Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 271(11): 2951-5, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24609647

RESUMO

Despite advances in endoscopic approaches, instrumentations and imaging guidance systems, the management of frontal sinus is still challenging. Failure of the endoscopic procedure and restenosis of the newly formed ostium have been demonstrated even with large frontal sinusotomy. We describe a newly designed double nasoseptal flap to cover the bare bone after endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP). Five fresh, double-injected cadavers were dissected through an endoscopic endonasal approach. Posteriorly based nasoseptal flap on one side and laterally based nasoseptal flap on the other side were harvested before performing wide EMLP. Feasibility of the procedure, versatility of the flap, coverage area and measurements were calculated. Harvesting the mucoperichondrial/mucoperiosteal flap over the septectomy site was straightforward step. Two different designed flaps (one on each side) are more practical to avoid torsion of the flap. The flap measures 2 × 3 cm on average that was able to cover the bare bone of the anterior and posterior wall of frontal sinus. Osteoneogenesis and progressive osteoplastic activity after EMLP plays a major role in restenosis of frontal sinus. Vascularized nasoseptal flap helps in preventing closure of the newly formed ostium. Applying these flaps over the bare bone enhances the healing process and minimizes the crust formation.


Assuntos
Endoscopia/métodos , Seio Frontal/patologia , Seio Frontal/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Cadáver , Doença Crônica , Constrição Patológica/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Doenças dos Seios Paranasais/patologia , Doenças dos Seios Paranasais/prevenção & controle , Doenças dos Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Laryngoscope ; 125(7): 1568-72, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25647632

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the necessity of reconstructing the eroded bony boundaries after mucocele marsupialization when the mucoperiosteum has been spared. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 308 patients treated for a sinonasal mucocele. Of these, 116 showed areas of bone reabsorption in their preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: Of 116 patients showing one or more areas of bone reabsorption who underwent marsupialization of the mucocele, whether using a purely endonasal endoscopic approach or a combined approach, the common factor was that the mucoperiosteum of the paranasal sinus had always been spared and the eroded bone had never been reconstructed. After rigorous selection, 12 adult patients were enrolled to undergo a postoperative CT scan in order to verify what had happened to the eroded bone at least 3 years following the surgical marsupialization of the mucocele. RESULTS: In 66,6% of patients, the postoperative CT scan showed complete self-reconstruction of bone that had previously been eroded by the mucocele. No enophthalmus, meningocele, or other facial deformities were noted in our selection group, despite not having undergone surgical reconstruction of the bone. CONCLUSIONS: Even taking into account the small number of patients enrolled in the present study, indications are that there is no need to reconstruct the eroded bone, as would appear from our results that sparing the mucoperiosteum is enough to enable the bone to regenerate. Nevertheless, larger scale studies of the subject are merited.


Assuntos
Regeneração Óssea , Mucocele/cirurgia , Doenças dos Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças dos Seios Paranasais/diagnóstico por imagem , Seios Paranasais/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa