Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone. RESULTS: EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.

Accelerated treatment of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) restricted to the tumor bed, by means of an interstitial implant, and lasting 4 to 5 days after lumpectomy was prospectively evaluated in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The goals of the study were to determine whether treatment time can be reduced and whether elective treatment of the entire breast is necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1993 and January 2000, 174 cases of early-stage breast cancer were managed with lumpectomy followed by RT restricted to the tumor bed using an interstitial implant. Each brachytherapy patient was matched with one external-beam RT (ERT) patient derived from a reference group of 1,388 patients treated with standard BCT. Patients were matched for age, tumor size, histology, margins of excision, absence of an extensive intraductal component, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, and tamoxifen use. Median follow-up for both the ERT and brachytherapy groups was 36 months. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted in the 5-year actuarial rates of ipsilateral breast treatment failure or locoregional failure between ERT and brachytherapy patients (1% v 0%, P =.31 and 2% v 1%, P =.63, respectively). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences noted in rates of distant metastasis (6% v 3%, P =.24), disease-free survival (87% v 91%, P =.55), overall survival (90% v 93%, P =.66), or cause-specific survival (97% v 99%, P =.28). CONCLUSION: Accelerated treatment of breast cancer using an interstitial implant to deliver radiation to the tumor bed alone over 4 to 5 days seems to produce 5-year results equivalent to those achieved with conventional ERT. Extended follow-up will be required to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment approach.

Intraoperative optimization of needle placement and dwell times for conformal prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, transperineal prostate brachytherapy has been heavily operator dependent. To overcome this limitation, a treatment planning method was developed for intraoperative planning, guidance, and evaluation. In this setting, reliability, speed, and ease of understanding are primary considerations. This planning method has been implemented for ultrasound guided implants of the prostate, but can be extended for use in other body sites. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The length and cross-section of the target (prostate) and location of urethra and rectum are determined intraoperatively from live ultrasound imaging. The planning program then automatically generates a "reference plan" containing needle locations, dwell times, and the resulting isodose distribution. As needles are placed, this information is corrected to account for any deviation of needle placement or movement of the prostate. Once all needles are in place, the normalization is adjusted to reconcile remaining hot-spots with coverage of the target volume. Optimization is performed in three separate stages. Each stage works to enhance only a subset of the implant parameters. (a) Pattern Optimization attempts to find the most appropriate placement for the needles or catheters. It is based on the transverse contour of the target volume. Needles are placed uniformly around the perimeter, and interior needle positions are determined from the cross-sectional area and shape. Critical structures such as the urethra are explicitly avoided. This step provides the overall framework for the implant, and is not generally repeated. (b) Relative Dwell Time Optimization selects relative dwell times that will give the best uniformity of dose. It works by setting the relative dwell time in each source position inversely proportional to the dose delivered to that point by the other source positions. It is used in the reference plan, and is repeated as each needle is inserted. This provides dosimetric feedback to the physician, who can judge the effect of deviations from the reference plan. (c) Relative Volume Optimization is an interactive method for fine tuning the normalization based upon volume analysis. The volume analysis is presented in tabular and graphical form, both being updated rapidly as the normalization is adjusted. The information is formatted to help the operator judge coverage and uniformity. Special functions are provided that allow the operator to "jump" to special normalization values based on several indices of uniformity or uniformity/coverage. RESULTS: This system overcomes some conventional brachytherapy limitations. Rather than depend on the operator's intuitive judgement of where the needles should be placed, a global plan is generated and validated with full dose calculations. Immediate feedback is provided concerning the adequacy of placement and avoidance of critical structures. This information is provided in terms of actual tissue doses to the target volume and critical structures using point doses, isodose distributions, and volume analysis. Since the new method was introduced in January 1994, 33 implants have been performed. The needle placement method has been reliable in the clinic, with different doctors producing similar results on subsequent fractions for the same patient. CONCLUSION: The method of decomposing the optimization problem into several simple steps is capable of rapidly, consistently, and reliably designing conformal treatment plans of high uniformity. Operator dependence has been significantly reduced. We are adapting the method for other anatomic sites.

A multiple-site perineal applicator (MUPIT) for treatment of prostatic, anorectal, and gynecologic malignancies.

