Long-term Symptom Control After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy and Dor Fundoplication for Achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a primary esophageal motility disorder in which there is incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and absence of peristalsis in the lower two thirds of the esophagus. A favored treatment is laparoscopic modified Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication (LHMDor) with more than 90% immediate beneficial effect. The short-term outcomes of LHMDor are well documented, but stability and durability of postoperative symptom control over time is less understood. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2016, 54 patients with achalasia underwent LHMDor (single center). Using validated questionnaires, patients rated their symptoms in five domains: pain, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dysphagia, regurgitation, and quality of life. Symptom ratings were done preoperatively, 4 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and yearly after the operation. RESULTS: As expected, patients reported marked improvement in dysphagia, odynophagia, regurgitation, GERD, and quality of life after the operation (P < .001). From then on, the symptom control remained durable with respect to absence of pain, regurgitation, and odynophagia; however, we observed a recurrence of GERD symptoms beginning 3 to 5 years postoperatively (P = .001 and P = .04, respectively), with associated increased antireflux medication use. After initial LHMDor, 5 patients required endoscopic dilatation an average of 1.5 years postoperatively, and no patient required reoperation. Patients reported preserved improved quality of life to 11 years after the operation (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the durability of LHMDor in the definitive management of achalasia, offering consistent symptomatic relief and significant improvement in quality of life over the decade after surgery, despite some increase in GERD symptoms and antireflux medication use.

Surgical Exploration and Discovery Program: Early Exposure to Surgical Subspecialties and Its Influence on Student Perceptions of a Surgical Career.

OBJECTIVE: Interest in pursuing a surgical career has been declining among North American medical students. Numerous factors are known to influence student interest in pursuing surgery as a career, such as prestige, income potential, and overall lifestyle. Given that many of these factors are rooted in bias, it may be possible to properly address several of these stereotypes through first-hand, early exposure to the field of surgery via the Surgical Exploration and Discovery (SEAD) Program. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate whether participation in an intensive, 2-week surgical program may alter student opinion, bias, and/or preconceived assumptions of a career in surgery, and (2) to determine whether these changes in perception, if present, has an impact on student interest in pursuing a surgical career compared to baseline. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study. The analysis cohort consisted of 30 first-year medical students who participated in the 2-week SEAD program. The control group consisted of 29 first-year medical students who did not participate in the SEAD program. Both the SEAD and control groups completed two surveys: (1) an entry survey distributed prior to the start of the SEAD program, and (2) an exit survey distributed upon completion of the SEAD program. The surveys were designed to assess students' motivations for choosing a specialty in medicine, previous surgical experience, as well as perceptions and biases surrounding a surgical career, pre- and post-exposure. SETTING: Undergraduate Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, at the University of Ottawa in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 30 medical students in the SEAD group, and 29 in the control group. RESULTS: Students' perceptions of the lifestyle, call schedule as a staff or resident, diversity of practice and gender changed significantly following the SEAD program compared to students in the control group. Furthermore, students' perceptions of surgeons as intimidating declined following the 2-week program (p = 0.003), however they were more likely to view surgery as a field requiring physical strength (p = 0.022). Overall, there was no significant change with regards to desire to pursue a career in surgery in the treatment group (p = 0.625) or in the control group (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Early exposure to surgery through the SEAD program alters student perceptions of surgical specialties, yet it does not significantly influence students to pursue a career in the surgical field. Nonetheless, participation in the SEAD program continues to assist medical students with career decision making.