Efficient plasma metabolic fingerprinting as a novel tool for diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer: a large-scale, multicentre study.

OBJECTIVE: Metabolic biomarkers are expected to decode the phenotype of gastric cancer (GC) and lead to high-performance blood tests towards GC diagnosis and prognosis. We attempted to develop diagnostic and prognostic models for GC based on plasma metabolic information. DESIGN: We conducted a large-scale, multicentre study comprising 1944 participants from 7 centres in retrospective cohort and 264 participants in prospective cohort. Discovery and verification phases of diagnostic and prognostic models were conducted in retrospective cohort through machine learning and Cox regression of plasma metabolic fingerprints (PMFs) obtained by nanoparticle-enhanced laser desorption/ionisation-mass spectrometry (NPELDI-MS). Furthermore, the developed diagnostic model was validated in prospective cohort by both NPELDI-MS and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-MS (UPLC-MS). RESULTS: We demonstrated the high throughput, desirable reproducibility and limited centre-specific effects of PMFs obtained through NPELDI-MS. In retrospective cohort, we achieved diagnostic performance with areas under curves (AUCs) of 0.862-0.988 in the discovery (n=1157 from 5 centres) and independent external verification dataset (n=787 from another 2 centres), through 5 different machine learning of PMFs, including neural network, ridge regression, lasso regression, support vector machine and random forest. Further, a metabolic panel consisting of 21 metabolites was constructed and identified for GC diagnosis with AUCs of 0.921-0.971 and 0.907-0.940 in the discovery and verification dataset, respectively. In the prospective study (n=264 from lead centre), both NPELDI-MS and UPLC-MS were applied to detect and validate the metabolic panel, and the diagnostic AUCs were 0.855-0.918 and 0.856-0.916, respectively. Moreover, we constructed a prognosis scoring system for GC in retrospective cohort, which can effectively predict the survival of GC patients. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated diagnostic and prognostic models for GC, which also contribute to advanced metabolic analysis towards diseases, including but not limited to GC.

Does resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS regimen) benefit for gastric cancer patients with single non-curable factor? a multicenter, prospective cohort study (Neo-REGATTA).

BACKGROUND: The Neo-REGATTA study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS regimen) followed by radical resection vs. chemotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients with single non-curable factor. METHODS: This cohort study prospectively enrolled advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients with single non-curable factor between November 2017 and June 2021. Patients without progression after four cycles of DOS were divided into resection group and chemotherapy group. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Effectiveness analysis was also performed by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were enrolled and 13 patients were withdrawn due to disease progression after 4 cycles of DOS. Afterwards, 35 and 25 participants were in the resection and chemotherapy groups, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 30.0 months, the median PFS and OS were 9.0 months, and 18.0 months for the chemotherapy group, but not reached in the resection group. After PSM, 19 matched participants were in each group, and the median PFS and OS were longer in resection group than that in chemotherapy group. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events both in the resection group and chemotherapy groups were neutropenia (5.7%, 8.0%) and leukopenia (5.7%, 8.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Radical resection might provide survival benefit compared with continuous chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who had a disease control after DOS, with a good safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03001726, 23/12/2016).

SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: Data of patients with clinical stage T3-4aN0-3M0 (IIb-III) gastric cancer were reviewed to create a primary database. Patients treated with perioperative SOX combined with sintilimab were included in Group A, while those treated with SOX alone were included in Group B. After one-to-one propensity score matching, pathological response and short-term survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, potential efficacy-related biomarkers were analyzed. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2022, a total of 150 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 patients in each group. The rates of pathological complete response (21.3% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.001) and major pathological response (45.3% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.003) in Group A were statistically higher than those in Group B. There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.392) and disease-free survival (88.9% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.357) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of Group A showed that the pathological complete response (40.6% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.002) and major pathological response (65.6% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.002) rates were significantly higher in programmed death ligand-1-positive patients with a combined positive score of ≥ 5. A pathological complete response was achieved in 42.9% patients (3/7) with mismatch repair deficiency. For the two patients confirmed as Epstein-Barr virus-positive, one patient achieved a pathological complete response and the other achieved a major pathological response. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of SOX combined with a PD-1 inhibitor may improve the pathological response rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially those with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score ≥ 5, Epstein-Barr virus-positivity and mismatch repair deficiency. However, further prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the long-term survival benefit.

