Randomised clinical trial: mesalazine versus placebo in the prevention of diverticulitis recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reached conflicting conclusions regarding the efficacy of mesalazine in the prevention of recurrent diverticulitis. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of mesalazine granules in the prevention of recurrence of diverticulitis after acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. METHODS: Two phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre trials (SAG-37 and SAG-51) investigated mesalazine granules in patients with prior episodes (<6 months) of uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis. Patients were randomised to receive either 3 g mesalazine once daily or placebo (SAG-37, n=345) or to receive either 1.5 g mesalazine once daily, 3 g once daily or placebo for 96 weeks (SAG-51, n=330). The primary endpoint was the proportion of recurrence-free patients during 48 weeks (SAG-37 and SAG-51) or 96 weeks (SAG-51) of treatment. RESULTS: Mesalazine did not increase the proportion of recurrence-free patients over 48 or 96 weeks compared to placebo. In SAG-37, the proportion of recurrence-free patients during 48 weeks was 67.9% with mesalazine and 74.4% with placebo (P=.226). In SAG-51, the proportion of recurrence-free patients over 48 weeks was 46.0% with 1.5 g mesalazine, 52.0% with 3 g mesalazine and 58.0% with placebo (P=.860 for 3 g mesalazine vs placebo) and over 96 weeks 6.9%, 9.8% and 23.1% respectively (P=.980 for 3 g mesalazine vs placebo). Patients with only one diverticulitis episode in the year prior to study entry had a lower recurrence risk compared to >1 episode. Safety data revealed no new adverse events. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine was not superior to placebo in preventing recurrence of diverticulitis.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic action of budesonide in children with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide is effective as initial therapy of mild to moderate Crohn's disease in adults. Superior tolerability to conventional corticosteroids might be attributed to extensive first-pass metabolism of budesonide by cytochrome P450 3A. AIM: To evaluate biotransformation and pharmacodynamic action of budesonide in children. METHODS: Drug disposition and effects on endogenous cortisol were evaluated in 12 children with Crohn's disease (5-15 years) after first intake of 3 mg budesonide (single dose), and again after 1 week of thrice daily dosing (steady-state). The parent drug and cytochrome P450 3A-dependent metabolites were analysed in blood and urine. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters of budesonide following single-dose administration (e.g. AUC(0-infinity) 7.7+/-5.1 h ng/mL, C(max) 1.8+/-1.2 ng/mL) did not change upon multiple dosing. Overall systemic elimination of budesonide reflected by clearance and half-life was not different between children and adults. After 1 week of treatment reversible adrenal suppression was observed - most pronounced in children aged below 12 years. CONCLUSIONS: Disposition of oral budesonide appears to be similar between children and adults, but the doctor has to be aware of an increased risk for adrenal suppression in paediatric patients.

Consequences of rifampicin treatment on propafenone disposition in extensive and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6.

Propafenone undergoes extensive metabolism both by phase I and phase II enzymes: cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) dependent polymorphic hydroxylation to its main metabolite 5-OH-propafenone, CYP3A4/1A2 dependent N-dealkylation and further glucuronidation and sulfation. Since CYP2D6 is not inducible by rifampicin, an important drug interaction between rifampicin and propafenone is not to be expected a priori. However, non-CYP2D6-dependent pathways may be induced as a case report described dramatically lowered plasma concentrations of propafenone with loss of dysrhythmia control associated with rifampicin treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate induction properties of rifampicin on propafenone disposition in extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers of CYP2D6. Six extensive metabolizers and six poor metabolizers ingested 600 mg rifampicin once daily for nine consecutive days. The day before the first rifampicin dose and on the day of the last rifampicin dose each individual received a single intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 140 mg unlabelled propafenone and 2 h later a single dose of 300 mg deuterated propafenone orally (p.o.). During enzyme induction maximum QRS prolongation decreased significantly after propafenone p.o. (21 +/- 7% versus 13 +/- 6% in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.01; 15 +/- 6% versus 9 +/- 6% in poor metabolizers, P < 0.01) and not after propafenone i.v. In parallel, there were no substantial differences in pharmacokinetics of propafenone i.v. by rifampicin. However, bioavailability of propafenone dropped from 30 +/- 15% to 10 +/- 8% in extensive metabolizers (P < 0.01) and from 81 +/- 6% to 48 +/- 8% in poor metabolizers (P < 0.001). Following propafenone p.o. clearances through N-dealkylation (4.1 +/- 2.1 ml/min versus 23.5 +/- 12.6 ml/min in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.01; 3.4 +/- 1.3 ml/min versus 16.0 +/- 5.5 ml/min in poor metabolizers, P < 0.001) and glucuronidation (123 +/- 48 ml/min versus 457 +/- 267 ml/min in extensive metabolizers, P < 0.05; 43 +/- 9 ml/min versus 112 +/- 34 ml/min in poor metabolizers, P < 0.01), but not 5-hydroxylation increased regardless of phenotype indicating substantial enzyme induction. Clearances to propafenone sulfate and conjugates of 5-OH-propafenone were significantly enhanced by rifampicin treatment in poor metabolizers (P < 0.01). Thus, induction of both phase I pathways (CYP3A4/1A2) and phase II pathways (glucuronidation, sulfation) of propafenone by rifampicin resulted in a clinically relevant metabolic drug interaction which was more pronounced in extensive metabolizers than in poor metabolizers with regard to percentage decrease in bioavailability of propafenone.

