Tuberculosis case fatality is higher in male than female patients in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Epidemiological TB data indicate differences in infection prevalence, progression rates, and clinical disease incidence between sexes. In contrast, evidence on sex-specific differential (post) TB case fatality in Europe has not been synthesized systematically. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and grey literature up to December 2020 for studies reporting sex-stratified TB death data for Europe. The JBI critical appraisal tools served for bias risk assessment and subgroup analyses for studying heterogeneity. Random-effects models meta-analyses enabled estimating pooled relative risks of sex-associated TB fatality. Considering associations of comorbidities and risk factors on fatality differences, we applied relative risk meta-regression. RESULTS: Based on 17,400 records screened, 117 studies entered quantitative analyses. Seventy-five studies providing absolute participant data with moderate quality and limited sex stratification reported 33 to 235,000 TB cases and 7 to 27,108 deaths. The pooled male-to-female TB fatality risk ratio was 1.4 [1.3-1.5]. Heterogeneity was high between studies and subgroups. Study time, concurrent comorbidities (e.g., HIV, diabetes, cancers), and mean participant ages showed no effect modification. We identified higher male TB fatality in studies with higher homelessness (coefficient 3.18, 95% CI [-0.59 to 6.94], p-value 0.10) and lower migrants proportion (coefficient - 0.24, 95% CI [- 0.5 to 0.04], p-value 0.09). CONCLUSION: We found 30-50% higher TB case fatality for males in Europe. Except for homelessness, migration, and a trend for some comorbidities, assessing effect modification could not reduce our meta-analysis' high heterogeneity. Public health authorities should take heed of this higher risk of dying in male patients' treatment services.

Genetic counselling legislation and practice in cancer in EU Member States.

BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action. METHODS: National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country. RESULTS: Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.

Parental COVID-19-related health information practises, sources, evaluations and needs: A qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: Parents of infants and young children may have specific health information needs and preferences, as they are responsible for their children's health. COVID-19 posed many challenges for families, not least in terms of the constantly updated disease-prevention guidelines. However, little is known about parents' experiences with this unprecedented situation, that is, how and where they seek, use and evaluate COVID-19 (child)-specific health information. We aimed to find out more about this to provide insights to health (information) providers when communicating pandemic information to parents. METHODS: We conducted semistructured telephone interviews (August to October 2020) with a purposively selected sample of 20 German-speaking and 10 Arabic-speaking parents of children up to 4 years old. Recruitment occurred through multiple channels, including childcare institutions and social media. Qualitative content analysis of the interview transcripts illustrates the main differences between the two groups. RESULTS: By the time the interviews were conducted (mid-2020), some parents reported to seek information less actively or not at all, compared to the beginning of COVID-19. German speakers frequently used Google to obtain information, whereas Arabic speakers mentioned social media (particularly Facebook) as a central source. However, medical providers were the most trusted source for child health. Though determining the credibility of online information was difficult for some parents, others, mostly German speakers (middle-high education), were aware of some author-related criteria. When deciding on information use, parents often rely on their own judgement and gut instinct. Besides the necessity to disseminate information via multiple outlets to reach all parents, Arabic speakers desired audio-visual and translation tools to facilitate understanding. DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC CONCLUSION: Apart from education, language and knowledge of the health system and of the attributes of credible information may determine its quality and consequent decisions. There seems to be a considerable need to foster knowledge about reliable information sources, a greater understanding of the range of quality criteria and specific support for nonnative speakers, not least to better inform parents' decision-making. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A parent panel (n = 7) contributed to gathering ideas regarding recruitment, discussing initial results and the choice of topics and questions for a second interview phase.

[Cyberchondria - A New Behavioral Syndrome?] / Cyberchondrie ­ ein neues Verhaltenssyndrom?

Investigation of cyberchondria is still in its infancy. Preliminary research suggests that cyberchondria is likely to represent a distinct behavioral syndrome which is closely associated with health anxiety/hypochondria and extensive online searching for health information and/or digital self-tracking. The internet is characterized by anonymous, readily, convenient space-time-independent accessibility and availability of an almost unmanageable amount of information that may increase the reassurance-seeking safety behavior of individuals with heightened health anxiety. Cyberchondria also appears to be related to low self-esteem, anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, compulsivity and metacognitive beliefs. At present, it is unclear of whether individuals with cyberchondria suffer from extensive health-related online searching behavior only or also from other forms of internet use disorders. The link between cyberchondria and e-health literacy, defined as perceived skills at finding, evaluating, and applying online health information to health problems, is poorly recognized. At present, there are no standardized therapeutic interventions for cyberchondria available. Treatment should address the maladaptive health- or illness-related assumptions and beliefs by using existing, well established approaches for hypochondria. Furthermore, it should target the problematic internet use and enable individuals with cyberchondria to reflect their subjective e-health literacy and promote a functional use of health resources from the internet.

