Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials of p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The increased incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers has motivated efforts to optimise treatment for these patients with excellent prognosis. Validation of surrogates for overall survival could expedite the investigation of new therapies. We sought to evaluate candidate intermediate clinical endpoints in trials assessing definitive treatment of p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. METHODS: We did a retrospective review of five multicentre, randomised trials (NRG/RTOG 9003, 0129, 0234, 0522, and 1016) that tested radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients (aged ≥18 years) with p16-positive localised head or neck squamous-cell carcinomas. Eight intermediate clinical endpoints were considered as potential surrogates for overall survival: freedom from local progression, freedom from regional progression, freedom from distant metastasis, freedom from locoregional progression, freedom from any progression, locoregional progression-free survival, progression-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. We used a two-stage meta-analytical framework, which requires high correlation between the intermediate clinical endpoint and overall survival at the patient level (condition 1), and high correlation between the treatment effect on the intermediate clinical endpoint and the treatment effect on overall survival (condition 2). For both, an r2 greater than 0·7 was used as criteria for clinically relevant surrogacy. FINDINGS: We analysed 1373 patients with oropharyngeal cancer from May 9, 2020, to Nov 22, 2023. 1231 (90%) of patients were men, 142 (10%) were women, and 1207 (88%) were White, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 51-62). Median follow-up was 4·2 years (3·1-5·1). For the first condition, correlating the intermediate clinical endpoints with overall survival at the individual and trial level, the three composite endpoints of locoregional progression-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·91 and r2 0·72), distant metastasis-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·93 and r2 0·83), and progression-free survival (Kendall's τ 0·88 and r2 0·70) were highly correlated with overall survival at the patient level and at the trial-group level. For the second condition, correlating treatment effects of the intermediate clinical endpoints and overall survival, the composite endpoints of locoregional progression-free survival (r2 0·88), distant metastasis-free survival (r2 0·96), and progression-free survival (r2 0·92) remained strong surrogates. Treatment effects on the remaining intermediate clinical endpoints were less strongly correlated with overall survival. INTERPRETATION: We identified locoregional progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and progression-free survival as surrogates for overall survival in p16-positive oropharyngeal cancers treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which could serve as clinical trial endpoints. FUNDING: NRG Oncology Operations, NRG Oncology SDMC, the National Cancer Institute, Eli Lilly, Aventis, and the University of Michigan.

Immune Status in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Relationships With Clinical Factors and Independent Prognostic Value.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression (IS) currently is not considered in staging for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). An analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed to investigate immune status as an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) for patients with MCC and to describe the relationship between immune status and other prognostic factors. METHODS: The NCDB was queried for patients with a diagnosis of MCC from 2010 to 2016 who had known immune status. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to define factors associated with OS. Secondary models were constructed to assess the association between IS etiology and OS. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to characterize relationships between immune status and other factors. RESULTS: The 3-year OS was lower for the patients with IS (44.6%) than for the immunocompetent (IC) patients (68.7%; p < 0.0001). Immunosuppression was associated with increased adjusted mortality hazard (hazard ratio [HR], 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-2.75). The etiology of IS was associated with OS (p = 0.0015), and patients with solid-organ transplantation had the lowest 3-year OS (32.7%). Immunosuppression was associated with increased odds of greater nodal burden (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.37-2.11) and lymphovascular invasion (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.23-2.03). CONCLUSIONS: Immune status was independently prognostic for the OS of patients with localized MCC. The etiology of IS may be associated with differential survival outcomes. Multiple adverse prognostic factors were associated with increased likelihood of IS. Immune status, and potentially the etiology of IS, may be useful prognostic factors to consider for future MCC staging systems.

Cytokine and Growth Factor Response in a Rat Model of Radiation Induced Injury to the Submental Muscles.