Recently, transperineal interstitial-intracavitary applicators have been used to treat locally limited and advanced perineal and gynecologic malignancies. We have developed a single afterloading applicator, referred to as the "MUPIT" (Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template), which with its prototypes has been utilized to treat 78 patients with malignancies of the cervix, vagina, female urethra, perineum, prostate, and anorectal region. The device basically consists of two acrylic cylinders, an acrylic template with a predrilled array of holes that serve as guides for trocars, and a cover plate. Some of the guide holes on the template are angled outward to permit a wide lateral coverage without danger of striking the ischium. The cylinders have an axial hole large enough to pass a central tandem or a suction tube for the drainage of secretions. Thus, the device allows for the interstitial placement of 192Ir ribbons as well as the intracavitary placement of either 137Cs tubes or 192Ir ribbons. In use, the cylinders are placed in the vagina and rectum and then fastened to the template, so that a fixed geometric relationship among the tumor volume, normal structures, and source placement is preserved throughout the course of the implantation. Hollow, closed-end, stainless steel trocars are then inserted through the guide holes that produce optimal coverage of the treatment volume. Appropriate computer programs also have been developed on a minicomputer for the corresponding dose-rate computations. These programs run with sufficient speed that they may be used for both the planning of the source placement beforehand and the computation of the actual dose-rate distribution obtained. The advantages of the system are (1) greater control of the placement of sources relative to the tumor volume and critical structures owing to the fixed geometry provided by the template and cylinders, and (2) improved dose-rate distributions obtained by means of computer-assisted optimization of the source placement and strength during the planning phase.

Pelvic lymphadenectomy combined with transperineal interstitial implantation of iridium-192 and external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostatic carcinoma: technical description.

Regardless of the treatment modality, control of locally advanced extracapsular prostatic cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. At the Mayo Clinic, we have recently developed a combined approach for surgically staged patients employing interstitial irradiation with 192 Iridium via a transperineal template. The Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT-II) and moderate doses of external beam irradiation. The procedure consists of: 1) preoperative single dose external beam irradiation to decrease potential for tumor seeding or showering of malignant cells during MUPIT-II placement; 2) adequate surgical staging through a bilateral retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy; 3) transperineal interstitial implantation of the tumor and retropubic palpation of the needles to verify proper position; 4) intraoperative X rays are taken and used for documentation of needle position as well as for calculation and optimization of the implant dose distribution with the aid of a computerized system; 5) moderate doses of external beam irradiation postoperatively to the prostate with adequate margins. Our favorable preliminary results obtained in 18 patients treated with the above approach warrant the continuation of this trial. Details of this technique are presented.

The utilization of I-125 seeds as a substitute for Ir-192 seeds in temporary interstitial implants: an overview and a description of the William Beaumont Hospital technique.

In August of 1986, the Department of Radiation Oncology at William Beaumont Hospital (WBH) initiated the routine use of high activity I-125 seeds as a substitute for Ir-192 seeds in temporary implants where the afterloading plastic tube technique was used. Through March 6, 1987, 42 temporary I-125 implants were performed as a boost for curative therapy (38 breasts, 2 sarcomas, 2 tongues). Thus far, we have observed no differences in acute toxicity. Sources ranging from 2 to 5 mCi were utilized. The advantages of I-125 are as follows: (a) Easy to shield; (b) Radiation safety; (c) Decreased exposure to sensitive organs in close proximity to the implanted site; (d) Dosimetric advantages both intrinsic and extrinsic; and (e) Any private room can be used for these patients allowing a central brachytherapy ward to be established. While the advantages were obvious, we anticipated potential disadvantages and shortcomings and these will be discussed in detail. Furthermore because of significant differences in tube and ribbon construction, the I-125 afterloading plastic tube technique has important differences from that technique used with Ir-192. These modifications must be fully understood to maintain the integrity of the I-125 seed-ribbon afterloading tube assembly. A detailed description of the technique will be emphasized.

Combination of external beam irradiation and multiple-site perineal applicator (MUPIT) for treatment of locally advanced or recurrent prostatic, anorectal, and gynecologic malignancies.