Quality of life and fear of disease progression are associated with aspects of health literacy in men with prostate cancer from Germany.

PURPOSE: Our research aimed to identify whether specific aspects of health literacy (HL) are associated with quality of life (QOL) and fear of progression (FOP) in men with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study. Regarding HL, we surveyed communication skills, guideline awareness, and knowledge in several domains: PC, health care system, own physical condition, dealing with health problems. Research questions were addressed using regression models for QOL and FOP including sociodemographic and disease-related variables as additional predictors. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred seventy-seven men completed the questionnaire. Better QOL was statistically significant associated with communication skills (OR 2.24; CI 1.57-3.21), knowledge of dealing with health problems (OR 2.54; CI 1.74-3.72), and knowledge of own physical condition (OR 0.63; CI 0.42-0.95). FOP decreased with increasing communication skills (ß - 0.09; CI - 0.15 to - 0.04), knowledge of health care system (ß - 0.07; CI - 0.12 to - 0.02), and knowledge of dealing with health problems (ß - 0.21; CI - 0.27 to - 0.15). It increased with guideline awareness (ß 0.07; CI 0.02-0.11), PC knowledge (ß 0.11; CI 0.06-0.16), and knowledge about own physical condition (ß 0.11; CI 0.05-0.17). CONCLUSIONS: The findings lead to the hypothesis that some aspects of HL may have a positive and some a negative influence on men with PC. Men should not be overwhelmed by a recommendation for self-observation or by promotion of PC knowledge. Interventions are needed that provide knowledge for managing health problems. Communication in health care should be tailored to men's needs.

Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: Focus group discussions.

BACKGROUND: Deceased donor organs are scarce resources because of a large supply-and-demand mismatch. This scarcity leads to an ethical dilemma, forcing priority-setting of how these organs should be allocated and whom to leave behind. OBJECTIVE: To explore public preferences for the allocation of donor organs in regard to ethical aspects of distributive justice. METHODS: Focus groups were facilitated between November and December 2018 at Hannover Medical School. Participants were recruited locally. Transcripts were assessed with content analysis using the deductive framework method. All identified and discussed criteria were grouped according to the principles of distributive justice and reported following the COREQ statement. RESULTS: Six focus groups with 31 participants were conducted. Overall, no group made a final decision of how to allocate donor organ; however, we observed that not only a single criterion/principle but rather a combination of criteria/principles is relevant. Therefore, the public wants to allocate organs to save as many lives as possible by both maximizing success for and also giving priority to urgent patients considering the best compatibility. Age, waiting time, reciprocity and healthy lifestyles should be used as additional criteria, while sex, financial status and family responsibility should not, based on aspects of equality. CONCLUSIONS: All participants recognized the dilemma that prioritizing one patient might cause another one to die. They discussed mainly the unclear trade-offs between effectiveness/benefit and medical urgency and did not establish an agreement about their importance. The results suggest a need of preference studies to elucidate public preferences in organ allocation.

[Ethics University on Regenerative Medicine - As an Instrument for the Development of Valid Public Opinions?] / Ethik-Universität zur Regenerativen Medizin ­ ein Instrument der fundierten Meinungsbildung für Laien?

OBJECTIVES: In 2016, we invited interested citizens to participate in the "ethics university on regenerative medicine" at Hannover Medical School. The present study analyses if and how this discursive and informative event inspired participants to form their own opinion on the issues at hand and to develop their general ethics literacy. METHODS: The "ethics university" was performed twice in 2016; each run consisted of four single consecutive events. Lectures were combined with interactive learning stations, and group discussions. Opinions and information level of all participants were surveyed by means of a postal questionnaire before and after the course to detect any changes of opinions and information levels; additionally, we surveyed participants' self-assessment. Participants of the second run were asked to form a waiting list control group to compare results from first run-participants. Furthermore, we conducted a content analysis of group discussions during the ethics university. RESULTS: Of 168 participants of both runs, 101 took part in the pre/post-survey. In addition, 30 questionnaires of the waiting list control group were analysed. Participants showed a higher level of information after the ethics university (changes between 0.75 and 1.93 points on a five-point scale). Between 50.5 and 66.0% of participants indicated that their opinion on different issues had become either more affirmative or more disapprobative as a result of attending the ethics university. On average, opinions were more positive after participation (between 0.44 and 1.0 points on a 5-point scale). Respondents in the waiting list control group showed no changes in opinion or information level. Participants themselves felt that they formed their opinions mainly on the basis of information they received in lectures, conversations with experts, interactive learning sessions, and written information. However, for many participants, interacting with other participants in the group discussions, as well as reflecting their own views was an important to forming informed opinions. CONCLUSION: Results of the evaluation show that participants were inspired to form their own opinions by the ethics university and to develop their ethics literacy (e. g. ability to reflect on normative questions). For future ethics universities, the group of participants should be as diverse as possible. In addition, interactive and discursive elements should be given a higher priority.

[DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 1) - Background, Relevance, Research Topics and Questions in Health Services Research]. / DNVF Memorandum Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 1) ­ Hintergrund, Relevanz, Gegenstand und Fragestellungen in der Versorgungsforschung.

More than half of the German population has difficulties in dealing with health information. It is an important task of health services research to examine how healthcare professionals and health care organizations can meet this challenge. The DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 1) defines the terms of individual and organizational health literacy, presents the national and international state of research and ethical aspects of health literacy research in health care settings. The relevance of health literacy research is worked out in different phases of life, for different target groups and in different healthcare contexts. Central research topics and future research desiderata are derived.

[DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 1) - Background, Relevance, Research Topics and Questions in Health Services Research: Short Version]. / DNVF Memorandum Gesundheitskompetenz (Teil 1) ­ Hintergrund, Relevanz, Gegenstand und Fragestellungen in der Versorgungsforschung: Kurzfassung.

More than half of the German population has difficulties in dealing with health information. It is an important task of health services research to examine how healthcare professionals and health care organizations can meet this challenge. This short version of the DNVF Memorandum Health Literacy (Part 1) defines the terms of individual and organizational health literacy, presents the national and international state of research and ethical aspects of health literacy research in health care settings. Central research topics and future research desiderata are derived.

How older patients prioritise their multiple health problems: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multimorbidity often receive diverse treatments; they are subjected to polypharmacy and to a high treatment burden. Hence it is advocated that doctors set individual health and treatment priorities with their patients. In order to apply such a concept, doctors will need a good understanding of what causes patients to prioritise some of their problems over others. This qualitative study explores what underlying reasons patients have when they appraise their health problems as more or less important. METHODS: We undertook semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 34 patients (aged 70 years and over) in German general practices. Initially, patients received a comprehensive geriatric assessment, on the basis of which they rated the importance of their uncovered health problems. Subsequently, they were interviewed as to why they considered some of their problems important and others not. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Patients considered their health problems important, if they were severe, constant, uncontrolled, risky or if they restricted daily activities, autonomy and social inclusion. Important problems often correlated with negative feelings. Patients considered problems unimportant, if they were related to a bearable degree of suffering, less restrictions in activities, or psychological adjustment to diseases. Altogether different reasons occurred on the subject of preventive health issues. CONCLUSIONS: Patients assess health problems as important if they interfere with what they want from life (life values and goals). Psychological adjustment, by contrast, facilitates a downgrading of the importance. Asking patients with multimorbidity, which health problems are important, may guide physicians to treatment priorities and health problems in need of empowerment.

[The role of self-help groups and self-help organisations in promoting health literacy in the public]. / Die Rolle der gemeinschaftlichen Selbsthilfe in der Weiterentwicklung der Gesundheitskompetenz der Bevölkerung.

Health literacy has recently been put on the health policy agenda in Germany, triggered by several recent studies that show that more than half of the German population has difficulties in finding, understanding, appraising and applying health information. Respective statistics reflect these individual difficulties and point at user preferences and competencies being inadequately considered and responded to by the healthcare system. Among other measures to improve this situation, a national action plan on health literacy was launched in 2018, which explicitly addresses self-help groups and self-help organisations repeatedly as an important player in promoting health literacy on individual and organisational levels.This article discusses the relevance of the underlying and guiding concept of empowerment in mutual self-help and concludes that fostering health literacy was and still is a cornerstone in health-related self-help from the very beginning - just without using this term. Based on results from surveys, we show how those participating members of self-help groups increase their health literacy, and how educative, supportive and advisory tasks for self-help groups and organisations emerge from these developments. Thereupon, the specific role of mutual self-help becomes evident for, specifically, the individual daily life dimensions of health literacy.

[Participation in self-help groups: impact on self-management and knowledge]. / Teilnahme an Selbsthilfegruppen: Wirkungen auf Selbstmanagement und Wissenserwerb.

