Multiband mucosectomy versus endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal excavation for GI submucosal tumors: short and long term follow-up.

AIMS: To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of 3 different endoscopic dissection techniques for upper gastrointestinal (GI) submucosal tumours (SMTs). METHODS: Data for 135 patients withGI SMTs who underwent multiband mucosectomy (MBM), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) were retrospectively assessed. The en bloc resection rate, endoscopic complete resection rate, operation time, potential complications and local recurrence rate were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the rate of endoscopic complete resections and pathologic complete resections among the three groups. For SMTs > 15 mm in width, the lowest en bloc resection rate was found for MBM (P = 0.000). MBM was also associated with the shortest procedure time, lowest perforation rate and lowest rate of major bleeding. ESE was the most effective procedure for muscularis propria (MP) lesions but was associated with the longest operation time (P < 0.01). The ESD and ESE groups had similar perforation rates (P > 0.05). No differences were observed in 4-year local recurrence rates among the groups (P = 0.945). CONCLUSIONS: MBM is a simple and effective method for the treatment of small SMTs and achieves clinical success rates similar to those of ESD and ESE. However, ESD and ESE are preferable for larger and deep lesions and are associated with a longer operation time. Nonetheless, all 3 techniques resulted in a low 4-year local recurrence rate. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to further investigate these results.

A tandem trial of HD-NBI versus HD-WL to compare neoplasia miss rates in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether the use of narrow-band imaging (NBI) system could enhance the detection rate of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions during endoscopic examination of the esophagus. METHODOLOGY: 113 patients were randomized to undergo endoscopic examination using high definition television (HDTV) narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopy or HDTV WL endoscopy. The primary endpoint was the difference in the neoplasm miss rate, and secondary outcome was the neoplasm detection rate. RESULTS: The number of esophageal cancer and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia lesions detected by HD-NBI and HD-WL was 45 and 21, respectively. The neoplasm miss rate per lesion and per patient with HD-NBI showed significant difference compared with that of HD-WL (P <0.05). Characteristics of lesions missed by use of HD-NBI were similar to those missed by use of HD-WL; all missed lesions were high grade intraepithelial neoplasia lesions. Significant difference was observed between NBI and WL in adenoma detection rate (70.2% vs. 35.7%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy with HD-NBI seems to improve the detection of esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions, high definition may be tested for its effect on detection of esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions in the future. These results indicate that endoscopy routinely using the NBI system for the surveillance of esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions may be recommended.