Utilization Fraction of Reduction Mammoplasty Instrument Sets: Cost Savings and Efficiency Opportunities.

PURPOSE: Healthcare spending will account for 20% of US gross domestic product by 2028. One strategy to address rising costs is evaluating the utilization fraction (UF) of surgical trays. Utilization fraction averages between 13% and 27% among surgical specialties, yet data from plastic surgery are lacking. METHODS: This prospective observational study assessed UF of surgical instruments in all reduction mammoplasty performed at 2 sites in the same healthcare system over a 6-month period. Site 1 is a tertiary hospital and site 2, an outpatient surgical center. Utilization fraction was calculated as percent fraction of used, or if operating surgeons touched them, to opened instruments. A new surgical tray was created by removing instruments not used in 20% of cases. Reprocessing costs and savings were calculated using published reprocessing figures of $0.10 to $0.51 per instrument. Descriptive statistics and parametric variables reported as mean ± standard deviation. Unpaired Student t test was performed to determine statistical significance of findings ( P < 0.05). RESULTS: Four plastic surgeons performed 37 procedures, 11 at site 1 and 26 at site 2. At site 1, 112 instruments are opened in one tray with 53 unique and 59 duplicates. At site 2, 155 instruments are opened in 2 trays with 58 unique, 20 shared, and 77 duplicates. Instrument user did not vary by site ( P = 0.446), with 19 ± 3 instruments and 17 ± 3 instruments used per case; however, UF varied significantly ( P < 0.0001) with average UF of 16.6% ± 2.8% and 11.5% ± 1.7% at sites 1 and 2, respectively. Estimated reprocessing costs per case are currently $11.20 to $57.12 at site 1 and $15.50 to $79.05 at site 2, with unused instruments accounting for $9.34 to 47.64 and $13.72 to $69.96, respectively. The new surgical tray includes 32 instruments, 18 unique and 14 duplicates, with estimated reprocessing cost of $3.20 to $16.32 per case. Adoption would reduce reprocessing costs by approximately $8.00 to $40.80 and $12.30 to $62.73 per case at sites 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite studying a single, but common, plastic surgery procedure, our findings reveal consistency in excessive appropriation of instruments between sites with values similar to those in the literature. These findings exemplify a cost-saving opportunity at our institution and chance to optimize UF for other high-volume plastic surgery procedures.

Reimbursement Trends in Reduction Mammoplasty: A Single-Center Analysis of Insurance Reimbursements From 2012 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Medicare reimbursement for plastic surgery procedures increased by 2% while inflation increased by 19% in the past decade. Given increasing national breast reduction case volume and the negative impact decreased reimbursements have on surgeon well-being, we sought to evaluate actual surgeon reimbursements for bilateral breast reduction over a decade. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed including all identifiable breast reduction procedures (Current Procedure Terminology 19318) performed at a tertiary academic hospital between October 2011 and September 2021 (fiscal year 2012-2021). The annual number of patients undergoing breast reduction, the payor, and average yearly amounts reimbursed were evaluated and trended over time. Percent change from Medicare average yearly reimbursements was evaluated and trended over time. All values were adjusted to 2021 US dollars. RESULTS: During our study period, there were 486 bilateral breast reduction procedures with 36 outlier payments; therefore, 450 reimbursements were included in the study. There were 5 payors, and the average adjusted reimbursement amount was $2418.74 ± $1123.83. All private payors had significantly higher average reimbursement than Medicare ( P < 0.0001), and Medicare was the only payor with significant decrease in reimbursement over time (-$58.58 per year, 95% confidence interval, -$110.80 to -$6.33, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that a difference exists between public and private payors for bilateral breast reduction procedures. Private payor reimbursements outpaced inflation. Medicare is an unreliable benchmark that may indirectly lead to declining reimbursements over time.

Software-based Detection of Acute Rejection Changes in Face Transplant.

