Is the routine use of systemic antibiotics after spine surgery warranted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the published literature supports the current practice of utilizing antibiotics postoperatively in spine surgery. METHODS: A systematic review from PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials databases was performed. Search terms used: "Antibiotic Prophylaxis"[Mesh], antibiotic*, antibacterial*, "Spine"[Mesh], "Surgical Procedures, Operative"[Mesh]. Only comparative, clinical studies were included. Those studies with surgical site infection (SSI) criteria that were not similar to the CDC definition were excluded. A meta-analysis for overall SSI was performed. A subgroup analysis was also performed to analyze the outcomes specifically on instrumented groups of patients. A random-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RR). Forest plots were used to display RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included (four Randomized-Controlled Trials, three prospective cohorts, and six retrospective). Three different perioperative strategies were used in the selected studies: Group 1: preoperative antibiotic administration (PreopAbx) versus PreopAbx and any type of postoperative antibiotic administration (Pre + postopAbx) (n = 6 studies; 7849 patients); Group 2: Pre + postopAbx ≤ 24 h versus Pre + postopAbx > 24 h (n = 6; 1982); and Group 3: Pre + postopAbx ≤ 48 h versus. Pre + postopAbx ≤ 72 h (n = 1; 502). The meta-analysis performed on Groups 1 and 2 did not show significant effects (RR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.77, 2.09, and RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.64, 1.46, respectively). CONCLUSION: A meta-analysis and comprehensive review of the literature show that the routine use of postoperative antibiotics in spine surgery may not be effective in preventing surgical site infections.

Occipital Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (PICA) Bypass for the Treatment of a Ruptured Fusiform Aneurysm of the Left PICA: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are usually complex to treat because of their deep location, frequent entanglement with the lower cranial nerves, the presence of perforating arteries to the brainstem, and their often dissecting or fusiform morphology.1 These aneurysms can require revascularization of the PICA.2 The length and size of the occipital artery (OA) make it an excellent donor.3,4 Video 1 shows the technical nuances of an OA-PICA bypass for the treatment of a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the left PICA. The patient is a 34-year-old male presenting with an abrupt headache and confusion (Hunt and Hess grade III and World Federation Neurology Surgeons grade II). Computed tomography of the brain revealed hydrocephalus and subarachnoid hemorrhage (Fisher IV) and digital subtraction angiography revealed a fusiform aneurysm on the tonsillomedullary segment of the left PICA. Given the dissecting nature of this aneurysm and the fact that it was ruptured, we felt it would be safer to be prepared to perform revascularization and to secure the aneurysm using an open surgical approach.5 There were no complications associated with this procedure. The patient remained neurologically intact, and imaging showed good flow through the bypass and no evidence of stroke. OA-PICA bypass is a useful strategy to treat ruptured fusiform PICA aneurysms since it avoids sacrificing the PICA and the use of dual-antiplatelet therapy. This video is one of the few videos published on OA-PICA bypass.6,7 It explains the technical aspects, open and endovascular alternatives, and rationale for this procedure.

Do Multidisciplinary Spine Conferences Alter Management or Impact Outcome?

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary spine conferences (MSCs) are a strategy for discussing diagnostic and treatment aspects of patient care. Although they are becoming more common in hospitals, literature investigating how they impact patient care and outcomes is scarce. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of MSCs on surgical management and outcomes in elective spine surgical care. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the impact of MSCs on patient management and outcomes. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched using combinations and variations of search terms "Spine Conferences," "Multidisciplinary," and "Spine Team." RESULTS: The literature search yielded 435 articles, of which 120 were selected for full-text review. Four articles (N = 529 patients) were included. Surgical plans were discussed in 211 patients. The decision was altered to conservative treatment in 70 patients (33.17%) and a different surgical strategy in 34 patients (16.11%). The differences were significant in 2 studies (P < 0.05). A 51% reduction in 30-day complications rates was observed when MSC was implemented in patients with adult complex scoliosis. Other spinal disorders showed a 30-day complication rate between 0% and 14% after MSC. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of outcomes of MSCs in elective spine surgery and it confirms that MSCs impact management plan and outcomes. Consistent MSCs that include surgeons and nonsurgeons have the potential to enhance communication between specialists, standardize treatments, improve patient care, and encourage teamwork. More analysis is warranted to determine if patient outcomes are improved with these measures.