Enzyme induction in the elderly: effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone.

OBJECTIVE: A clinical study on enzyme induction in elderly subjects was performed by investigation of the effect of rifampin (INN, rifampicin) on propafenone disposition. Propafenone was chosen as a model drug because of its complex metabolism that permits the simultaneous in vivo assessment of induction of phase 1 and phase 2 pathways. METHODS: Six extensive metabolizers of CYP2D6 (age, 70.5 +/- 3.5 years) ingested 600 mg rifampin once daily for 9 consecutive days. One day before the first rifampin dose and on the day of the last rifampin dose, each elderly individual received a single intravenous infusion of 70 mg unlabeled propafenone and received a single oral dose of 300 mg deuterated propafenone 2 hours later. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propafenone were compared before and during induction. RESULTS: Maximum QRS prolongation after oral propafenone was decreased significantly by rifampin (18% +/- 5% versus 6% +/- 3%; P < .01). There were no substantial differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous propafenone during induction. However, bioavailability of propafenone dropped from 30% +/- 24% to 4% +/- 3% (P < .05). After oral propafenone was administered, clearances through N-dealkylation (6 +/- 3 mL/min versus 26 +/- 16 mL/min; P < .05) and glucuronidation (178 +/- 75 mL/min versus 739 +/- 533 mL/min; P < .05), but not 5-hydroxylation, were increased by rifampin, indicating substantial enzyme induction. CONCLUSIONS: Both phase 1 and phase 2 pathways of propafenone metabolism were induced by rifampin in elderly subjects, resulting in a clinically relevant drug interaction.

Pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamic action of midazolam in young and elderly patients undergoing tooth extraction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether age-dependent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations account for a more pronounced response to benzodiazepines among elderly patients. METHODS: Twelve young patients and 10 elderly patients received an intravenous dose of 0.05 or 0.03 mg/kg midazolan, respectively, before third molar extraction. Postoperative pain was treated with 30 mg dihydrocodeine. Serum concentrations of midazolam and sedative effects were monitored with visual analog scales and choice reaction time measurements for 6 hours. Test values above baseline were integrated, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed. Heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, and amnesia also were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant age-dependent differences in disposition of midazolam between young and elderly patients (apparent volume of distribution, 1.3 +/- 0.2 versus 1.1 +/- 0.4 L/kg; halflife, 3.3 +/- 1.5 hours versus 3.7 +/- 2.2 hours; total body clearance, 451 +/- 186 ml/min versus 343 +/- 137 ml/min). However, higher values of area under the effect curve (AUEC) and AUEC divided by area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) (sensitivity index) were observed among the elderly as follows: AUEC for reaction time (AUECRT) (573 versus 261; p = 0.042), AUEC for visual analog scale (AUECVAS) (37.7 versus 14.4; p = 0.011), AUECRT/AUC (6.3 versus 1.8; p = 0.007), and AUECVAS/AUC (0.40 versus 0.11; p = 0.009) compared with the young group. Likewise, mean concentration at half-maximal effect for sedation was lower (p = 0.025) among older patients (20.5 +/- 2.2 ng/ml) than among younger (29.7 +/- 6.6 ng/ml) patients. Amnesia was observed among 86% of patients and oxygen saturation was always 95% or more of basal value. There were no age-related differences in concentration of dihydrocodeine and its active metabolite dihydromorphine, but dihydromorphone levels were much lower in there intermediate metabolizers (455 to 879 fmol/l) and especially in five poor metabolizers (65 to 498 fmol/L) than among extensive metabolizer of cytochrome p450 2D6 (1604 to 6490 fmol/L). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients are more sensitive to the sedative action of midazolam than young patients, and the sensitivity is caused by age-dependent pharmacodynamic alterations. The age-adjusted doses used are both effective (for sedative amnesia) and safe (in terms of arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure.

Systematic review: ursodeoxycholic acid--adverse effects and drug interactions.

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid is increasingly being used for the treatment of chronic cholestatic liver diseases. It appears to be generally well tolerated, but a systematic review on drug safety is lacking. AIM: As experimental data suggest a role of bile acids in the regulation of hepatic drug metabolism at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level, the literature was screened for adverse drug reactions and drug interactions related to ursodeoxycholic acid. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using a refined search strategy to evaluate the adverse effects of ursodeoxycholic acid and its interactions with other drugs. RESULTS: Ursodeoxycholic acid caused diarrhoea in a small proportion of patients. Rare skin reactions were due to drug adjuvants rather than the active substance. Decompensation of liver cirrhosis was reported after the administration of ursodeoxycholic acid in single cases of end-stage primary biliary cirrhosis. Recurrent right upper quadrant abdominal pain was incidentally observed. The absorption of ursodeoxycholic acid was impaired by colestyramine, colestimide, colestipol, aluminium hydroxide and smectite. Metabolic drug interactions were reported for the cytochrome P4503A substrates, ciclosporin, nitrendipine and dapsone. CONCLUSIONS: Ursodeoxycholic acid is generally well tolerated. Drug absorption interactions with anion exchange resins deserve consideration. Metabolic interactions with compounds metabolized by cytochrome P4503A are to be expected.

High variation of tioguanine absorption in patients with chronic active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Tioguanine (thioguanine) has been suggested as a therapeutic alternative for patients with Crohn's disease resistant or intolerant to azathioprine or mercaptopurine. However, pharmacokinetic data on tioguanine in inflammatory bowel disease are missing. AIM: To determine the disposition of three different 40 mg tablet preparations of tioguanine in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: Six patients with chronic active Crohn's disease were included in a randomized, cross-over, single-dose study. Pharmacokinetic analysis was based on plasma concentrations of tioguanine during 6 h after dosing. Tioguanine was measured by a validated high-pressure liquid chromatographic method. RESULTS: The areas under the curve (AUC) varied 4-7-fold between patients. In two patients, tioguanine was not detected in plasma following the intake of one of the three tablets; another patient did not absorb tioguanine in two of the three different preparations. No significant differences were found in the AUC and Cmax values between the three tablets. In all patients, there was a second peak in plasma concentration following a meal 3 h after drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: The absorption of tioguanine is highly variable in patients with Crohn's disease, which may be responsible for treatment failure. Therapy with tioguanine may be improved by monitoring tioguanine nucleotides as a surrogate parameter of efficacy.

Randomised clinical trial: a comparative dose-finding study of three arms of dual release mesalazine for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Comparative data regarding different regimens of oral mesalazine (mesalamine) for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis are limited. AIM: To evaluate whether 3.0 g mesalazine once-daily (OD) is superior to the standard treatment of 0.5 g mesalazine three times daily (t.d.s.) and to prove the therapeutic equivalence of OD vs. t.d.s. dosing of total 1.5 g mesalazine for remission maintenance in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A 1-year, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study was undertaken in patients with endoscopically and histologically confirmed ulcerative colitis in remission. Patients were randomised to oral mesalazine 3.0 g OD, 1.5 g OD or 0.5 g t.d.s. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients still in clinical remission at the final visit, with clinical relapse being defined as CAI score >4 and an increase of ≥3 from baseline. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 162/217 3.0 g OD patients (75%), 129/212 1.5 g OD patients (61%) and 150/218 0.5 g t.d.s. patients (69%) in the intention-to-treat population, and in 152/177 (86%), 121/182 (67%) and 144/185 (78%) in the per protocol population respectively; 3.0 g OD was superior to both low-dose regimens for the primary endpoint (i.e. P < 0.001, 3.0 g OD vs. 1.5 g OD; P = 0.024, 3.0 g OD vs. 0.5 g t.d.s.; superiority test, per protocol population). Safety analysis, including comprehensive renal monitoring, revealed no concern in any treatment group. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine 3.0 g once daily was the most effective dose for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis of the three regimens assessed, with no penalty in terms of safety.