The percentages of signet-ring cells (SRCs) affects the prognosis after radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Only recently has the percentage of signet-ring cells (SRCs) been shown to affect the prognosis following gastric cancer surgery. It is uncertain whether the SRC percentage has a role in tumour biology or prognosis of gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC). For this research, we assessed the effect of the SRC percentage on the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of gastric cancer (GC) tumours and created and verified a prognostic nomogram to assess the overall survival (OS) of GSRCC patients. METHODS: In our study, 1100 GC patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from December 2013 to December 2018 who underwent curative gastric cancer resection were retrospectively analysed. The patients were separated into two groups: those with SRCC (SRC percentage >50%; n = 157) and those with partial signet-ring cell carcinoma (PSRCC) (SRC percentage ≤50%; n = 943). We compared the clinicopathological characteristics of both groups. To estimate OS and determine correlations with the SRC percentage, the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. To develop the prognostic nomogram, independent prognostic indicators for OS were identified using Cox regression analyses. Predictions were assessed using the calibration curve and C-index. RESULTS: Our research showed that there was no discernible difference in OS between the two groups. The preoperative CA242 level, pT stage, pN stage, age, nerve invasion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy, and maximum tumour diameter were independent prognostic risk factors for OS for GC (all p < 0.05). However, for advanced GC, the SRC percentage (HR = 1.571, 95% CI 1.072-2.302, p = 0.020) was an independent prognostic factor of OS. Other independent prognostic risk factors were age, pT stage, pN stage, nerve invasion, tumour location, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative chemotherapy, preoperative CA50 level, and preoperative CEA level (all p < 0.05). On these bases, nomograms were constructed for GC and advanced GC, with C-indexes of 0.806 (95%CI 0.782-0.830) and 0.728 (95%CI 0.697-0.759), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of advanced gastric cancer, the SRC percentage served as a standalone prognostic indicator for OS. An effective tool for assessing the prognosis of GSRCC was offered by the nomogram.

Efficacy analysis of Cheng's GIRAFFE reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction.

Objective: Reconstruction of the digestive tract for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) is in dispute. This study evaluated Cheng's gastric tube interposition esophagogastrostomy with reconstruction of His angle and fundus (Cheng's GIRAFFE anastomosis) in laparoscopic/open proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II AEG, which was performed at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University. Here, we discuss the preliminary results of gastric emptying and anti-reflux. Methods: From a retrospective database, 74 patients with advanced Siewert type II AEG underwent curative proximal gastrectomy with GIRAFFE anastomosis, and their gastric emptying and anti-reflux outcomes were evaluated by the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score, nuclide gastric emptying, 24-h impedance-pH monitoring and gastroscopy. Results: Seventy-four patients successfully completed proximal partial gastrectomy with Cheng's GIRAFFE esophagogastric anastomosis. RDQ score six months after the operation was 2.2±2.5. Results of nuclide gastric emptying examinations showed that the gastric half-emptying time was 67.0±21.5 min, the 1-h residual rate was (52.2±7.7)%, the 2-h residual rate was (36.4±5.1)%, and the 3-h residual rate was (28.8±3.6)%; 24-h impedance-pH monitoring revealed that the mean DeMeester score was 5.8±2.9. Reflux esophagitis was observed by gastroscopy in 7 patients six months after surgery. Conclusions: Cheng's GIRAFFE anastomosis is safe and feasible for Siewert type II AEG.

Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal perioperative chemotherapeutic regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative and postoperative S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) compared with postoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapOx) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy. METHODS: We did this open-label, phase 3, superiority and non-inferiority, randomised trial at 27 hospitals in China. We recruited antitumour treatment-naive patients aged 18 years or older with historically confirmed cT4a N+ M0 or cT4b Nany M0 gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with Karnofsky performance score of 70 or more. Patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) via an interactive web response system, stratified by participating centres and Lauren classification, to receive adjuvant CapOx (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice a day), adjuvant SOX (eight postoperative cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day cycle plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day), or perioperative SOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day one of each 21 day plus oral S-1 40-60 mg twice a day for three cycles preoperatively and five cycles postoperatively followed by three cycles of S-1 monotherapy). The primary endpoint, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, 3-year disease-free survival to assess the superiority of perioperative-SOX compared with adjuvant-SOX and the non-inferiority (hazard ratio non-inferiority margin of 1·33) of adjuvant-SOX compared with adjuvant-CapOx. Safety analysis were done in patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01534546. FINDINGS: Between Aug 15, 2012, and Feb 28, 2017, 1094 patients were screened and 1022 (93%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 345 (34%) patients were assigned to the adjuvant-CapOx, 340 (33%) patients to the adjuvant-SOX group, and 337 (33%) patients to the perioperative-SOX group. 3-year disease-free survival was 51·1% (95% CI 45·5-56·3) in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 56·5% (51·0-61·7) in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 59·4% (53·8-64·6) in the perioperative-SOX group. The hazard ratio (HR) was 0·77 (95% CI 0·61-0·97; Wald p=0·028) for the perioperative-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group and 0·86 (0·68-1·07; Wald p=0·17) for the adjuvant-SOX group compared with the adjuvant-CapOx group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia (32 [12%] of 258 patients in the adjuvant-CapOx group, 21 [8%] of 249 patients in the adjuvant-SOX group, and 30 [10%] of 310 patients in the perioperative-SOX group). Serious adverse events were reported in seven (3%) of 258 patients in adjuvant-CapOx group, two of which were related to treatment; eight (3%) of 249 patients in adjuvant-SOX group, two of which were related to treatment; and seven (2%) of 310 patients in perioperative-SOX group, four of which were related to treatment. No treatment-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: Perioperative-SOX showed a clinically meaningful improvement compared with adjuvant-CapOx in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who had D2 gastrectomy; adjuvant-SOX was non-inferior to adjuvant-CapOx in these patients. Perioperative-SOX could be considered a new treatment option for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Program of China, Beijing Scholars Program 2018-2024, Peking University Clinical Scientist Program, Taiho, Sanofi-Aventis, and Hengrui Pharmaceutical. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Deep Targeted Sequencing and Its Potential Implication for Cancer Therapy in Chinese Patients with Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer (GC) has a high incidence and mortality rate, especially in East Asians, and about 90% of GCs are adenocarcinomas. Histological and etiological heterogeneity and ethnic diversity make molecular subtyping of GC complicated, thus making it difficult to determine molecular division systems and standard treatment modalities. Limited cohorts from South Korea, Singapore, Australia, and Japan have been studied; however, the mutational landscape of gastric adenocarcinomas in Chinese patients is still unknown. METHODS: We performed a targeted sequencing panel focusing on cancer-related genes and tumor-associated microorganisms of 529 gastric adenocarcinoma samples with matched blood controls. We identified 449 clinically relevant gene mutations. RESULTS: Approximately 47.1% of Chinese patients with GC harbored at least one actionable mutation. The top somatic mutations were TP53, ARID1A, LRP1B, PIK3CA, ERBB2, CDH1, KRAS, FAT4, CCNE1, and KMT2D. Truncation mutations of ARID1A, KMT2D, RNF43, TGFBR2, and CIC occurred in patients with high tumor mutational burden. Gene amplifications of ERBB2, CCNE1, CDK12, and CCND1 were detected in patients with low tumor mutational burden. Pathway analysis revealed common gene alterations in the Wnt and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. The ratio of patients with high microsatellite instability was significantly lower than other cohorts, and high microsatellite instability and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive features seemed mutually inclusive in Chinese patients with GC. In 44 (8.3%) patients, 45 germline mutations were identified, among which SPINK1 mutations, all SPINK1 c.194 + 2T > C, were present in 15.9% (7/44) of patients. Microorganisms found in Chinese patients with GC included Helicobacter pylori, EBV, hepatitis B virus, and human papillomavirus types 16 and 18. CONCLUSION: Identification of varied molecular features by targeted next-generation sequencing provides more insight into patient stratification and offers more possibilities for both targeted therapies and immunotherapies of Chinese patients with GC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study investigated the genomic alteration profile of 529 Chinese patients with gastric adenocarcinoma by deep targeting sequencing, which might be the largest Chinese cohort on the genomic research of gastric adenocarcinoma up to now.

