The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence (MA) is critical to successful chronic disease management. It is not clear how social determinants of health (SDH) impact MA. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the evidence on the relationship between SDH and MA. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) format. A literature search was performed using three databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Clinical Trials Register in December of 2018. Included studies were completed in the USA, included adults aged 18 years and older, measured at least one social determinant of health, and medication adherence was the primary outcome measure. Data from included full texts were independently extracted using a standardized data extraction form. We then conducted a meta-analysis and pooled the odds ratios from the included studies for each social determinant as well as for all SDH factors collectively. RESULTS: A total of 3137 unduplicated abstracts were identified from our database searches. A total of 173 were selected for full text review after evaluating the abstract. A total of 29 articles were included for this systematic review. Economic-related SDH factors and MA were mostly commonly examined. The meta-analysis revealed a significant relationship between food insecurity (aOR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.42-0.7), housing instability (aOR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.44-0.93), and social determinants overall (aOR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.65-0.88) and medication adherence. DISCUSSION: Food insecurity and housing instability most consistently impacted medication adherence. Although included studies were heterogenous and varied widely in SDH and MA measurements, adverse social determinants overall were significantly associated with lower MA. The relationship between SDH and MA warrants more attention and research by health care providers and policymakers.

An Atypical Presentation of a Polyarticular Gout Flare: Case Report.

A 54-year-old man with a history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, osteoarthritis, and gout presented to the emergency department (ED) with dysuria, painful scrotal swelling, severe bilateral flank pain, back pain, atraumatic right arm (elbow and distally) pain and swelling, and bilateral knee pain. His physical exam was notable for fever, tachycardia, bilateral costovertebral angle (CVA) tenderness, exquisite pain, erythema, and swelling of bilateral knees and the right arm (elbow and distally). He met Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, was placed on Ceftriaxone for presumed septic pyelonephritis, and was admitted to the medicine team. With initially unremarkable imaging studies, the differential diagnosis was broadened, and subsequent infectious workups yielded grossly normal results. At the end of hospital day one, the patient remained febrile and without symptomatic improvement. Rheumatology was consulted and empirically treated; the patient with a dose of Anakinra due to concerns about a polyarticular flare of crystalline arthropathy. Subsequent arthrocentesis confirmed a final diagnosis of a polyarticular gout flare. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges a polyarticular gout flare poses and the importance of early involvement of specialists for prompt recognition, treatment, and avoidance of unnecessary interventions.

Remote Patient Monitoring for Hypertension: Feasibility and Outcomes of a Clinic-Based Pilot in a Minority Population.

BACKGROUND: In the US 48% of adults have hypertension, with direct costs in excess of $130 billion per year. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been discussed as a useful tool in the treatment of hypertension, but few studies evaluate its cost effectiveness or efficacy in minority, lower socio-economic (SES) populations. Our study aims to evaluate the clinical and financial outcomes of RPM in hypertension management in a primarily minority, low-SES population. METHODS: In this prospective cohort pilot study, patients with uncontrolled primary hypertension (defined via Joint National Committee 8 guidelines) were randomly selected from a single academically affiliated primary care clinic. Patients were enrolled on a rolling basis for 90 days. Patients were given blood pressure cuffs and transmission hubs and asked to transmit daily blood pressure readings. Patients were called weekly by research assistants and concerns were escalated to the primary care physician. The control group was the remaining 299 uncontrolled hypertensive patients from the same clinic population analyzed via retrospective chart records at the conclusion of the interventional study period. The primary outcome was blood pressure control. Secondary outcomes were relative improvement in systolic pressure and direct costs. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were enrolled into the RPM intervention; these patients were 54% female, 100% African American, and 77% Medicaid. When assessed via intention-to-treat analysis, patients in the intervention group had non-inferior blood pressure control at 90 days (46% experimental vs 31% control, P = .33) and average change in systolic blood pressure at 90 days (13.5 vs 3.7 mmHg, P = .174) while experiencing a significant reduction in office-based visits at 90 days (1.5 vs 5.9, P < .001) as compared to control. Results on per-protocol analysis also showed non-inferior BP control (63% vs 31%, P = .135). Financially, the program generated margins of $29 per patient at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in our minority- and Medicaid-predominant cohort achieved noninferior blood pressure control as compared to retrospective control at 90 days and a significant reduction in all-cause clinic visits at 90 days. The program generated little revenue per patient, with main barriers to implementation including patient compliance and payor denial.

COVID-19 and the Case for Medical Management and Primary Care.