Influence of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 genotype and expression on budesonide pharmacokinetics: a possible role of intestinal CYP3A4 expression.

Budesonide treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel disease commonly leads to non-response or adverse reactions, possibly because of alterations in efflux transport mediated by the ABCB1 gene product P-glycoprotein or metabolism by CYP3A isoenzymes. Two groups, each consisting of nine healthy volunteers, one with the CYP3A5(*)1/(*)3 genotype (expressors) and the other with the CYP3A5(*)3/(*)3 genotype (non-expressors), were given a single oral dose of 9 mg budesonide. Plasma and urine concentrations of budesonide and its major metabolites were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Subsequently, rectosigmoidal biopsies were taken for analysis of messenger RNA (mRNA) expression. Budesonide pharmacokinetics did not differ between genotype groups. However, intestinal CYP3A4 expression was shown to correlate directly with partial metabolic clearances of 16-hydroxy-prednisolone (r(2) = 0.30; P = 0.010) and 6-hydroxy-budesonide (r(2) = 0.25; P = 0.016), but inversely with budesonide AUC(0-24 h) (r(2) = 0.18; P = 0.040). Interestingly, a strong correlation was found between CYP3A5 and ABCB1 expression in CYP3A5 expressors (r(2) = 0.79; P = 0.001). This study suggests that intestinal CYP3A4 expression has an impact on budesonide pharmacokinetics. Moreover, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 expression appears to be coregulated.

A clinical trial on absorption and N-acetylation of oral and rectal mesalazine.

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine (5-ASA) is a standard treatment for ulcerative colitis. Extent of absorption and N-acetylation determine systemic exposure to 5-ASA, and are thereby relevant for the safety of the treatment. The aim of the study was to compare absorption and N-acetylation of 5-ASA following rectal or oral drug administration. Healthy subjects were compared to patients with ulcerative colitis to evaluate the impact of chronic inflammation of colorectal mucosa on disposition of 5-ASA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: First, 12 healthy adults were randomized to receive 2 g of 5-ASA by each of four different formulations: oral delayed release granules, 30 mL enema, 60 mL rectal foam, and 120 mL rectal foam. Second, 12 patients with active ulcerative colitis received 60 mL rectal foam. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by determination of 5-ASA and its acetylated, pharmacologically inactive metabolite (Ac-5-ASA) in plasma and urine. RESULTS: First, systemic exposure to 5-ASA was markedly lower after rectal drug administration as compared to oral dosing (P < 0.001; e.g. median relative bioavailability of 60 mL rectal foam: 36%). Second, N-acetylation of rectal 5-ASA was lower in patients than in healthy subjects [area under the curve (AUC) ratio Ac-5-ASA/5-ASA: 1.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.4, mean +/- SD, P < 0.01]. High peak plasma concentrations of 5-ASA were correlated with high microscopic disease activity (r = 0.67, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rectal delivery of 5-ASA results in low systemic drug exposure with potentially reduced toxicity in comparison with oral drug administration. Chronic inflammation of colorectal mucosa might be a relevant source of variability in pharmacokinetics of 5-ASA.

[Are graduate education requirements in ophthalmology in Germany compatible with European standards?]. / Die Weiterbildungsordnung zum Augenarzt in Deutschland, Euro-compatibel?