Adjuvant albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with S-1 vs. oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine after D2 gastrectomy in patients with stage III gastric adenocarcinoma: a phase III multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the only treatment option for operable gastric cancer. The CLASSIC and ACTS-GC studies showed that the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III gastric cancer undergoing D2 gastrectomy is still very low. Whether adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) combined chemotherapy is more effective than the XELOX standard adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III gastric cancer has not been confirmed. METHODS: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase III clinical study. In this trial, 616 patients with locally advanced stage III gastric cancer that underwent curative D2 radical surgery and achieved R0 are planned to be included. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 (AS) vs. oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX). XELOX group: Patients assigned to the XELOX group received eight 3-week cycles of oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle plus intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle. AS group: AS group received eight 3-week cycles of oral S-1 (80-120 mg) (< 1.25 m2, 40 mg; 1.25 to < 1.5 m2, 50 mg; and > 1.5 m2, 60 mg) twice daily on days 1-14 plus intravenous nab-paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was the 3-year disease-free survival (3-year-DFS) defined as the time from randomisation to the time of recurrence of the original gastric cancer, development of a new gastric cancer, or death from any cause. The secondary endpoints were the overall survival, (defined as the time from the date of randomisation to date of death from any cause) and safety (any adverse event). DISCUSSION: Compared with previous studies, this study includes nab-paclitaxel based on S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, which is expected to achieve better efficacy and lower toxicity than the standard treatment. This study is the first clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 in patients with stage III gastric cancer after D2 radical resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04135781 , on October 20th, 2019.

Neoadjuvant systemic and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with cytoreductive surgery for gastric cancer patients with limited peritoneal metastasis: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is no currently available treatment for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. This phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the treatment of these patients. METHODS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprised two cycles of HIPEC and four cycles of S-1 plus paclitaxel. HIPEC was administered intraperitoneally with paclitaxel (75 mg/m2). For systemic chemotherapy, paclitaxel was administered intravenously(150 mg/m2) on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally(80 mg/m2/day)on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle. Another two cycles of HIPEC and four cycles of S-1 plus paclitaxel were administered after second diagnostic staging laparoscopy or CRS. The primary endpoints were treatment efficiency and safety; the secondary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled and 38 patients have been analyzed. Of these, 18 (47.4%) patients received neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, HIPEC and CRS (conversion therapy group), while 20 patients received only chemotherapy and HIPEC (palliative chemotherapy group). Median OS was markedly improved in the conversion therapy group (21.1 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.7-25.6 months) in comparison with the palliative chemotherapy group(10.8 months, 95%CI 7.3-14.2 months, p = 0.002). After neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and HIPEC, a second laparoscopic exploration was performed, and the prognosis of patients with low peritoneal cancer index (PCI) (PCI < 6) was significantly better than that of patients with high PCI (PCI ≥ 6)(20.1 vs.11.3 months, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and HIPEC combined with CRS is safe and feasible, and could potentially improve the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with limited peritoneal metastasis. However, further clinical trials are still warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02549911 . Trial registration date: 15/09/2015.

Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of lymph node (LN) dissection for advanced distal gastric cancer remains controversial. The present study compared the safety and efficacy of extended LN dissection (D2 plus) with standard D2 radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups: D2 group and D2 plus group. Patients in the D2 group received standard D2 LN dissection, while patients in the D2 plus group received an additional nos. 8p, 12b, 13, and 14v LNs dissection. The clinicopathological and surgical data of these two groups were compared, and the factors that may influence survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled, out of which 64 patients were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, and complications between the two groups. In the D2 plus group, the positive rate of the nos. 12b, 13, and 14v LN was 3.1%, 9.4%, and 12.5%, respectively. The positive rate of the no. 13 LN correlated with the duodenal involvement, while the positive rate of the no. 14v LN correlated with no. 6 LN metastasis. The survival analysis indicated that among patients with duodenum involvement, the 3-year disease-free survival rate of the D2 plus group was significantly better than that of the D2 group. CONCLUSION: Duodenum involvement and positive no. 6 LN were high-risk factors of advanced distal gastric cancer. D2 plus radical surgery turned out to be safe and feasible, and may improve the prognosis of these patients. However, further clinical trials are still warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01836991 , registered on 22 April 2013.

Evaluation of D2-plus radical resection for gastric cancer with pyloric invasion.