We have devised a single after-loading applicator, the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT), which has been used in combination with external beam irradiation to treat 104 patients with either locally advanced or recurrent malignancies of the cervix, vagina, female urethra, prostate, or anorectal region. Twenty-six patients treated for prostate cancer are excluded because of their short follow-up. Local failure developed in 13 of the 78 remaining patients (16.6%)--major complications developed in 4 patients (5.1%). Follow-up has been 1 year to 7 1/2 years; 60/78 patients have been followed for more than 2 years. All local recurrences and complications occurred before 18 months. The device consists of two acrylic cylinders, an acrylic template with an array of holes that serve as guides for trocars, and a cover plate. In use, the cylinders are placed in the vagina and/or rectum or both and then fastened to the template so that a fixed geometric relationship among the tumor volume, normal structures, and source placement is preserved throughout the course of the implantation. Appropriate computer programs have been developed to calculate the dose from these implants. The advantages of the system are (a) greater control of the placement of sources relative to the tumor volume and critical structures, as a result of the fixed geometry provided by the template and cylinders, and (b) improved dose-rate distributions obtained by means of computerized optimization of the source placement and strength during the planning phase. We conclude that the local control rate (83.4%) with low morbidity (5.1%) achieved with the combination of external beam irradiation and MUPIT applicator in these patients with locally advanced malignancies represents an improvement over previous published results with other applicators.

Concurrent treatment planning for outpatient high dose rate prostate template implants.

PURPOSE: Since November of 1991, we have treated locally advanced (B2-C) prostate cancer using external beam radiotherapy integrated with outpatient high dose rate interstitial implant boost as part of a Phase II clinical trial. This required (a) rapid, automated planning; (b) incorporation of image data and (c) dose optimization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A treatment planning system was designed which integrates imaging and needle guidance with source reconstruction and dose display. All components of treatment planning (reconstruction, optimization, dose prescription, dose display) are largely automated. A rectal reference point was defined which was reproducible and easily verified. No pretreatment planning was required. RESULTS: As of November 1992, 83 treatments were delivered using this system. Intra-operative treatment decisions were made possible due to the speed and ease of interpretation of the system. The system has proven satisfactory in the operating room. Rectal doses were calculated for all patients, and ranged from 35-79% of the prescribed dose, with a mean of 58%. The first echelon of a Phase II escalating dose trial has been completed, with 22 patients treated over a period of 1 year. CONCLUSION: Outpatient high dose rate brachytherapy appears to be a practical means of boosting locally advanced prostate cancer patients. Rapid treatment planning is possible incorporating on-line ultrasound images to allow immediate dose optimization to be performed during and after implant placement.

The use of iodine-125 seeds as a substitute for iridium-192 seeds in temporary interstitial breast implants.

PURPOSE: We have previously reported that the use of iodine-125 seeds in temporary plastic tube interstitial implants may be more advantageous than iridium-192 seeds due to less patient and personnel radiation exposure, reduced shielding requirements, and significant dosimetric advantages. The impact of this isotope on the rate of local control and cosmetic outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with interstitial implants for their irradiation "boost" remains to be defined. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the treatment outcome of 402 consecutive cases of Stage I and II breast cancer undergoing breast conserving therapy between 1/1/80 and 12/31/87. All patients underwent excisional biopsy and received 45-50 Gy to the entire breast followed by a boost to the tumor bed using either electrons (104 patients), photons (15 patients), or an interstitial implant with either iridium-192 (197 patients) or iodine-125 (86 patients) to at least 60 Gy. Iodine-125 implants were primarily performed in patients with significant risk factors for local recurrence (71%) or in patients with large breasts (17%). Local tumor control and cosmetic outcome were assessed and contrasted between patients boosted with each modality. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 59.3 months, 18 (4.5%) patients developed a recurrence of the tumor in the treated breast (4.4% 5-year actuarial rate). No statistically significant differences in the 5-year actuarial rate of local recurrence were noted between patients boosted with either iodine-125 (3.0%), iridium-192 (3.8%), electrons (5.4%), or photons (0%). Likewise, no significant differences in the percentage of patients obtaining good/excellent cosmetic results were noted between iodine-125 (93%), iridium-192 (88%), electrons (90%), or photons (82%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients with Stage I and II breast cancer undergoing breast conserving therapy and judged to be candidates for boosts with interstitial implants can be effectively treated with iodine-125 seeds. Use of this isotope results in less patient and personnel irradiation exposure and a better dose distribution than iridium-192, since dose optimization can be routinely employed. Overall, local control and cosmetic outcome have been excellent and are similar to either iridium-192, electrons, or photons.

