Validation of a noninvasive prognostic signature for allograft failure following BK virus associated nephropathy.

Identifying kidney transplant recipients at risk for graft failure following BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) may allow personalization of therapy. We have reported that a noninvasive composite signature of urinary cell level of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1(PAI-1) mRNA and serum creatinine level, measured at the time of BKVN diagnosis, is prognostic of graft failure. In this investigation, we determined whether the composite signature is prognostic of graft failure in an independent cohort of 25 patients with BKVN. Of the 25 patients, 8 developed graft failure and 17 did not. We measured urinary cell levels of PAI-1 mRNA, 18S rRNA, and BKV VP1 mRNA at the time of BKVN diagnosis and evaluated clinical parameters including Banff pathology scores, acute rejection, and graft function. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the noninvasive composite signature was 0.95 (P < .001) for prognosticating graft failure. The previously reported threshold of -0.858 predicted graft failure with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 94%. Our current study validates the use of composite signature and the threshold of -0.858 to identify those at risk for graft failure following BKVN diagnosis, and supports future studies utilizing the composite signature score to personalize treatment of BKVN.

Urinary cell mRNA profiles predictive of human kidney allograft status.

Kidney allograft status is currently characterized using the invasive percutaneous needle core biopsy procedure. The procedure has become safer over the years, but challenges and complications still exist including sampling error, interobserver variability, bleeding, arteriovenous fistula, graft loss, and even death. Because the most common type of acute rejection is distinguished by inflammatory cells exiting the intravascular compartment and gaining access to the renal tubular space, we reasoned that a kidney allograft may function as an in vivo flow cytometer and sort cells involved in rejection into urine. To test this idea, we developed quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for absolute quantification of mRNA and pre-amplification protocols to overcome the low RNA yield from urine. Here, we review our single center urinary cell mRNA profiling studies that led to the multicenter Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation (CTOT-04) study and the discovery and validation of a 3-gene signature of 18S rRNA-normalized measures of CD3ε mRNA and IP-10 mRNA and 18S rRNA that is diagnostic and predictive of acute cellular rejection in the kidney allograft. We also review our development of a 4-gene signature of mRNAs for vimentin, NKCC2, E-cadherin, and 18S rRNA diagnostic of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA).

Urine Metabolite Profiles Predictive of Human Kidney Allograft Status.

Noninvasive diagnosis and prognostication of acute cellular rejection in the kidney allograft may help realize the full benefits of kidney transplantation. To investigate whether urine metabolites predict kidney allograft status, we determined levels of 749 metabolites in 1516 urine samples from 241 kidney graft recipients enrolled in the prospective multicenter Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04 study. A metabolite signature of the ratio of 3-sialyllactose to xanthosine in biopsy specimen-matched urine supernatants best discriminated acute cellular rejection biopsy specimens from specimens without rejection. For clinical application, we developed a high-throughput mass spectrometry-based assay that enabled absolute and rapid quantification of the 3-sialyllactose-to-xanthosine ratio in urine samples. A composite signature of ratios of 3-sialyllactose to xanthosine and quinolinate to X-16397 and our previously reported urinary cell mRNA signature of 18S ribosomal RNA, CD3ε mRNA, and interferon-inducible protein-10 mRNA outperformed the metabolite signatures and the mRNA signature. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the composite metabolite-mRNA signature was 0.93, and the signature was diagnostic of acute cellular rejection with a specificity of 84% and a sensitivity of 90%. The composite signature, developed using solely biopsy specimen-matched urine samples, predicted future acute cellular rejection when applied to pristine samples taken days to weeks before biopsy. We conclude that metabolite profiling of urine offers a noninvasive means of diagnosing and prognosticating acute cellular rejection in the human kidney allograft, and that the combined metabolite and mRNA signature is diagnostic and prognostic of acute cellular rejection with very high accuracy.

Urinary-cell mRNA profile and acute cellular rejection in kidney allografts.

BACKGROUND: The standard test for the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplants is the renal biopsy. Noninvasive tests would be preferable. METHODS: We prospectively collected 4300 urine specimens from 485 kidney-graft recipients from day 3 through month 12 after transplantation. Messenger RNA (mRNA) levels were measured in urinary cells and correlated with allograft-rejection status with the use of logistic regression. RESULTS: A three-gene signature of 18S ribosomal (rRNA)-normalized measures of CD3ε mRNA and interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) mRNA, and 18S rRNA discriminated between biopsy specimens showing acute cellular rejection and those not showing rejection (area under the curve [AUC], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 by receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis). The cross-validation estimate of the AUC was 0.83 by bootstrap resampling, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good fit (P=0.77). In an external-validation data set, the AUC was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.86; P<0.001) and did not differ significantly from the AUC in our primary data set (P=0.13). The signature distinguished acute cellular rejection from acute antibody-mediated rejection and borderline rejection (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.89; P<0.001). It also distinguished patients who received anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies from those who received T-cell-depleting antibodies (P<0.001) and was diagnostic of acute cellular rejection in both groups. Urinary tract infection did not affect the signature (P=0.69). The average trajectory of the signature in repeated urine samples remained below the diagnostic threshold for acute cellular rejection in the group of patients with no rejection, but in the group with rejection, there was a sharp rise during the weeks before the biopsy showing rejection (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A molecular signature of CD3ε mRNA, IP-10 mRNA, and 18S rRNA levels in urinary cells appears to be diagnostic and prognostic of acute cellular rejection in kidney allografts. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).

Urinary cell mRNA profiles and differential diagnosis of acute kidney graft dysfunction.

Noninvasive tests to differentiate the basis for acute dysfunction of the kidney allograft are preferable to invasive allograft biopsies. We measured absolute levels of 26 prespecified mRNAs in urine samples collected from kidney graft recipients at the time of for-cause biopsy for acute allograft dysfunction and investigated whether differential diagnosis of acute graft dysfunction is feasible using urinary cell mRNA profiles. We profiled 52 urine samples from 52 patients with biopsy specimens indicating acute rejection (26 acute T cell-mediated rejection and 26 acute antibody-mediated rejection) and 32 urine samples from 32 patients with acute tubular injury without acute rejection. A stepwise quadratic discriminant analysis of mRNA measures identified a linear combination of mRNAs for CD3ε, CD105, TLR4, CD14, complement factor B, and vimentin that distinguishes acute rejection from acute tubular injury; 10-fold cross-validation of the six-gene signature yielded an estimate of the area under the curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.98). In a decision analysis, the six-gene signature yielded the highest net benefit across a range of reasonable threshold probabilities for biopsy. Next, among patients diagnosed with acute rejection, a similar statistical approach identified a linear combination of mRNAs for CD3ε, CD105, CD14, CD46, and 18S rRNA that distinguishes T cell-mediated rejection from antibody-mediated rejection, with a cross-validated estimate of the area under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.93). Incorporation of these urinary cell mRNA signatures in clinical decisions may reduce the number of biopsies in patients with acute dysfunction of the kidney allograft.

Urinary cell mRNA profiling of kidney allograft recipients: Development of a portable protocol for noninvasive diagnosis of T cell mediated rejection and BK virus nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: We developed urinary cell mRNA profiling for noninvasive diagnosis of acute T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), two significant post-transplant complications. Our profiling protocol for the multicenter Clinical Trial of Transplantation-04 (CTOT-04) study consisted of centrifugation of urine to prepare cell pellets, washes, addition of an RNA preservative, storage at 800C and shipment in cold containers to our Gene Expression Monitoring (GEM) Core for RNA isolation and quantification of mRNA in RT-qPCR assays. To simplify profiling, we developed a filter-based protocol (ZFBP) that eliminated the need for centrifugation, RNA preservative, storage at 800C, and shipment in cold containers for mRNA profiling. Furthermore, we trained kidney allograft recipients to perform the filtration of urine at home using the filter and post the urinary cell lysate containing the RNA at ambient temperature to our GEM Core for profiling. Here, we report our refinement of ZFBP and investigation of its diagnostic performance characteristics. METHODS: Total RNA was isolated from kidney allograft biopsy-matched urines using a filter-based protocol complemented by a silica-membrane-based cartridge for mRNA enrichment, the Weill Cornell Hybrid Protocol (WCHP). Absolute copy numbers of CD3ε mRNA, CXCL10 mRNA, and 18S rRNA, components of the CTOT-04 three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature, and urinary cell BKV VP 1 mRNA copy number were measured using RT-qPCR assays. Mann-Whitney test, Fischer exact test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used for data analyses. RESULTS: Urinary cell three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature scores in urines processed using the WCHP discriminated kidney allograft recipients with TCMR (12 TCMR biopsies from 11 patients) from those without TCMR or BKVN (29 No TCMR/No BKVN biopsies from 29 patients). The median (25th and 75th percentiles) score of the CTOT-04 three-gene TCMR diagnostic signature was -0.448 (-1.664, 0.204) in the TCMR group and - 2.542 (-3.267, -1.365) in the No TCMR/ No BKVN group (P = 0.0005, Mann-Whitney test). ROC curve analysis discriminated the TCMR group from the No TCMR/ No BKVN group; the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.84 (95% Confidence Intervals [CI], 0.69 to 0.98) (P < 0.001), and TCMR was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI, 35 to 89) at a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 67 to 95) using the CTOT-04 validated cutpoint of -1.213 (P = 0.0016, Fisher exact test). BKV VP1 mRNA copy number in urines processed using the WCHP discriminated patients with BKVN (n = 7) from patients without TCMR or BKVN (n = 29) and the AUROC was 1.0 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.00) (P < 0.0001) and BKVN was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 42 to 99) at a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 85 to 100) with the previously validated cutpoint of 6.5 × 108 BKV-VP1 mRNA copies per microgram of RNA (P < 0.0001, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: Urine processed using the WCHP predicted TCMR and BKVN in kidney allograft recipients. WCHP represents not only a significant advance toward the portability of urinary cell mRNA profiling but also improved patient management by minimizing their visits for urine collection.

Evaluation of Immunocompetence and Biomarkers of Tolerance in Chimeric and Immunosuppression-free Kidney Allograft Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Thirty-seven patients have received a living-donor kidney transplant in a phase 2 study designed to induce tolerance with facilitated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The study protocol is based on tolerogenic CD8 + /T-cell receptor - facilitating cells (FCR001; also including hematopoietic stem cells and αß-T-cell receptor + T cells) and low-dose, nonmyeloablative conditioning. Persistent chimerism allowing full immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal was achieved in 26 patients (time off IS 36-123 mo). METHODS: We evaluated biomarkers of tolerance through urinary cell mRNA profiling and immunocompetence to respond to vaccination in these patients. We also assessed kidney function and metabolic parameters compared with standard-of-care patients on IS. RESULTS: Persistently chimeric patients retained chimerism after removal of IS and remained rejection free without donor HLA-specific antibody development. The presence of donor chimerism at >50% correlated with a signature of tolerance in urinary cell mRNA profiles, with a uniquely elevated increase in the ratio of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 to granzyme B mRNA. Tolerance was associated with protection from recurrence of immune-mediated causes of kidney disease. Tolerant participants were safely vaccinated, developed protective immune responses, and did not lose chimerism after vaccination. When compared with kidney transplant recipients treated with standard IS, tolerant participants showed stable kidney function and reduced medication use for hypertension and hyperlipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that elimination of IS has distinct advantages in living-donor kidney allograft recipients.

MicroRNA expression profiles predictive of human renal allograft status.

