reduced inflammatory response in addition to the direct effect on exercise capacity. Pooling of the available data from small randomized studies confirms the positive effect of training on morbidity, and also suggests that this type of intervention improves survival. Large scale studies are on-going to confirm the beneficial effects of training on mortality. This paper reviews the effects of exercise training in patients with the syndrome of heart failure and discusses the different types of training protocols and the tools for assessing the training effect in this population.

Successful management of severe congestive cardiac failure with enalapril.

The new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril (MK-421) was administered to a patient with severe congestive cardiac failure. Dramatic and sustained symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement is reported. The possible clinical significance of this agent's favorable profile is briefly discussed.

Clinical pharmacokinetics in heart failure. An updated review.

Pharmacokinetics is the study of the effect that the body has on drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. The pharmacokinetics of a specific drug are assessed by the volume of distribution, bioavailability, clearance and elimination half-life. Elimination half-life is directly related to the volume of distribution and inversely related to clearance. Any 1 or more of these parameters may be altered by physiological changes such as ageing, or disease states such as congestive heart failure. Congestive heart failure is associated with hypoperfusion to various organs including the sites of drug clearance, i.e. the liver and kidneys. It also leads to organ congestion as seen in the liver and gut. The main changes in drug pharmacokinetics seen in congestive heart failure are a reduction in the volume of distribution and impairment of clearance. The change in elimination half-life consequently depends on whether both clearance and the apparent volume of distribution change, and the extent of that change. Pharmacokinetic changes are not always predictable in congestive heart failure, but it seems that the net effect of reduction in the volume of distribution and impairment of clearance is that plasma concentrations of drugs are usually higher in patients with congestive heart failure than in healthy subjects. The changes in pharmacokinetics assume importance only in the case of drugs with a narrow therapeutic ratio (e.g. digoxin) and some of the antiarrhythmics such as lignocaine (lidocaine), procainamide and disopyramide. This necessitates reduction in both the loading and maintenance doses. Prolongation of the elimination half-life leads to delay in reaching steady-state, and therefore dose increments must be made more gradually. Plasma concentration measurements of the drugs concerned are a good guide to therapy and help to avoid toxicity. Pharmacokinetic changes are of less importance in the case of drugs with immediate clinical response, e.g. diuretics and intravenous vasodilators such as nitrates and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The dose in the latter group can be titrated to the desired effect. Not all adverse reactions to drugs that may occur in heart failure are the result of alterations in pharmacokinetics; rather, some may be due to important drug interactions. An interaction may occur directly e.g. reduction of renal clearance of digoxin by captopril and quinidine; or indirectly, e.g. through diuretic-induced hypokalaemia, which exacerbate arrhythmias associated with digoxin and antiarrhythmics such as quinidine and procainamide.

Comparison of baseline data, initial course, and management: losartan versus captopril following acute myocardial infarction (The OPTIMAAL Trial). OPTIMAAL Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

The OPTIMAAL study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, trial in high-risk patients who were treated early after acute myocardial infarction that compared treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril) and a selective angiotensin II antagonist (losartan) on survival and morbidity. A total of 5,477 patients with heart failure during the acute phase or with a new Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction were recruited. This study describes the baseline data and initial course of the cohort and compares these data and patient management across countries.

Comparison of the effects of losartan and captopril on mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL trial design. Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and evidence of heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction during the acute phase have an excessive mortality risk. Therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors attenuates the detrimental effects of angiotensin II and has been shown to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality in this population. Selective, angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism with losartan, which inhibits the effects of angiotensin II regardless of its source at the receptor level, may provide more complete blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. The Optimal Therapy in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (OPTIMAAL) study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, captopril-controlled trial. The primary hypothesis is that, compared with captopril, losartan will decrease the risk for all-cause mortality by 20% in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction. The study population will consist of 5,000 patients, > or = 50 years of age, with heart failure during the acute phase or with a new Q-wave anterior infarction or reinfarction. Patients will be randomized to treatment with either losartan or captopril. All patients will be followed until 937 deaths occur (event-driven). The primary end point is total mortality (all-cause mortality). The secondary and tertiary end points are sudden death (and/or resuscitated cardiac death) and fatal/nonfatal reinfarction. Based on the assumed event rate, treatment effect and a 95% power to detect a 20% reduction in all-cause mortality at the 4.3% significance level (2-sided, adjusted for 2 interim analyses), the trial will enroll at least 5,004 patients and continue until a total number of 937 events has been reached (intention-to-treat analysis).

Effect of simvastatin in preventing progression of carotid artery stenosis.