Phase II prospective study of the use of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for the treatment of favorable stage prostate cancer: a feasibility report.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the technical feasibility and tolerance of image-guided transperineal conformal high-dose-rate (C-HDR) brachytherapy as the sole treatment modality for favorable, localized cancer of the prostate, and to analyze possible intrafraction and interfraction volume changes in the prostate gland which may affect dosimetric quality. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were eligible for this prospective Phase II trial if they had biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate with favorable prognostic factors (Gleason score < or =7, PSA < or =10 ng/ml and Stage < or =T2a). The technique consisted of a transperineal implant procedure using a template with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance. An interactive on-line real-time planning system was utilized with geometric optimization. This allowed dosimetry to be generated and modified as required intraoperatively. Prescription was to the minimum dose point in the implanted volume, assuring conformal coverage of the prostate at its widest dimension with no margin. Total dose was 3800 cGy in 4 fractions of 950 cGy each, delivered twice a day over 2 days. The dose to any segment of rectum and urethra was limited to < or =75% and < or =125% of the prescription dose, respectively. Before each fraction, needle positions were verified under fluoroscopy and adjusted as required. For the last 10 patients, the adjustments required were measured in a prospective fashion in representative extrema of the gland. TRUS images were recorded for all patients before any needle manipulation, again just before delivering the first fraction and immediately after the last fraction. This typically meant approximately 36 h to pass between the first and last measurements. Implant quality was assessed via dose-volume histograms (DVH). RESULTS: Between 3/99 and 6/00, 41 patients received C-HDR interstitial brachytherapy as their only treatment for prostate cancer at our institution. Median age was 64 years (range 51-79). Stage distribution was 27 T1c patients and 14 T2a patients. Three patients had Gleason score (GS) of 5; 34 had GS of 6; 4 patients had GS of 7. Median pretreatment PSA was 4.7 ng/ml (range 0.8-13.3). All patients tolerated the treatment well with minimal discomfort. For 23 patients, data on volume changes in the gland during the implant were tabulated. They demonstrated a mean prostate volume of 30.7 cc before any manipulation with needles, 37.0 cc at the end of fraction 1, and 38.2 cc at the end of fraction 4. In addition, for those 10 patients prospectively evaluated for required adjustments, the overall mean adjustment between fraction 1 and fraction 2 was 2.0 cm, between fraction 2 and 3 was 0.4 cm, and between fractions 3 and 4 was 0.4 cm. For 10 consecutive patients, the average prescriptions dose -D90 for fractions 1 and 4 were 104% and 100%, respectively. The corresponding average urethral D10 for fractions 1 and 4 were 122% and 132%. CONCLUSION: Our protocol using C-HDR interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy for early cancer of the prostate was feasible and well tolerated by 41 patients treated. Changes in interfraction prostate volume do not appear to be significant enough to warrant modification of dosimetry for each fraction. Both excellent dose coverage of the prostate gland and low urethral dose are achieved as measured by DVH. However, paramount attention should be given to needle displacement before each fraction. Needle movement is most significant between fractions 1 and 2. Acute toxicity (RTOG) has been modest. Late toxicity and tumor control rates will be reported as longer follow-up allows.

The clinical advantages of I-125 seeds as a substitute for Ir-192 seeds in temporary plastic tube implants.

In August of 1986 at William Beaumont Hospital, Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds were introduced in the clinical practice as a substitute for Iridium-192 (Ir-192) seeds in patients undergoing temporary plastic tube interstitial implants. Through February 1988, 108 I-125 implants were performed in 105 patients. Acute and chronic toxicity was indistinguishable from Ir-192. However, improved radiation safety and a dynamic dosimetric program have resulted from this endeavor. Because of the multiple clinical advantages of I-125, we feel that this should be considered the isotope of choice in temporary interstitial plastic tube implants.

Management of malignant airway obstruction: clinical and dosimetric considerations using an iridium-192 afterloading technique in conjunction with the neodymium-YAG laser.

