Viewpoint: Lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a well-established risk factor for the clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Accurate LA detection is an essential prerequisite for optimal diagnosis and management of patients with APS or aPL carriers. Variability remains a challenge in LA testing, with reliable detection influenced by multiple factors, including pre-analytical conditions, anticoagulation treatment, choice of tests and procedures performed, as well as interpretation of results, that can lead to false-positives or negatives. A standardised approach to LA testing, following current guidance, based on published data and international consensus, and with attention to detail, is required to underpin accurate detection of LA. Future work should focus on better characterisation of the nature of LA, which may ultimately lead to improved diagnosis and management of patients with APS and aPL carriers. This article reviews current practice and challenges, providing an overview on detection of LA.

Can complement activation be the missing link in antiphospholipid syndrome?

APS is an autoimmune disorder with life-threatening complications that, despite therapeutic advantages, remains associated with thrombotic recurrences and treatment failure. The role of complement activation in APS pathogenesis is increasingly recognised, specifically in obstetric APS. However, its exact role in thrombotic APS and on the severity of the disease is not yet fully elucidated. Further mechanistic studies are needed to delineate the role of complement activation in the various APS clinical manifestations with aim to identify novel markers of disease severity, together with clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of complement inhibition in APS. This could ultimately improve risk stratification in APS, patient tailored targeted therapy with complement inhibition identified as an adjunctive treatment. This article reviews current findings and challenges about complement activation in APS, discusses the potential role of platelet mediated complement activation in this setting and provides an overview on clinical implications and current therapeutics.

Damage measured by Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients included in the APS ACTION registry.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to quantify damage burden measured by Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) in aPL-positive patients with or without a history of thrombosis in an international cohort (the APS ACTION cohort). Secondly, we aimed to identify clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with damage in aPL-positive patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analysed the baseline damage in aPL-positive patients with or without APS classification. We excluded patients with other autoimmune diseases. We analysed the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics based on two subgroups: (i) thrombotic APS patients with high vs low damage; and (ii) non-thrombotic aPL-positive patients with vs without damage. RESULTS: Of the 826 aPL-positive patients included in the registry as of April 2020, 586 with no other systemic autoimmune diseases were included in the analysis (412 thrombotic and 174 non-thrombotic). In the thrombotic group, hyperlipidaemia (odds ratio [OR] 1.82; 95% CI 1.05, 3.15; adjusted P = 0.032), obesity (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.23, 3.71; adjusted P = 0.007), aß2GPI high titres (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.36, 4.02; adjusted P = 0.002) and corticosteroid use (ever) (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.80, 7.75; adjusted P < 0.001) were independently associated with high damage at baseline. In the non-thrombotic group, hypertension (OR 4.55; 95% CI 1.82, 11.35; adjusted P = 0.001) and hyperlipidaemia (OR 4.32; 95% CI 1.37, 13.65; adjusted P = 0.013) were independent predictors of damage at baseline; conversely, single aPL positivity was inversely correlated with damage (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.075, 0.77; adjusted P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: DIAPS indicates substantial damage in aPL-positive patients in the APS ACTION cohort. Selected traditional cardiovascular risk factors, steroids use and specific aPL profiles may help to identify patients more prone to present with a higher damage burden.

Comparison of clinical and serological features in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients, with and without associated systemic lupus erythematosus, followed for up to 42 years: A single centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of concomitant systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on the clinicopathological manifestations of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective study compared clinical and antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) data from 118 patients, 58 with SLE-associated APS (SLE-APS), and 60 with primary APS. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13.9 (IQR 7.7-19.3) and 8.6 years (3.5-10.6) for the SLE-APS cohort and PAPS cohort, respectively. Age at diagnosis of APS was lower in the SLE-APS cohort (mean 35.9 vs PAPS: 46.7 years; p < 0.05). Distribution of aPL subtypes was similar across cohorts. 198 thrombotic events were identified overall (index plus recurrent), with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thrombosis each occurring in just over half of patients in both cohorts. Microvascular thrombosis (12.1% vs 0%), and a mixed (any combination of venous, arterial and microvascular) thrombotic phenotype (19.0% vs 6.7%, p = 0.05) were more prevalent in SLE-APS patients. Recurrent thrombosis incidence rates (∼0.5 events/10-patient years), and Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival after index thrombosis, were similar. In the PAPS cohort, only: (i) triple-aPL-positivity was associated with a significantly higher recurrent thrombosis event rate (incidence rate ratio 2.22, p = 0.03) and lower recurrence-free survival after first thrombosis (log-rank test p = 0.01); (ii) lupus anticoagulant (LA)-positivity was associated with higher prevalance of arterial thrombosis (RR 2.69, p = 0.01), and lower prevlance of VTE (RR 0.48, p < 0.001), versus LA-negativity. CONCLUSION: Concomitant SLE does not appear to modify long-term recurrent thrombosis risk, or aPL phenotypes, in patients with APS. Triple-aPL-positivity and LA-positive status may have less influence on thrombotic outcomes in patients with SLE-APS compared to PAPS.

Associations Among Antiphospholipid Antibody Types, Isotypes, and Titers: An AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) Study.

Several antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profiles ("triple" and lupus anticoagulant [LA] positivity) are associated with a higher risk for clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Further risk is correlated with higher levels of anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) and anti-ß2 glycoprotein-I antibody (aß2GPI), and with aPL persistence. Given that the 3 aPL tests detect partially overlapping sets of antibodies, the primary goal of this study was to characterize the associations among aPL tests using AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION) core laboratory data. The APS ACTION Registry includes annually followed adult patients with positive aPL based on the Revised Sapporo Classification Criteria. We analyzed baseline and prospective core laboratory data of the registry for associations among aPL tests using the Spearman rank correlation with Bonferroni-adjusted significance level for multiple comparisons. An aPL Load was calculated based on 6 tests (aCL IgG/IgM/IgA and aß2GPI IgG/IgM/IgA); a receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the aPL Load in predicting LA positivity. In 351 patients simultaneously tested for LA, aCL, and aß2GPI, the frequency of moderate-to-high (≥40 U) titers of aCL and aß2GPI IgG/IgM/IgA was higher in patients who were positive for LA vs those who were negative. An aPL Load was calculated for each patient to assess the overall aPL burden. For every 1-point increase in the aPL Load, the possibility of a positive LA test increased by 32% (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5; P < .001). Based on core laboratory data from a large international registry, most aPL enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ≥40 U and a high calculated aPL Load combining 6 aPL enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were predictive of a positive LA. These data suggest that the combined quantitative burden of aPL may provide a mechanistic explanation of a positive LA.

A one-point increase in the Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) predicts mortality in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether early damage and its kinetics measured by the Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) predicts mortality. METHODS: We carried out a single-centre retrospective analysis of thrombotic APS patients (2006 Sydney criteria), using the DIAPS for damage assessment. Early damage was considered to be at six months after disease onset; early damage increase (delta-DIAPS) was deemed to be at least a one-point rise in DIAPS within the first five years of illness. Groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Survival was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of mortality. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients (71.1% female; 65.9% primary APS; 72.4% Caucasian) were followed for up to 43 years (median 10). Damage developed in 143 (73.6%) patients. Twenty-three patients (12%) died. Secondary APS (HR 3.07, 95%CI 1.32-7.12, p=0.009), male sex (HR 3.14, 95%CI 1.35-7.33, p=0.008) and age at APS onset ≥40 years (HR 5.34, 95%CI 1.96-14.53, p=0.001) were risk factors for death. Early damage (n=69, 35.0%) was not associated with death (p=0.231). Having a first arterial event was associated with early damage (p<0.001), but not with delta-DIAPS (p=0.539) nor with the risk of death (p=0.151). Delta-DIAPS (n=53/181, 29.3%) predicted mortality (HR 5.40, 95%CI 2.33-12.52, p<0.001), even after adjusting individually for APS category (secondary), sex (male), early damage and age at APS onset (≥40 years) (all p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Evolving damage in the first five years of illness, but not early damage, predicted mortality regardless of the nature of the first thrombotic event, sex, APS category and age.

Anti-protein C antibodies and acquired protein C resistance in SLE: novel markers for thromboembolic events and disease activity?

OBJECTIVES: Risk factors for thromboembolism in SLE are poorly understood. We hypothesized a possible role for protein C, based on its dual activity in inflammation and haemostasis and on the evidence of an association between acquired activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) and high-avidity anti-protein C antibodies (anti-PC) with a severe thrombotic phenotype in venous thrombosis APS patients. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study of 156 SLE patients, the presence and avidity of IgG anti-PC was established by in house-ELISA, and APCR to exogenous recombinant human APC (rhAPC) and Protac (which activates endogenous protein C) was assessed by thrombin generation-based assays. Associations with aPL profile, thrombotic history and disease activity (BILAG and SLEDAI-2K) were also established. RESULTS: Anti-PC were detected in 54.5% of patients and APCR in 59%. Anti-PC positivity was associated with APCR to both rhAPC (P <0.0001) and Protac (P =0.0001). High-avidity anti-PC, detected in 26.3% of SLE patients, were associated with APCR in patients with thrombosis only (P <0.05), and with the development of thrombosis over time (range: 0-52 years; P =0.014). High-avidity anti-PC levels correlated with SLEDAI-2K (P =0.033) and total BILAG (P =0.019); SLEDAI-2K correlated inversely with APCR to Protac (P =0.004). CONCLUSION: Anti-PC occur in patients with SLE, independently of aPL profile, and are associated with APCR. High-avidity anti-PC are associated with thrombosis and with active disease and might prove a novel marker to monitor the risk of thrombosis and disease progression in SLE.

Coexistent antiphospholipid syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasm.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. The optimal management of patients with coexistent APS and MPN has not been defined. A single centre and systematic literature review of patients with coexistent APS and MPN was performed. Cases were divided into two groups based on whether they met international consensus criteria for APS. Of the 12 studies identified, eight were excluded (leaving five of a total 54 patients), as although antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) were documented, the diagnosis of APS was not conclusively demonstrated. Another ten patients with definite APS were identified at our centre. Fifteen patients (ten females, five males) were therefore included in this analysis (eleven definite APS and four highly likely), median age 44 (range: 13-71) years. Nine had polycythaemia vera and six, essential thrombocythaemia. Thirteen of the 15 patients (86.7%) had thrombotic APS (seven with initial venous events and six arterial) and two (13.3%) had obstetric APS. Nine patients were single-positive, and six double-positive for aPL. None were triple aPL-positive. Four patients at our centre had recurrent thrombotic/obstetric events, including while on anticoagulation/antiplatelet treatment.

COVID-19 and antiphospholipid antibodies: A position statement and management guidance from AntiPhospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and InternatiOnal Networking (APS ACTION).

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high rate of thrombosis. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are reported in COVID-19 patients. The majority of publications have not reported whether patients develop clinically relevant persistent aPL, and the clinical significance of new aPL-positivity in COVID-19 is currently unknown. However, the reports of aPL-positivity in COVID-19 raised the question whether common mechanisms exist in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In both conditions, thrombotic microangiopathy resulting in microvascular injury and thrombosis is hypothesized to occur through multiple pathways, including endothelial damage, complement activation, and release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETosis). APS-ACTION, an international APS research network, created a COVID-19 working group that reviewed common mechanisms, positive aPL tests in COVID-19 patients, and implications of COVID-19 infection for patients with known aPL positivity or APS, with the goals of proposing guidance for clinical management and monitoring of aPL-positive COVID-19 patients. This guidance also serves as a call and focus for clinical and basic scientific research.

Cluster analysis for the identification of clinical phenotypes among antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients from the APS ACTION Registry.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use cluster analysis (CA) to identify different clinical phenotypes among antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL)-positive patients. METHODS: The Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) Registry includes persistently positive aPL of any isotype based on the Sydney antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria. We performed CA on the baseline characteristics collected retrospectively at the time of the registry entry of the first 500 patients included in the registry. A total of 30 clinical data points were included in the primary CA to cover the broad spectrum of aPL-positive patients. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients from international centres were analysed, resulting in three main exclusive clusters: (a) female patients with no other autoimmune diseases but with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and triple-aPL positivity; (b) female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, VTE, aPL nephropathy, thrombocytopaenia, haemolytic anaemia and a positive lupus anticoagulant test; and (c) older men with arterial thrombosis, heart valve disease, livedo, skin ulcers, neurological manifestations and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our hierarchical cluster analysis, we identified different clinical phenotypes of aPL-positive patients discriminated by aPL profile, lupus or CVD risk factors. Our results, while supporting the heterogeneity of aPL-positive patients, also provide a foundation to understand disease mechanisms, create new approaches for APS classification and ultimately develop new management approaches.

Under crossfire: thromboembolic risk in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Cerebral and cardiovascular ischaemic events are frequent complications of SLE and constitute primary causes of permanent damage. However, the pathogenic determinants of an increased thromboembolic risk in patients with SLE are only partially understood. Atherosclerosis constitutes fertile soil for the development of thrombosis and shows disproportionately high prevalence and progression rates in patients with SLE. aPLs are independent risk factors for acute thrombosis but can also prompt long-term vascular inflammation. Aberrant interactions among immune cells and dysfunctions in the deployment of the coagulation cascade have historically been less explored in SLE, but recent evidence suggests they can also play a critical role at the crossroads between inflammation and haemostasis. In this review we discuss how different prothrombotic mechanisms can be prompted by and synergize with SLE-specific pathogenic events and speculate about novel potential directions for research and drug development.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

The current mainstay of the treatment and secondary thromboprophylaxis of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is anticoagulation with warfarin or other vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In addition to their well-known limitations, VKAs are often problematic in APS patients because of the variable sensitivity of thromboplastins to lupus anticoagulant. As a result, the international normalized ratio may not accurately reflect the intensity of anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are established as therapeutic alternatives to VKAs for a wide range of indications, including the treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Definition of the role of DOACs in the treatment of thrombotic APS is emerging with the results of recent and ongoing clinical studies. This review focuses on the current situation with regard to DOACs for secondary thromboprophylaxis in APS and issues pertinent to DOAC use in APS patients, as well as potential future directions.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Use in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Are These Drugs an Effective and Safe Alternative to Warfarin? A Systematic Review of the Literature: Comment.

We respond to comments by Dufrost et al. about the RAPS trial, in particular, showing that the trial did achieve its target sample size; pointing out that thrombin potential is not synonymous with overall thrombin generation; confirming that overall, no increased thrombotic risk was evident comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin; and that high-risk patients (28% were triple positive, representative of patients with venous thromboembolism requiring standard-intensity anticoagulation) were included; and clarifying our rationale for using a laboratory surrogate primary outcome measure instead of a clinical one.

Platelets and Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by thrombosis and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL): lupus anticoagulant and/or IgG/IgM anti-ß2-glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin antibodies. APS carries significant morbidity for a relatively young patient population from recurrent thrombosis in any vascular bed (arterial, venous, or microvascular), often despite current standard of care, which is anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Platelets have established roles in thrombosis at any site, and platelet hyperreactivity is clearly demonstrated in the pathophysiology of APS. Together with excess thrombin generation, platelet activation and aggregation are the common end result of all the pathophysiological pathways leading to thrombosis in APS. However, antiplatelet therapies play little role in APS, reserved as a possible option of low dose aspirin in addition to VKA in arterial or refractory thrombosis. This review outlines the current evidence and mechanisms for excessive platelet activation in APS, how it plays a central role in APS-related thrombosis, what evidence for antiplatelets is available in clinical outcomes studies, and potential future avenues to define how to target platelet hyperreactivity better with minimal impact on haemostasis.

Rivaroxaban for stroke patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (RISAPS): protocol for a randomized controlled, phase IIb proof-of-principle trial.

Background: Optimal secondary prevention antithrombotic therapy for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or other ischemic brain injury is undefined. The standard of care, warfarin or other vitamin K antagonists at standard or high intensity (international normalized ratio (INR) target range 2.0-3.0/3.0-4.0, respectively), has well-recognized limitations. Direct oral anticoagulants have several advantages over warfarin, and the potential role of high-dose direct oral anticoagulants vs high-intensity warfarin in this setting merits investigation. Objectives: The Rivaroxaban for Stroke patients with APS trial (RISAPS) seeks to determine whether high-dose rivaroxaban could represent a safe and effective alternative to high-intensity warfarin in adult patients with APS and previous ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or other ischemic brain manifestations. Methods: This phase IIb prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority, open-label, proof-of-principle trial compares rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily vs warfarin, target INR range 3.0-4.0. The sample size target is 40 participants. Triple antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients are excluded. The primary efficacy outcome is the rate of change in brain white matter hyperintensity volume on magnetic resonance imaging, a surrogate marker of presumed ischemic damage, between baseline and 24 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes include additional neuroradiological and clinical measures of efficacy and safety. Exploratory outcomes include high-dose rivaroxaban pharmacokinetic modeling. Conclusion: Should RISAPS demonstrate noninferior efficacy and safety of high-dose rivaroxaban in this APS subgroup, it could justify larger prospective randomized controlled trials.

Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients: Prospective study from antiphospholipid syndrome alliance for clinical trials and international networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository ("Registry").

BACKGROUND: Long-term anticoagulant therapy is generally recommended for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) patients, however it may be withdrawn or not introduced in routine practice. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the risk of thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated TAPS patients, compared to anticoagulated TAPS, and secondly, to identify different features between those two groups. PATIENTS/METHODS: Using an international registry, we identified non-anticoagulated TAPS patients at baseline, and matched them with anticoagulated TAPS patients based on gender, age, type of previous thrombosis, and associated autoimmune disease. Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding were prospectively analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a marginal Cox's regression model. RESULTS: As of June 2022, 94 (14 %) of the 662 TAPS patients were not anticoagulated; and 93 of them were matched with 181 anticoagulated TAPS patients (median follow-up 5 years [interquartile range 3 to 8]). The 5-year thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding rates were 12 % versus 10 %, and 6 % versus 7 %, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 3.56, p = 0.50 and HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.86; p = 0.32, respectively). Non-anticoagulated patients were more likely to receive antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.001), and less likely to have more than one previous thrombosis (p < 0.001) and lupus anticoagulant positivity (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Fourteen percent of the TAPS patients were not anticoagulated at recruitment. Their recurrent thrombosis risk did not differ compared to matched anticoagulated TAPS patients, supporting the pressing need for risk-stratified secondary thrombosis prevention trials in APS investigating strategies other than anticoagulation.

Fluctuation of Anti-Domain 1 and Anti-ß2 -Glycoprotein I Antibody Titers Over Time in Patients With Persistently Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to longitudinally evaluate titers of antibodies against ß2 -glycoprotein I (anti-ß2 GPI) and domain 1 (anti-D1), to identify predictors of variations in anti-ß2 GPI and anti-D1 titers, and to clarify whether antibody titer fluctuations predict thrombosis in a large international cohort of patients who were persistently positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the APS ACTION Registry. METHODS: Patients with available blood samples from at least 4 time points (at baseline [year 1] and at years 2-4 of follow-up) were included. Detection of anti-ß2 GPI and anti-D1 IgG antibodies was performed using chemiluminescence (BIO-FLASH; INOVA Diagnostics). RESULTS: Among 230 patients in the study cohort, anti-D1 and anti-ß2 GPI titers decreased significantly over time (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.010, respectively). After adjustment for age, sex, and number of positive aPL tests, we found that the fluctuations in anti-D1 and anti-ß2 GPI titer levels were associated with treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) at each time point. Treatment with HCQ, but not immunosuppressive agents, was associated with 1.3-fold and 1.4-fold decreases in anti-D1 and anti-ß2 GPI titers, respectively. Incident vascular events were associated with 1.9-fold and 2.1-fold increases in anti-D1 and anti-ß2 GPI titers, respectively. Anti-D1 and anti-ß2 GPI titers at the time of thrombosis were lower compared to titers at other time points. A 1.6-fold decrease in anti-D1 titers and a 2-fold decrease in anti-ß2 GPI titers conferred odds ratios for incident thrombosis of 6.0 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.62-59.3) and 9.4 (95% CI 1.1-80.2), respectively. CONCLUSION: Treatment with HCQ and incident vascular events in aPL-positive patients predicted significant anti-D1 and anti-ß2 GPI titer fluctuations over time. Both anti-D1 and anti-ß2 GPI titers decreased around the time of thrombosis, with potential clinical relevance.

Development of biodegradable films using sunflower protein isolates and bacterial nanocellulose as innovative food packaging materials for fresh fruit preservation.

This study presents the valorization of side streams from the sunflower-based biodiesel industry for the production of bio-based and biodegradable food packaging following circular economy principles. Bacterial cellulose (BC) was produced via fermentation in 6 L static tray bioreactors using nutrient-rich supplements derived from the enzymatic hydrolysis of sunflower meal (SFM) combined with crude glycerol as carbon source. Novel biofilms were produced using either matrices of protein isolates extracted from sunflower meal (SFMPI) alone or SFMPI matrices reinforced with nanocellulose biofillers of commercial or bacterial origin. Acid hydrolysis was employed for ex-situ modification of BC to nanostructures (56 nm). The biofilms reinforced with bacterial nanocellulose structures (SFMPI-BNC) showed 64.5% higher tensile strength, 75.5% higher Young's modulus, 131.5% higher elongation at break, 32.5% lower water solubility and 14.1% lower water vapor permeability than the biofilms produced only with SFMPI. The biofilms were evaluated on fresh strawberries packaging showing that the SFMPI-BNC-based films lead to effective preservation at 10 °C considering microbial growth and physicochemical profile (weight loss, chemical characterization, color, firmness and respiration activity). The SFMPI-BNC-based films could be applied in fresh fruit packaging applications.

