A retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors of male breast cancer from a single center.

BACKGROUND: Less than 1% of all breast cancer cases are found in men, who reportedly have inferior outcomes compared with matched women patients. Ethnic differences may also affect their prognosis. Here, we investigated overall survival (OS) and major prognostic factors for male breast cancer (MBC) in a cohort of Egyptian patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed OS in a cohort of 69 male patients with MBC who were surgically treated at the Mansoura Cancer Center, Egypt between 2000 and 2007. We registered demographic data, age, height, weight and body mass index, tumor size, histology, number of infiltrated axillary lymph nodes, hormone receptor (HR) status and metastatic presence, and TNM staging. Patients' OS was the primary endpoint. Patients received treatment to the medical standards at the time of their diagnosis. RESULTS: In the 69 patients who met the inclusion criteria and had complete stored patient data, tumors ranged from T1c to T3. We could gather cancer-related survival data from only 56 patients. The collective 5-year survival in this cohort was 46.4%. Only five patients had distant metastasis at diagnosis, but they showed a null percent 5-year survival, whereas those with no lymph node infiltration showed a 100% 5-year survival. Lymph node status and tumor grading were the only prognostic factors that significantly affected OS. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node status and tumor grade are the most important prognostic factors for overall survival of MBC in Egyptian male patients; whereas even remarkably low HR expression in MBC did not significantly affect OS. Further research is needed to understand the factors that affect this disease.

Clinical outcome of HCV-positive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab-based chemotherapy.

The influence of rituximab therapy on prognosis and hepatic toxicity (HT) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is unclear. Thus, we assessed HT and clinical outcome in patients with DLBCL and HCV infection who received rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy. We carried out a prospective analysis on a total of 280 HCV-positive patients with DLBCL, 200 of whom received chemotherapy plus rituximab (R-CHT), 80 received chemotherapy (CHT)-only. Survival outcomes and HT were compared according to rituximab administration. The median follow-up was 41 months. Addition of rituximab did not significantly affect prognosis (median progression-free survival, 40 vs 35 months, P = 0.26; median overall survival, 51 vs 43 months P = 0.09). Of 200 patients who received rituximab, 53 (26.5 %) had severe HT (grade 3-4), compared with 11 of 80 (13.75 %) patients who received rituximab-free regimens (P = 0.033). Among patients treated with rituximab, 50 patients (25 %) did not complete planned course of therapy, 14 patients because of hepatic toxicity and 36 patients because of progressive disease. Pretreatment liver function impairment was predictive of severe HT. These results raise concerns regarding the routine use of rituximab with chemotherapy in individuals with HCV-positive DLBCL. However, more studies are warranted before a definitive conclusion can be made.