Fourteen patients with malignant airway obstruction have had 21 placements of a flexible nylon catheter for afterloading Iridium-192 using the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Prescribed therapy was completed in 13 patients (18 courses). All patients had prior full-dose external irradiation, and no effective surgical or chemotherapeutic options remained. While many have had a trial of neodymium-YAG (yttrium-aluminum-garnet) laser therapy alone, eight patients received laser treatment one to three weeks prior to planned brachytherapy to provide immediate relief of symptoms and/or facilitate access and safe catheter placement. Most patients (64%) had recurrent squamous cell lung cancer. A dose of 3000 cGy is currently specified to 5 mm and 10 mm in the bronchus and trachea, respectively. Nine of the 13 treated patients have had follow-up bronchoscopy at approximately three months post-treatment with improvement documented in seven and progression in two patients. One patient was clinically improved without follow-up bronchoscopy, and three patients have had insufficient follow-up. A single patient treated with laser and 6000 rad at 5 mm developed a bronchoesophageal fistula. No other complication has been observed. The technique is simple and safe with the use of laser therapy when needed and appears to offer effective palliation in most patients even when standard therapy is exhausted.

A comprehensive review of prostate cancer brachytherapy: defining an optimal technique.

PURPOSE: A comprehensive review of prostate cancer brachytherapy literature was performed to determine if an optimal method of implantation could be identified, and to compare and contrast techniques currently in use. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to obtain all articles in the English language on prostate cancer brachytherapy from 1985 through 1998. Articles were reviewed and grouped to determine the primary technique of implantation, the method or philosophy of source placement and/or dose specification, the technique to evaluate implant quality, overall treatment results (based upon pretreatment prostate specific antigen, (PSA), and biochemical control) and clinical, pathological or biochemical outcome based upon implant quality. RESULTS: A total of 178 articles were identified in the MEDLINE database. Of these, 53 studies discussed evaluable techniques of implantation and were used for this analysis. Of these studies, 52% used preoperative ultrasound to determine the target volume to be implanted, 16% used preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans, and 18% placed seeds with an open surgical technique. An additional 11% of studies placed seeds or needles under ultrasound guidance using interactive real-time dosimetry. The number and distribution of radioactive sources to be implanted or the method used to prescribe dose was determined using nomograms in 27% of studies, a least squares optimization technique in 11%, or not stated in 35%. In the remaining 26%, sources were described as either uniformly, differentially, or peripherally placed in the gland. To evaluate implant quality, 28% of studies calculated some type of dose-volume histogram, 21% calculated the matched peripheral dose, 19% the minimum peripheral dose, 14% used some type of CT-based qualitative review and, in 18% of studies, no implant quality evaluation was mentioned. Six studies correlated outcome with implant dose. One study showed an association of implant dose with the achievement of a PSA nadir < or = 0.5. Two studies showed an improvement in biochemical control with a D90 (dose to 90% of the prostate volume) of 120 to 140 Gy or higher, and 2 additional studies found an association of clinical outcome with implant dose. One study correlated implant quality with biopsy results. Of the articles, 33 discussed evaluable treatment results, but only 16 reported findings based upon pretreatment PSA and biochemical control. Three- to 5-year biochemical control rates ranged from 48% to 100% for pretreatment PSAs < or = 4, 55% to 90% for PSAs between 4 and 10, 30% to 89% for PSAs > 10, < or = 20 and < 10% to 100% for PSAs > 20. Due to substantial differences in patient selection criteria (e.g., median Gleason score, clinical stage, pretreatment PSA), number of patients treated, median follow-up, definitions of biochemical control, and time points for analysis, no single technique consistently produced superior results. CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive review of prostate cancer brachytherapy literature failed to identify an optimal treatment approach when studies were analyzed for treatment outcome based upon pretreatment PSA and biochemical control. Although several well-designed studies showed an improvement in outcome with total dose or implant quality, the numerous techniques for implantation and the varied and inconsistent methods to specify dose or evaluate implant quality suggest that standardized protocols should be developed to objectively evaluate this treatment approach. These protocols have recently been suggested and, when implemented, should significantly improve the reporting of treatment data and, ultimately, the efficacy of prostate brachytherapy.

Pelvic lymphadenectomy and transperineal interstitial implantation of IR 192 combined with external beam radiotherapy for bulky stage C prostatic carcinoma.

