Clinical and Biomarker Evaluations of Sunitinib in Patients with Grade 3 Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Angiogenesis is extensively developed in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET) where sunitinib was shown to prolong progression-free survival, leading to nationwide approval. However, clinical experience in patients with grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNEN-G3) remains limited. This prospective phase II trial evaluated potential predictive biomarkers of sunitinib activity in patients with advanced GEPNEN-G3. METHODS: Sunitinib was given at a dose of 37.5 mg/day as a continuous daily dosing until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Evaluation of activity was based on RECIST1.1. Safety was evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE v4. Pharmacokinetics of sunitinib and its main active metabolite SU12662 were evaluated. All tumour samples were reviewed histologically for tumour differentiation. PDGFRß, carbonic anhydrase 9, Ki-67, VEGFR2, and p-AKT were quantified using immunohistochemistry and their expression correlated with response by RECIST1.1. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included and 26 had available histological tissue. Six and 20 patients presented well-differentiated tumours (NET-G3) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), respectively. Eighteen patients responded to sunitinib (4 experienced partial responses and 14 tumour stabilization). A high p-AKT expression correlated with lower response to sunitinib (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99, p = 0.04). Safety and PK exposure to sunitinib and SU12662 in these patients were consistent with that reported in PanNET. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib showed evidence of activity in patients with GEPNEN-G3 with expected toxicity profile. In the NET-G3 and NEC groups, 4/6 and 11/20 patients were responders, respectively. High p-AKT expression predicted a lower response to sunitinib. Our study allowed the identification of a potential biomarker of resistance/sensitivity to sunitinib in aggressive GEPNEN-G3.

BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer: What Is the Optimal Strategy for Treatment?

OPINION STATEMENT: The BRAF activating mutation, harbored by approximately 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC), confers dramatic prognosis to advanced diseases. In early-stage setting, the identification of the BRAF mutation does not impact the therapeutic decision. Yet, the BRAF mutation could be considered as a stratification factor in adjuvant trials, because of its prognostic impact after relapse. Moreover, both BRAF mutation and mismatch repair (MMR) statuses should be determined in all CRC to help identify sporadic tumors versus Lynch syndrome-related tumors. Indeed, in patients with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors and MLH1 loss of expression, the BRAFV600E mutation indicates a sporadic origin. In advanced BRAF-mutated CRC, the standard of care remains fluoropyrimidine-based cytotoxic regimen in combination with bevacizumab. Although a recent meta-analysis showed that there was insufficient data to justify the exclusion of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, antiangiogenic agents should be preferred in the first-line setting. Despite the lack of a randomized phase 3 study dedicated to BRAF-mutated CRC, chemotherapy intensification combining a quadruple association of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI), and bevacizumab seems like a valid option. Although first results with BRAF inhibitors as single agents in BRAF-mutated CRC were disappointing, their association with therapies targeting the MAPK pathway seems to overcome the primary resistance to BRAF inhibition. In the field of sporadic CRC, the BRAF mutation is strongly associated with MMR deficiency. Considering breakthrough results of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR repair tumors, determination of the MMR status appears to be mandatory. Given the dramatic prognosis conferred by the BRAF mutation, patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC need to be systematically identified and proposed for clinical trial enrolment in order to benefit from innovative therapies.

Efficacy of a sequential treatment strategy with GEMOX-based followed by FOLFIRI-based chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancers.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (GEM)-platinum chemotherapy stands as first-line therapy for patients with recurrent/advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), yielding progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.4-6.4 months. No standard second-line chemotherapy after GEM-platinum failure exists and data on survival benefit remain limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with recurrent/advanced BTC who received gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX)-based chemotherapy followed by 5-fluorouracil-irinotecan (FOLFIRI)-based chemotherapy to evaluate the efficacy of the sequential treatment strategy. Overall survival (OS) and PFS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were analyzed, 21 (40%) had intrahepatic, 14 (27%) had hilar/extrahepatic, and 17 (33%) had gallbladder cancer. Median age was 64 years (range 38-79 years). Prior curative intent resection of the primary tumor was performed in 23 (44.2%) patients and GEMOX adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 12 (23.1%) patients. After a median follow-up of 36.3 months, 47 (90.4%) patients completed the treatment strategy. First-sequence GEMOX and second sequence FOLFIRI achieved 4.8 months and 3.2 months median PFS, respectively. The global OS for the sequential chemotherapy was 21.9 months. The sequence of FOLFIRI resulted in a median OS of 8.4 months. CONCLUSION: The sequence of GEMOX-FOLFIRI is a potential treatment strategy for patients with recurrent/advanced BTC.