The advanced training of medical specialists is determined by federal regulation called '(Muster) Weiterbildungs-Ordnung'. As education and cultural affairs are subject of federal sovereignty, that regulation of postgraduate training is to be determined by the minister for education and culture in each of those 16 german federal states. To get an utmost identical regulation for Germany the federal councils of physicians have handed over the task of evaluation and upgrading of that regulation to the Bundesärztekammer (BAK). The BAK designs the novel of postgraduated training regulations as a kind of frame-work for all federal councils. That frame-work is called exemplary regulation. On the level of each federal country only editorial changes are added or submitted. Federal regulation is proposed to each federal minister for educational affairs and turned into validity by federal law. The renewed regulation, dated by late summer 1992, prescribes a minimum duration of training for ophthalmology of 5 years, which can be done in any acknowledged institution (university eye hospital, county hospital, municipal hospital or office of any eye-doctor, acknowledged for medical training). Two years of those five years duration may even be done in the office of any physician, who got the right for medical training. In addition to the essential regulation of ophthalmic training there are supplementary demands for special knowledge and abilities which should be fulfilled by each applicant for a specialist's diploma. Those demands precisely prescribe the number and degree of difficulty of special medical procedures as well as the degree of responsibility of the trainee for his activities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Use of computers for patient data and billing]. / Computereinsatz für Patientenerfassung und Abrechnungswesen.

The security and speed with which data can be handled in a medical software context depends on the kind of filing and sorting codes used. Thus software producers can be classified by how good the follow-up program is, as well by the quality of the filing and sorting codes applied. Using a sorting code that is composed of patients' initials, partially enlarged by their data of birth, is not sufficient to fulfill the demand for user comfort and input-security. An alternative often used, a patient number, demands a highly cooperative patient, who keeps his special number in mind and presents it when visiting the doctor's office. When used as a unique filing code, if that number is missing at the patient check-in counter in the office, an additional search must be made in a book listing patients. Besides wasting a lot of time, this kind of filing system is too insecure and unreliable. The best searching and filing code in medical software should be composed of parts of a patient's name, family name and date of birth. Large and small numbers should be accepted by the input window. The amount of matching codes should be minimized and selecting the patient in question should be done by clicking the mouse. A definite advantage in using a computer in the office is to manage routine data. Addresses, telephone numbers, insurance companies, drugs, therapy, mailing addresses, etc. must be made exclusively the computer's tasks. In this way, the speed of handling and data security can be improved. The benefits from an office computer will grow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lack of drug interaction between omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and theophylline.

AIMS: Theophylline is a model substrate of cytochrome P4501A2. The ability of the proton pump inhibitors (PPI) omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole to induce cytochrome P4501A2 has not yet been unequivocally resolved. The aim of this comprehensive study was to compare directly the effect of the three PPI on the absorption and disposition of theophylline. METHODS: Twenty healthy, nonsmoking, male and female volunteers (extensive metabolisers of cytochrome P4502C19 and Helicobacter pylori negative) participated in a randomized, double-blind, four-period, placebo-controlled crossover study. In each of the four periods they received either omeprazole (40 mg), lansoprazole (60 mg), pantoprazole (80 mg) or placebo once daily for 10 days. Sustained release theophylline (350 mg twice daily) was coadministered from day 8-10. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline as well as of all three PPI were determined at steady-state (day 10). RESULTS: In all periods, point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC), maximum steady-state concentrations and peak-trough fluctuations of theophylline were not altered by PPI pretreatment and met the required limits for bioequivalence. Point estimates (90% confidence intervals) of the AUC ratios of theophylline plus PPI to theophylline alone were 0.92 (0.87-0.97), 0.90 (0.85-0.95) and 1.00 (0.95-1.06) for omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant intake of omeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole at high therapeutic doses does not affect the absorption and disposition of theophylline.

Inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A: relevant drug interactions in gastroenterology.

Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) is involved in biotransformation of more than half of all drugs currently available. Drug interactions by inhibition of CYP3A are of major interest in patients receiving combinations of drugs. Some interactions with CYP3A inhibitors also involve inhibition of the multidrug export pump, P-glycoprotein. An increasing number of adverse drug reactions might be avoided on the basis of knowledge about CYP3A substrates and inhibitors. This article summarizes some examples of such interactions relevant to gastroenterologists. Serious cases by coadministration of CYP3A inhibitors resulting in acute hepatitis, hypotension, rhabdomyolyis, torsade de pointes, sedation, or ergotism are presented: interactions with azole antifungals (ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole), HIV protease inhibitors (ritonavir, indinavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir), macrolide antibiotics (clarithromycin, erythromycin), and grapefruit juice. In addition, 1 case is reported who presented the highest trough levels of the CYP3A substrate budesonide in serum ever measured. Practitioners have to be aware of the high potential of metabolic drug interactions when they prescribe a CYP3A inhibitor. It is wise to check carefully comedication in patients complaining of side effects with substrates of CYP3A.