From January 1983 until June 1987, 51 patients with locally advanced prostatic carcinoma (47 Stage C, 4 bulky B2) were treated at Mayo Clinic (33 patients) and at William Beaumont Hospital (18 patients) with (a) 5 Gy delivered pre-operatively in one fraction, (b) pelvic lymphadenectomy and (c) interstitial implantation of the prostate with Ir 192 seeds via a perineal template (the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template) to deliver 35 Gy, and (d) 30.6 Gy external beam therapy in 17 fractions to prostate only fields. Initial clinical response has been excellent. Local control, with a median follow-up of 45 months, has been 100% by clinical exam and 84.5% pathologically in the subset biopsied. Disease-free actuarial survival at 5 years is 89%. Major toxicity has been limited to the rectum, but a modification of the brachytherapy technique has reduced this sharply. We conclude that bulky Stage C prostatic carcinoma can be successfully treated by this aggressive combination of modalities with acceptable toxicity.

Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: report of the American Brachytherapy Society.

PURPOSE: The preplanned technique used for permanent prostate brachytherapy has limitations that may be overcome by intraoperative planning. The goal of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) project was to assess the current intraoperative planning process and explore the potential for improvement in intraoperative treatment planning (ITP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Members of the ABS with expertise in ITP performed a literature review, reviewed their clinical experience with ITP, and explored the potential for improving the technique. RESULTS: The ABS proposes the following terminology in regard to prostate planning process: *Preplanning--Creation of a plan a few days or weeks before the implant procedure. *Intraoperative planning--Treatment planning in the operating room (OR): the patient and transrectal ultrasound probe are not moved between the volume study and the seed insertion procedure. * Intraoperative preplanning--Creation of a plan in the OR just before the implant procedure, with immediate execution of the plan. *Interactive planning--Stepwise refinement of the treatment plan using computerized dose calculations derived from image-based needle position feedback. *Dynamic dose calculation--Constant updating of dose distribution calculations using continuous deposited seed position feedback. Both intraoperative preplanning and interactive planning are currently feasible and commercially available and may help to overcome many of the limitations of the preplanning technique. Dosimetric feedback based on imaged needle positions can be used to modify the ITP. However, the dynamic changes in prostate size and shape and in seed position that occur during the implant are not yet quantifiable with current technology, and ITP does not obviate the need for postimplant dosimetric analysis. The major current limitation of ITP is the inability to localize the seeds in relation to the prostate. Dynamic dose calculation can become a reality once these issues are solved. Future advances can be expected in methods of enhancing seed identification, in imaging techniques, and in the development of better source delivery systems. Additionally, ITP should be correlated with outcome studies, using dosimetric, toxicity, and efficacy endpoints. CONCLUSION: ITP addresses many of the limitations of current permanent prostate brachytherapy and has some advantages over the preplanned technique. Further technologic advancement will be needed to achieve dynamic real-time calculation of dose distribution from implanted sources, with constant updating to allow modification of subsequent seed placement and consistent, ideal dose distribution within the target volume.

Improved local control and survival for surgically staged patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with up-front low dose rate iridium-192 prostate implantation and external beam irradiation.

PURPOSE: In an effort to improve upon the historically poor local control and survival rates for locally advanced prostate carcinoma, a prospective multidisciplinary clinical trial was initiated using low dose rate Iridium-192 prostate implantation and external beam irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1983 and September 1989, 57 patients with newly diagnosed bulky prostatic carcinoma (5 Stage B2, 52 Stage C) were treated at the Mayo Clinic (34 patients) and William Beaumont Hospital (23 patients) with (a) 5 Gy delivered preoperatively in one fraction, (b) pelvic lymphadenectomy with interstitial implantation of the prostate using Iridium-192 seeds via a perineal template to 30-35 Gy, and (c) 30.6 Gy external irradiation to prostate only in 17 fractions. RESULTS: After lymphadenectomy, 30/57 (53%) patients had pathologically confirmed positive lymph nodes or "D1" disease. Thirty-four patients (60%) had Gleason scores > or = 7. Mean age at diagnosis was 63.3 years. Median overall follow-up was 72 months. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 85% and disease-free survival was 63%. The 5-year survival for patients with negative nodes was 93% and with positive nodes was 79%. The corresponding survival for patients with Gleason scores < or = 6 was 96% and > or = 7 was 78%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that of all covariates considered, only Gleason score had prognostic significance for disease-free survival (p < 0.05) and no covariates were statistically significant for overall survival. Thirty-nine of the 57 patients had a prostatic re-biopsy performed at 18 months. Pathologically confirmed local control was ultimately achieved in 31/39 (79.5%). There was no difference in survival in patients with positive re-biopsies vs. those with negative results. The 5-year actuarial rate of clinical local control was 94%. Three patients clinically failed locally and 21 demonstrated distant progression. The median time to progression was 34 months. Nineteen percent received some form of hormonal manipulation at the time of their treatment course and an additional 42% were treated with hormones during their follow-up period, primarily after distant failure. The grade 4 rectal ulceration rate decreased to 4.5% with modification of the brachytherapy technique. Three patients experienced grade 4 urinary incontinence and three patients experienced grades 3 or 4 chronic perineal pain. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that bulky prostate carcinoma can be successfully controlled locally by this novel and aggressive approach with moderate toxicity and improved survival.

