Evaluation of efficacy of follicular unit extraction versus follicular unit extraction with platelet rich plasma in treatment of cicatricial alopecia.

BACKGROUND: Follicular unit extraction (FUE) is a minimally invasive surgery that is becoming popular in hair restoration in cicatricial alopecia (CA). AIM: Evaluation of FUE with or without platelet rich plasma (PRP) in scarring alopecia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with CA were randomized into two groups. Group A (10 patients) underwent FUE, group B (10 patients) underwent FUE + PRP. PRP was injected 1 week before surgery, then monthly after surgery for 3 months. Follow up was done after 3, 6 and 12 months by calculating the density of surviving follicular units and the survival rate. RESULTS: In group A, there was statistically significant increase in mean survival rate which was 30.30%. At 3 months, 67.26% at 6 months and 78.15% at 12 months. In group B, there was a significant increase in mean survival rate being 30.14% at 3 months, 58.75% at 6 months and 69.74% at 12 months. There was no significant difference between both groups at anytime during follow up period. CONCLUSION: Follicular unit extraction is a preferred procedure for hair restoration in CA with few side effects. The role of PRP in HT is controversial. In the present study, PRP does not significantly affect the survival rate of hair grafts.

Photodynamic therapy using methylene blue and intense pulsed light versus intense pulsed light alone in treatment of verruca: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Many therapeutic modalities are available for treatment of warts, but no single therapy is universally effective. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) using intralesional methylene blue (MB) followed by intense pulsed light (IPL) could be a successful option for treatment by several mechanisms. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial was carried out on eighty patients with verrucae. Patients were randomized into three groups; group A (30 patients) received MB/IPL/PDT sessions, group B (30 Patients) received IPL sessions, and group C (control). Response was assessed by clinical and dermoscopy score (0,1, 2, or 3 according to extent of clinical and dermoscopic resolution), cure rate (percent of verrucae clinically and dermoscopy cleared), and imageJ analysis (surface area of wart and haemorrhagic structures or vessels). RESULTS: Clinical and dermoscopic clearance was achieved in 43.3% and 20% of patients in groups A and B respectively. Cure rate was 40.9% for group A compared to 23.4% for group B. ImageJ analysis revealed more reduction of surface area in group A being 80.05 ± 27.12% for verrucae and 89.28 ± 19.19% for vessels and haemorrhagic dots compared to 48.16 ± 34.21% and 65.99 ± 30.58% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: MB/IPL/PDT is an effective option for treatment of warts with a success rate of around 40%, based on clinical and dermoscopic assessment. The efficacy was found to be higher on using imageJ utilizing both the surface area of the wart and surface area of vessels and haemorrhagic dots with the latter being more effected by treatment.