RESUMO
Objectives: In adult ventricular assist device (VAD) programs in Australian hospitals, Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel (MAWG) is routinely used at the skin exit-site of VAD drivelines to prevent infections; however, its effectiveness remains unclear. Our aim was to assess antimicrobial activity of Medihoney wound gel, using in vitro models that mimic clinical biofilms grown at the driveline exit-site. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of MAWG was performed for 24 clinical isolates grown under planktonic conditions, and four representative strains grown as biofilms. Different antimicrobial mechanisms of MAWG were assessed respectively for their relative contribution to its anti-biofilm activity. A colony biofilm assay and a drip-flow biofilm reactor assay mimicking the driveline exit-site environment were used to evaluate the activity of MAWG against biofilm growth at the driveline exit-site. Results: MAWG demonstrated species-specific activity against planktonic cultures [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), 5-20% weight/volume (W/V) for Staphylococcus species, 20->40% (W/V) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida species]. Higher concentrations [MICs, 30->80% (W/V)] were able to inhibit biofilm growth, but failed to eradicate pre-established biofilms. The anti-biofilm properties of MAWG were multi-faceted, with the often-advertised "active" ingredient methylglyoxal (MGO) playing a less important role. The colony biofilm assay and the drip-flow biofilm reactor assay suggested that MAWG was unable to kill biofilms pre-established in a driveline exit-site environment, or effectively prevent planktonic cells from forming adherent monolayers and further developing mature biofilms. Conclusion: Our work suggests a suboptimal effectiveness of MAWG in preventing driveline infections due to biofilm development.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Driveline infections remain a major complication of ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. This study aimed to characterize in vivo microbial biofilms associated with driveline infections and host tissue integration of implanted drivelines. METHODS: A total of 9 infected and 13 uninfected drivelines were obtained from patients with VAD undergoing heart transplantation in Australia between 2016 and 2018. Each driveline was sectioned into 11 pieces of 1.5 cm in length, and each section was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and viable counts for microbial biofilms. Microorganisms were cultured and identified. Host tissue integration of clinical drivelines was assessed with micro-computed tomography (CT) and SEM. An in vitro interstitial biofilm assay was used to simulate biofilm migration in the driveline tunnel, and time-lapse microscopy was performed. RESULTS: Of the 9 explanted, infected drivelines, all had organisms isolated from varying depths along the velour section of the drivelines, and all were consistent with the swab culture results of the clinically infected exit site. SEM and micro-CT suggested insufficient tissue integration throughout the driveline velour, with microgaps observed. Clinical biofilms presented as microcolonies within the driveline tunnel, with human tissue as the sub-stratum, and were resistant to anti-microbial treatment. Biofilm migration mediated by a dispersal-seeding mechanism was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study of explanted infected drivelines showed extensive anti-microbial-resistant biofilms along the velour, associated with microgaps between the driveline and the surrounding tissue. These data support the enhancement of tissue integration into the velour as a potential preventive strategy against driveline infections by preventing biofilm migration that may use microgaps as mediators.