BACKGROUND: The optimal lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer (GC) with pyloric invasion is controversial because the pattern of lymph node metastasis is different from that of distal GC. The rate of lymph node metastasis into the posterior area of the pancreatic head and hepatoduodenal ligament is high. This study evaluated the estimated benefit of radical gastrectomy with D2-plus lymphadenectomy in patients with pyloric invasion. METHODS: All patients with GC invading the pylorus who underwent curative surgical resection with D2-plus lymphadenectomy between February 2013 and September 2015 were enrolled in the study. The index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection (IEBLD) was calculated by multiplying the incidence of metastasis to each lymph node station by the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with metastasis to that station. RESULTS: In total, 128 patients were eligible. The rate of lymph node metastasis and the 3-year OS rate (and IEBLD) of the patients with metastasis to lymph nodes were 14.3 and 44.4% (5.56) for No. 8p, 10.9 and 35.7% (3.89) for No. 12b, 9.5 and 33.3% (3.13) for No. 12p, 18.8 and 54.2% (10.19) for No. 13, and 21.8 and 53.6% (11.68) for No. 14v, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In radical gastrectomy for GC with pyloric invasion, some survival benefit was observed with dissection of the No. 13 and No. 14 lymph nodes, but there was no survival benefit with dissection of the No. 8p lymph nodes. The No. 12b and No. 12p lymph nodes may be better to dissect in cT3 GC patients with pyloric invasion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01836991. Date of registration: April 17, 2013.

Postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin versus S-1 alone in locally advanced gastric cancer (RESCUE-GC study): a protocol for a phase III randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The ACTS-GC study had shown postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 improved survival of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Addition of oxaliplatin to S-1 is considered to be acceptable as one of the treatment options for gastric cancer patients after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node excision. METHODS: We have commenced a randomized phase III trial in December 2016 to evaluate S-1 plus oxaliplatin compared with S-1 alone in the adjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer. A total of 564 patients will be accrued from 13 Chinese institutions in two years. The primary endpoint is 3-year relapse-free survival. The secondary endpoints are 5-year overall survival, proportion of patients who complete the postoperative chemotherapy and incidence of adverse events. ETHIC AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the institutional review board of each participating institution and it was activated on December, 2016. The enrollment will be finished in December, 2018. Patient's follow-up will be ended until December, 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02867839. Registered on August 4, 2016.

[Resectibility assessment of enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for the periampullary neoplasm].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) for assessment of the resectibility of periampullary neoplasm. METHODS: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients with periampullary neoplasm underwent CT and CE-EUS was conducted to compare the imaging data with the surgical and pathological findings, in order to evaluate their efficacies for the resectibility assessment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT and CE-EUS for the evaluation of adjacent organ invasion, lymph node metastasis and liver metastasis (P > 0.05). For the diagnosis of periampullary neoplasm and assessment of vascular invasion, CE-EUS was better than CT (94.6% vs 84.1%, P = 0.023; 96.2% vs 85.9%, P = 0.041). Logistic regression indicated that the accuracy of CE-EUS in determing adjacent organ invasion was correlated with the tumor size, and vascular invasion was correlated with the tumor location and size. CONCLUSIONS: CE-EUS has advantages in the assessment of the resectibility of periampullary neoplasm, especially for the assessment of vascular invasion, and can be used as a supplementary Image technology to the enhanced CT.

Expression of multidrug resistance-associated proteins and their relation to postoperative individualized chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy could reduce residual tumor cells and prevent relapse, however, not all patients are suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy. Screening appropriate patients based on molecular markers for individualized adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary. METHODS: Between June 2002 and June 2004, 119 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Some patients had adjuvant chemotherapy based on platinum and 5-FU for four to six cycles. Topoisomerase II (ToPo II) negative, multidrug resistance protein (MRP) positive and glutathione S-transferase π (GST-π) positive were regarded as three risk factors that may be associated with chemotherapy resistance and poor prognosis. Patients were divided into two groups: a high-risk group (≥2 risk factors) and a low-risk group (<2 risk factors), and tumor recurrence and patient survival time of the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The average recurrence time of the low-risk group was significantly longer than that of the high-risk group (21.29 ± 11.10 versus 15.16 ± 8.05 months, P < 0.01). The 3-year and 5-year survival rates of the high-risk group were 57.4% and 42.6%, however, it had no significant difference compared to 66.2% and 58.5% of the low-risk group (P >0.05). In the high-risk group, the 3-year survival rates of patients with/without chemotherapy were 62.1% and 52.0% and the 5-year survival rates were 44.8% and 40.0%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In the low-risk group, the 3-year survival rates of patients with/without chemotherapy were 81.2% and 51.5%, and the 5-year survival rates were 71.9% and 45.5%, respectively, these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined detection of the multidrug resistance (MDR)-related proteins ToPo II, MRP and GST-π may be prospectively valuable for postoperative individualized chemotherapy and in further predicting the outcomes of gastric cancer patients.