Hospitals and health systems suffer an over-reliance on elective surgeries to remain profitable. As a result, systems report record losses, while demand for emergency room, hospital, and intensive care beds have surged. Studies have admitted that many surgeries are unnecessary, and physician leaders admit that profit plays a role in driving such needless cost and risk. Most diseases are better managed with medications and lifestyle changes. But it pays more to replace a knee than to prevent that replacement. We must bring surgical and medical value closer in-line. Communities of color are suffering disproportionately from coronavirus. The social determinants of health that lead to higher concentrations of hypertension and diabetes can be mitigated by investment in primary care. Such investment has been proven to decrease cost and increase quality of life. However, the United States spends 50% less on primary care, than other developed countries. While showing promise, telehealth is not a panacea. It relies on continued reimbursement parity, and there remains a digital divide. Any meaningful fix will draw the ire from those who profit from such a profligate system. If we want to improve quality, access and equity, while avoiding unnecessary hospitalizations, risky surgeries, and runaway costs, we must invest in primary care.

A Hematological Menace: Multiple Venous Thrombosis Complicated by Acquired Factor VIII Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) classically presents with spontaneous bleeding of mucosal sites, GI tract, and subcutaneous tissues, often leading to large hematomas and ecchymosis. Among documented cases, 50% are idiopathic and few have been associated with trauma or surgery. We present a case of life-threatening bleeding caused by AHA, following trauma and complicated by multiple venous thrombi. CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old man presented with multiple injuries secondary to trauma leading to extensive life-saving surgery. Two weeks post-operatively, he developed multiple deep venous thrombi and was started on anticoagulation. Twenty-four days post-operatively, he started bleeding from multiple mucosal sites and developed an abdominal hematoma. Anticoagulation was stopped, with administration of fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K. Diagnosis of AHA was made based on low factor VIII level and presence of factor VIII inhibitors after an appropriate battery of tests ruled out other possible diagnoses. He was started on steroids and recombinant factor VIIa, leading to immediate improvement. Once stable, Rituximab infusions resulted in decreasing factor VIII inhibitor levels, with gradual normalization of PTT. CONCLUSIONS: AHA remains a diagnostic challenge because of its rarity, leading to delay in diagnosis and causing significant morbidity and mortality. Elevated PTT relative to PT/INR is a strong clue which should be followed by mixing studies. Very few cases have been associated with surgery or trauma and relatively few large, controlled trials have compared different treatment modalities for AHA. Growing evidence supports anti-CD20 (Rituximab) as an effective treatment option, as in this case.

Takotsubo's Cardiomyopathy in a Patient with Kartagener's Syndrome.

A 46-year-old African-American male with past medical history significant for Kartagener's syndrome, essential hypertension, and HIV presented with acute chest pain. ECG and troponins indicated an acute myocardial infarction. Ventriculography confirmed dyskinesia of the left ventricle, with an EF of 25%. However the coronary catheterization showed nonobstructed coronaries. Ventricular contraction and EF were restored in 4 weeks. To our knowledge, this is the first incidence of Takotsubo's reported in a young patient with Kartagener's syndrome. Chronic lung disease may contribute to the development of Takotsubo's cardiomyopathy, which is a documented yet not fully understood phenomenon.

The effect of acute postoperative pain and chronic neuropathic pain on subsequent weight gain in the rat.

OBJECT: Acute postoperative pain has demonstrated effects on appetite and weight gain in human studies. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that chronic neuropathic pain has a more significant effect on weight than acute postsurgical pain. METHODS: One hundred eighteen rats were separated into 3 groups: common sciatic nerve ligation, surgery without ligation, and no surgery. Each group was further divided to undergo testing at 3, 7, and 14 days. On the day of testing, the rats were tested for signs of pressure and heat hyperalgesia and were weighed. RESULTS: The effect on the percentage of change in body weight from the day of surgery to the day of testing was statistically significant for both the condition (F = 15.0, p < 0.0001) and the day of testing (F = 43.3, p < 0.0001). The rats that received no surgery had a change in weight of 2.3% on Day 3, 4.0% on Day 7, and 10.7% on Day 14. In the nonligation surgery group, the change was -3.8% on Day 3, 2.0% on Day 7, and 9.7% on Day 14. In the ligation surgery group, the change was -6.3% on Day 3, -0.7% on Day 7, and 4.9% on Day 14. This group began gaining weight by Day 14 but continued to have less weight gain than the other groups by Day 14. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropathic pain inhibits weight gain more than normal, postsurgical pain. Recognizing the difference and initiating effective treatment for neuropathic pain may have an impact on the patient's nutrition.