Iodoquinazoline-derived VEGFR-2 and EGFRT790M dual inhibitors: Design, synthesis, molecular docking and anticancer evaluations.

Herein, we report the synthesis of a series of new fourteen iodoquinazoline derivatives 7a-c to 13a-e and their evaluation as potential anticancer agents via dual targeting of EGFRT790M and VEGFR-2. The new derivatives were designed according to the target receptors structural requirements. The compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxicity against HepG2, MCF-7, HCT116 and A549 cancer cell lines using MTT assay. Compound 13e showed the highest anticancer activities with IC50 = 5.70, 7.15, 5.76 and 6.50 µM against HepG2, MCF-7, HCT116 and A549 cell lines correspondingly. Compounds 7c, 9b and 13a-d exhibited very good anticancer effects against the tested cancer cell lines. The highly effective six derivatives 7c, 10, 13b, 13c, 13d and 13e were examined against VERO normal cell lines to estimate their cytotoxic capabilities. Our conclusion revealed that compounds 7c, 10, 13b, 13c, 13d and 13e possessed low toxicity against VERO normal cells with IC50 prolonging from 41.66 to 53.99 µM. Also compounds 7a-c to 13a-e were further evaluated for their inhibitory activity against EGFRT790M and VEGFR-2. Also, their ability to bind with both EGFR and VEGFR-2 receptors was examined by molecular modeling. Compounds 13e, 13d, 7c and 13c excellently inhibited VEGFR-2 activity with IC50 = 0.90, 1.00, 1.25 and 1.50 µM respectively. Moreover, Compounds 13e, 7c, 10 and 13d excellently inhibited EGFRT790M activity with IC50 = 0.30, 0.35, 0.45 and 0.47 µM respectively. Finally, our derivatives 7b, 13d and 13e showed good in silico calculated ADMET profile.

Exploration of cytotoxicity of iodoquinazoline derivatives as inhibitors of both VEGFR-2 and EGFRT790M: Molecular docking, ADMET, design, and syntheses.

Novel inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)T790M/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) were synthesized based on the iodoquinazoline scaffold linked to different heteroaromatic, aromatic, and/or aliphatic moieties. The novel derivatives were in vitro examined for anticancer activities against A549, HCT116, michigan cancer foundation-7 (MCF-7), and HepG2 cells. Molecular modeling was applied to discover their orientation of binding with both VEGFR-2 and EGFR active sites. Compounds 8d, 8c, 6d, and 6c indicated the highest cytotoxicity with IC50 = 6.00, 6.90, 6.12 and 6.24 µM, 7.05, 7.35, 6.80, and 6.80 µM, 5.75, 7.50, 6.90, and 6.95 µM, and 6.55, 7.88, 7.44, and 7.10 µM against the A549, HepG2, HCT116, and MCF-7 cell lines, correspondingly. The cytotoxicity against normal VERO (normal african green monkey kidney cells) of the extremely active eight compounds 6a-d and 8a-d was evaluated. Our compounds exhibited low toxicity concerning normal VERO cells with IC50 = 45.66-51.83 µM. Furthermore, inhibition assays for both the EGFRT790M and VEGFR-2 enzymes were done for all compounds. Remarkable inhibition of EGFRT790M activity was achieved with compounds 6d, 8d, 6c, and 8c at IC50 = 0.35, 0.42, 0.48, and 0.50 µM correspondingly. Moreover, remarkable inhibition of VEGFR-2 activity was achieved with compounds 8d, 8c, 6d, and 6c at IC50 = 0.92, 0.95, 1.00, and 1.20 µM correspondingly. As planned, derivatives 6d, 8d, 6c, and 8c presented exceptional inhibition of both EGFRT790M/VEGFR-2 activities. Finally, in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) studies were made for the highly active four compounds 6c, 6d, 8c, and 8d in comparison with erlotinib and sorafenib as reference standards.

2-Thioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidine and thiourea endowed with sulfonamide moieties as dual EGFRT790M and VEGFR-2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, docking, and anticancer evaluations.

The effectiveness of a new series of thiopyrimidine and thiourea containing sulfonamides moieties was tested on HCT-116, MCF-7, HepG2, and A549. HepG2 cell line was the one that all the new derivatives affected the most. The greatest potent compounds against the four HepG2, HCT116, MCF-7, and A549 cell lines were 8f and 8g with IC50 = 4.13, 6.64, 5.74, 6.85 µM and 4.09, 4.36, 4.22, 7.25 µM correspondingly. Compound 8g exhibited higher activity than sorafenib against HCT116 and MCF-7 but exhibited lower activity against HepG2 and A549. Moreover, compounds 8f and 8g exhibited higher activities than erlotinib on HepG2, HCT116, and MCF-7 but demonstrated lower activity on A549. The most potent cytotoxic derivatives 6f, 6g, 8c, 8d, 8e, 8f, and 8g were examined on normal VERO cell lines. Our derivatives have low toxicity on VERO cells with IC50 values ranging from 32.05 to 53.15 µM. Additionally, all compounds were assessed for dual VEGFR-2 and EGFRT790M inhibition effects. Compounds 8f and 8g were the most potent derivatives inhibited VEGFR-2 at IC50 value of 0.88 and 0.90 µM, correspondingly. As well, derivatives 8f and 8g could inhibit EGFRT790M demonstrating strongest effects with IC50 = 0.32 and 0.33 µM sequentially. Additionally, the greatest active derivatives ADMET profile was evaluated in relationship with sorafenib and erlotinib as reference agents. The data attained from docking were greatly related to that achieved from the biological testing.

Assessment of antimicrobial activity and GC-MS using culture filtrate of local marine Bacillus strains.

Secondary metabolites produced by Bacillus species from marine sources encompass a variety of compounds such as lipopeptides, isocoumarins, polyketides, macrolactones, polypeptides and fatty acids. These bioactive substances exhibit various biological activities, including antibiotic, antifungal, antiviral, and antitumor properties. This study aimed to isolate and identify a particular species of Bacillus from marine water and organisms that can produce bioactive secondary metabolites. Among the 73 Bacillus isolates collected, only 5 exhibited antagonistic activity against various viral and bacterial pathogens. The active isolates were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing to determine their taxonomical affiliation. Among them, Bacillus tequilensis CCASU-2024-66 strain no. 42, with the accession number ON 054302 in GenBank, exhibited the highest inhibitory potential. It displayed an inhibition zone of 21 mm against Bacillus cereus while showing a minimum zone of inhibition of 9 mm against Escherichia coli and gave different inhibition against pathogenic fungi, the highest inhibition zone 15 mm against Candida albicans but the lowest inhibition zone 10 mm was against Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum. Furthermore, it demonstrated the highest percentage of virucidal effect against the Newcastle virus and influenza virus, with rates of 98.6% and 98.1%, respectively. Furthermore, GC-MS analysis was employed to examine the bioactive substance components, specifically focusing on volatile and polysaccharide compounds. Based on these results, Bacillus tequilensis strain 42 may have the potential to be employed as an antiviral agent in poultry cultures to combat Newcastle and influenza, two extremely destructive viruses, thus reducing economic losses in the poultry production sector. Bacteria can be harnessed for the purpose of preserving food and controlling pathogenic fungi in both human and plant environments. Molecular docking for the three highly active derivatives 2,3-Butanediol, 2TMS, D-Xylopyranose, 4TMS, and Glucofuranoside, methyl 2,3,5,6-tetrakis-O-(trimethylsilyl) was carried out against the active sites of Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Candida albicans, Newcastle virus and influenza virus. The data obtained from molecular docking is highly correlated with that obtained from biology. Moreover, these highly active compounds exhibited excellent proposed ADMET profile.

New quinazoline sulfonamide derivatives as potential anticancer agents: Identifying a promising hit with dual EGFR/VEGFR-2 inhibitory and radiosensitizing activity.

Herein, we report the synthesis of a series of new quinazoline sulfonamide conjugates 2-16 and their evaluation as potential anticancer agents via dual targeting of EGFRT790M and VEGFR-2. The newly synthesized compounds were designed based on the structure requirements of the target receptors and were confirmed using spectral data. The compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxicity against four cancer cell lines (HepG2, MCF-7, HCT116 and A549) using MTT assay. The most active compounds were further evaluated for their inhibitory activity against EGFRT790M and VEGFR-2. Compound 15 showed the most significant cytotoxic activity with IC50 = 0.0977 µM against MCF-7 and the most potent inhibitory activity against both EGFR and VEGFR with IC50 = 0.0728 and 0.0523 µM, respectively. Compound 15 was able to induce apoptosis in MCF-7 cells and cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase. The relative safety profile of 15 was assessed using HEK-293 normal cell line and an ADMET profile was carried out. Radiosensitizing evaluation of 15 proved its significant ability to sensitize the cancer cell to the effect of radiation after being subjected to a single dose of 8 Gy gamma irradiation. Molecular docking studies revealed that 15 could bind to the ATP-binding site of EGF and VEGF receptors, inhibiting their activity.

Exploration of thiazolidine-2,4-diones as tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Design, synthesis, ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations.

As dual EGFR and VEGFR-2 inhibitors, 22 innovative thiazolidine-2,4-diones were modeled, constructed, and measured for their anticancer performance versus four human neoplasms HCT-116, MCF-7, A549, and HepG2. Molecular docking and MD simulation were performed to inspect the binding technique of the proffered congeners with the EGFR and VEGFR-2 receptors. Evidence realized thanks to the docking inquests was vastly consistent together with that detected through the biological screening. Structures 14a and 14g emerged as the most active compounds toward HCT116 (IC50 = 6.01 and 7.44 µM), MCF-7 (IC50 = 5.77 and 7.23 µM), A549 (IC50 = 5.35 and 5.47 µM) and HepG2 (IC50 = 3.55 and 3.85 µM) tumefaction cells. Compounds 14a and 14g exhibited higher events than sorafenib (IC50 = 5.05, 5.58, 4.04, and 4.00 µM) against HepG2 instead subordinate incidents concerning A549, MCF-7, and HCT116, parallelly. Nevertheless, these compounds signified weightier performance than erlotinib (IC50 = 13.91, 8.20, 5.49, 7.73, and µM), with respect to the four cell lines. Compounds having the best activity against the four cell lines, 12a-f, 13a-d, and 14a-g were chosen to appraise their in vitro VEGFR-2 and EGFRT790M inhibiting activities. The best results were for compounds 14a and 14g compared to sorafenib and erlotinib, respectively, with IC50 values of 0.74 and 0.78 µM and 0.12 and 0.14 µM, respectively. Moreover, 13d, 14a, and 14g showed an adequate in silico calculated ADMET profile. The current investigation presents novel candidates for future optimization to construct mightier and eclectic binary VEGFR-2/EGFRT790M restrainers with higher antitumor effects.

Novel promising benzoxazole/benzothiazole-derived immunomodulatory agents: Design, synthesis, anticancer evaluation, and in silico ADMET analysis.

Eleven novel benzoxazole/benzothiazole-based thalidomide analogs were designed and synthesized to obtain new effective antitumor immunomodulatory agents. The synthesized compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxic activities against HepG-2, HCT-116, PC3, and MCF-7 cells. Generally, the open analogs with semicarbazide and thiosemicarbazide moieties (10, 13a-c, 14, and 17a,b) exhibited higher cytotoxic activities than derivatives with closed glutarimide moiety (8a-d). In particular, compound 13a (IC50 = 6.14, 5.79, 10.26, and 4.71 µM against HepG-2, HCT-116, PC3, and MCF-7, respectively) and 14 (IC50 = 7.93, 8.23, 12.37, and 5.43 µM, respectively) exhibited the highest anticancer activities against the four tested cell lines. The most active compounds 13a and 14 were further evaluated for their in vitro immunomodulatory activities on tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), caspase-8 (CASP8), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and nuclear factor kappa-B p65 (NF-κB p65) in HCT-116 cells. Compounds 13a and 14 showed a remarkable and significant reduction in TNF-α. Furthermore, they showed significant elevation in CASP8 levels. Also, they significantly inhibited VEGF. In addition, compound 13a showed significant decreases in the level of NF-κB p65 while compound 14 demonstrated an insignificant decrease with respect to thalidomide. Moreover, our derivatives exhibited good in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination, toxicity (ADMET) profiles.

Design, synthesis, and docking of novel thiazolidine-2,4-dione multitarget scaffold as new approach for cancer treatment.

Novel thiazolidine-2,4-diones have been developed and estimated as conjoint inhibitors of EGFRT790M and VEGFR-2 against HCT-116, MCF-7, A549, and HepG2 cells. Compounds 6a, 6b, and 6c were known to be the dominant advantageous congeners against HCT116 (IC50 = 15.22, 8.65, and 8.80 µM), A549 (IC50 = 7.10, 6.55, and 8.11 µM), MCF-7 (IC50 = 14.56, 6.65, and 7.09 µM) and HepG2 (IC50 = 11.90, 5.35, and 5.60 µM) mass cell lines, correspondingly. Although compounds 6a, 6b, and 6c disclosed poorer effects than sorafenib (IC50 = 4.00, 4.04, 5.58, and 5.05 µM) against the tested cell sets, congeners 6b and 6c demonstrated higher actions than erlotinib (IC50 = 7.73, 5.49, 8.20, and 13.91 µM) against HCT116, MCF-7 and HepG2 cells, yet lesser performance on A549 cells. The hugely effective derivatives 4e-i and 6a-c were inspected versus VERO normal cell strains. Compounds 6b, 6c, 6a, and 4i were found to be the most effective derivatives, which suppressed VEGFR-2 by IC50 = 0.85, 0.90, 1.50, and 1.80 µM, respectively. Moreover, compounds 6b, 6a, 6c, and 6i could interfere with the EGFRT790M performing strongest effects with IC50 = 0.30, 0.35, 0.50, and 1.00 µM, respectively. What is more, 6a, 6b, and 6c represented satisfactory in silico computed ADMET profile.

Nanogel-mediated drug delivery system for anticancer agent: pH stimuli responsive poly(ethylene glycol/acrylic acid) nanogel prepared by gamma irradiation.

The popularity of nanogel as nano drug carrier lies in its adjustable physical properties, and the ability to encapsulate drug particles with improved properties is being developed to meet the diverse pH-sensitive nanogel for anticancer agent. Monitoring pH has been identified as an important diagnostic element during the treatment process. A pH-sensitive nanogel consisting of (PEG/PMAc) in the ratio of (50:50%) hasbeen cross-linkedby γ-irradiation techniques at an irradiation dose of 5 kGy. Compound 4 and its nanogel 5 were synthesized and assessed for their anticancer effects against HepG2, A549, MCF-7 and HCT-116 as dual VEGFR-2 and EGFR tyrosine kinases inhibitors. The molecular design was performed to investigate the binding mode of compound 4 with VEGFR-2 and EGFR receptors. Our compound 5 in nanogel showed enhanced anticancer activities against the four tested cancer cell lines and also showed higher inhibition activities against VEGFR-2 and EGFRT790M kinases than the derivative 4. Finally, our derivative 4 showed good in silico calculated ADMET profile. It was expected to show good GIT absorption in human, lower CNS side effects, no hepatotoxic actions and higher acute and oral chronic toxic doses in comparing to sorafenib and erlotinib. The obtained results showed that, our compound could be useful as a template for future design, optimization, adaptation and investigation to produce more potent and selective dual VEGFR-2/EGFRT790M inhibitors with higher anticancer activity.

Triazoloquinoxalines-based DNA intercalators-Topo II inhibitors: design, synthesis, docking, ADMET and anti-proliferative evaluations.

Sixteen [1, 2, 4]triazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalines as DNA intercalators-Topo II inhibitors have been prepared and their anticancer actions evaluated towards three cancer cell lines. The new compounds affected on high percentage of MCF-7. Derivatives 7e, 7c and 7b exhibited the highest anticancer activities. Their activities were higher than that of doxorubicin. Molecular docking studies showed that the HBA present in the chromophore, the substituted distal phenyl moiety and the extended linkers enable our derivatives to act as DNA binders. Also, the pyrazoline moiety formed six H-bonds and improved affinities with DNA active site. Finally, 7e, 7c and 7b exhibited the highest DNA affinities and act as traditional intercalators of DNA. The most active derivatives 7e, 7c, 7b, 7g and 6e were subjected to evaluate their Topo II inhibition and DNA binding actions. Derivative 7e exhibited the highest binding affinity. It intercalates DNA at IC50 = 29.06 µM. Moreover, compound 7e potently intercalates DNA at an IC50 value of 31.24 µM. Finally, compound 7e demonstrated the most potent Topo II inhibitor at a value of 0.890 µM. Compound 7c exhibited an equipotent IC50 value (0.940 µM) to that of doxorubicin. Furthermore, derivatives 7b, 7c, 7e and 7g displayed a high ADMET profile.

