Antisynthetases syndrome associated with right heart failure.

Cardiac involvement is a complication of end stage polymyositis with left heart insufficiency reported to be the most frequent manifestation. We here describe an unusual clinical presentation of antisynthetases syndrome, beginning with right-sided cardiomyopathy associated with right heart failure. A 26 year-old Caucasian male experienced a 6-month clinical course of polyarthritis, fever, sweats, and myalgia. Laboratory studies showed elevated C reactive protein, elevated sedimentation rate, and myolysis associated with anti SSA and anti JO1 antibodies. Electromyography showed a myopathic pattern. Muscle biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of polymyositis. Chest X ray, chest scan, and cardiac echography were normal. One week after hospital admission, the patient developed acute right heart insufficiency, and magnetic resonance imaging showed a right ventricular myocarditis with myocardial inflammatory thickening. Treatment with corticosteroids rapidly improved both symptoms and biological abnormalities.

C-reactive protein predicts tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker retention rate in axial ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: In ankylosing spondylitis (AS), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers are recommended for patients with high symptomatic disease activity. Few data are available about objective signs of inflammation such as increased C-reactive protein (CRP). We assessed the retention rate of TNF blockers in patients with axial AS, according to baseline CRP and other potentially predictive measures. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients treated with TNF blockers for axial AS. Retention rate was evaluated using a survival-data analysis technique with discontinuation of the drug because of inefficacy (Kaplan-Meier method). Potential factors explaining the retention rates (demographic and clinical indicators and CRP) were evaluated using log-rank tests and a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS: For axial AS, 175 patients received TNF blockers (men 78%, mean disease duration 12.4 +/- 9.1 yrs); 100 patients (of 143 with available data) had an increased CRP (> 10 mg/l). An increased CRP at baseline was the only variable explaining the retention rate in the Cox model (p = 0.003, hazard ratio = 3.3, 95% CI 1.5-7.3). CONCLUSION: Interruption for expert opinion of inefficacy was more frequent for patients with low baseline CRP; however, even in these patients retention was high. Increased CRP should not be considered mandatory for proposing TNF blocker treatment in axial AS.

Retention rates of tumor necrosis factor blockers in daily practice in 770 rheumatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers are efficacious in clinical trials in rheumatic diseases. However, their efficacy in daily practice, depending on the specific diagnosis or the use of concomitant therapy, remains to be confirmed. Our objective was to evaluate TNF blocker retention rates and their predisposing factors in daily practice. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of all TNF blocker therapies in one center. Retention rate was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier survival data analysis technique in which the event was discontinuation of the drug due to inefficacy or toxicity with log-rank tests and a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2004, 770 patients with inflammatory rheumatism received at least one TNF blocker; 142 received more than one agent (975 treatment courses: 493 etanercept, 335 infliximab, 147 adalimumab). The underlying disease was mainly rheumatoid arthritis (RA), found in 57.1% of patients, and spondyloarthropathies (SpA) in 37.7%. The percentage of patients receiving the same treatment at Month 12, 24, and 36 was 64.0%, 50.3%, and 39.4%, respectively. No difference between the 3 TNF blockers was found (p = 0.48). The retention rate was longer for the first treatment course [hazard ratio (HR) 2.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.82-2.58, p < 0.0001]; longer for patients with SpA (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20-2.13, p = 0.001); and longer without concomitant DMARD (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a lower retention rate of TNF blockers in daily practice compared with clinical trials, with no difference between the 3 currently available agents. Moreover, results suggest greater benefit in SpA. The role of concomitant DMARD remains to be confirmed.