Safety and efficacy of ixmyelocel-T: an expanded, autologous multi-cellular therapy, in dilated cardiomyopathy.

RATIONALE: Ixmyelocel-T is associated with a wide range of biological activities relevant to tissue repair and regeneration. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ixmyelocel-T in 2 prospective randomized phase 2A Trials administered via minithoracotomy or intramyocardial catheter injections in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) stratified by ischemic or nonischemic status. METHODS AND RESULTS: In IMPACT-DCM, patients were randomized to either ixmyelocel-T or standard-of-care control in a 3:1 ratio (n=39); ixmyelocel-T was administered intramyocardially via minithoracotomy. In Catheter-DCM, patients were randomized to either ixmyelocel-T or standard of care control in a 2:1 ratio (n=22); ixmyelocel-T was administered intramyocardially using the NOGA Myostar catheter. Only patients randomized to ixmyelocel-T underwent bone marrow aspiration and injections. In the 2 studies, a total of 61 patients were randomized, and 59 were treated or received standard of care. Fewer ischemic patients treated with ixmyelocel-T experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event during follow-up when compared with control patients. A similar benefit was not seen in the nonischemic patients. Heart failure exacerbation was the most common major adverse cardiovascular event. Ixmyelocel-T treatment was associated with improved New York Heart Association class, 6-minute walk distance, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores in the ischemic population relative to control; a similar trend was not observed in the nonischemic population. CONCLUSIONS: Intramyocardial injection with ixmyelocel-T reduces major adverse cardiovascular event and improves symptoms in patients with ischemic DCM but not in patients with nonischemic DCM.

Assessing clinical and biomarker characteristics to optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure.

Of the various medical therapies for heart failure (HF), sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor that combines sacubitril, a pro-drug that is further metabolized to the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitrilat, and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker valsartan. Inhibition of neprilysin and blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor with sacubitril/valsartan increases vasoactive peptide levels, increasing vasodilation, natriuresis, and diuresis. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used to classify HF, to assist with clinical decision-making, for patient selection in HF clinical trials, and to optimize the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in HF. However, as HF is a complex syndrome that occurs on a continuum of overlapping and changing phenotypes, patient classification based solely on LVEF becomes problematic. LVEF measurement can be imprecise, have low reproducibility, and often changes over time. LVEF may not accurately reflect inherent disease heterogeneity and complexity, and the addition of alternate criteria to LVEF may improve phenotyping of HF and help guide treatment choices. Sacubitril/valsartan may work, in part, by mechanisms that are not directly related to the LVEF. For example, this drug may exert antifibrotic and neurohumoral modulatory effects through inhibition or activation of several signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss markers of cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, systemic inflammation; activation of neurohormonal pathways, including the natriuretic system and the sympathetic nervous system; the presence of comorbidities; patient characteristics; hemodynamics; and HF signs and symptoms that may all be used to (1) better understand the mechanisms of action of sacubitril/valsartan and (2) help to identify subsets of patients who might benefit from treatment, regardless of LVEF.

Probability of Accurate Heart Failure Diagnosis and the Implications for Hospital Readmissions.

Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome with inherent diagnostic challenges. We studied the scope of possibly inaccurately documented HF in a large health care system among patients assigned a primary diagnosis of HF at discharge. Through a retrospective record review and a classification schema developed from published guidelines, we assessed the probability of the documented HF diagnosis being accurate and determined factors associated with HF-related and non-HF-related hospital readmissions. An arbitration committee of 3 experts reviewed a subset of records to corroborate the results. We assigned a low probability of accurate diagnosis to 133 (19%) of the 712 patients. A subset of patients were also reviewed by an expert panel, which concluded that 13% to 35% of patients probably did not have HF (inter-rater agreement, kappa = 0.35). Low-probability HF was predictive of being readmitted more frequently for non-HF causes (p = 0.018), as well as documented arrhythmias (p = 0.023), and age >60 years (p = 0.006). Documented sleep apnea (p = 0.035), percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.006), non-white race (p = 0.047), and B-type natriuretic peptide >400 pg/ml (p = 0.007) were determined to be predictive of HF readmissions in this cohort. In conclusion, approximately 1 in 5 patients documented to have HF were found to have a low probability of actually having it. Moreover, the determination of low-probability HF was twice as likely to result in readmission for non-HF causes and, thus, should be considered a determinant for all-cause readmissions in this population.