Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction between triazole antifungals and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators in a real-life cohort.

Limited data on the clinical management of drug-drug interactions between triazoles and Cystic Fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators are available. We retrospectively evaluated azole target attainment and dose adaptations in patients from two Dutch CF centres concomitantly receiving triazoles and CFTR modulators. In total, 21 patients with 59 triazole trough concentrations were evaluated. Subtherapeutic concentrations were frequently observed, especially for itraconazole and voriconazole. Of the investigated antifungal agents, posaconazole appears the most preferable option. Our results emphasize the importance of adequate management of this interaction and underpin the added value of therapeutic drug monitoring of triazoles in this population.

Fungal infections are serious complications in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients. We evaluated patients concomitantly receiving triazoles and CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators: subtherapeutic triazole exposure was frequently observed. Posaconazole appears the preferable antifungal agent.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in liver or kidney transplanted people with cystic fibrosis using tacrolimus, a drug-drug interaction study.

BACKGROUND: The use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) after solid organ transplantation is controversial because of potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) with tacrolimus. We aimed to improve insight into the safety and clinical benefits of co-administration of ETI and tacrolimus in liver or kidney transplanted adult pwCF. METHODS: In 5 pwCF, tacrolimus concentrations were monitored during 2 weeks before and 4 weeks after starting ETI treatment. Trough levels, area under the curve (AUC) and clinical effect of ETI were investigated. During the study (6 weeks in total) adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: The DDI between tacrolimus and ETI resulted in an increased exposure of tacrolimus in all subjects, the dose adjusted AUC0-24h was 1.79 (median) times higher at the end of the study. Five dose adjustments were performed in 4 subjects in order to attain tacrolimus target range. No adverse events were reported and all subjects showed clinical improvement during ETI treatment. CONCLUSION: The clinical value of ETI treatment in kidney and liver transplanted pwCF is clear. The use of ETI may increase tacrolimus levels moderately. Therefore, we recommend close monitoring of tacrolimus trough levels in patients who start ETI.

The influence of exocrine pancreatic function on the exposure and pharmacokinetics of ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies target the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis (CF), and show robust treatment effects at group level. The individual effect however, is variable which might be (partially) related to differences in drug exposure. The profound influence of fat containing food compared to fasting on drug exposure gives need to investigate if the exocrine pancreatic function changes the degree and rate of absorption of ivacaftor and thereby may contribute to differences in drug exposure. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic parameters of ivacaftor were measured in 10 pancreatic sufficient (PS) and 10 pancreatic insufficient (PI) patients with CF on current treatment with tezacaftor/ivacaftor and compared between both groups. In PI patients pharmacokinetic parameters were investigated with and without the use pancreatic enzymes and compared in each individual. RESULTS: We demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic parameters of ivacaftor did not differ significantly between PS and PI people with CF (pwCF). Pancreatic enzymes did not significantly change the absorption or exposure to ivacaftor in PI pwCF using tezacaftor/ivacaftor. CONCLUSION: The exocrine pancreatic function of pwCF does not significantly influence the absorption and exposure of ivacaftor. The use of pancreatic enzymes in PI pwCF does not change the absorption and exposure of ivacaftor. Therefore, the dosing advice as mentioned in the SmPC for ivacaftor can be maintained independent of the exocrine pancreatic function.