Submental muscles (i.e., mylohyoid and geniohyoid) play a vital role during swallowing, protecting the airway from ingested material. To design therapies to reduce the functional deficits associated with radiation treatment relies in part on our understanding of the changes in the cytokine and growth factor response that can impact muscle function. The purpose of this study is to quantify changes in the inflammatory, pro-fibrotic, and pro-angiogenic factors following 48 Gy of fractionated radiation to the mylohyoid muscle. We hypothesized that (1) irradiation will provoke increases in TGF-1ß and MMP-2 mRNA in the mylohyoid muscle; and (2) muscles surrounding the target location (i.e., geniohyoid and digastric muscles) will exhibit similar alterations in their gene expression profiles. Rats were exposed to 6 fractions of 8 Gy using a 6 MeV electron beam on a clinical linear accelerator. The highest dose curve was focused at the mylohyoid muscle. After 2- and 4-weeks post-radiation, the mylohyoid, geniohyoid, and digastric muscles were harvested. Expression of TNF-α, IFNγ, IL-1ß, IL-6, TGF-1ß, VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9 mRNA was analyzed via PCR and/or RT-PCR. TGF-1ß, MMP-2, and IL-6 expression was upregulated in the irradiated mylohyoid compared to non-irradiated controls. No notable changes in TNF-α, IFNγ, and IL-1ß mRNA expression were observed in irradiated muscles. Differing expression profiles were found in the surrounding muscles post-radiation. Results demonstrated that irradiation provokes molecular signals involved in the regulation of wound healing, which could lead to fibrosis or atrophy in the swallowing muscle after radiation.

Surface mould brachytherapy in oral and oropharyngeal cancers.

INTRODUCTION: There are insufficient data on surface mold brachytherapy (SMB) in treating oral cancers. We reviewed our institutional experience to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of this treatment modality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all the patients treated between 1989 and 2018 with high-dose-rate iridium-192 SMB for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas at our institution. Surface mold brachytherapy was delivered via an acrylic surface mold with 1-5 inserted catheters spaced 1 cm apart fabricated by our dental oncologist. The Kaplan-Meier product estimator was used to assess local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of various variables and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Indications for treatment were primary tumor (n = 13), local recurrence (2), locoregional recurrence (1), and oligometastatic disease (1). Ten patients received SMB alone and 8 received external beam radiotherapy with an SMB boost. The acute toxicity outcomes were as follows: no toxicity (n = 1), grade 1 (7), grade 2 (9), and grade 3 (1). Late effects were rare, only occurring in 3 patients. The one- and two-year LC were 81% and 68%, LRC 77% and 64%, DMFS 81% and 81%, and OS 77% and 46%. CONCLUSIONS: Surface mold brachytherapy is a viable modality as either primary or boost treatment for superficial oral cancers. In our patients, this treatment method has a low toxicity profile and resulted in reasonable LC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of adrenal gland metastases in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a form of noninvasive treatment that is becoming increasingly used to manage cancers with adrenal gland metastases. There is a paucity of data on safety and efficacy of this modality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adrenal gland SBRT in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we performed a single-institution analysis of 26 adrenal lesions from 23 patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease treated from 2013 to 2019 with the goal of achieving durable local control. Palliative cases were excluded. Radiation dosimetry data was collected. Kaplan Meier product estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The median dose was 36 Gy in 3 fractions (range: 24-50 Gy and 3-6 fractions) with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 (range: 40-100). 1-year local control rate was 80% and median local control was not achieved due to a low number of failures. 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 66% and 32%. Toxicity was mild with only one case of grade 2 nausea and no grade 3-5 toxicity. Higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was associated with worse overall survival and a trend toward worse progression-free survival. In addition, worse performance status and lower BED10 were associated with worse survival. No such association could be shown for primary tumor location, histology, size or stage. CONCLUSION: Adrenal SBRT for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease is a safe and effective form of treatment.

Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma have high survival when treated with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Whether replacement of cisplatin with cetuximab-an antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor-can preserve high survival and reduce treatment toxicity is unknown. We investigated whether cetuximab would maintain a high proportion of patient survival and reduce acute and late toxicity. METHODS: RTOG 1016 was a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial at 182 health-care centres in the USA and Canada. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition clinical categories T1-T2, N2a-N3 M0 or T3-T4, N0-N3 M0; Zubrod performance status 0 or 1; age at least 18 years; and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive either radiotherapy plus cetuximab or radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks, and patients were stratified by T category (T1-T2 vs T3-T4), N category (N0-N2a vs N2b-N3), Zubrod performance status (0 vs 1), and tobacco smoking history (≤10 pack-years vs >10 pack-years). Patients were assigned to receive either intravenous cetuximab at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 5-7 days before radiotherapy initiation, followed by cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly for seven doses (total 2150 mg/m2), or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 of radiotherapy (total 200 mg/m2). All patients received accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivered at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 6 weeks at six fractions per week (with two fractions given on one day, at least 6 h apart). The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation to death from any cause, with non-inferiority margin 1·45. Primary analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat approach, whereby all patients meeting eligibility criteria are included. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01302834. FINDINGS: Between June 9, 2011, and July 31, 2014, 987 patients were enrolled, of whom 849 were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy plus cetuximab (n=425) or radiotherapy plus cisplatin (n=424). 399 patients assigned to receive cetuximab and 406 patients assigned to receive cisplatin were subsequently eligible. After median follow-up duration of 4·5 years, radiotherapy plus cetuximab did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·45, one-sided 95% upper CI 1·94; p=0·5056 for non-inferiority; one-sided log-rank p=0·0163). Estimated 5-year overall survival was 77·9% (95% CI 73·4-82·5) in the cetuximab group versus 84·6% (80·6-88·6) in the cisplatin group. Progression-free survival was significantly lower in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 1·72, 95% CI 1·29-2·29; p=0·0002; 5-year progression-free survival 67·3%, 95% CI 62·4-72·2 vs 78·4%, 73·8-83·0), and locoregional failure was significantly higher in the cetuximab group compared with the cisplatin group (HR 2·05, 95% CI 1·35-3·10; 5-year proportions 17·3%, 95% CI 13·7-21·4 vs 9·9%, 6·9-13·6). Proportions of acute moderate to severe toxicity (77·4%, 95% CI 73·0-81·5 vs 81·7%, 77·5-85·3; p=0·1586) and late moderate to severe toxicity (16·5%, 95% CI 12·9-20·7 vs 20·4%, 16·4-24·8; p=0·1904) were similar between the cetuximab and cisplatin groups. INTERPRETATION: For patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, radiotherapy plus cetuximab showed inferior overall survival and progression-free survival compared with radiotherapy plus cisplatin. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin is the standard of care for eligible patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute USA, Eli Lilly, and The Oral Cancer Foundation.

Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte grade in Merkel cell carcinoma: relationships with clinical factors and independent prognostic value.

INTRODUCTION: Surrogate markers of the host immune response are not currently included in AJCC staging for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), and have not been consistently associated with clinical outcomes. We performed an analysis of a large national database to investigate tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) grade as an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) for patients with MCC and to characterize the relationship between TIL grade and other clinical prognostic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The NCDB was queried for patients with resected, non-metastatic MCC with known TIL grade (absent, non-brisk and brisk). Multivariable Cox regression modeling was performed to define TIL grade as a predictor of OS adjusting for other relevant clinical factors. Multinomial, multivariable logistic regression was performed to characterize the relationship between TIL grade and other clinical prognostic factors. Multiple imputation was performed to account for missing data bias. RESULTS: Both brisk (HR 0.55, CI 0.36-0.83) and non-brisk (HR 0.77, CI 0.60-0.98) were associated with decreased adjusted hazard of death relative to absent TIL grade. Adverse clinical factors such as 1-3 positive lymph nodes, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and immunosuppression were associated with increased likelihood of non-brisk TIL relative to absent TIL grade (p values <.05). Extracapsular extension (ECS) was associated with decreased likelihood of brisk TIL relative to absent TIL grade (p<.05). DISCUSSION: Histopathologic TIL grade was independently predictive for OS in this large national cohort. Significant differences in the likelihood of non-brisk or brisk TIL relative to absent grade were present with regards to LVI, ECS and immune status. TIL grade may be a useful prognostic factor to consider in addition to more granular characterization of TIL morphology and immunophenotype.

