RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to develop a best-practices document on chiropractic care for pregnant and postpartum patients with low back pain (LBP), pelvic girdle pain (PGP), or a combination. METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus process was conducted. A multidisciplinary steering committee of 11 health care professionals developed 71 seed statements based on their clinical experience and relevant literature. A total of 78 panelists from 7 countries were asked to rate the recommendations (70 chiropractors and representatives from 4 other health professions). Consensus was reached when at least 80% of the panelists deemed the statement to be appropriate along with a median response of at least 7 on a 9-point scale. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 71 statements after 3 rounds of distribution. Statements included informed consent and risks, multidisciplinary care, key components regarding LBP during pregnancy, PGP during pregnancy and combined pain during pregnancy, as well as key components regarding postpartum LBP, PGP, and combined pain. Examination, diagnostic imaging, interventions, and lifestyle factors statements are included. CONCLUSION: An expert panel convened to develop the first best-practice consensus document on chiropractic care for pregnant and postpartum patients with LBP or PGP. The document consists of 71 statements on chiropractic care for pregnant and postpartum patients with LBP and PGP.
Assuntos
Quiroprática , Dor Lombar , Manipulação Quiroprática , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Consenso , Período Pós-Parto , Dor Lombar/terapia , Dor Lombar/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review (SR) of the literature to assess the effectiveness of specific chiropractic care options commonly used for postpartum low back pain (LBP), pelvic girdle pain (PGP), or combination (LBP and PGP) pain. METHODS: A search strategy was developed. Interventions were those manual or other nonpharmacologic therapies commonly used by chiropractors (not requiring additional certifications). The outcomes were self-reported changes in pain or disability self-reported outcomes. We used the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network checklists. Strength of the evidence (excluding cohort studies) was determined using an adapted version of the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria as described in the UK report. RESULTS: Of the 1611 published articles, 16 were included. These were 5 SRs, 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 1 cohort study. Postpartum LBP (1 RCT): moderate, favorable strength for spinal manipulation therapy/mobilization. Postpartum PGP (4 RCTs): moderate, unclear strength for exercise; and inconclusive, unclear strength for patient education. Postpartum LBP or PGP (3 SRs and 4 RCTs): inconclusive, unclear strength for exercise, self-management, and physiotherapy; while osteopathic manipulative therapy was inconclusive, favorable. CONCLUSION: No treatment option was identified as having sufficient evidence to make a clear recommendation. This SR identified a scarcity of literature regarding chiropractic care and back pain for postpartum women, as well as inconsistency among the terms LBP, PGP, and combination pain.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar/terapia , Manipulação Quiroprática/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor da Cintura Pélvica/terapia , Transtornos Puerperais/terapia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Período Pós-Parto , AutorrelatoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review (SR) of the literature to assess the effectiveness of chiropractic care options commonly used for pregnancy-related low back pain (LBP), pelvic girdle pain (PGP), or combination pain for both experienced practitioners and students of chiropractic. METHODS: We included procedures that were commonly used by chiropractors and not requiring additional certifications. Outcomes were self-reported changes in pain or disability. We used the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network checklists to assess outcomes. For strength of evidence, we used the adapted version of the US Preventive Services Task Force criteria as described in the UK report. RESULTS: Fifty articles were included from 18 SRs, 30 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 2 cohort studies. Pregnancy LBP (7 SRs and 12 RCTs): moderate, favorable evidence for electrotherapy and osteopathic manipulative therapy; inconclusive, favorable strength for chiropractic care, exercise, and support devices; and inconclusive, unclear strength for spinal manipulative therapy. Pregnancy PGP (4 SRs and 4 RCTs): inconclusive, favorable strength for exercise; and inconclusive, unclear evidence for patient education, information, and support devices. Pregnancy LBP or PGP (13 SRs and 12 RCTs): moderate, unclear evidence for complementary and alternative medicine; moderate, unclear evidence for exercise; inconclusive, favorable evidence for multimodal care, patient education, and physiotherapy; and inconclusive, unclear strength for spinal manipulative therapy, osteopathic manipulative therapy, and support devices. CONCLUSION: Although there is a lack of conclusive evidence, many of the interventions have moderate or unclear but favorable evidence.