Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer ; 125(6): 902-909, 2019 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30561756

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers are rare, aggressive neoplasms. Most patients present with advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease at diagnosis, and no second-line regimen has demonstrated clinical benefit. This was a phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in patients who had advanced/unresectable or metastatic disease after receiving standard therapy. METHODS: In this single arm-study, patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer who failed at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy received regorafenib once daily on a schedule of 21-days on/7-days off in a 28-day cycle. Patients initially received a standard 160 mg dose. After toxicity assessments in the first 3 patients, the dose was reduced to 120 mg for subsequent patients, as preplanned. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), the objective response rate, and the disease control rate. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received at least 1 dose of regorafenib, and 34 patients who received at least 1 cycle of treatment were evaluable for tumor response. The median PFS was 15.6 weeks (90% confidence interval, 12.9-24.7 weeks), and the median OS was 31.8 weeks (90% confidence interval, 13.3-74.3 weeks), with survival rates 40% at 12 months and 32% at 18 months. A partial response was achieved in 5 patients (11%), and 19 had stable disease (44%), for a disease control rate of 56%. The toxicity profile was as expected, with grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in 40% of patients. The most common toxicities were hypophosphatemia (40%), hyperbilirubinemia (26%), hypertension (23%), and hand-foot skin reaction (7%). CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest promising efficacy of regorafenib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory, advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancer, warranting further studies to confirm its clinical efficacy. There is a clear unmet need for effective therapies in patients who have advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Sistema Biliar/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 23(4): 431-433, 2019 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31322626

RESUMO

At the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center's Hillman Cancer Center, multiple occurrences of critically elevated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) levels drawn by central venous access devices (implantable ports) were determined to be inaccurate. Root cause analysis revealed the institutional policy and staff education for collection did not support peripheral venipuncture for coagulation panels. Peer-reviewed literature and case studies were evaluated by the evidence-based practice council, and the data revealed that PTT levels yielded incorrect results when drawn through an implantable port. This suggested that peripheral venipuncture might be preferable.


Assuntos
Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Tempo de Tromboplastina Parcial , Humanos , Pennsylvania , Flebotomia , Análise de Causa Fundamental
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa