Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level.

OBJECTIVE: For an effective control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with vaccines, most people in a population need to be vaccinated. It is thus important to know how to inform the public with reference to individual preferences-while also acknowledging the societal preference to encourage vaccinations. According to the health care standard of informed decision-making, a comparison of the benefits and harms of (not) having the vaccination would be required to inform undecided and skeptical people. To test evidence-based fact boxes, an established risk communication format, and to inform their development, we investigated their contribution to knowledge and evaluations of COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: We conducted four studies (1, 2, and 4 were population-wide surveys with N = 1,942 to N = 6,056): Study 1 assessed the relationship between vaccination knowledge and intentions in Germany over three months. Study 2 assessed respective information gaps and needs of the population in Germany. In parallel, an experiment (Study 3) with a mixed design (presentation formats; pre-post-comparison) assessed the effect of fact boxes on risk perceptions and fear, using a convenience sample (N = 719). Study 4 examined how effective two fact box formats are for informing vaccination intentions, with a mixed experimental design: between-subjects (presentation formats) and within-subjects (pre-post-comparison). RESULTS: Study 1 showed that vaccination knowledge and vaccination intentions increased between November 2020 and February 2021. Study 2 revealed objective information requirements and subjective information needs. Study 3 showed that the fact box format is effective in adjusting risk perceptions concerning COVID-19. Based on those results, fact boxes were revised and implemented with the help of a national health authority in Germany. Study 4 showed that simple fact boxes increase vaccination knowledge and positive evaluations in skeptics and undecideds. CONCLUSION: Fact boxes can inform COVID-19 vaccination intentions of undecided and skeptical people without threatening societal vaccination goals of the population.

How to improve health literacy to reduce short- and long-term consequences of maternal obesity?

Aim: To demonstrate the global challenge of maternal obesity and to propose models to increase awareness and health literacy. Methods: The regional perinatal data base and the international literature were reviewed to demonstrate the rising rates of maternal overweight and obesity causing major public health problems in low and high-resourced countries. A preliminary systematic review analyzing interventions in maternal obesity and a fact box based on a recent Cochrane review on dietary interventions were performed. Results: Between 2000 and 2015, the regional rates of maternal overweight and obesity have significantly increased, and the rate of morbid maternal obesity has even doubled. Pregnant women were insufficiently informed about the health risks and international recommendations for weight gain associated with pre-pregnancy body mass index. Scientific publications and guidelines of professional boards have not yet interrupted the vicious cycle of transgenerational transfer of associated health risks for the offspring. For the first time we propose a fact box to translate the results from a Cochrane review about dietary interventions into a transparent information for health care providers and patients which could help to improve awareness. Conclusions: Improving health literacy and translating clinical science into models which are understandable by policy makers, health care providers and parents is a challenge mainly if health risks are modifiable during gestation and could prevent the increasing burden of obesity for future societies.