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar/terapia , Osteopatia/métodos , Dor da Cintura Pélvica/terapia , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia , Adulto , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Manipulação da Coluna/métodos , GravidezRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current pilot study is to determine the point and period prevalence of site-specific back pain, low back pain (LBP), pelvic girdle pain (PGP), and combined pain (Combo Pain) in pregnant women at a large urban centre in Ontario. METHODS: Point and period prevalence for LBP, PGP, and Combo Pain were determined using a questionnaire and accompanying pain diagram. Women were included in the study if they were healthy, of child-bearing age (18-45 years), currently experiencing a singleton pregnancy (any trimester), and proficient in the English language. RESULTS: Data collected from 287 women were included in the analysis. Three-quarters of women suffered from some sort of pregnancy-related back pain. The point and period prevalences for women who were experiencing LBP, PGP, and Combo Pain were 15.7%, 17.8%, and 15.3% and 33.4%, 27.9%, and 30.7%, respectively. Secondary analyses demonstrated that increasing GA and suffering from both pains at some point prior to pregnancy (Prior Both) increased the risk of experiencing PGP and Combo Pain during pregnancy, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that 76% of sampled women experienced pregnancy-related back pain and the prevalence of site-specific pain (LBP, PGP, and Combo Pain) increases with increased gestation. Risk factors include advanced GA and experiencing both types of pain prior to pregnancy (Prior Both). Furthermore, it is suggested that a standard definition of pain by location should be developed and employed so that future studies can elucidate appropriate prevention strategies and treatment options for each.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Dor da Cintura Pélvica/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Ontário/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor , Dor da Cintura Pélvica/etiologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/etiologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Prevalência , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Back pain is common during pregnancy and can have an adverse impact on the quality of life for some, yet treatment options for this population are limited. We document a chiropractic treatment that involves using kinesiology tape (tape) to help alleviate pregnancy-related back pain in two patients. CASE PRESENTATION AND MANAGEMENT: Two pregnant women reported to two different chiropractic offices with varying presentations of pregnancy-related back pain. A trial of chiropractic care was rendered in both chiropractic offices, which included the application of tape. OUTCOME AND DISCUSSION: In both case presentations, the addition of tape in the lumbosacral and/or abdominal regions, decreased pain intensity from 9-10/10 to 4/10 or less on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Including a taping protocol to a plan of management in women with pregnancy-related LBP or PGP may be a safe and effective option to alleviate pain in this population.
CONTEXTE: Les maux de dos sont fréquents pendant la grossesse et peuvent avoir un impact négatif sur la qualité de vie de certaines femmes, mais les options de traitement pour cette population sont limitées. Nous documentons un traitement chiropratique qui implique l'utilisation de ruban de kinésiologie (ruban) pour aider à soulager les douleurs dorsales liées à la grossesse chez deux patientes. PRÉSENTATION ET GESTION DE CAS: Deux femmes enceintes se sont présentées à deux cabinets de chiropractie différents présentant des maux de dos différents liés à la grossesse. Un essai de soins chiropratiques comprenant l'application de ruban a été effectué dans les deux cabinets de chiropractie. RÉSULTATS ET DISCUSSION: Dans les deux présentations de cas, l'ajout de ruban dans les régions lombo-sacrées et/ou abdominales a diminué l'intensité de la douleur qui est passée de 910/10 à 4/10 ou moins sur l'échelle d'évaluation numérique (EEN). Le fait d'inclure un protocole d'utilisation de ruban à un plan de prise en charge chez les femmes présentant une lombalgie ou des douleurs pelviennes liées à la grossesse peut constituer une option sûre et efficace pour soulager la douleur chez cette population.