BACKGROUND: An objective, non-invasive method for redness detection during acute allograft rejection in face transplantation (FT) is lacking. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed with 688 images of 7 patients with face transplant (range, 1 to 108 months post-transplant). Healthy controls were matched to donor age, sex, and had no prior facial procedures. Rejection state was confirmed via tissue biopsy. An image-analysis software developed alongside VicarVision (Amsterdam, Netherlands) was used to produce R, a measure of differences between detectable color and absolute red. R is inversely proportional to redness, where lower R values correspond to increased redness. Linear mixed models were used to study fixed effect of rejection state on R values. Estimated marginal means of fitted models were calculated for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: Of 688 images, 175, 170, 202, and 141 images were attributable to Banff Grade 0,1,2, and 3, respectively. Estimated change in R value of facial allografts decreased with increasing Banff Grade (p = 0.0001). The mean R value of clinical rejection (Banff Grade ⅔) (16.67, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 14.79-18.58) was lower (p = 0.005) than non-rejection (Banff Grade 0/1) (19.38, 95%CI 17.43-21.33). Both clinical and non-rejection mean R values were lower (p = 0.0001) than healthy controls (24.12, 95%CI 20.96-27.28). CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that software-based analysis can detect and monitor acute rejection changes in FT. Future studies should expand on this tool's potential application in telehealth and as a screening tool for allograft rejection.

Plastic Surgery in the Time of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has swept the world in the last several months, causing massive disruption to existing social, economic, and health care systems. As with all medical fields, plastic and reconstructive surgery has been profoundly impacted across the entire spectrum of practice from academic medical centers to solo private practice. The decision to preserve vital life-saving equipment and cancel elective procedures to protect patients and medical staff has been extremely challenging on multiple levels. Frequent and inconsistent messaging disseminated by many voices on the national stage often conflicts and serves only to exacerbate an already difficult decision-making process. METHODS: A survey of relevant COVID-19 literature is presented, and bioethical principles are utilized to generate guidelines for plastic surgeons in patient care through this pandemic. RESULTS: A cohesive framework based upon core bioethical values is presented here to assist plastic surgeons in navigating this rapidly evolving global pandemic. CONCLUSION: Plastic surgeons around the world have been affected by COVID-19 and will adapt to continue serving their patients. The lessons learned in this present pandemic will undoubtedly prove useful in future challenges to come.

Software-based video analysis of functional outcomes of face transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of outcomes after face transplantation (FT) is necessary to provide sound evidence on the benefits of this life-giving surgery. Current methods for outcomes assessment, however, are imprecise or prone to subjectivity. Software-based video analysis may allow fast, objective and retrospective assessment of restoration of facial movements and functions after FT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recorded videos of 7 subjects before as well as every 3-6 months after facial transplantation. Patients performed the same sequence of facial movements in every video: smile, open mouth, purse lips, wrinkle nose, frown, close eyes, and lift eyebrows. The videos were retrospectively analyzed using EMOTIENT software, which is capable of automatic tracking and detailed measurements of facial movements and expressions. These measurements were subsequently compared to the same patient at different time points, as well as to the normal population. RESULTS: Open mouth, wrinkle nose and smile functions significantly improved in all patients when compared to pre-transplant functions; this improvement was significant at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplant, respectively. Lip purse, eye closure and frown functions improved by 6, 9, and 18 months after transplantation, respectively; however, improvement in these particular functions was not significantly with respect to pre-transplant. Face transplantation did not improve any of the patients' ability to lift their eyebrows. Most remarkably, mouth opening and smiling functions both reached values comparable to the normal population at 3 and 12 months after transplantation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Software-based video analysis provides a valuable assessment tool capable of objective, precise and reproducible analysis of facial movements and functions after FT.

Innovations in reconstructive microsurgery: Reconstructive transplantation.

In the past 20 years, reconstructive transplantation (RT) has emerged as a viable reconstructive option for carefully selected patients. More than 100 upper extremity and 40 face transplants have been performed worldwide to date. Concomitantly, the portfolio of reconstructive transplantation has been extended by additional procedures such as lower extremities, abdominal wall, neck, uterus, genitourinary, and pediatric transplants. In the present review article, we aim to summarize the current state of knowledge about this exciting field.

