Influence of tibialis posterior muscle activation on foot anatomy under axial loading: A biomechanical CT human cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Collapse of the medial longitudinal arch and subluxation of the subtalar joint are common occurrences in adult flatfoot deformity. Controversy exists about the role of the tibialis posterior (TP) tendon as first and/or essential lesion. Subtle changes in the foot configuration can occur under weight bearing. PURPOSE: This human cadaveric study is designed to investigate the effect that isolated actuation of the TP tendon has on the medial longitudinal arch and the hindfoot configuration under simulated weight bearing. METHODS: A radiolucent frame was developed to apply axial loading on cadaveric lower legs during computer tomography (CT) examinations. Eight pairs of fresh-frozen specimens were imaged in neutral position under foot-flat loading (75N) and under single-leg stance weight bearing (700N) without and with addition of 150N pulling force on the TP tendon. Measurements of subtalar joint subluxation, forefoot arch angle and talo-first metatarsal angle were conducted on each set of CT scans. RESULTS: Subtalar subluxation, talo-first metatarsal angle and talo-navicular coverage angle significantly increased under single-leg stance weight bearing, whereas forefoot arch angle significantly decreased. Actuation of the TP tendon under weight bearing did not restore the forefoot arch angle or correct subtalar subluxation and talo-metatarsal angle. CONCLUSION: Significant effect that weight bearing has on the medial longitudinal arch and the subtalar joint configuration is demonstrated in an ex-vivo model. In absence of other medial column derangement, actuation of the TP tendon alone does not seem to reconstitute the integrity of the medial longitudinal arch or correct the hindfoot subluxation under weight bearing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study together with the developed model for ex-vivo investigation provide a further insight in foot anatomy.

Functional outcome and cost-effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of acute scaphoid fractures: a cost-utility analysis.

BACKGROUND: Physical forces have been widely used to stimulate bone growth in fracture repair. Addition of bone growth stimulation to the conservative treatment regime is more costly than standard health care. However, it might lead to cost-savings due to a reduction of the total amount of working days lost. This economic evaluation was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) compared to standard health care in the treatment of acute scaphoid fractures. METHODS: An economic evaluation was carried out from a societal perspective, alongside a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial involving five centres in The Netherlands. One hundred and two patients with a clinically and radiographically proven fracture of the scaphoid were included in the study and randomly allocated to either active bone growth stimulation or standard health care, using a placebo. All costs (medical costs and costs due to productivity loss) were measured during one year follow up. Functional outcome and general health related quality of life were assessed by the EuroQol-5D and PRWHE (patient rated wrist and hand evaluation) questionnaires. Utility scores were derived from the EuroQol-5D. RESULTS: The average total number of working days lost was lower in the active PEMF group (9.82 days) compared to the placebo group (12.91 days) (p = 0.651). Total medical costs of the intervention group (€1594) were significantly higher compared to the standard health care (€875). The total amount of mean QALY's (quality-adjusted life year) for the active PEMF group was 0.84 and 0.85 for the control group. The cost-effectiveness plane shows that the majority of all cost-effectiveness ratios fall into the quadrant where PEMF is not only less effective in terms of QALY's but also more costly. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the desired effects in terms of cost-effectiveness are not met. When comparing the effects of PEMF to standard health care in terms of QALY's, PEMF cannot be considered a cost-effective treatment for acute fractures of the scaphoid bone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR2064.