New Therapeutic Opportunities Based on DNA Mismatch Repair and BRAF Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Recently, colorectal cancer (CRC) subtyping consortium identified four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-4). CMS1 is enriched for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and BRAF (V600E) tumors. Intriguingly, this subtype has better relapse-free survival but worse overall survival after relapse compared with the other subtypes. Growing evidence is accumulating on the benefit of specific therapeutic strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in dMMR tumors and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway targeted therapy in tumors harboring BRAF (V600E) mutation. After reviewing dMMR prognostic value, immune checkpoints as major targets for dMMR carcinomas will be highlighted. Following, BRAF (V600E) prognostic impact will be reviewed and therapeutic strategies with the combination of cytotoxic agents and especially the combinations of BRAF and MAPK inhibitors will be discussed.

Alternative Response Criteria (Choi, European association for the study of the liver, and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) Versus RECIST 1.1 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

INTRODUCTION: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), may underestimate activity and does not predict survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib. This study assessed the value of alternative radiological criteria to evaluate response in HCC patients treated with sorafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective blinded central analysis was performed of computed tomography (CT) scans from baseline and the first tumor evaluation in consecutive patients treated with sorafenib over a 2-year period in a single institution. Four different evaluation criteria were used: Choi, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), modified RECIST (mRECIST), and RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: Among 82 HCC patients, 64 with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C were evaluable with a median follow-up of 22 months. Median duration of sorafenib treatment was 5.7 months, and median overall survival was 12.8 months. At the time of the first CT scan, performed after a median of 2.1 months, Choi, EASL, mRECIST, and RECIST 1.1 identified 51%, 28%, 28%, and 3% objective responses, respectively. Responders by all criteria showed consistent overall survival >20 months. Among patients with stable disease according to RECIST 1.1, those identified as responders by Choi had significantly better overall survival than Choi nonresponders (22.4 vs. 10.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.86, p = .0097). CONCLUSION: Choi, EASL, and mRECIST criteria appear more appropriate than RECIST 1.1 to identify responders with long survival among advanced HCC patients benefiting from sorafenib.

Pure and mixed fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinomas differ in natural history and prognosis after complete surgical resection.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to describe pure and mixed fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FL-HCC). METHODS: Consecutive patients with pure and mixed FL-HCC were identified from a central pathological review using Edmondson's criteria. Clinical, pathological, and epigenetic characteristics of patients who underwent curative surgery were evaluated. Overall and disease-free survival as well as patterns of disease recurrence were examined. Methylation levels of L1 retrotransposon (LINE-1) repetitive elements and Ras association domain family 1A gene (RASSF1) promoter were also assessed using pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Forty of 53 patients with a median age of 22 years (range, 9 years-;65 years) met the criteria for analysis. Central pathological review found that 30 patients (75%) had pure and 10 patients (25%) had mixed FL-HCC. Pure FL-HCC typically occurred in patients aged < 30 years. These patients often presented with lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis and frequently experienced extrahepatic recurrences (n = 16). Conversely, mixed FL-HCC appeared to resemble to classic HCC, occurring in patients aged > 40 years and frequently involving the liver as the primary site of disease recurrence. With a median follow-up of 7.8 years, the median overall survival from the time of diagnosis in all patients was 6.4 years (range, 3.2 years-12 years). Multivariate analysis found that the risk of death was increased in patients with higher American Joint Committee on Cancer disease stages (P = .003) and those with mixed FL-HCC (P = .03). Methylation analysis of LINE-1 repetitive elements and RASSF1 promoter revealed different methylation levels between pure and mixed FL-HCC, suggesting a different epigenetic background. CONCLUSIONS: Pure and mixed FL-HCC display distinct clinical presentations and epigenetic backgrounds leading to different prognoses and as such may be regarded as separate clinical entities.

First-In-Human Effects of PPT1 Inhibition Using the Oral Treatment with GNS561/Ezurpimtrostat in Patients with Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers.