This study examines the effect of simvastatin on progression of carotid artery stenosis and shows that the drug substantially reversed the anticipated disease development. This finding indicates that treatment with simvastatin may reduce the risk for stroke in patients with known carotid artery disease.

Effect of timolol on cardiopulmonary exercise performance in men after myocardial infarction.

The effect of the nonselective beta blocker timolol on maximal cardiopulmonary exercise performance was evaluated in 28 men with previous myocardial infarction without effort angina (mean age 63 +/- 8 years). Patients were randomized to placebo or timolol (10 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks and then crossed over to the alternative therapy in a double-blind manner. At the completion of each treatment period, patients underwent symptom-limited maximal cardiopulmonary exercise on a cycle ergometer. Exercise time, heart rate, oxygen consumption (VO2), oxygen (O2) pulse and respiratory exchange ratio were measured at peak exercise and at a submaximal exercise level defined at a respiratory exchange ratio of 1.00. Timolol treatment reduced peak heart rate from 153 +/- 11 to 102 +/- 14 beats/min (-33%, p less than 0.001). Exercise time decreased from 680 +/- 91 to 633 +/- 78 seconds (-7%, p less than 0.001). Peak VO2 decreased from 25.3 +/- 4.7 to 21.4 +/- 3.5 ml/min/kg (-15%, p less than 0.001). O2 pulse increased from 12.9 +/- 1.9 to 16.7 +/- 2.3 ml/beat (+29%, p less than 0.001). Peak respiratory exchange ratio did not change significantly, indicating comparable effort. At submaximal exercise, defined at a respiratory exchange ratio of 1.00, there was no difference in exercise time between placebo and timolol. Heart rate decreased with timolol compared with placebo, from 126 +/- 16 beats/min by 31% (p less than 0.001), VO2 decreased from 18.5 +/- 4.3 ml/min/kg by 10% (p less than 0.001), O2 pulse increased from 11.5 +/- 2.0 ml/beat by 30% (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prognostic value of plasma atrial natriuretic factor, norepinephrine and epinephrine in acute myocardial infarction.

Neurohumoral activation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may reflect the degree of hemodynamic compromise, contribute to the progression of heart failure and augment to the risk of serious ventricular arrhythmias. Consequently, assessment of neurohumoral variables may provide an index of prognostic value in AMI. Plasma levels of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), norepinephrine and epinephrine were determined in 145 patients on day 3 after AMI. During the 360-day follow-up period 17 patients died. In univariate analysis, all 3 neurohormones were significantly related to 1-year mortality rates (ANF, p < 0.001; norepinephrine, p = 0.009; epinephrine, p = 0.048). After correction for age, sex, anamnestic, biochemical and clinical variables including signs of clinical heart failure in a multivariate model, ANF remained independently related to mortality. The association between plasma norepinephrine and survival failed to reach statistical significance after introduction of clinical heart failure in the model. Comparison of patients subdivided according to median hormone levels (ANF, 30.3 pmol/liter; norepinephrine, 2.29 nmol/liter) demonstrated a significantly increased mortality rate in patients with elevated ANF (p < 0.001), but not elevated norepinephrine levels. These results suggest that early plasma ANF levels are related to survival in patients with AMI, independently of signs of clinical heart failure.

Validation of a computerized technique for detection of the gas exchange anaerobic threshold in cardiac disease.

Respiratory gas exchange data were collected from 77 men greater than 6 months after acute myocardial infarction. Maximal exercise was performed on an ergometer cycle programmed for a ramp protocol of 15 W/min. The gas exchange anaerobic threshold (ATge) was determined by analysis of the carbon dioxide elimination (VCO2) vs oxygen consumption (VO2) curve below a respiratory exchange ratio of 1.00 using a computerized algorithm. This value was estimated at the inflection of VCO2 from a line with a slope of 1 which intersects the VCO2 vs VO2 curve. The relation of the ATge to the lactate acidosis threshold was studied in 29 patients. The reproducibility of the ATge method was studied in 77 patients. Mean (+/- standard deviation) VO2 for the ATge was 905 +/- 220 vs 866 +/- 299 ml/min for the lactate acidosis threshold (r = 0.86, p less than 0.001). Mean VO2 at the ATge for test 1 was 968 +/- 225 vs 952 +/- 217 ml/min for test 2 (r = 0.71, p less than 0.001). Mean peak VO2 was 1,392 +/- 379 vs 912 +/- 202 ml/min at the ATge (r = 0.76, p less than 0.001). Results demonstrate that this ATge method correlates well with the lactate acidosis threshold, is reproducible, and should be useful as an objective measure of submaximal exercise performance.