Triazoloquinazoline derived classical DNA intercalators: Design, synthesis, in silico ADME profile, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations.

Thirteen novel [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline derivatives as DNA intercalators were synthesized and their anticancer activities evaluated against HepG2 and HCT-116 cells. A docking study was carried out to explore how the new derivatives bind to active sites of DNA. The docking data were highly interrelated with that of biological testing. The HCT-116 cell line was the most sensitive one to the effect of the new derivatives. Compound 7c exhibited the highest anticancer activities against both the HepG2 and HCT116 cancer cell lines. Despite this compound displaying less activity than doxorubicin, it could be useful as a template for future manipulation, optimization, and investigation to produce other analogs with potential activity. The most active derivatives, 7c , 7b , and 7a were evaluated as DNA binders. Compound 7c displayed the highest binding affinity. Furthermore, the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) profile was calculated for the four most active compounds in comparison to doxorubicin as reference drug. Our derivatives 7a , 7b , and 7c displayed a very good calculated ADMET profile in comparison to doxorubicin.

Design, synthesis, in silico ADMET, docking, and antiproliferative evaluations of [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines as classical DNA intercalators.

Eleven novel [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazolines were designed, synthesized, and evaluated against HepG2 and HCT-116 cells. The molecular design was performed to investigate the binding mode of the proposed compounds with the DNA active site. The data obtained from biological testing highly correlated with that obtained from molecular modeling. HCT-116 was found to be the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compounds 6f and 6e were found to be the most potent derivatives over all the tested compounds against the two HepG2 and HCT116 cancer cell lines, with IC50 = 23.44 ± 2.9, 12.63 ± 1.2, and 25.80 ± 2.1, and 14.32 ± 1.5 µM, respectively. Although compounds 6f and 6e displayed less activity than doxorubicin (IC50 = 7.94 ± 0.6 and 8.07 ± 0.8 µM, respectively), both could be useful as a template for future design, optimization, and investigation to produce more potent anticancer analogs. The most active derivatives 6a , 6c , 6e , and 6f were evaluated for their DNA-binding activities. Compound 6f displayed the highest binding affinity. This compound potently intercalates DNA at a decreased IC50 value (54.08 µM). Compounds 6a , 6c , and 6e exhibited good DNA-binding affinities, with IC50 values of 79.35, 84.08, and 59.35 µM, respectively. Furthermore, ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) profiles were calculated for the four most active compounds in comparison to doxorubicin as a reference drug. Our derivatives 6a , 6c , 6e , and 6f displayed very good in-silico-predicted ADMET profiles. Doxorubicin violates three of Lipinski's rules, our derivatives 6a , 6c , 6e , and 6f do not violate any rule.

Antiproliferative evaluations of triazoloquinazolines as classical DNA intercalators: Design, synthesis, ADMET profile, and molecular docking.

Novel triazoloquinazolines were designed and synthesized and evaluated as anticancer agents against HepG2 and HCT-116 cells. The biological testing data corresponded well to those of the molecular docking studies. The HCT-116 cell line was most affected due to the actions of our derivatives. Derivative 7a was the most potent one against both HepG2 and HCT116 cells, with IC50 = 7.98 and 5.57 µM, respectively. This compound showed anticancer activity that was nearly equipotent to that of doxorubicin against HepG2 cells, but higher than that of doxorubicin against HCT116 cells (IC50 = 7.94 and 8.07 µM, respectively). Compounds 8, 7b , and 6f showed excellent anticancer activities against both the HCT116 and HepG2 cell lines. The highly active compounds 6f , 7a , 7b , and 8 were evaluated for their DNA-binding activities. Compounds 7a and 8 showed the highest binding activities. These derivatives potently intercalate in DNA, at IC50 values of 42.90 and 48.13 µM, respectively. Derivatives 6f and 7b showed good DNA-binding activities, with IC50 values of 54.24 and 50.56 µM, respectively. Furthermore, in silico calculated ADMET profiles were established for our four highly active derivatives, in comparison to doxorubicin. Our derivatives 6f , 7a , 7b , and 8 showed a very good ADMET profile. Compounds 6f , 7a , 7b , and 8 follow Lipinski's rules, while doxorubicin violates three of these rules.