BACKGROUND: Self-help groups (SHGs) are an inherent part of patient involvement and play an important role in the healthcare system. Until now, however, there has been a lack of systematic investigations and quantitative data about the individual impact of self-help for patients and relatives. OBJECTIVES: This study presents the results of a comparison between members of SHGs and non-members. Thereby, the effects of self-help shall be described in terms of empowerment and self-management. The study is part of the project "Health-related Collective Self-Help in Germany" (Gesundheitsbezogene Selbsthilfe in Deutschland-SHILD) funded by the Federal Ministry of Health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted with patients from five therapeutic areas (diabetes mellitus type 2, prostate cancer, multiple sclerosis, tinnitus, relatives of dementia patients). Participants administered a multidimensional questionnaire (paper-and-pencil or online). Of the 2870 participants in this analysis, 49% were active members of SHGs. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed some significant, but small differences between the two groups in five out of seven scales of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ) in favour of the SHG members. Furthermore, SHG members performed better in specific knowledge tests. Members see the importance of their group especially in social inclusion, psychosocial relief, coping with the disease and new insights in dealing with the disease. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to the study design we cannot rule out that differences might be based on personal characteristics influencing the decision to participate in a SHG or not. But as the results are controlled for confounders, the hypothesis that SHG participation has a positive impact on the outcomes rather than vice versa seems supported.

[Providing knowledge and support for caring relatives with the smartphone - the MoCaB project]. / Über das Smartphone Wissen und Unterstützung für pflegende Angehörige bereitstellen.

Providing knowledge and support for caring relatives with the smartphone - the MoCaB project Abstract. Background: Caring relatives often have a lack of knowledge of illness and care options. Surveys, as part of the MoCaB (Mobile Care Backup) project, showed that this is often experienced as a burden. Aim: The aim is to support caring relatives by increasing their knowledge. Therefore care-relevant knowledge and instructions for self-care should be provided according to their needs. Methods: The core element of the mobile application, personalized knowledge transfer in dialogue form, will be developed in a participative process with potential users. The relevant evidence-based nursing knowledge was reviewed by experts and written down for the target group. Results: So far, 86 relevant topics have been identified and formulated. First usability tests showed that the content itself, the used expressions and the presentation via the MoCaB app are well received. Outlook: In a next step, the app will be tested in the home setting with caring relatives and, in order to identify any further need and areas for improvement.

Participation in a prostate cancer support group and health literacy.

BACKGROUND: To cope with prostate cancer (PC) and its consequences and to be certain about therapeutic alternatives, some patients seek mutual help in prostate cancer support groups (PCSGs), where they share information and find social support. Our study was intended to assess whether group participation is associated with health literacy (HL). METHODS: We compared PCSG members (n = 441) with PC patients without support group experiences (n = 135) in a cross-sectional design. For this purpose, HL was operationalized through PC-specific knowledge, noncancer-specific knowledge about health care, guideline awareness, and skills needed to apply health information to meet own needs. Binary logistic regression models were calculated. Socio-demographic data and disease-related characteristics were used as control variables. RESULTS: Knowledge about PC (OR, 2.2; CI, 1.3-3.7), the fact of having heard of guidelines (OR, 3.7; CI, 2.1-6.8) and having read one (OR, 5.1; CI, 2.8-9.4), and competencies regarding health service navigation (OR, 1.8; CI, 1.0-3.1) are associated with PCSG membership. No statistically significant associations could be found between PCSG membership and further skills questioned, as well as between membership and knowledge about noncancer-specific health care. CONCLUSION: PCSG membership is associated with HL in some areas only. In particular, the groups seem to provide an important platform for information exchange in the field of PC. The potentially conflicting results on PC knowledge and the application skills may arise from the different forms of measurement-knowledge was tested; skills were self-assessed.

A geriatric assessment in general practice: prevalence, location, impact and doctor-patient perceptions of pain.

BACKGROUND: To investigate what a geriatric assessment in general practice adds towards previous findings of prevalence, location, impact and the dyadic doctor-patient perception of pain in this age group. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Consecutive patients aged 70 and over underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment in general practice that included a basic pain assessment (severity, sites and impact). Patients with pain and their doctors then independently rated its importance. Pain was correlated with further findings from the assessment, such as overall health, physical impairments, everyday function, falls, mood, health related lifestyle, social circumstances, using bivariate and multivariate statistics. Patient-doctor agreement on the importance of pain was calculated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: 219 out of 297 patients (73.7 %) reported pain at any location. Pain was generally located at multiple sites. It was most often present at the knee (33.9%), the lumbar spine (33.5%) as well as the hip (13.8%) and correlated with specific impairments such as restrictions of daily living (knee) or sleep problems (spine). Patients with pain and their physicians poorly agreed on the importance of the pain problem. CONCLUSIONS: A basic pain assessment can identify older patients with pain in general practice. It has resulted in a high prevalence exceeding that determined by encounters in consultations. It has been shown that a geriatric assessment provides an opportunity to address pain in a way that is adapted to older patients' needs - addressing all sites, its specific impact on life, and the patients' perceived importance of pain. Since there is little doctor-patient agreement, this seems a valuable strategy to optimize concrete treatment decisions and patient centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the German Clinical Trial Register ( DRKS00000792 ).