10-Year Trends in the Surgical Management of Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases are present in approximately 20% of patients with cancer, giving a risk for neurologic dysfunction and instability. In already frail patients, surgeons strive to improve quality of life. Our goal was to review a 10-year trend in the surgical management of spinal metastases. METHODS: A scoping review was performed systematically using PubMed to assess trends in surgical treatment for spinal metastases. The search terms used were: metastas∗, "neoplasm metastasis"[Mesh], "Spine"[Mesh], spine, spinal, "vertebral column," "vertebral body," laser, robot, radiofrequency, screws, fixation, "separation surgery," corpectomy, vertebrectomy, spondylectomy, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, surgery, "open surgery," "mini open surgery," "minimally invasive surgery," endoscopy, thoracoscopy, corpectom∗, vertebrectom∗, spondylectom∗, "en bloc," and MIS. The variables of interest were neurologic improvement, tumor recurrence, reoperation, and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 2132 articles were found within the primary query. Fifty-six studies were selected for final review. The results were organized into main surgical practices: decompression, mechanical stabilization, and pain management. For separation surgery, clinical outcomes were overall 1-year survival, 40.7%-78.4%; recurrence rate, 4.3%-22%; reoperation, 5%; and complications, 5.4%-14%. For corpectomy, clinical outcomes were overall 1-year survival, 30%-92%; reoperation, 1.1%-50%; and recurrence rate, of 1.1%-28%. Complications and reoperations with spinal instrumentation were 0%-13.6% and 0%-15%, respectively. Cement augmentation achieved pain reduction rates of 56%-100%, neurologic improvement/stability 84%-100%, and complication rates 6%-56%. Laser achieved local tumor control rate of 71%-82% at 1 year follow-up, reoperation rate of 15%-31%, and complication rate of 5%-26%. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive techniques for decompression and stabilization seem to be the preferred method to surgically treat metastatic spine disease, with good outcomes. More research with high level of evidence is required to support the long-term outcomes of these approaches.

Is L5/S1 interbody fusion necessary in long-segment surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus regarding the best surgical strategy at the lumbosacral junction (LSJ) in long constructs for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The use of interbody fusion (IF) has been advocated to increase fusion rates, with additional pelvic fixation (PF) typically recommended. The actual benefit of IF even when extending to the pelvis, however, has not been vigorously analyzed. The goal of this work was to better understand the role of IF, specifically with respect to arthrodesis, when extending long constructs to the ilium. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify the relevant studies in English, addressing the management of LSJ in long constructs (defined as ≥ 5 levels) in ASD. The search terms used were as follows: "Lumbosacral Junction," "Long Constructs," "Long Fusion to the Sacrum," "Sacropelvic Fixation," "Interbody Fusion," and "Iliac Screw." The authors excluded technical notes, case reports, literature reviews, and cadaveric studies; pediatric populations; pathologies different from ASD; studies not using conventional techniques; and studies focused only on alignment of different levels. RESULTS: The PRISMA protocol was used. The authors found 12 retrospective clinical studies with a total of 1216 patients who were sorted into 3 different categories: group 1, using PF or not (n = 6); group 2, using PF with or without IF (n = 5); and group 3, from 1 study comparing anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Five studies in group 1 and 4 in group 2 had pseudarthrosis rate as primary outcome and were selected for a quantitative analysis. Forest plots were used to display the risk ratio, and funnel plots were used to look at the risk of publication bias. The summary risk ratios were 0.36 (0.23-0.57, p < 0.001) and 1.03 (0.54-1.96, p = 0.94) for the PF and IF, respectively; there is a protective effect of overall pseudarthrosis for using PF in long constructs for ASD surgeries, but not for using IF. CONCLUSIONS: The long-held contention that L5/S1 IF is always advantageous in long-construct deformity surgery is not supported by the current literature. Based on the findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis, PF with or without additional L5/S1 interbody grafting demonstrates similar overall construct pseudarthrosis rates. The added risk and costs associated with IF, therefore, should be more closely considered on a case-by-case basis.