Pediatric face transplantation: a viable option?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Face transplantation is no longer a young field. Reported outcomes suggest that this life-enhancing transplantation is viable and ethically justified for appropriate patients. Given that pediatric hand transplantation has been performed with promising reported outcomes, it is time to consider how to properly expand the field of face transplantation into pediatric patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Appropriate collaboration between adult and pediatric colleagues can mitigate risks associated with expanding surgical innovation between respective patient demographics. The reported outcomes of the first pediatric hand transplant question the appropriateness of increasing immunosuppression burden to a patient on an existing regimen for prior solid organ allotransplantion. Young donor allografts prove to be more resilient, however, implying that managing rejection episodes is key to long-term viability. Expanding face transplants into a younger population must consider the social functions of the face, and may facilitate healthy personal development given the cultural value appearance has in real life and in social media. SUMMARY: We believe that pediatric face transplantation is not just a viable option, but an ethically reasonable one as long as the field proceeds with cautious optimism.

Outcomes of Orchiectomy for Gender-affirming Surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify perioperative outcomes of transgender orchiectomy (TGO) and to broadly compare outcomes of TGO to cisgender orchiectomy (CGO) for nononcologic indications. METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2010 to 2020, a retrospective study was performed on patients with ICD-9/10 codes for gender dysphoria, testicular torsion, and testicular pain who underwent simple orchiectomy. Demographics and surgical outcomes were summarized. Welch two-sample t test and chi-square test were used for group analysis. A trend analysis was performed for temporal trends of these surgeries. RESULTS: 246 patients underwent TGO and 997 patients underwent CGO (607 testicular torsion, 390 testicular pain). Overall complication rates between TGO and CGO did not differ for testicular torsion (3.7% vs 4.4%, P = .6) or testicular pain (3.7% vs 5.9%, P = .2). No differences in patient characteristics were seen within the TGO group when comparing those who experienced complications to those who didn't. From 2015 to 2020, TGO cases significantly increased by, on average, 9.5 cases per year (95% CI: 6.3-12.7, P = .001), while CGO had showed no significant temporal change. CONCLUSION: Standalone TGO can be performed safely in an outpatient setting with an acceptable complication profile in medically diverse patients.

Facial Expression after Face Transplant: An International Face Transplant Cohort Comparison.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of motor function restoration following face transplant (FT) is difficult, as standardized, bilateral tests are lacking. This study aims to bolster support for software-based analysis through international collaboration. METHODS: FaceReader (Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands), a facial expression analysis software, was used to analyze posttransplant videos of eight FT patients from Boston, Massachusetts (range, 1 to 9 years after transplant), two FT patients from Helsinki, Finland (range, 3 to 4 years after transplant), and three FT patients from Antalya, Turkey (range, 6.5 to 8.5 years after transplant). Age-matched healthy controls from respective countries had no history of prior facial procedures. Videos contained patients and controls performing facial expressions evaluated by software analysis using the Facial Action Coding System. Facial movements were assigned intensity score values between 0 (absent) and 1 (fully present). Maximum values were compared with respective healthy controls to calculate percentage restoration. RESULTS: Of 13 FT patients, eight patients were full FT, five patients were partial FT, and two patients were female patients. Compared with healthy controls, the median restoration of motor function was 36.9% (interquartile range, 28.8% to 52.9%) for all patients with FT ( P = 0.151). The median restoration of smile was 37.2% (interquartile range, 31.5% to 52.7%) for all patients with FT ( P = 0.065). When facial nerve coaptation was performed at the distal branch level, average motor function restoration was 42.7% ± 3.61% compared with 27.9% ± 6.71% at the proximal trunk coaptation level ( P = 0.032). Use of interpositional nerve grafts had no influence on motor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Software-based analysis is suitable to assess motor function after FT. International collaboration strengthens outcome data for FT. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Racial disparities in short-term outcomes after breast reduction surgery-A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Analysis with 23,268 patients using Propensity Score Matching.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of widespread disparities in healthcare for racial and ethnic minorities is well documented. This study aims to evaluate differences in surgical outcomes after breast reduction surgery (BRS) according to patients' ethnicities. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database (2005-2018) was utilized to analyze two propensity score matched patient cohorts-White and non-White-that underwent BRS. Preoperative variables assessed included demographic data and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and obesity. Postoperative outcomes assessed were medical complications, minor and major surgical complications, as well as mortality. RESULTS: In total, 23268 patients underwent BRS and met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, the two cohorts were matched with respect to these preoperative variables, and 7187 patients were included in each cohort of White and non-White patients (total 14374). After matching, overall 30-day major complications were not significantly different between White and non-White cohort (2.25% vs 2.14%, p=0.65). After accounting for differences in confounding variables at the patient and socioeconomic level, racial and ethnic minorities who underwent breast reduction were found to experience fewer minor surgical complications. The analysis of temporal trends identified an overall rise in the number of patients seeking BRS, with a higher increase noted in the non-White population. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings are reassuring exemptions to prevalent racial and ethnic health inequalities and can serve as a positive example for adequate and fair provision of surgical care.