[Patients' need for consultation after a geriatric assessment in family practice : Survey]. / Patientenseitiger Gesprächsbedarf nach einem geriatrischen Assessment in Hausarztpraxen : Survey.

BACKGROUND: During a doctor-patient consultation patients usually seek information by disclosing their reasons for requesting the encounter. Geriatric assessment allows a proactive examination of patients' overall health and function and provides an opportunity to broach issues beyond the initial purposes of the consultation. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed at investigating older patients' information seeking behavior following a geriatric assessment and the kind of topics they wished to discuss, taking a variety of patient and health-related factors into account. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 317 patients (≥ 70 years) underwent a geriatric assessment in 40 general practices. Subsequently they obtained a list of the problems uncovered and rated the relevance and information needs for each problem. Analyses consisted of determining the prevalence of information need for each health topic and identifying predictors in a mixed model (multilevel regression analysis). RESULTS: The 317 patients presented with a median of 11 health problems (interquartile range, IQR 8-14) and 80 % of the patients had information needs concerning only a few of the problems. High information needs were present for physical complaints and for vaccination issues. Little information seeking behavior was evident for unhealthy lifestyles, falls, limitations in daily activities and psychosocial problems. In the mixed model the personal relevance and the type of health problem both had a significant and independent effect on information seeking behavior. CONCLUSION: A geriatric assessment generates a moderate need for information. It provides physicians with an opportunity to focus on those health problems that are important to older patients but not usually addressed in normal consultations. This particularly applies to limitations in daily activities and psychosocial problems.

Determinants of HIV, viral hepatitis and STI prevention needs among African migrants in Germany; a cross-sectional survey on knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and practices.

BACKGROUND: Migrants from sub-Saharan Africa (MisSA) are a relevant sub-group for HIV-transmission in Germany. A total of 10-15 % of all newly diagnosed cases are MisSA, and approximately one third acquired HIV in Germany. There is limited information on knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and practices (KABP) regarding sexual health in African communities residing in Germany. METHODS: From October-December 2013 we conducted a cross-sectional survey on KABP regarding HIV, viral hepatitis (HEP), and sexually transmitted infections (STI) among MisSA in Hamburg as a community-based participatory research project to identify knowledge gaps, sexual risk behavior regarding HIV/HEP/STI, HIV/STI-testing history and attitudes toward people living with HIV (PLWH). Trained peer researchers recruited participants through outreach. Questionnaires in German, English or French were either administered face-to-face or self-completed. Questions on knowledge about HIV/HEP/STI presented true statements; participants were asked if they knew the information before. To detect differences in sub-groups, unadjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated, and a multivariate analysis for knowledge on HIV/HEP/STI was performed. RESULTS: The final sample included 569 participants of whom 57 % were men. Most participants originated from Western and Central sub-Saharan Africa. Median time living in Germany was 6 years. Overall, 28 % had a university degree and 54 % reported a good level of German language. Over 80 % knew the risks for HIV transmission. A total of 44 % of respondents wrongly assumed that an HIV-diagnosis might lead to deportation and 64 % were not aware of the free and anonymous local HIV/STI-testing service. The proportion of participants with knowledge of presented facts on HEP varied from 40-58 %. The respective proportion on STI was 28-68 % and better among women compared to men (44 % vs. 54 %; OR = 1.45; 95 % CI 1.22-1.74). Men reported more often casual sex partners than women (43 % vs. 23 %; OR = 2.6; 95 % CI 1.7-4.0), and more frequently a previous STI (58 % vs. 39 %; OR = 2.1; 95 % CI 1.1-4.1). Overall, 16 % of women reported a history of sexual violence. The majority of respondents (75 %) reported that they would treat PLWH like any other person. CONCLUSION: Study participants demonstrated good knowledge on HIV-transmission but knowledge gaps regarding HIV/STI-testing services, HEP and STI. This calls for targeted interventions providing more information about these topics in African communities in Hamburg and possibly also elsewhere.