Immune rejection of organ transplants is a life-threatening complication and is exemplified by alterations in the expression of protein-encoding genes. Because microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate the expression of genes implicated in adaptive immunity, we investigated whether acute rejection (AR) is associated with alterations in miRNA expression within allografts and whether expression profiles are diagnostic of AR and predict allograft function. Seven of 33 renal allograft biopsies (12 AR and 21 normal) were profiled using microfluidic cards containing 365 mature human miRNAs (training set), and a subset of differentially expressed miRNAs were quantified in the remaining 26 allograft biopsies (validation set). We found a strong association between intragraft expression of miRNAs and messenger RNAs (mRNAs), and that AR, and renal allograft function, could be predicted with a high level of precision using intragraft levels of miRNAs. Our investigation of miRNA expression in normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) showed that miRNAs (miR-142-5p, -155, and -223) overexpressed in AR biopsies are highly expressed in PBMCs, and that stimulation with the mitogen phytohaemagglutinin results in an increase in the abundance of miR-155 and a decrease in miR-223 and let-7c. Quantification of miRNAs in primary cultures of human renal epithelial cells (HRECs) showed that miR-30a-3p, -10b, and let-7c are highly expressed in HRECs, and that stimulation results in a decreased expression of miR-30a-3p. Our studies, in addition to suggesting a cellular basis for the altered intragraft expression of miRNAs, propose that miRNA expression patterns may serve as biomarkers of human renal allograft status.

Development of a Bak gene based standard curve for absolute quantification of BK virus in real time quantitative PCR assay and noninvasive diagnosis of BK virus nephropathy in kidney allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) is a frequent and serious post-transplant complication and undermines realization of the full benefits of kidney transplantation. We developed a Bak amplicon-based standard curve for absolute quantification of BKV VP1 mRNA copy number in the real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay and investigated the performance characteristics of this novel assay. METHODS: We determined analytical specificity, sensitivity, and precision of our 73 bp mouse Bak amplicon based standard curve for absolute quantification of BKV VP1 mRNA in RT-qPCR assays. The diagnostic accuracy of the Bak standard curve in the RT-qPCR assay for the noninvasive diagnosis of BKVN in human kidney allograft recipients was investigated by quantification of BKV VP1 mRNA copy number in 192 urine samples matched to 192 kidney allograft biopsies from 155 unique kidney allograft recipients. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the threshold cycles (Ct) and BKV VP1 mRNA copy number observed in the RT-qPCR assay with the Bak standard curve or the BKV standard curve. RESULTS: Performance characteristics of the Bak amplicon-based RT-qPCR assay were exceptional with a slope of -3.291, Y-intercept of 38.60, R2 value of 1.00, efficiency of 101% and error of 0.014. Amplification was specific for the Bak amplicon. Intra assay standard deviation (SD) was 0.08 or less and inter assay SD was 0.11 or less for 31 cycles or less of amplification of the Bak amplicon. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of BKV VP1 mRNA copy number in 192 biopsy matched urines yielded an area under the ROC of 0.982 (95% CI, 0.964 to 0.999, P < 0.0001) for discriminating patients with BKVN biopsies from patients without BKVN biopsies. The striking identity in the measurement of BKV VP1 mRNA copy numbers in the Bak amplicon-based RT-qPCR assay and in the BKV amplicon-based RT-qPCR assay was shown by an ICC of 1.00 when the Cts were compared, and an ICC of 0.99 when the log10 BKV VP1 mRNA copy numbers were compared. CONCLUSIONS: Bak standard curve for absolute quantification of BKV VP1 mRNA copy number in the RT-qPCR assay demonstrated high efficiency, short and long-term precision and analytical specificity. BKVN was diagnosed with high accuracy. Our new findings, viewed in the light of our earlier demonstration that absolute quantification of a panel of mRNAs encoding immunoregulatory proteins is feasible with the Bak amplicon-based RT-qPCR assays, suggest that the Bak standard curve could serve as a universal calibrator for absolute quantification of transcripts in RT-qPCR assays and help reduce the workload, costs and eliminate contamination of genes of interest by repeated amplification of gene specific standard curves.

HLA-mismatched renal transplantation without maintenance immunosuppression.

Five patients with end-stage renal disease received combined bone marrow and kidney transplants from HLA single-haplotype mismatched living related donors, with the use of a nonmyeloablative preparative regimen. Transient chimerism and reversible capillary leak syndrome developed in all recipients. Irreversible humoral rejection occurred in one patient. In the other four recipients, it was possible to discontinue all immunosuppressive therapy 9 to 14 months after the transplantation, and renal function has remained stable for 2.0 to 5.3 years since transplantation. The T cells from these four recipients, tested in vitro, showed donor-specific unresponsiveness and in specimens from allograft biopsies, obtained after withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy, there were high levels of P3 (FOXP3) messenger RNA (mRNA) but not granzyme B mRNA.

Urinary cell mRNA profiling of kidney allograft recipients: A systematic investigation of a filtration based protocol for the simplification of urine processing.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is a life-restorative therapy, but immune rejection undermines allograft survival. Urinary cell mRNA profiles offer a noninvasive means of diagnosing kidney allograft rejection, but urine processing protocols have logistical constraints. We aimed to determine whether the centrifugation-based method for urinary cell mRNA profiling could be replaced with a simpler filtration-based method without undermining quality. METHODS: We isolated RNA from urine collected from kidney allograft recipients using the Cornell centrifugation-based protocol (CCBP) or the Zymo filter-based protocol (ZFBP) and compared RNA purity and yield using a spectrophotometer or a fluorometer and measured absolute copy number of transcripts using customized real-time quantitative PCR assays. We investigated the performance characteristics of RNA isolated using ZFBP and stored either at -80 °C or at ambient temperature for 2 to 4 days and also when shipped to our Gene Expression Monitoring (GEM) Core at ambient temperature. We examined the feasibility of initial processing of urine samples by kidney allograft recipients trained by the GEM Core staff and the diagnostic utility for acute rejection, of urine processed using the ZFBP. RESULTS: RNA purity (P = 0.0007, Wilcoxon matched paired signed-ranks test) and yield (P < 0.0001) were higher with ZFBP vs. CCBP, and absolute copy number of 18S rRNA was similar (P = 0.79) following normalization of RNA yield by reverse transcribing a constant amount of RNA isolated using either protocol. RNA purity, yield, and absolute copy numbers of 18S rRNA, TGF-ß1 mRNA and microRNA-26a were not different (P > 0.05) in the filtrates containing RNA stored either at -80 °C or at ambient temperature for 2 to 4 days or shipped overnight at ambient temperature. RNA purity, yield, and absolute copy numbers of 18S rRNA and TGF-ß1 mRNA were also not different (P > 0.05) between home processed and laboratory processed urine filtrates. Urinary cell levels of mRNA for granzyme B (P = 0.01) and perforin (P = 0.0002) in the filtrates were diagnostic of acute rejection in human kidney allografts. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary cell mRNA profiling was simplified using the ZFBP without undermining RNA quality or diagnostic utility. Home processing by the kidney allograft recipients, the stability of RNA containing filtrates at ambient temperature, and the elimination of the need for centrifuges and freezers represent some of the advantages of ZFBP over the CCBP for urinary cell mRNA profiling.

FOXP3 mRNA Profile Prognostic of Acute T Cell-mediated Rejection and Human Kidney Allograft Survival.

BACKGROUND: T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is the most frequent type of acute rejection and is associated with kidney allograft failure. Almost 40% of TCMR episodes are nonresponsive to therapy, and molecular mechanisms for the nonresponsiveness are unknown. Our single-center study identified that urinary cell FOXP3 mRNA abundance predicts TCMR reversibility and allograft survival. METHODS: We developed PCR assays and measured absolute copy numbers of transcripts for FOXP3, CD25, CD3E, perforin, and 18S rRNA in 3559 urines from 480 kidney allograft recipients prospectively enrolled in the multicenter Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04. In this replication study, we investigated the association between mRNA profile and TCMR diagnosis, TCMR reversibility, and allograft survival. RESULTS: 18S rRNA normalized levels of mRNA for FOXP3 (P = 0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test), CD25 (P = 0.01), CD3E (P < 0.0001), and perforin (P < 0.0001) were diagnostic of TCMR, but only FOXP3 mRNA level predicted TCMR reversibility (ROC AUC = 0.764; 95% confidence interval, 0.611-0.917; P = 0.008). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that urinary cell FOXP3 mRNA level predicted reversal, independent of clinical variables. A composite model of clinical variables and FOXP3 mRNA (AUC = 0.889; 95% CI, 0.781-0.997; P < 0.001) outperformed FOXP3 mRNA or clinical variables in predicting TCMR reversibility (P = 0.01, likelihood ratio test). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses showed that FOXP3 mRNA level predicts kidney allograft survival (P = 0.047) but not after controlling for TCMR reversal (P = 0.477). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary cell level of FOXP3 mRNA is diagnostic of TCMR, predicts TCMR reversibility, and is prognostic of kidney allograft survival via a mechanism involving TCMR reversal.