PCF Chemotherapy Combined with Surgical Treatment of Late Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of PCF chemotherapy combined with surgery in the treatment of late-stage gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: From July 2008 to February 2011, 72 cases of late-stage gastric cancer that could not be treated with R0 resection were treated prospectively. Patients received 2-4 cycles of paclitaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PCF regimen) chemotherapy followed by cytoreductive surgery for the primary and metastatic tumors and another 2-4 cycles of PCF chemotherapy post-operatively. The treatment completion rate, patient tolerance and overall survival time were analyzed. RESULTS: There was one perioperative death. The overall response rate (complete and partial response) was 72.2%. Fifty patients (69.4%) completed chemotherapy and surgical resection as planned and 42 (58.3%) cases had R0 resection. The median survival time was 23.5 months (95% CI: 15.8-31.2 months). One-year and 2-year survival rates were 67.0% and 47.0%. The survival time of patients with surgical resection was much longer than that of the non-surgery group (30.2 vs. 8.9 months) (P < 0.01). The survival time of local advanced group was 30.3 months, and was significantly longer than 17.6 months of the distant metastasis group (P < 0.01); however, it had no significant difference compared to 28.2 months of the distant metastasis group with R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: PCF chemotherapy combined with surgical resection were safe and effective, and can make survival benefits for some late-stage gastric cancer patients.

Catheter-guided anvil insertion for circular stapler esophagojejunal anastomosis: a novel technique in laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of employing the catheter-guided stapler anvil insertion technique for esophagojejunal anastomosis using a circular stapler during laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2021 to April 2023, the catheter-guided stapler anvil insertion technique was employed in 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for esophagojejunal anastomosis. A modified D2 dissection, according to the en bloc technique, was performed in the patients. Subsequently, a longitudinal incision, approximately 2 cm in length, was made on the anterior wall of the esophagus, about 2 cm above the tumor. The transection line was pre-marked with blue dye along the esophagus's minor axis, and the tail of the anvil was capped with a 10-cm length of catheter (F14 d4.7 mm). The surgeon secures the head of anvil and carefully inserts it into the esophagus, ensuring that only a 5-cm segment of the catheter remains outside the esophagus. A linear cutter was employed to transect and seal the lower end of the esophagus. Subsequently, esophagojejunostomy was performed under laparoscopic guidance using a circular stapler. RESULTS: Among patients undergoing esophagojejunal anastomosis with the new technique, postoperative complications included pneumonia or pleural effusion in 14 patients (17.5%), anastomotic stenosis in 3 patients (3.75%), abdominal infection in 2 patients (2.5%), and intestinal obstruction in 1 patient (1.25%). No instances of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, or deaths were recorded. All patients experiencing complications improved with conservative treatment, without the need for secondary surgery. CONCLUSION: The catheter-guided stapler anvil insertion technique is demonstrated to be a safe and effective method for esophagojejunostomy, potentially reducing the occurrence of anastomotic leakage.

Prognostic significance of serum tumor markers in various pathologic subtypes of gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the utility of 6 serum tumor markers in prognosis between gastric adenocarcinoma and gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). METHODS: A cohort of 3131 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma and 275 cases of gastric SRCC was assembled. The serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 125, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242), and carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724) were measured in all cases. The study analyzed the association between the levels of these 6 tumor markers and the prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma and SRCC. RESULTS: The study revealed that gastric SRCC exhibited lower concentrations of CEA (P < .001) and CA19-9 (P = .002), along with reduced positive rates of CEA (P = .041), CA19-9 (P = .003), AFP (P < .001), and CA242 (P = .006), while displaying higher positive rates of CA724 (P = .024) than gastric adenocarcinoma. Nevertheless, the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that serum tumor markers did not hold clinical significance in differentiating between gastric adenocarcinoma and SRCC. Survival analysis substantiated that the combined criteria of serum tumor markers stood as an independent risk factor for both gastric adenocarcinoma and SRCC. Notably, the nomogram indicated that serum tumor markers exerted a more substantial influence on the prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma than on gastric SRCC. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that the combined criteria of serum tumor markers emerge as independent risk factors for both subtypes of gastric cancer. Furthermore, this combined approach exhibited enhanced efficacy in prognosticating the outcome of gastric adenocarcinoma compared with gastric SRCC.