Introduction: GNS561/Ezurpimtrostat is a first-in-class, orally bioavailable, small molecule that blocks cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting late-stage autophagy and dose-dependent build-up of enlarged lysosomes by interacting with the palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1 (PPT1). Methods: This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation trial (3 + 3 design) explored two GNS561 dosing schedules: one single oral intake 3 times a week (Q3W) and twice daily (BID) continuous oral administration in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma or colorectal adenocarcinomas with liver metastasis. The primary objective was to determine GNS561 recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and schedule. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of GNS561. Results: Dose escalation ranged from 50 to 400 mg Q3W to 200-300 mg BID. Among 26 evaluable patients for safety, 20 were evaluable for efficacy and no dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Adverse events (AEs) included gastrointestinal grade 1-2 events, primarily nausea and vomiting occurred in 13 (50%) and 14 (54%) patients, respectively, and diarrhea in 11 (42%) patients. Seven grade 3 AEs were reported (diarrhea, decreased appetite, fatigue, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase increased). Q3W administration was associated with limited exposure and the BID schedule was preferred. At 200 mg BID GNS561, plasma and liver concentrations were comparable to active doses in animal models. Liver trough concentrations were much higher than in plasma a median time of 28 days of administration with a mean liver to plasma ratio of 9,559 (Min 149-Max 25,759), which is in accordance with rat preclinical data observed after repeated administration. PPT1 expression in cancer tissues in the liver was reduced upon GNS561 exposure. There was no complete or partial response. Five patients experienced tumor stable diseases (25%), including one minor response (-23%). Conclusion: Based on a favorable safety profile, exposure, and preliminary signal of activity, oral GNS561 RP2D was set at 200 mg BID. Studies to evaluate the antitumor activity of GNS561 in hepatocarcinoma cells and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are to follow NCT03316222.

Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment through mTOR Inhibition and Chemotherapy as Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The CAPRA Study.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) regulates cellular functions by integrating intracellular signals and signals from the tumor microenvironment (TME). The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is activated in 70% of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and associated with poor prognosis. This phase I-II study investigated the effect of mTOR inhibition using weekly everolimus (30 mg for dose level 1, 50 mg for dose level 2) combined with weekly induction chemotherapy (AUC2 carboplatin and 60 mg/m2 paclitaxel) in treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced T3-4/N0-3 HNSCC. Patients received 9 weekly cycles before chemoradiotherapy. Objectives were safety and antitumor activity along with tissue and blood molecular biomarkers. A total of 50 patients were enrolled. Among 41 evaluable patients treated at the recommended dose of 50 mg everolimus weekly, tolerance was good and overall response rate was 75.6%, including 20 major responses (≥50% reduction in tumor size). A significant decrease in expression of p-S6K (p-value: 0.007) and Ki67 (p-value: 0.01) was observed in post-treatment tumor tissue. Pro-immunogenic cytokine release (Th1 cytokines IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-ß) was observed in the peripheral blood. The combination of everolimus and chemotherapy in HNSCC was safe and achieved major tumor responses. This strategy favorably impacts the TME and might be combined with immunotherapeutic agents.

[Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer]. / Traitements ciblés des cancers colorectaux.

Since cancer biology is now better understood, molecular targets involved in tumorigenesis have been identified and specific "targeted therapy" has been designed. Antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR are the 2 targeted families of drugs introduced in the management of colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab are well tolerated and improve the pronostic of the patients in combination with conventional chemotherapy. Moreover, the mutation of KRAS gene has been recently identified as a predictive factor of resistance to anti-EGFR and allows a better selection of the patients. Formely based on 5FU, the management of advanced colorectal cancer is now involving a complex multidisciplinary strategy combining conventional chemotherapy, targeted agents, and surgery with curative intent whenever possible.

[New molecular classification of colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer and stomach cancer: Towards "à la carte" treatment?]. / Nouvelles classifications moléculaires du cancer colorectal, du cancer du pancréas et du cancer de l'estomac : vers un traitement à la carte ?

