Agency factors associated with first response systems that improve out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Data are conflicting regarding the association between first responder (FR) intervention and improved outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We evaluated characteristics of agencies that have positive associations between FR interventions and outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed the 2016-2021 national Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). We defined the exposures as FR CPR and AED. The outcome was survival with favorable neurologic status. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the association between FR interventions with OHCA outcome for each agency, stratifying agencies into positive association (95% confidence interval above 1) and no/inverse association (95% confidence below or including 1). We compared characteristics between cohorts. RESULTS: For the association between FR CPR and outcomes, 21 agencies caring for 42,856 OHCAs had a positive association; 371 agencies caring for 449,824 OHCAs had no association. For FR AED, 47 agencies caring for 103,120 OHCAs had a positive association; 262 agencies caring for 327,761 OHCAs had no association. Comparing agency characteristics for FR CPR, agencies with a positive association had more annual OHCAs (+300), lower FR CPR rate (-11.3%), and lower FR AED rate (-10.8%). Comparing FR AED, agencies with a positive association had more OHCAs per year (+150.5), lower FR CPR rate (-6.8%), lower FR AED rate (-13.3%), lower response time (-0.6 minutes), and more OHCAs from high-income neighborhoods (+3.7%). CONCLUSION: FR AED more commonly had a positive association with outcomes than FR CPR. Agencies with better outcomes from FR interventions treated more OHCAs and had lower rates of FR intervention.

Spanish-Speaking Caregivers' Experience with an Emergency Department Pediatric Asthma-Care Bundle Quality Initiative.

Most pediatric emergency departments' (ED) quality improvement (QI) initiatives for asthma aim to standardize care based on the priorities of healthcare providers. Perceptions and priorities of the caregiver rarely are addressed, especially in families with limited English-language proficiency. We explored Spanish-speaking caregivers' perceptions, understandings, and barriers with the care they received for asthma, after exposure to an ED asthma-care bundle. This qualitative study was part of a larger QI initiative on Spanish-speaking caregivers of patients presenting to a children's hospital ED with an asthma exacerbation. Patients were exposed to an asthma-care bundle, which included timely administration of medication, home dose of medications, an educational intervention, asthma action plans (AAPs), and discharge instructions. Through semi-structured interviews and qualitative analyses, we assessed the perceptions, understandings, and barriers caregivers reported during their ED experience. From January 2015 to October 2016, 492 patients received AAPs in the ED. Of 128 families that preferred Spanish, 88 (69%) received a Spanish AAP, 41 (32%) received Spanish discharge instructions, and 34 (27%) received discharge materials in both languages. Thirteen families were interviewed. Three themes emerged regarding the caregivers' perceived barriers: (1) need for improved accessibility to medication, primary care, and insurance; (2) communication barriers, such as timeliness, availability of interpreters, and need for resources in their preferred language; and (3) uncertainty about the child's diagnosis and acuity. Incorporating the caregivers' perspectives into QI projects may yield valuable information when developing new interventions. In the ED, improving accessibility to interpreters and providing discharge materials in their preferred language, as well as addressing misconceptions about asthma, may enhance caregivers' satisfaction.