Genomic and immune microenvironment features influencing chemoimmunotherapy response in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) exhibit poor prognosis. Chemoimmunotherapy offers promising clinical benefits; however, its efficacy and predictive biomarkers in a conversion therapy setting remain unclear. The authors aimed to retrospectively evaluate chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in a conversion therapy setting for GC patients with PM and establish a prediction model for assessing clinical benefits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes encompassed 55 GC patients with PM who underwent chemoimmunotherapy in a conversion therapy setting. Baseline PM specimens were collected for genomic and transcriptomic profiling. Clinicopathological factors, gene signatures, and tumor immune microenvironment were evaluated to identify predictive markers and develop a prediction model. RESULTS: Chemoimmunotherapy achieved a 41.8% objective response rate and 72.4% R0 resection rate in GC patients with PM. Patients with conversion surgery showed better overall survival (OS) than those without the surgery (median OS: not reached vs 7.82 m, P <0.0001). Responders to chemoimmunotherapy showed higher ERBB2 and ERBB3 mutation frequencies, CTLA4 and HLA-DQB1 expression, and CD8+ T cell infiltration, but lower CDH1 mutation and naïve CD4+ T cell infiltration, compared to nonresponders. A prediction model was established integrating CDH1 and ERBB3 mutations, HLA-DQB1 expression, and naïve CD4+ T cell infiltration (AUC=0.918), which were further tested using an independent external cohort (AUC=0.785). CONCLUSION: This exploratory study comprehensively evaluated clinicopathological, genomic, and immune features and developed a novel prediction model, providing a rational basis for the selection of GC patients with PM for chemoimmunotherapy-involved conversion therapy.

Multi-dimensional cell-free DNA-based liquid biopsy for sensitive early detection of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer type. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis. A non-invasive assay for the detection of early-stage gastric cancer is highly desirable for reducing associated mortality. METHODS: We collected a prospective study cohort of 110 stage I-II gastric cancer patients and 139 non-cancer individuals. We performed whole-genome sequencing with plasma samples and profiled four types of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) characteristics, fragment size pattern, copy number variation, nucleosome coverage pattern, and single nucleotide substitution. With these differential profiles, we developed an ensemble model to detect gastric cancer signals. Further, we validated the assay in an in-house first validation cohort of 73 gastric cancer patients and 94 non-cancer individuals and an independent second validation cohort of 47 gastric cancer patients and 49 non-cancer individuals. Additionally, we evaluated the assay in a hypothetical 100,000 screening population by Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Our cfDNA-based assay could distinguish early-stage gastric cancer from non-cancer at an AUROC of 0.962 (95% CI: 0.942-0.982) in the study cohort, 0.972 (95% CI: 0.953-0.992) in the first validation cohort and 0.937 (95% CI: 0.890-0.983) in the second validation cohort. The model reached a specificity of 92.1% (128/139) and a sensitivity of 88.2% (97/110) in the study cohort. In the first validation cohort, 91.5% (86/94) of non-cancer individuals and 91.8% (67/73) of gastric cancer patients were correctly identified. In the second validation cohort, 89.8% (44/49) of non-cancer individuals and 87.2% (41/47) of gastric cancer patients were accurately classified. CONCLUSIONS: We introduced a liquid biopsy assay using multiple dimensions of cfDNA characteristics that could accurately identify early-stage gastric cancer from non-cancerous conditions. As a cost-effective non-invasive approach, it may provide population-wide benefits for the early detection of gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05269056 on March 7, 2022.

Mutation characteristics and molecular evolution of ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer and potential biomarkers for paclitaxel treatment.

Ovarian metastasis is one of the major causes of treatment failure in patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, the genomic characteristics of ovarian metastasis in GC remain poorly understood. In this study, we enroll 74 GC patients with ovarian metastasis, with 64 having matched primary and metastatic samples. Here, we show a characterization of the mutation landscape of this disease, alongside an investigation into the molecular heterogeneity and pathway mutation enrichments between synchronous and metachronous metastasis. We classify patients into distinct clonal evolution patterns based on the distribution of mutations in paired samples. Notably, the parallel evolution group exhibits the most favorable prognosis. Additionally, by analyzing the differential response to chemotherapy, we identify potential biomarkers, including SALL4, CCDC105, and CLDN18, for predicting the efficacy of paclitaxel treatment. Furthermore, we validate that CLDN18 fusion mutations improve tumor response to paclitaxel treatment in GC with ovarian metastasis in vitro and vivo.