This review reports 3 of recently published molecular classifications of the 3 main gastro-intestinal cancers: gastric, pancreatic and colorectal adenocarcinoma. In colorectal adenocarcinoma, 6 independent classifications were combined to finally hold 4 molecular sub-groups, Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS 1-4), linked to various clinical, molecular and survival data. CMS1 (14% MSI with immune activation); CMS2 (37%: canonical with epithelial differentiation and activation of the WNT/MYC pathway); CMS3 (13% metabolic with epithelial differentiation and RAS mutation); CMS4 (23%: mesenchymal with activation of TGFß pathway and angiogenesis with stromal invasion). In gastric adenocarcinoma, 4 groups were established: subtype "EBV" (9%, high frequency of PIK3CA mutations, hypermetylation and amplification of JAK2, PD-L1 and PD-L2), subtype "MSI" (22%, high rate of mutation), subtype "genomically stable tumor" (20%, diffuse histology type and mutations of RAS and genes encoding integrins and adhesion proteins including CDH1) and subtype "tumors with chromosomal instability" (50%, intestinal type, aneuploidy and receptor tyrosine kinase amplification). In pancreatic adenocarcinomas, a classification in four sub-groups has been proposed, stable subtype (20%, aneuploidy), locally rearranged subtype (30%, focal event on one or two chromosoms), scattered subtype (36%,<200 structural variation events), and unstable subtype (14%,>200 structural variation events, defects in DNA maintenance). Although currently away from the care of patients, these classifications open the way to "à la carte" treatment depending on molecular biology.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of DTS-108, a human oligopeptide bound to SN-38 with an esterase-sensitive cross-linker in patients with advanced malignancies: a Phase I study.

BACKGROUND: DTS-108 is a hydrosoluble prodrug, where the SN-38 moiety is covalently linked to a 20-amino acid vector peptide by a specific esterase-sensitive cross-linker, releasing 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycampthotecin (SN-38) by esterase bond cleavage. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of DTS-108, adverse events graded according to NCI-CTCv3.1, dose-limiting toxicities at cycle 1, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of intravenous DTS-108 (1-2 hours) every 2 weeks were evaluated in a first-in-human Phase I study in patients with advanced/metastatic carcinomas, according to an accelerated dose escalation design. SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) levels were evaluated with fluorescence high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) test, then liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) methods. RESULTS: Forty-two patients received DTS-108 across 14 dosing cohorts (range 3-416 mg/m2). At 416 mg/m2, three out of six patients had grade 4 neutropenia thereby defining the MTD and the RP2D at 313 mg/m2. Fluorescence HPLC was inaccurate to quantify DTS-108 and its metabolites (SN-38 and SN-38G). New processes and analytical LC/MS/MS methods for testing SN-38 were implemented. At a dose of 313 mg/m2, mean DTS-108, SN-38, and SN-38G area under the plasma concentration-time curve to infinity (coefficients of variation %) were 439,293 (24%), 1,992 (34%), and 4,538 (46%) h·ng/mL. Stable disease (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) was observed in nine patients. CONCLUSION: Assessing SN-38 concentration using fluorescence HPLC is questionable since this method failed to monitor dose escalation of DTS-108, a new topoisomerase I inhibitor, due to ex vivo degradation. LC/MS/MS methods were consistent in evaluating SN-38 exposures allowing drug monitoring. The maximum tolerated dose of DTS-108 was 416 mg/m2. The RP2D for intravenous DTS-108 was 313 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.

Disease control with sunitinib in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma resistant to gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy.

Advanced cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor prognostic survival and has limited therapeutic options available at present. The importance of angiogenesis and expression of pro-angiogenic factors in intrahepatic forms of cholangiocarcinoma suggest that therapies targeting angiogenesis might be useful for the treatment of this disease. Here we report three cases of patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progressive after standard chemotherapy and treated with sunitinib 50 mg/d in 6-wk cycles of 4 wk on treatment followed by 2 wk off treatment (Schedule 4/2). In all three patients, sunitinib treatment was associated with a sustained disease control superior to 4 mo, patients achieving either a partial response or stable disease. A reduction in tumor size and density was observed in all cases, suggesting tumor necrosis as a result of sunitinib treatment in these patients. In addition, sunitinib was generally well tolerated and the occurrence of side effects was managed with standard medical interventions, as required. Our results suggest that sunitinib therapy may be associated with favorable outcomes and tolerability in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Those observations contributed to launch a prospective phase II multicenter trial investigating sunitinib in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (SUN-CK study; NCT01718327).

Sunitinib in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: latest evidence and clinical potential.