Characteristics of Patients With Antiphospholipid Antibody Positivity in the APS ACTION International Clinical Database and Repository.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) who were enrolled in an international registry, the Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository, overall and by clinical and laboratory subtypes. METHODS: The APS ACTION registry includes adults who persistently had positivity for aPLs. We evaluated baseline sociodemographic and aPL-related (APS classification criteria and "non-criteria") characteristics of patients overall and in subgroups (aPL-positive without APS, APS overall, thrombotic APS only, obstetric APS only, and both thrombotic APS/obstetric APS). We assessed baseline characteristics of patients tested for the presence of three aPLs (lupus anticoagulant [LAC] test, anticardiolipin antibody [aCL], and anti-ß2 -glycoprotein I [anti-ß2 GPI]) antibodies by aPL profiles (LAC only, single, double, and triple aPL positivity). RESULTS: The 804 aPL-positive patients assessed in the present study had a mean age of 45 ± 13 years, were 74% female, and 68% White; additionally, 36% had other systemic autoimmune diseases. Of these 804 aPL-positive patients, 80% were classified as having APS (with 55% having thrombotic APS, 9% obstetric APS, and 15% thrombotic APS/obstetric APS). In the overall cohort, 71% had vascular thrombosis, 50% with a history of pregnancy had obstetric morbidity, and 56% had experienced at least one non-criteria manifestation. Among those with three aPLs tested (n = 660), 42% were triple aPL-positive. While single-, double-, and triple aPL-positive subgroups had similar frequencies of vascular, obstetric, and non-criteria events, these events were lowest in the single aPL subgroup, which consisted of aCLs or anti-ß2 GPI only. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the heterogeneity of aPL-related clinical manifestations and laboratory profiles in a multicenter international cohort. Within single aPL positivity, LAC may be a major contributor to clinical events. Future prospective analyses, using standardized core laboratory aPL tests, will help clarify aPL risk profiles and improve risk stratification.

Mutations in BMP4 cause eye, brain, and digit developmental anomalies: overlap between the BMP4 and hedgehog signaling pathways.

Developmental ocular malformations, including anophthalmia-microphthalmia (AM), are heterogeneous disorders with frequent sporadic or non-Mendelian inheritance. Recurrent interstitial deletions of 14q22-q23 have been associated with AM, sometimes with poly/syndactyly and hypopituitarism. We identify two further cases of AM (one with associated pituitary anomalies) with a 14q22-q23 deletion. Using a positional candidate gene approach, we analyzed the BMP4 (Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4) gene and identified a frameshift mutation (c.226del2, p.S76fs104X) that segregated with AM, retinal dystrophy, myopia, brain anomalies, and polydactyly in a family and a nonconservative missense mutation (c.278A-->G, p.E93G) in a highly conserved base in another family. MR imaging and tractography in the c.226del2 proband revealed a primary brain developmental disorder affecting thalamostriatal and callosal pathways, also present in the affected grandmother. Using in situ hybridization in human embryos, we demonstrate expression of BMP4 in optic vesicle, developing retina and lens, pituitary region, and digits strongly supporting BMP4 as a causative gene for AM, pituitary, and poly/syndactyly. Because BMP4 interacts with HH signaling genes in animals, we evaluated gene expression in human embryos and demonstrate cotemporal and cospatial expression of BMP4 and HH signaling genes. We also identified four cases, some of whom had retinal dystrophy, with "low-penetrant" mutations in both BMP4 and HH signaling genes: SHH (Sonic Hedgehog) or PTCH1 (Patched). We propose that BMP4 is a major gene for AM and/or retinal dystrophy and brain anomalies and may be a candidate gene for myopia and poly/syndactyly. Our finding of low-penetrant variants in BMP4 and HH signaling partners is suggestive of an interaction between the two pathways in humans.