Urinary Cell Transcriptome Profiling and Identification of ITM2A, SLAMF6, and IKZF3 as Biomarkers of Acute Rejection in Human Kidney Allografts.

Identification of a shared gene expression pattern between T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in human kidney allografts may help prioritize targets for the treatment of both types of acute rejection. METHODS: We performed RNA sequencing and bioinformatics of genome-wide transcriptome profiles of urinary cells to identify novel mRNAs shared between TCMR and AMR and of mechanistic relevance. Customized RT-QPCR assays were then used to validate their abundance in urinary cells. Urinary cell transcriptome profiles and mRNA abundance were assessed in 22 urine samples matched to 22 TCMR biopsies, 7 samples matched to 7 AMR biopsies, and 24 samples matched to 24 No Rejection (NR) biopsies and correlated with biopsy diagnosis. RESULTS: RNA sequencing data and bioinformatics identified 127 genes in urine to be shared between TCMR and AMR. We selected 3 novel mRNAs-ITM2A, SLAMF6, and IKZF3-for absolute quantification and validation by customized RT-QPCR assays. The abundance of all 3 mRNAs was significantly higher in urine matched to TCMR or AMR than in urine matched to NR biopsies. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis showed that all 3 mRNAs distinguished TCMR or AMR from NR. Their abundance was similar in patients with TCMR and those with AMR. CONCLUSIONS: State-of-the-art antirejection therapies are mostly effective to treat TCMR but not AMR. Our identification of mRNAs shared between TCMR and AMR and contributing to T cell-B cell interactions may help prioritize therapeutic targets for the simultaneous treatment of TCMR and AMR.

Transforming growth factor beta and excess burden of renal disease.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is more frequent in African Americans (blacks) compared to whites. Because renal fibrosis is a correlate of progressive renal failure and a dominant feature of ESRD, and because transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta1) can induce fibrosis and renal insufficiency, we hypothesized that TGF-beta1 hyperexpression is more frequent in blacks compared to whites. We measured circulating levels of TGF-beta1 in black and white patients with ESRD, hypertension, and in normal patients. We demonstrated that circulating levels of TGF-beta1 are higher in black ESRD patients, hypertensive patients, and normal control patients compared to their white counterparts. Our preliminary genetic analyses suggest that TGF-beta1 DNA polymorphisms are different in blacks and whites. Our observations of hyperexpression of TGF-beta1 in blacks suggest a mechanism for the increased prevalence of renal failure and hypertensive target organ damage in this population.