Design, synthesis, docking, and anticancer evaluations of phthalazines as VEGFR-2 inhibitors.

Twenty new N-substituted-4-phenylphthalazin-1-amine derivatives were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their anticancer activities against HepG2, HCT-116, and MCF-7 cells as VEGFR-2 inhibitors. HCT-116 was the most sensitive cell line to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compound 7f was found to be the most potent derivative among all the tested compounds against the three cancer cell lines, with 50% inhibition concentration, IC50 = 3.97, 4.83, and 4.58 µM, respectively, which is more potent than both sorafenib (IC50 = 9.18, 5.47, and 7.26 µM, respectively) and doxorubicin (IC50 = 7.94, 8.07, and 6.75 µM, respectively). Fifteen of the synthesized derivatives were selected to evaluate their inhibitory activities against VEGFR-2. Compound 7f was found to be the most potent derivative that inhibited VEGFR-2 at an IC50 value of 0.08 µM, which is more potent than sorafenib (IC50 = 0.10 µM). Compound 8c inhibited VEGFR-2 at an IC50 value of 0.10 µM, which is equipotent to sorafenib. Moreover, compound 7a showed very good activity with IC50 values of 0.11 µM, which is nearly equipotent to sorafenib. In addition, compounds 7d, 7c, and 7g possessed very good VEGFR-2-inhibitory activity, with IC50 values of 0.14, 0.17, and 0.23 µM, respectively.

Design, synthesis, anticancer, and docking of some S- and/or N-heterocyclic derivatives as VEGFR-2 inhibitors.

Novel heterocyclic derivatives (4-22) were designed, synthesized, and evaluated against hepatocellular carcinoma type (HepG2) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cells, targeting the VEGFR-2 enzyme. Compounds 18, 10, 13, 11, and 14 were found to be the most potent derivatives against both the HepG2 and MCF-7 cancer cell lines, with GI50 = 2.11, 2.54 µM, 3.16, 3.64 µM, 3.24, 6.99 µM, 7.41, 6.49 µM and 8.08, 10.46 µM, respectively. Compounds 18 and 10 showed higher activities against both HepG2 and MCF-7 cells than sorafenib (GI50 = 9.18, 5.47 µM, respectively) and doxorubicin (GI50 = 7.94, 8.07 µM, respectively). Compounds 13, 11, and 14 showed higher activities than sorafenib against HepG2 cancer cells, but lower activities against MCF-7 cells. Compounds 18, 13, and 10 were more potent than sorafenib, inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) at GI50 values of 0.05, 0.06, and 0.08 µM, respectively. Compound 11 inhibited VEGFR-2 at an IC50 value of 0.10 µM, which is equipotent to sorafenib. Compound 14 inhibited VEGFR-2 at an IC50 value of 0.11 µM, which is nearly equipotent to sorafenib. The tested compounds have more selectivity against cancer cell lines. Compounds 18, 10, 13, 11, and 14 are, respectively, 16.76, 9.24, 6.06, 2.78, and 2.85 times more toxic in HePpG2 cancer cells than in VERO normal cells. Also, compounds 18, 10, 13, 11, and 14 are, respectively, 14.07, 8.02, 2.81, 3.18, and 2.20 times more toxic in MCF-7 than in VERO normal cells. The most active compounds, 10, 13, and 18, showed a good ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) profile.

New quinoxalin-2(1H)-one-derived VEGFR-2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, in vitro anticancer evaluations, in silico ADMET, and docking studies.