Disposition of propafenone in a poor metabolizer of CYP2D6 with Gilbert's syndrome.

Gilbert's syndrome, a genetic deficiency in bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1), may dispose to increased toxicity of propafenone in poor metabolizers (PMs) of cytochrome P4502D6 because glucuronidation of propafenone is the major metabolic pathway for drug elimination in PMs. A patient with Gilbert's syndrome who is also PM participated in an interaction study with propafenone and rifampicin along with five otherwise healthy PMs. Using stable isotope techniques, the pharmacokinetics of single doses of 140 mg propafenone i.v. (unlabelled) and 300 mg propafenone p.o. (labelled) were compared between the index patient and the five healthy controls. Propafenone did not accumulate in the plasma of the index patient either before or during induction: AUC(0-infinity) of propafenone in the index patient was within the 95% confidence interval of controls; AUC(0-infinity) of propafenone glucuronide and amount of urinary excretion of propafenone glucuronide in the patient were within or even greater than the 95% confidence intervals of controls. Therefore, individuals with Gilbert's syndrome who also have a PM phenotype appear to be at no higher risk for toxicity of propafenone than otherwise healthy PMs. An indirect conclusion from these in vivo data might be that propafenone is not a substrate of the UGT1A1 isoform.

CYP2E1 activity in patients with alcoholic liver disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In addition to the possible toxicological impact of cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) in alcohol-induced liver damage, its activity can be regarded as a variable for drug action in patients with alcoholic liver disease as CYP2E1 is involved in the metabolism of several drugs, for example, paracetamol and halogenated anesthetics. The purpose of our study was to acquire detailed knowledge of CYP2E1 activity in patients with progressingly severe manifestations of alcoholic liver disease. METHODS: The concentration ratio of 6-hydroxy-chlorzoxazone/chlorzoxazone in plasma 2 h after ingestion of 500 mg chlorzoxazone (so-called metabolic ratio) has been shown to reflect CYP2E1 activity in vivo. We examined CYP2E1 activity in 56 Caucasian inpatients with minor (n=20), more pronounced (n=14) and severe alcoholic liver disease (n=22). Alcohol abusers were compared to healthy teetotallers (n=14). RESULTS: Metabolic ratios were increased 3-fold in actively drinking (ethanol-induced) compared to abstaining (non-induced) patients with alcoholic liver disease (1.19+/-0.84 vs. 0.44+/-0.45, mean+/-SD, (p<0.0001). CYP2E1 activity was significantly lower in non-induced patients with severe alcoholic liver disease (0.19+/-0.10) than in healthy controls (0.50+/-0.28, p<0.01), abstaining alcohol abusers with minor (0.67+/-0.60, p<0.01) and more pronounced alcoholic liver disease (0.53+/-0.31, p<0.01). When non-induced patients with alcoholic liver disease were arranged in progressing order of liver damage (minor, more pronounced, severe alcoholic liver disease), there was a significant decline in CYP2E1 activity (p=0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: In non-induced patients, CYP2E1 activity decreases in line with severity of alcoholic liver disease. CYP2E1-mediated drug metabolism is significantly impaired in severe alcoholic liver disease.