Optimal adjuvant radiotherapy dose for stage I, II or III Merkel cell carcinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: We performed an analysis of the National Cancer Database to determine optimal doses of conventionally-fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with stage I/II or III Merkel cell carcinoma. METHODS: The cohort included 2735 patients with resected Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck, trunk or extremities receiving radiotherapy. Exclusion criteria included doses of radiotherapy <30 or >80 Gy, or dose per fraction >200 or <180 cGy. Recursive partitioning analysis and spline models were used to select dose thresholds. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to validate thresholds with respect to overall survival. RESULTS: Recursive partitioning analysis models defined a threshold of 57 Gy for stage I/II Merkel cell carcinoma, above which 3-year overall survival rate was decreased (P < 0.0001). The 3-year overall survival rate for patients receiving 50.0-57.0 Gy (81.2%) was greater compared to doses of 30.0-49.9 Gy (75.3%) or >57.0 Gy (70%, P < 0.0001). Doses > 57.0 Gy were associated with an increased hazard of death (1.31, confidence interval 1.07-1.60) with respect to doses of 50.0-57.0 Gy. Doses < 50.0 Gy for stage III Merkel cell carcinoma were associated with worsened 3-year overall survival (P < 0.0001) and increased hazard of death (2.01, confidence interval 1.43-2.82) with respect to doses between 50.0 and 57.0 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support doses of 50-57 Gy for most patients with stage I/II Merkel cell carcinoma receiving conventionally-fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy. In contrast to a prior National Cancer Database analysis, our results suggest doses ≥ 50 Gy should be strongly considered for patients with stage III Merkel cell carcinoma regardless of anatomic subsite.

Effects of adjuvant radiation therapy on survival for patients with resected primary tracheal carcinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVE(S): To identify predictors for receiving adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and investigate the impact of adjuvant RT on survival for patients with resected primary tracheal carcinoma (PTC). METHODS: The National Cancer database was queried for patients with PTC diagnosed from 2004 to 2014 undergoing resection. Patients who died within 30 days of resection were excluded to minimize immortal time bias. Kaplan-Meier methods, Cox regression modeling and propensity score weighted (PSW) log-rank tests were considered to assess the relationship between adjuvant RT and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors associated with receiving adjuvant RT. RESULTS: A total of 549 patients were identified with 300 patients (55%) receiving adjuvant RT. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common histology with 234 patients (43%). Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) was second most frequent with 180 patients (33%). Adjuvant RT was not associated with OS by multivariable Cox analysis or PSW log-rank test (P values > 0.05). Patients with positive surgical margins (odds ratio (OR) 1.80, confidence interval (CI) 1.06-3.07) were more likely to receive adjuvant RT than those with negative surgical margins. Patients with ACC (OR 6.53, CI 3.57-11.95) were more likely to receive adjuvant RT compared with SCC. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant RT was not significantly associated with OS for patients with resected PTC in this analysis. Surgical margin status and tumor histology were associated with receiving adjuvant RT. Further investigations including prospective registry studies capturing radiation technique and treatment volumes are needed to better define which patients with resected PTC may benefit from adjuvant RT.

Neck dissection for unknown cancer of the head and neck in the era of chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes for patients with cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary site of the head and neck treated with either non-operative therapy or neck dissection followed by adjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with squamous cell carcinoma of an unknown primary site of the head or neck seen between 2003 and 2013 were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival, local recurrence free survival, loco-regional recurrence free survival, and progression free survival. The log-rank test and proportional hazards regression were used to analyze factors influencing outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2258 patients with a new diagnosis of head and neck cancer, no primary site was identified in 66 patients. Twenty-nine patients were treated with definitive non-operative therapy (15 with chemoradiation and 14 with radiation alone). Thirty-seven patients received an upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation. Three-year loco-regional recurrence free survival, progression free survival, and overall survival were 55.9%, 55.4%, and 69.4% respectively. Patients treated with preoperative neck dissection had improved local recurrence free survival (96.7% vs 54.1%, p=0.003) and loco-regional recurrence free survival (82.2% vs 46.4%, p=0.068) compared to patients treated with definitive chemoradiation with no difference in overall survival (p=0.641). CONCLUSIONS: Neck dissection improved local and regional control but not overall survival in patients with unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck over non-operative therapy alone.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for a Lung Metastasis in a Child With Ewing's Sarcoma.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivers a high dose of radiation to a small volume over several fractions. Although most commonly used as a treatment alternative to surgery in adult patients with primary lung cancer, its use has now been reported in children with metastatic disease to the lungs. We present the case of a child treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to pulmonary metastases in preparation for a salvage stem cell transplant. The patient was treated to a dominant pulmonary nodule and successfully received his stem cell transplant, however he developed clinical and radiographic findings consistent with pneumonitis several months after treatment.

Pathophysiology of Radiation-Induced Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer.

Oncologic treatments, such as curative radiotherapy and chemoradiation, for head and neck cancer can cause long-term swallowing impairments (dysphagia) that negatively impact quality of life. Radiation-induced dysphagia comprised a broad spectrum of structural, mechanical, and neurologic deficits. An understanding of the biomolecular effects of radiation on the time course of wound healing and underlying morphological tissue responses that precede radiation damage will improve options available for dysphagia treatment. The goal of this review is to discuss the pathophysiology of radiation-induced injury and elucidate areas that need further exploration.

Human papillomavirus E7 serology and association with p16 immunohistochemistry in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer is associated with improved survival and treatment response as compared to HPV-negative cancers. P16 overexpression is widely accepted as a surrogate marker for HPV positivity. METHODS: A total of 92 serum samples from 75 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients were examined for HPV16 and 18 E7 antibodies by ELISA. Available tissue was tested for HPV-DNA by PCR, and p16 immunohistochemistry was obtained from a deidentified database. RESULTS: Of 75 HNSCC patients, 25 were HPV E7 seropositive. Seropositivity was strongly associated with cancers of the oropharynx, and correlated with positive p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and HPV-DNA. Post-treatment serum was available in a limited subset of patients, revealing a decrease in antibody titers following response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: HPV E7 seropositivity correlated with positive tumor HPV-DNA and p16 expression, and was strongly associated with cancers of the oropharynx. E7 serology warrants further study as a potential biomarker in HPV-positive HNSCC.

HPV: a factor in organ preservation for locally advanced larynx and hypopharynx cancer?

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To assess the interaction of HPV/p16 status and therapy rendered in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients receiving definitive treatment between 2009 and 2011 for locally advanced larynx or hypopharynx cancer with high-risk HPV and/or p16 testing performed were identified and retrospectively investigated. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were assessed. RESULTS: Of 47 evaluable patients, there were 38 (81%) with laryngeal and 9 (19%) with hypopharyngeal tumors, 13 (28%) of which were found to be either HPV or p16 positive. At a median follow-up of 24 months, comparing HPV/p16+ versus HPV/p16- patients, there was no difference in OS, DFS, or LRFS. There was an improvement in 2-year DFS (60% vs 100%, P=.03) and LRFS (80% vs 100%, P=.08), in HPV/p16+ patients treated with chemo/RT versus surgery. There was an improvement in 2-year DFS (100% vs 68%, P=.04) and LRFS (100% vs 72%, P=.05) in HPV/p16+ versus HPV/p16- patients who received chemo/RT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HPV/p16+ tumors fared more favorably with chemo/RT than up-front surgery, with improvements in DFS and LRFS. In patients treated with the intent of organ preservation therapy, HPV/p16+ patients had no observed treatment failures. HPV/p16 status should be taken into account when considering organ preservation for locally advanced larynx and hypopharynx cancers.

Alzheimer's disease and low-dose radiation therapy: A new hope.

The concept of low-dose radiation (LDR)-induced hormetic responses was initially observed approximately 70 years ago and systematically reviewed along with the discovery of LDR-induced adaptive responses in a cytogenetic in vitro study in 1980s. By the end of the 1990s, discussions regarding the potential applications of LDR-induced hormesis and adaptive responses for preventing or treating chronic diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) had taken place. Until 2016, reports on radiotherapy for the subjects with AD and for genetic AD model mice were published. Subsequently, several preclinical studies with animal models of AD and clinical studies in AD subjects were conducted. A significant milestone was achieved with the online availability of a new Systematic Review based on qualified publications from these preclinical and clinical studies. This mini-review provides a concise historical introduction to LDR-induced hormesis and adaptive responses with discussion of AD radiotherapy with either LDR or relatively high dose radiation. Highlights of this Systematic Review cover promising outcomes, challenges, and new questions, followed by discussion of potential mechanisms.