More than 70% of cancer patients who are treated with chemotherapeutics do not show a durable response. As part of the global plan seeking new effective chemotherapeutics, here, we report the synthesis and in vitro and computational studies of new lenvatinib and sorafenib analog quinoxalines as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor II (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The central quinolone and pyridine moieties of the Food and Drug Administration-approved anticancer agents lenvatinib and sorafenib were replaced with the versatile quinoxaline scaffold that has been exploited for developing potent cytotoxic agents. With some minor structural optimizations, all the other pharmacophoric features of lenvatinib and sorafenib were maintained. Accordingly, three new sets of quinoxalines were synthesized to evaluate their activity against liver, colorectal, and breast malignancies. The results obtained in the in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation study revealed the superior activity of three derivatives (20, 25, and 29) compared with that of doxorubicin and sorafenib. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) profiling and docking of 20, 25, and 29 into the VEGFR-2 receptor were also performed. Results of in silico studies showed the potential of the designed compounds to bind effectively with a number of key residues. The obtained in vitro cytotoxic activity and ADMET profiles of compounds 20, 25, and 29 suggested that they should be subjected to further structural optimizations to develop new candidates in cancer treatment protocols.

[1,2,4]Triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline and bis([1,2,4]triazolo)[4,3-a:4',3'-c]quinazoline derived DNA intercalators: Design, synthesis, in silico ADMET profile, molecular docking and anti-proliferative evaluation studies.

In view of their DNA intercalation activities as anticancer agents, novel fifteen [1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-c]quinazoline and bis([1,2,4]triazolo)[4,3-a:4',3'-c]quinazoline derivatives have been designed, synthesized and evaluated against HepG2 and HCT-116. The molecular design was performed to investigate the binding mode of the proposed compounds with DNA active site. The data obtained from biological testing highly correlated with that obtained from molecular modeling studies. HCT-116 was found to be more sensitive cell lines to the influence of the new derivatives. In particular, compounds 16, 18, 11 and 5 were found to be the most potent derivatives with IC50 = 3.61, 6.72, 7.16 and 5.18 µM respectively against HepG2 cell line. Also, compounds 16, 18, 11 and 5 displayed IC50 = 2.85, 3.82, 4.97 and 6.40 µM respectively against HCT-116 cell line. These derivatives displayed higher activities than doxorubicin, (IC50 = 7.94 and 8.07 µM respectively) against the two HepG2 and HCT-116 cell lines. The most active anti-proliferative derivatives 5, 6, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, 19 and 20 were further evaluated for their DNA-binding affinity which revealed the ability of these compounds to intercalate DNA. The tested compounds displayed very strong to moderate DNA-binding affinities. Compounds 16 and 18 potently intercalate DNA at IC50 values of 26.03 and 28.37 µM respectively which were lower than IC50 of Doxorubicin (IC50 = 31.27). This finding indicated that these derivatives exhibited higher DNA binding activities than Doxorubicin. Also, compounds 11 and 5 displayed very strong DNA binding at IC50 = 30.84 and 33.56 µM respectively, which were nearly equipotent to that of doxorubicin. Moreover, most of our derivatives exhibited good ADMET profile.

Design, synthesis, and anti-proliferative evaluation of new quinazolin-4(3H)-ones as potential VEGFR-2 inhibitors.

Inhibiting VEGFR-2 has been set up as a therapeutic strategy for treatment of cancer. Thus, nineteen new quinazoline-4(3H)-one derivatives were designed and synthesized. Preliminary cytotoxicity studies of the synthesized compounds were evaluated against three human cancer cell lines (HepG-2, MCF-7 and HCT-116) using MTT assay method. Doxorubicin and sorafenib were used as positive controls. Five compounds were found to have promising cytotoxic activities against all cell lines. Compound 16f, containing a 2-chloro-5-nitrophenyl group, has emerged as the most active member. It was approximately 4.39-, 5.73- and 1.96-fold more active than doxorubicin and 3.88-, 5.59- and 1.84-fold more active than sorafenib against HepG2, HCT-116 and MCF-7 cells, respectively. The most active cytotoxic agents were further evaluated in vitro for their VEGFR-2 inhibitory activities. The results of in vitro VEGFR-2 inhibition were consistent with that of the cytotoxicity data. Molecular docking of these compounds into the kinase domain, moreover, supported the results.

Design, synthesis, molecular docking and in silico ADMET profile of pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as antimicrobial and anticancer agents.

Pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives were synthesized by treating cyclic compounds containing active methylene group with aldehyde and malononitrile in butanol. The behavior of pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidine towards some electrophlies namely triethylorthoformate followed by nitrogen nucleophiles as isobutylamine, urea, phenylthiourea, p-toluidine, o-phenylenediamine, o-aminophenol, 2-amino-4-methyl-pyridine and acetic acid with the aim of obtaining some interesting non-mixed heterocyclic compounds. All synthesized compounds to some extent have shown good antimicrobial activity against different microbial strains that had been extracted by inhibiting cell wall synthesis. Compound 5b showed the highest antibacterial activities against B. subtilis, S. aureus and E. coli. On the other hand compound 5 g exhibited the highest antibacterial and antifungal activities against P. aeruginosa and A. niger respectively. In addition, they explore cytotoxic potentialities against different cell lines via DNA intercalation and Top-II inhibition. The cytotoxic activities clarify the strong inhibitory activity of derivative 5a against HepG2 cells with IC50 = 2.09 µM, while HCT-116 cells were highly susceptible to derivative 5c with IC50 = 2.61 µM, in the meantime, derivative 5f showed pronounced negative impact against MCF-7 (IC50 = 2.43 µM) when compared with other prepared compounds. All derivatives exhibited higher anticancer activities than doxorubicin against the three cell lines except compound 2 against both HepG2 and MCF-7 and compound 5e against HepG2 cell lines. Compounds 5a, 5c and 5f potently intercalate DNA at IC50 values of 26.96, 27.13 and 29.86 µM respectively, which were more potent than doxorubicin (IC50 value of 31.27 µM). Moreover, compounds 5a, 5c and 5f exhibited very good Topoisomerase II inhibitory activities with IC50 values of 0.752, 0.791 and 0.776 µM respectively, that were more potent than that of doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.94 µM). For a great extent, the molecular modeling studies were in agreement with that of in vitro cytotoxicity activity, DNA binding and Top-II inhibition results.

Design, synthesis, molecular docking, in silico ADMET profile and anticancer evaluations of sulfonamide endowed with hydrazone-coupled derivatives as VEGFR-2 inhibitors.

A new series of sulfonamide endowed with hydrazone coupled to dimethyl and/or diethyl malonates were prepared. Various sulfa drugs were diazotized and followed by coupling with active methylene of dimethyl and/or diethyl malonate to afford the new intermediates hydrazones 3a-c and 4a-c. The reactivity of hydrazone derivatives towards hydrazines was investigated. Thus, a novel series of 3,5-dioxopyrazolidine7a-cwere obtained by treatment with hydrazine hydrate. When hydrazones were allowed to react with phenyl hydrazine, the alkyl 2-((4-(N-(substituted)sulfamoyl)phenyl)diazenyl)-3-oxo-3-(2-phenylhydrazinyl)propanoateswere obtained 8a-c and/or 10a-c. Their anticancer activities were evaluated against HepG2, HCT-116 and MCF-7. HepG2 was the most sensitive one. In particular, compounds 7c, 7b and 10c were found to be the most potent derivatives with IC50 = 6.43 ± 0.5, 9.66 ± 0.8, 10.57 ± 0.9 µM, 8.65 ± 0.7, 7.49 ± 0.6, 14.29 ± 1.3 µM and 8.97 ± 0.7, 10.13 ± 0.9, 13.82 ± 1.1 µM respectively. Sorafenib and doxorubicin were used as reference drugs. The most potent derivatives 7a, 7b, 7c, 8c and 10c were tested for their cytotoxicity against normal VERO cell lines. Compounds 7a, 7b, 7c, 8c and 10c are respectively, 2.41, 4.85, 4.08, 3.23 and 5.89 fold times more toxic in HCT116 than in VERO normal cells. Moreover, the most active anti-proliferative derivatives 7a, 7b, 7c, 8c and 10c were subjected to further biological study to evaluate their inhibitory potentials against VEGFR-2. The tested compounds displayed high to good inhibitory activity with IC50 values ranging from 0.14 ± 0.02 to 0.23 ± 0.03 µM. Among them, compounds 7c, 7b and 10c were found to be the most potent derivative that inhibited VEGFR-2 at IC50 values of 0.14 ± 0.02, 0.15 ± 0.02 and 0.15 ± 0.02 µM respectively. sorafenib was used as reference drug. Furthermore, ADMET profile was evaluated for the four most active compounds in comparison to doxorubicin as a reference drug. The data obtained from docking studies were highly correlated with that obtained from the biological screening.