Recognizing Emotional Expression as an Outcome Measure After Face Transplant.

Importance: Limited quantitative data exist on the restoration of nonverbal communication via facial emotional expression after face transplant. Objective and noninvasive methods for measuring outcomes and tracking rehabilitation after face transplant are lacking. Objective: To measure emotional expression as an indicator of functional outcomes and rehabilitation after face transplant via objective, noninvasive, and nonobtrusive software-based video analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center case-control study analyzed videos with commercially available video analysis software capable of detecting emotional expression. The study participants were 6 patients who underwent face transplant at Brigham and Women's Hospital between April 2009 and March 2014. They were matched by age, race/ethnicity, culture, and sex to 6 healthy controls with no prior facial surgical procedures. Participants were asked to perform either emotional expressions (direct evaluation) or standardized facial movements (indirect evaluation). Videos were obtained in a clinical setting, except for direct evaluation videos of 3 patients that were recorded at the patients' residences. Data analysis was performed from June 2018 to November 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The possibility of detecting the emotional expressions of happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, and disgust was evaluated using intensity score values between 0 and 1, representing expressions that are absent or fully present, respectively. Results: Six patients underwent face transplant (4 men; mean [SD] age, 42 [14] years). Four underwent full face transplants, and 2 underwent partial face transplants of the middle and lower two-thirds of the face. In healthy controls, happiness was the only emotion reliably recognized in both indirect (mean [SD] intensity score, 0.92 [0.05]) and direct (mean [SD] intensity score, 0.91 [0.04]) evaluation. Indirect evaluation showed that expression of happiness significantly improved 1 year after transplant (0.04 point per year; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06 point per year; P = .002). Expression of happiness was restored to a mean of 43% (range, 14% to 75%) of that of healthy controls after face transplant. The expression of sadness showed a significant change only during the first year after transplant (-0.53 point per year; 95% CI, -0.82 to -0.24 point per year; P = .005). All other emotions were detectable with no significant change after transplant. Nearly all emotions were detectable in long-term direct evaluation of 3 patients, with expression of happiness restored to a mean of 26% (range, 5% to 59%) of that of healthy controls. Conclusions and Relevance: Partial restoration of facial emotional expression is possible after face transplant. Video analysis software may provide useful clinical information and aid rehabilitation after face transplant.

Should a Caregiver's QoL Be Considered in Decisions About Whether a Patient Has an Experimental Double-Hand Transplant?

A goal of hand and upper extremity transplantation is to return motor and sensory function to an amputee. Given the integral roles of one's hands in activities of daily living and social interaction, however, restoring psychosocial well-being should also be a priority. Based on the authors' experience, double-hand transplantation success depends significantly on strong social support, physical rehabilitation, medication adherence, and social integration. Because caregiving is demanding, tasks should be distributed among members of a patient's family and social network. This article analyzes how to respond to an overwhelmed caregiver by drawing on solid organ transplant literature about caregiver fatigue.