Messenger RNA for FOXP3 in the urine of renal-allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of renal transplantation after an episode of acute rejection is difficult to predict, even with an allograft biopsy. METHODS: We studied urine specimens from 36 subjects with acute rejection, 18 subjects with chronic allograft nephropathy, and 29 subjects with normal biopsy results. Levels of messenger RNA (mRNA) for FOXP3, a specification and functional factor for regulatory T lymphocytes, and mRNA for CD25, CD3epsilon, perforin, and 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) were measured with a kinetic, quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction assay. We examined associations of mRNA levels with acute rejection, rejection reversal, and graft failure. RESULTS: The log-transformed mean (+/-SE) ratio of FOXP3 mRNA copies to 18S ribosomal RNA copies was higher in urine from the group with acute rejection (3.8+/-0.5) than in the group with chronic allograft nephropathy (1.3+/-0.7) or the group with normal biopsy results (1.6+/-0.4) (P<0.001 by the Kruskal-Wallis test). FOXP3 mRNA levels were inversely correlated with serum creatinine levels measured at the time of biopsy in the acute-rejection group (Spearman's correlation coefficient = -0.38, P=0.02) but not in the group with chronic allograft nephropathy or the group with normal biopsy results. Analyses of receiver-operating-characteristic curves demonstrated that reversal of acute rejection can be predicted with 90 percent sensitivity and 73 percent specificity with use of the optimal identified cutoff for FOXP3 mRNA of 3.46 (P=0.001). FOXP3 mRNA levels identified subjects at risk for graft failure within six months after the incident episode of acute rejection (relative risk for the lowest third of FOXP3 mRNA levels, 6; P=0.02). None of the other mRNA levels were predictive of reversal of acute rejection or graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of FOXP3 mRNA in urine may offer a noninvasive means of improving the prediction of outcome of acute rejection of renal transplants.

Hyperexpression of Foxp3 and IDO during acute rejection of islet allografts.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the hypothesis that Foxp3+ cells are an integral component of antiallograft immunity but are dominated by pathogenic effectors. METHODS: Wild-type H-2b C57BL/6 (B6) mice or B6 mice with a targeted disruption of c-Rel gene (c-Rel-/-) were used as recipients of islet grafts from allogeneic DBA/2 (H-2d) mice or syngeneic B6 mice. We developed kinetic quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays and measured intragraft expression of mRNA for Foxp3, IDO, cytolytic molecules, proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines/receptors. RESULTS: Intraislet levels of mRNA for Foxp3, IDO, CD3, CD25, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, RANTES, IP-10, and CXCR3 were highest in DBA/2 islet allografts from WT B6 recipients compared to DBA/2 islet allografts from c-Rel-/- B6 recipients or syngeneic B6 islet grafts from WT B6 mice. The ratio of granzyme B or IFN-gamma to Foxp3 was higher with the DBA/2 islet allografts from the WT B6 recipients compared to DBA/2 islet allografts from c-Rel-/- B6 recipients or B6 islet grafts from WT B6 recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Foxp3+ cells are an integral component of acute rejection of allografts but may be dominated by pathogenic effectors.

Molecular signatures of urinary cells distinguish acute rejection of renal allografts from urinary tract infection.

Acute rejection (AR) and urinary tract infection (UTI) continue to plague renal transplantation. We tested the hypotheses that UTI does not increase granzyme B mRNA levels in urinary cells, and that the levels distinguish AR from UTI. We measured the levels of granzyme B mRNA in 15 urine specimens from renal allograft recipients with UTI, 29 specimens from patients with AR but without UTI, and 14 specimens from patients without AR and without UTI. We also measured transcript levels in urine specimens from 41 nontransplant individuals, 11 with UTI and 30 without UTI. UTI did not increase granzyme B mRNA levels. Granzyme B mRNA levels were lower in renal allograft recipients with UTI compared with those with AR (P<0.0001). We conclude that bacterial UTI is unlikely to confound AR diagnosis made by measurement of granzyme B mRNA levels in urinary cells.

CD103 mRNA levels in urinary cells predict acute rejection of renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: CD103 is displayed on the cell surface of alloreactive CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and is a critical component for the intraepithelial homing of T cells. Because intratubular localization of mononuclear cells is a feature of acute cellular rejection of renal allografts, we explored the hypothesis that CD103 messenger (m)RNA levels in urinary cells predict acute rejection. METHODS: We collected 89 urine specimens from 79 recipients of renal allografts. RNA was isolated from the urinary cells, and we measured CD103 mRNA levels and a constitutively expressed 18S ribosomal (r)RNA with the use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS: CD103 mRNA levels, but not 18S rRNA levels, were higher in urinary cells from 30 patients with an episode of acute rejection (32 biopsies and 32 urine samples) compared with the levels in 12 patients with other findings on allograft biopsy (12 biopsies and 12 urine samples), 12 patients with biopsy evidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (12 biopsies and 12 urine samples), and 25 patients with stable graft function after renal transplantation (0 biopsies and 33 urine samples) (P = 0.001; one-way analysis of variance). Acute rejection was predicted with a sensitivity of 59% and a specificity of 75% using natural log-transformed value 8.16 CD103 copies per microgram as the cutoff value (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CD103 mRNA levels in urinary cells are diagnostic of acute rejection of renal allografts. Because CD103 is a cell surface marker of intratubular CD8 CTLs, a noninvasive assessment of cellular traffic into the allograft may be feasible by the measurement of CD103 mRNA levels in urinary cells.