Long-Term Update of NRG/RTOG 0522: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Cisplatin With or Without Cetuximab in Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin and radiation or cetuximab and radiation improves overall survival of patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck carcinoma. NRG Oncology conducted a phase 3 trial to test the hypothesis that adding cetuximab to radiation and cisplatin would improve progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition stage T2 N2a-3 M0 or T3-4 N0-3 M0 were accrued from November 2005 to March 2009 and randomized to receive radiation and cisplatin without (arm A) or with (arm B) cetuximab. Outcomes were correlated with patient and tumor features. Late reactions were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3). RESULTS: Of 891 analyzed patients, 452 with a median follow-up of 10.1 years were alive at analysis. The addition of cetuximab did not improve PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.26; P = .74), with 10-year estimates of 43.6% (95% CI, 38.8- 48.4) for arm A and 40.2% (95% CI, 35.4-45.0) for arm B. Cetuximab did not reduce locoregional failure (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.95-1.53; P = .94) or distant metastasis (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54-1.14; P = .10) or improve overall survival (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.16; P = .36). Cetuximab did not appear to improve PFS in either p16-positive oropharynx (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.87-1.93) or p16-negative oropharynx or nonoropharyngeal primary (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.21). Grade 3 to 4 late toxicity rates were 57.4% in arm A and 61.3% in arm B (P = .26). CONCLUSIONS: With a median follow-up of more than 10 years, this updated report confirms the addition of cetuximab to radiation therapy and cisplatin did not improve any measured outcome in the entire cohort or when stratifying by p16 status.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Vertebral Metastases of the Spine: Phase 3 Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0631 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Spine metastasis can be treated with high-dose radiation therapy with advanced delivery technology for long-term tumor and pain control. Objective: To assess whether patient-reported pain relief was improved with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as compared with conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) for patients with 1 to 3 sites of vertebral metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial, patients with 1 to 3 vertebral metastases were randomized 2:1 to the SRS or cEBRT groups. This NRG 0631 phase 3 study was performed as multi-institutional enrollment within NRG Oncology. Eligibility criteria included the following: (1) solitary vertebral metastasis, (2) 2 contiguous vertebral levels involved, or (3) maximum of 3 separate sites. Each site may involve up to 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. A total of 353 patients enrolled in the trial, and 339 patients were analyzed. This analysis includes data extracted on March 9, 2020. Interventions: Patients randomized to the SRS group were treated with a single dose of 16 or 18 Gy (to convert to rad, multiply by 100) given to the involved vertebral level(s) only, not including any additional spine levels. Patients assigned to cEBRT were treated with 8 Gy given to the involved vertebra plus 1 additional vertebra above and below. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was patient-reported pain response defined as at least a 3-point improvement on the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) without worsening in pain at the secondary site(s) or the use of pain medication. Secondary end points included treatment-related toxic effects, quality of life, and long-term effects on vertebral bone and spinal cord. Results: A total of 339 patients (mean [SD] age of SRS group vs cEBRT group, respectively, 61.9 [13.1] years vs 63.7 [11.9] years; 114 [54.5%] male in SRS group vs 70 [53.8%] male in cEBRT group) were analyzed. The baseline mean (SD) pain score at the index vertebra was 6.06 (2.61) in the SRS group and 5.88 (2.41) in the cEBRT group. The primary end point of pain response at 3 months favored cEBRT (41.3% for SRS vs 60.5% for cEBRT; difference, -19 percentage points; 95% CI, -32.9 to -5.5; 1-sided P = .99; 2-sided P = .01). Zubrod score (a measure of performance status ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden) was the significant factor influencing pain response. There were no differences in the proportion of acute or late adverse effects. Vertebral compression fracture at 24 months was 19.5% with SRS and 21.6% with cEBRT (P = .59). There were no spinal cord complications reported at 24 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, superiority of SRS for the primary end point of patient-reported pain response at 3 months was not found, and there were no spinal cord complications at 2 years after SRS. This finding may inform further investigation of using spine radiosurgery in the setting of oligometastases, where durability of cancer control is essential. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00922974.