Determination of propafenone and its phase I and phase II metabolites in plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

A sensitive method was developed to determine propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone, N-despropylpropafenone and propafenone glucuronides in human plasma and urine by HPLC-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry with the respective deuterated analogues as internal standards. The analytes were extracted by a single solid-phase extraction, collecting two fractions, one containing the glucuronides and the other propafenone and the phase I metabolites 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-despropylpropafenone. The mobile phases used for HPLC were: (A) 5 mM ammonium acetate in water and (B) 5 mM ammonium acetate in methanol-tetrahydrofuran (50:50, v/v). Separation of the diastereoisomeric propafenone glucuronides was achieved on a Spherisorb ODS 2 column (150 x 2.0 mm I.D., particle size 5 microm) at a flow-rate of 0.3 ml/min using a linear gradient from 20% B to 50% B in 15 min. For separation of propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone and N-desalkylpropafenone a linear gradient from 50% B to 80% B in 10 min was employed. The mass spectrometer was operated in the selected ion monitoring mode using the respective MH+ ions for quantification. The limits of quantification achieved with this method were 10 pmol/ml for propafenone, 5-hydroxypropafenone, R- and S-propafenone glucuronide and 20 pmol/ml for N-desalkylpropafenone using 0.5 ml of plasma. Reproducibility and accuracy was below 12% for each analyte over the whole concentration range measured. The method was applied to a pharmacokinetic study assessing the influence of rifampicin on propafenone disposition.

Chronopharmacology of intravenous and oral modified release verapamil.

AIMS: Using a stable isotope technique which allows simultaneous and differential measuring of orally and intravenously administered drugs we compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of unlabelled modified release verapamil p.o. (steady state) and deuterated verapamil i.v. (single dose) following morning and evening administration. METHODS: Twelve female and 12 male healthy volunteers were studied in a randomized, crossover design. During the last day of each treatment period (day 6 and day 10) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PR interval) of verapamil were assessed; 1 h before ingestion of a new R/S-verapamil 240 mg modified release formulation (08.00 h vs 20.00 h) a single dose of 10 mg d7-R/S-verapamil was administered intravenously. Serum levels of unlabelled and labelled R/S-verapamil were measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. In selected samples of serum which were chosen at tmin,po and tmax,po the enantiomers were separated by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography in order to calculate R- to S-verapamil serum concentration ratios. RESULTS: We observed no significant differences in pharmacokinetics (AUCpo, Cmax, tmax, CLo, F and R/S enantiomer ratio) between morning and evening treatment with modified release verapamil and there was no influence of time of dosing on mean prolongation of PR interval. AUCiv, CL, Vss and d7-R/d7-S enantiomer ratio following verapamil i.v. did not show circadian variation. t1/2 was slightly but statistically significantly increased after the morning infusion. PR-prolongation was significantly greater after verapamil i.v. in the morning than in the evening. The 90% confidence intervals of the differences between morning and evening administration in AUCpo, Cmax and AUCiv were within the equivalence range of 0.8-1.25. CONCLUSIONS: Time of dosing has no significant influence on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this new modified release formulation of verapamil. Circadian variation in presystemic metabolism of verapamil was not observed.

Gut wall metabolism of verapamil in older people: effects of rifampicin-mediated enzyme induction.

AIMS: To investigate prehepatic metabolism of verapamil and its inducibility by rifampicin in older subjects. METHODS: Eight older subjects (67.1 +/- 1.2 years mean +/- s.d.) received racemic, unlabelled verapamil orally for 16 days (120 mg twice daily). Rifampicin (600 mg daily) was coadministered from day 5 to 16. Using stable isotope technology (i.e. intravenous coadministration of 10 mg deuterated verapamil) during verapamil steady-state without (day 4) and with rifampicin (day 16) bioavailability, prehepatic and hepatic extraction of verapamil were determined. The effects of verapamil on AV-conduction were measured by the maximum PR interval prolongation (%). RESULTS: Bioavailability of the cardiovascularly more active S-verapamil decreased from 14.2 +/- 4.3% on day 4 to 0.6 +/- 0.5% on day 16 (P < 0.001). As a consequence, effects of orally administered verapamil on the AV-conduction were nearly abolished (14.4 +/- 9.4% vs 2.7 +/- 2.6%, P < 0.01). This could be attributed to a considerable increase of prehepatic extraction during treatment with rifampicin (41.7 +/- 22.1% vs 91.6 +/- 6.6%, P < 0.01) and to a minor extent to induction of hepatic metabolism (73.7 +/- 9.4% vs 91.6 +/- 5.3%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prehepatic metabolism of verapamil occurred in the group of older people investigated. Induction of gut wall metabolism most likely was the major reason for the loss of verapamil effect during treatment with rifampicin in this group of older subjects.