Noninvasive diagnosis of BK virus nephritis by measurement of messenger RNA for BK virus VP1 in urine.

BACKGROUND: Polyoma virus type BK (BKV) nephritis has emerged as an important cause of renal allograft dysfunction and graft failure. Its diagnosis is contingent on the invasive procedure of allograft biopsy. A noninvasive diagnostic test for BKV nephritis could improve clinical outcome. METHODS: We obtained 25 urine specimens from 8 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed BKV nephritis, 31 samples from 28 recipients in whom BKV nephritis was excluded by allograft biopsy, and 74 specimens from 34 patients with stable allograft function. RNA was isolated from the urinary cells and reverse transcribed to complementary DNA. We designed gene-specific oligonucleotide primers and probes for the measurement of messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding BKV VP1 protein and a constitutively expressed 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. We explored the hypothesis that BKV VP1 mRNA levels predict BKV nephritis. RESULTS: The levels of BKV VP1 mRNA but not the levels of 18S rRNA predicted BKV nephritis. Analysis involving the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that BKV nephritis can be predicted with a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 93.9% with the use of a cutoff value of 6.5 x 10 BKV VP1 mRNA copy number per nanogram of total RNA ( <0.00001). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the calculated area under the curve was 0.949 (95% confidence interval, 0.912 to 0.987, <0.00001) for BKV VP1 mRNA levels and 0.562 (95% confidence interval, 0.417 to 0.708, >0.2) for 18S rRNA. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of BKV VP1 mRNA in urinary cells offers a noninvasive and accurate means of diagnosing BKV nephritis.

Proapoptotic Bax is hyperexpressed in isolated human islets compared with antiapoptotic Bcl-2.

BACKGROUND: Apoptosis is a well-documented pathway for islet cell death. One potential mechanism is overexpression of death-promoting Bax compared with antiapoptotic Bcl-2 in islets. METHODS: We isolated islets from 10 human pancreata and measured the expression of Bax mRNA and Bcl-2 mRNA by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; islet and pancreas expression of Bax, Bcl-2, activated caspase-3, and cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase were also assessed by immunohistochemistry. Islet cell apoptosis was evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay and by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SE) level of Bax mRNA was 336+/-79 copies per nanogram of total RNA, and the level of Bcl-2 mRNA was 36+/-10 (P=0.001). A positive correlation existed between islet expression of Bax mRNA and Bcl-2 mRNA (P=0.001). The islet Bax to Bcl-2 ratio was 10.8+/-1.3 and 1.71+/-0.3 for the spleens (P=0.0001). Bax mRNA (P=0.04), but not Bcl-2 mRNA, was expressed at a higher level in islets compared with spleens. Human islets contained large numbers of cells expressing Bax protein, whereas only infrequent islet cells expressed Bcl-2 protein, activated caspase-3, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. The apoptotic index was 5% by TUNEL assay, and the percentage of apoptotic islet cells was 9.7+/-2.5% by flow cytometry. Sections of human pancreas before islet isolation showed islet staining for Bax but not Bcl-2. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that isolated human islets express Bax at a higher level compared with Bcl-2 suggests a molecular mechanism for islet cell death by apoptosis. We hypothesize that reducing islet expression of Bax, or regulating its activation, will help preserve islet cell mass after islet transplantation.