Radiotherapy Plus Cisplatin With or Without Lapatinib for Non-Human Papillomavirus Head and Neck Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Patients with locally advanced non-human papillomavirus (HPV) head and neck cancer (HNC) carry an unfavorable prognosis. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody improves overall survival (OS) of patients with stage III to IV HNC, and preclinical data suggest that a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor dual EGFR and ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) inhibitor may be more effective than anti-EGFR antibody therapy in HNC. Objective: To examine whether adding lapatinib, a dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitor, to radiation plus cisplatin for frontline therapy of stage III to IV non-HPV HNC improves progression-free survival (PFS). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial enrolled 142 patients with stage III to IV carcinoma of the oropharynx (p16 negative), larynx, and hypopharynx with a Zubrod performance status of 0 to 1 who met predefined blood chemistry criteria from October 18, 2012, to April 18, 2017 (median follow-up, 4.1 years). Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2020, to December 4, 2020. Intervention: Patients were randomized (1:1) to 70 Gy (6 weeks) plus 2 cycles of cisplatin (every 3 weeks) plus either 1500 mg per day of lapatinib (CRT plus lapatinib) or placebo (CRT plus placebo). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was PFS, with 69 events required. Progression-free survival rates between arms for all randomized patients were compared by 1-sided log-rank test. Secondary end points included OS. Results: Of the 142 patients enrolled, 127 (median [IQR] age, 58 [53-63] years; 98 [77.2%] male) were randomized; 63 to CRT plus lapatinib and 64 to CRT plus placebo. Final analysis did not suggest improvement in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.56-1.46; P = .34) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.61-1.86; P = .58) with the addition of lapatinib. There were no significant differences in grade 3 to 4 acute adverse event rates (83.3% [95% CI, 73.9%-92.8%] with CRT plus lapatinib vs 79.7% [95% CI, 69.4%-89.9%] with CRT plus placebo; P = .64) or late adverse event rates (44.4% [95% CI, 30.2%-57.8%] with CRT plus lapatinib vs 40.8% [95% CI, 27.1%-54.6%] with CRT plus placebo; P = .84). Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, dual EGFR-ERBB2 inhibition with lapatinib did not appear to enhance the benefit of CRT. Although the results of this trial indicate that accrual to a non-HPV HNC-specific trial is feasible, new strategies must be investigated to improve the outcome for this population with a poor prognosis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01711658.

Patterns of Care and Data Quality in a National Registry of Black and White Patients with Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cancer most commonly affecting White patients; less is known for Black patients. We aim to report presentation, treatment, and quality of registry data by race with a secondary endpoint of overall survival. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis between 2006−2017 via the National Cancer Database of Black and White MCC patients with and without known staging information. Multivariable logistic, proportional odds logistic, and baseline category logistic regression models were used for our primary endpoint. Multivariable Cox regression was used to interrogate overall survival. Multiple imputation was used to mitigate missing data bias. 34,503 patients with MCC were included (2566 Black patients). Black patients were younger (median age 52 vs. 72, p < 0.0001), had higher rates of immunosuppression (28% vs. 14%, p = 0.0062), and were more likely to be diagnosed at a higher stage (proportional OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.25−1.59). No differences were noted by race across receipt of definitive resection (DR), though Black patients did have longer time from diagnosis to DR. Black patients were less likely to receive adjuvant radiation. Black patients were more likely to have missing cancer stage (OR = 1.69, CI 1.52−1.88). Black patients had decreased adjusted risk of mortality (HR 0.73, 0.65−0.81). Given the importance of registry analyses for rare cancers, efforts are needed to ensure complete data coding. Paramount to ensuring equitable access to optimal care for all is the recognition that MCC can occur in Black patients.