Based on preclinical data available in the RIP1-Tag2 transgenic mouse model, sunitinib is an inhibitor of angiogenesis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors blocking vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors in endothelial cells and pericytes, respectively. Evidence of objective response in phase I trials justified the initiation of a large phase II/III program using sunitinib in patients with advanced/metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. In the phase II study, sunitinib showed potent antitumor activity and a safe toxicity profile. In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial, sunitinib doubled the progression-free survival of patients, induced objective responses, and reduced the risk of death of patients with advanced/metastatic well-differentiated tumors. These data allowed the approval of sunitinib in several countries including Europe and the United States of America. These recent data provide hope for patients with well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and will change standards of care in this disease.

[PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway and cancer]. / Rôle de la voie PI3K-AKT-mTOR dans le cancer et les thérapeutiques antitumorales.

PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is an intracellular signalling pathway composed of different kinases. Many protein mutations are described in that pathway, and are responsible of dysregulation of cell growth, proliferation, survival and angiogenesis. Rapamycin is an antibiotic inhibiting mTOR. Different analogs of rapamycin are developed or being developed in antitumoral therapy, in which temsirolimus, everolimus and deforolimus, demonstrated antitumoral activity in renal cancer and mantle cell lymphoma, and many clinical trials are in progress in other tumors. In the future, predictive factors of response need to be identified; patient selection and associations with chemotherapy or with other targeted therapies should be explored.

Sunitinib in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Sunitinib is an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor with potent antiangiogenic properties. Preclinical data have demonstrated that pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors depend on vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet growth factor receptors-signaling pathways for tumor angiogenesis. Sunitinib has recently been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced, progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Sunitinib has demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival in a double-blinded randomized trial against placebo, setting progression-free survival as a valid endpoint for the evaluation of novel agents in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Although patients who progressed in this phase III trial were allowed to cross-over, a trend toward improvement in overall survival was also observed. In this trial, side effects reported with sunitinib were those previously reported in other tumor types, including hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and hypertension. This trial also investigated patient-reported outcome and showed that treatment with sunitinib did not affect quality of life of patient. Interestingly, this trial showed that sunitinib could be combined with somatostatin analogues without affecting the safety profile of either sunitinib or somatostatin analogues. Since the overall survival of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors remains sufficiently long, it is worth considering using alternate sequences of targeted therapy (such as everolimus) and chemotherapy to optimize the care of patients with advanced diseases. The optimal sequence for using chemotherapy, everolimus, and sunitinib will remain to be established in clinical trials.

Imaging response in neuroendocrine tumors treated with targeted therapies: the experience of sunitinib.

Among neuroendocrine carcinomas of the gut, well-differentiated tumors are highly vascularized, featuring specific characteristics on contrast-enhanced imaging. Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors spontaneously harbor hypervascular enhancement, coexisting with areas of necrosis mainly located at the center of tumor lesions. When exposed to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR) inhibitors such as sunitinib, target lesions display few if any variation in tumor size, but rather detectable modifications in tumor density. In several patients treated with targeted therapy, a significant decrease of tumor density at first tumor evaluation can be detected as compared to baseline. Consistently, the two randomized trials leading to approval of sunitinib and everolimus in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors report objective response rate below 10%, emphasizing that Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), that focus only on the largest diameters of target lesions, may be insufficient to capture the full benefit of targeted therapies. Alternative criteria, such as those developed by Choi et al., consider both the size and the density of the tumor as parameters for response evaluation. Choi criteria have been recently proposed as a surrogate endpoint for efficacy and to identify patients that are good responders to VEGFR inhibitors such as sunitinib and sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, another disease highly addicted to angiogenesis. Preliminary data generated from patients included in the sunitinib phase III trial suggest that Choi criteria might also be considered as an alternative to RECIST to evaluate the effects of sunitinib in patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Clinical outcome after a totally implantable venous access port-related infection in cancer patients: a prospective study and review of the literature.