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial.

PURPOSE: We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. RESULTS: The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSION: Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.

Improving the dosimetric coverage of interstitial high-dose-rate breast implants.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) dose-volume analysis of high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial breast implants to evaluate the adequacy of lumpectomy cavity coverage, and then designed a simple, reproducible algorithm for dwell-time adjustment to correct for underdosage of the lumpectomy cavity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Since March 1993, brachytherapy has been used as the sole radiation modality after lumpectomy in selected protocol patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. In this protocol, all patients received 32 Gy in 8 fractions of 4 Gy over 4 days. Eleven patients treated with HDR brachytherapy who underwent CT scanning after implant placement were included in this analysis. For each patient, the postimplant CT dataset was transferred to a 3D treatment planning system, and the relevant tissue volumes were outlined on each axial slice. The implant dataset, including the dwell positions and dwell times, were imported into the 3D planning system and then registered to the visible implant template in the CT dataset. The calculated dose distribution was analyzed with respect to defined volumes via dose-volume histograms. Due to the variability of lumpectomy cavity coverage discovered in this 3D quality assurance analysis, dwell times at selected positions were adjusted in an attempt to improve dosimetric coverage of the lumpectomy cavity. Using implant data from 5 cases, a dwell-time adjustment algorithm was designed and was then tested on 11 cases. In this algorithm, a point P was identified using axial CT images, which was representative of the underdosed region within the cavity. The distance (d) from point P to the nearest dwell position was measured. A number of dwell positions (N) nearest to point P were selected for dwell time adjustment. The algorithm was tested by increasing the dwell times of a variable number of positions (N = 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 20) by a weighting factor (alpha), where alpha = f(d) and alpha > 1, and subsequently performing 3D dose-volume analysis to evaluate the improvement in lumpectomy cavity coverage. RESULTS: Before adjustment in the 11 implants, the median proportion of the lumpectomy cavity and target volume that received at least the prescription dose was 85% and 68%, respectively. After dwell-time adjustment, lumpectomy cavity coverage was significantly improved in all 11 cases. The median distance from point P to the nearest dwell position (d) was 1.4 cm (range 0.9-1.9). The median volume of the lumpectomy cavity receiving 32 Gy increased from 85.3% in the actual implant to 97.0% (range 74-100%) by increasing the dwell time of a single dwell position by a median factor (alpha) of 12.2 according to the above algorithm. With N = 3, the median proportion of the cavity volume receiving 32 Gy was improved to 97.5% (range 77-100%), with a median alpha of 5.7. Further improvement in lumpectomy cavity coverage was relatively small by increasing additional dwell times. In addition, with N = 20, the median absolute volume of breast tissue receiving 150% of the prescription dose was 70.3 cm3 compared to 26.3 cm3 in the actual implant; whereas with N = 1 or N = 3, this median volume was only 35.9 and 42.0 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lumpectomy cavity coverage sometimes appears suboptimal with interstitial HDR breast brachytherapy using our current technique. A simple dwell-time increase at only 1-3 dwell positions can compensate for some underdosage without creating significant regions of overdosage. Using simple methodology, a single reference point representing the underdosed region can be utilized for initial selection of the dwell positions to be increased.