Morbidity and mortality after a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP)-related infection in oncology patients have rarely been studied. We conducted this study to assess the incidence and factors associated with the following outcome endpoints: severe sepsis or septic shock at presentation, cancellation of antineoplastic chemotherapy, and mortality at week 12. We conducted a prospective single-center observational study including all adult patients with solid cancer who experienced a TIVAP-related infection between February 1, 2009, and October 31, 2010. Patients were prospectively followed for 12 weeks. Among 1728 patients receiving antineoplastic chemotherapy during the inclusion time, 72 had an episode of TIVAP-related infection (4.2%) and were included in the study (median age, 60 yr; range, 28-85 yr). The incidence of complications was 18% for severe sepsis or septic shock (13/72 patients), 30% for definitive cancellation of antineoplastic chemotherapy (14/46 patients who still had active treatment), and 46% for death at week 12 (33/72 patients). Factors associated with severe sepsis or septic shock were an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level and an infection caused by Candida species; 4 of the 13 severe episodes (31%) were due to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Factors associated with death at week 12 were a low median Karnofsky score, an elevated Charlson comorbidity index, the metastatic evolution of cancer, palliative care, and an elevated CRP level at presentation. Hematogenous complications (that is, infective endocarditis, septic thrombophlebitis, septic pulmonary emboli, spondylodiscitis, septic arthritis, or organ abscesses) were found in 8 patients (11%). In conclusion, patients' overall condition (comorbidities and autonomy) and elevated CRP level were associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome after a TIVAP-related infection. Candida species and CoNS were responsible for severe sepsis or septic shock.

Gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

AIM: To assess feasibility, tolerability and efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients ≥ 75 years old with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: All consecutive patients ≥ 75 years old with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Necessary criteria to receive chemotherapy were: performance status 0-2, adequate biological parameters and no serious comorbidities. Other patients received best supportive care (BSC). RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (53% women, median age 78 years, range 75-84) with pancreatic cancer (metastatic: n = 20, locally advanced: n = 18) were studied. Among them, 30 (79%) were able to receive chemotherapy [median number: 9 infusions (1-45)]. Six patients (23%) had at least one episode of grade 3 neutropenia and one patient developed a grade 3 hemolytic-uremic syndrome. No toxic death occurred. Three patients (11%) had a partial tumor response, 13 (46%) had a stable disease and 12 (43%) had a tumor progression. Median survival was 9.1 mo (metastatic: 6.9 mo, locally advanced: 11.4 mo). CONCLUSION: Tolerance and efficacy of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is acceptable in elderly patients in good condition, with similar results to younger patients.

Predictive biomarkers for the activity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors.

In the quest for personalized medicine, only a few biological parameters are routinely used to select patients prior to the initiation of anticancer targeted therapies, including mTOR inhibitors. Identifying biological factors that may predict efficacy or resistance to mTOR inhibitors represents an important challenge since rapalogs may exert antitumor effects through multiple mechanisms of action. Despite the fact that no such a factor is currently available, several molecular patterns are emerging, correlating with sensitivity and/or resistance to rapalogs. While activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, overexpression of cyclin D1, and functional apoptosis seem to sensitize tumor cells to rapalogs, Bcl2 overexpression or KRAS mutations are reported to be associated with resistance to mTOR inhibitors in several preclinical models. Translational research aimed at validating those parameters in clinical trials is ongoing.

Changes in tumor density in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

PURPOSE: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) may underestimate the efficacy of targeted therapies. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) studies with sunitinib, RECIST-defined response rates are low, although hypodensity on computed tomography (CT) scans occurs more frequently. This exploratory analysis investigated tumor density as a surrogate endpoint of sunitinib activity in a phase II HCC study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients received sunitinib 50 mg/d (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Tumor size and density were assessed on CT scans by using RECIST and Choi criteria, the latter of which classify a partial response as a 15% or more reduction in tumor density or a 10% or more reduction in tumor size. The overall percentage volume of tumor necrosis was calculated with volumetric reconstruction. Tumor perfusion parameters were assessed by using perfusion CT scans with specific acquisition. RESULTS: Among the 26 evaluable patients, 1 achieved a partial response and 22 had tumor stabilization by RECIST. In analysis of tumor density, 17 of 26 patients (65.4%) were responders by Choi criteria. Volumetric assessment showed major tumor necrosis (≥30% of tumor volume) in 10 of 21 patients (47.6%). Among four patients evaluated, tumor blood flow was reduced by 58.8% and blood volume by 68.4% after 4 weeks of treatment. The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.4 months. Patients with responses by Choi criteria had a significantly longer TTP (7.5 months) compared with nonresponders (4.8 months; HR = 0.33, two-sided P = 0.0182). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor density assessment suggested that radiologic endpoints in addition to RECIST may be considered to capture sunitinib activity in HCC.