Ultrasound-guided high dose rate conformal brachytherapy boost in prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To improve results for locally advanced prostate cancer, a prospective clinical trial of concurrent external beam irradiation and fractionated iridium-192 (Ir-192) high dose rate (HDR) conformal boost brachytherapy was initiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 1991 and February 1994, 99 implants were performed on 33 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma at William Beaumont Hospital. Using AJCC staging criteria, 9 patients had T2b tumors, 17 patients had T2c tumors, and 7 patients had T3 disease. Patients were treated with (a) 45.6 Gy whole pelvis external irradiation and (b) three HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (18 patients) or 6 Gy each (15 patients) to the prostate. Transperineal needle implants using real-time ultrasound guidance with interactive on-line isodose distributions were performed on an outpatient basis during weeks 1, 2, and 3 of external irradiation. Acute toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) morbidity grading system. RESULTS: This technique of concurrent external pelvic irradiation and conformal HDR brachytherapy was well tolerated. No significant intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. Three patients (9%) experienced Grade 3 acute toxicity (two dysuria and one diarrhea). All toxicities were otherwise Grades 1 or 2 and were primarily as expected from pelvic external irradiation. Persistent implant-related toxicities included Grades 1-2 perineal pain (12%) and hematospermia (15%). Median follow-up time was 13 months. Serum prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) levels normalized in 91% of patients (29 out of 32) within 1-14 months (median 2.8 months) after irradiation. PSA levels were progressively decreasing in the other three patients at last measurement. Prospectively planned prostatic rebiopsies done at 18 months in the first 10 patients were negative in 9 out of 10 (90%). CONCLUSIONS: Acute toxicity has been acceptable with this unique approach using conformal high dose rate Ir-192 boost brachytherapy with concurrent external irradiation. The initial tumor response as assessed by serial PSA measurement and rebiopsy is extremely encouraging. Dose escalation will proceed in accordance with the protocol guidelines. Further patient accrual and longer follow-up will allow comparison to other techniques.

Conformal prostate brachytherapy: initial experience of a phase I/II dose-escalating trial.

PURPOSE: To improve treatment results on prostatic adenocarcinoma, conformal radiation therapy (CRT) has been used. Two major drawbacks of external CRT are: (a) internal organ motion/daily set-up variations, and (b) exclusion of several patients for CRT based on poor geometrical relationships as identified by three dimensional (3D) treatment planning. To overcome the above problems, we began the first prospective Phase I/II dose-escalating clinical trial of conformal brachytherapy (CB) and concurrent external beam irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-nine patients with T2b-T3c prostatic adenocarcinoma received 176 transperineal ultrasound-guided conformal high-dose rate (HDR) boost implants. All patients received concomitant external beam pelvic irradiation. Dose escalation of the three HDR-CB fractions proceeded as follows: 5.5 Gy (30 patients), 6 Gy (20 patients), and 6.5 Gy (9 patients). The CB dose was prescribed to the prostate contour as outlined using an online biplanar transrectal ultrasound probe. The urethra, anterior rectal wall, and prostate boundaries were identified individually and outlined at 5 mm intervals from the base to the apex of the gland. The CB using real-time ultrasound guidance with interactive online isodose distributions was performed on an outpatient basis. As needles were placed into the prostate, corrections for prostate displacement were recorded and the isodose distributions were recalculated to represent the new relationship between the needles, prostate, and normal structures. No computerized tomography (CT) planning or implant preplanning was required. RESULTS: No patient was rejected based on poor geometrical relation of pelvic structures. In every implant performed, prostate displacement was noted. Craniocaudal motion of the gland ranged from 0.5-2.0 cm (mean = 1.0 cm), whereas lateral displacement was 0.1-0.4 cm. With the interactive online planning system, organ motion was immediately detected, accounted for, and corrected prior to each HDR treatment. The rectal dose has ranged from 45 to 87%, and the urethral dose from 97 to 112% of the prostate dose. It is significant to note that operator dependence has been completely removed because the interactive online planning system uniformly guides the physicians. CONCLUSIONS: With ultrasound guidance and the interactive online dosimetry system, organ motion (as compared to external beam) is insignificant because it can be corrected during the procedure without increasing target volume margins. Common pitfalls of brachytherapy, including operator dependence and difficulty with reproducibility, have been eliminated with the intraoperative online planning system.