Genetic diversity in European Pisum germplasm collections.

The distinctness of, and overlap between, pea genotypes held in several Pisum germplasm collections has been used to determine their relatedness and to test previous ideas about the genetic diversity of Pisum. Our characterisation of genetic diversity among 4,538 Pisum accessions held in 7 European Genebanks has identified sources of novel genetic variation, and both reinforces and refines previous interpretations of the overall structure of genetic diversity in Pisum. Molecular marker analysis was based upon the presence/absence of polymorphism of retrotransposon insertions scored by a high-throughput microarray and SSAP approaches. We conclude that the diversity of Pisum constitutes a broad continuum, with graded differentiation into sub-populations which display various degrees of distinctness. The most distinct genetic groups correspond to the named taxa while the cultivars and landraces of Pisum sativum can be divided into two broad types, one of which is strongly enriched for modern cultivars. The addition of germplasm sets from six European Genebanks, chosen to represent high diversity, to a single collection previously studied with these markers resulted in modest additions to the overall diversity observed, suggesting that the great majority of the total genetic diversity collected for the Pisum genus has now been described. Two interesting sources of novel genetic variation have been identified. Finally, we have proposed reference sets of core accessions with a range of sample sizes to represent Pisum diversity for the future study and exploitation by researchers and breeders.

Analysis of plant diversity with retrotransposon-based molecular markers.

Retrotransposons are both major generators of genetic diversity and tools for detecting the genomic changes associated with their activity because they create large and stable insertions in the genome. After the demonstration that retrotransposons are ubiquitous, active and abundant in plant genomes, various marker systems were developed to exploit polymorphisms in retrotransposon insertion patterns. These have found applications ranging from the mapping of genes responsible for particular traits and the management of backcrossing programs to analysis of population structure and diversity of wild species. This review provides an insight into the spectrum of retrotransposon-based marker systems developed for plant species and evaluates the contributions of retrotransposon markers to the analysis of population diversity in plants.

Excess heterozygosity contributes to genetic map expansion in pea recombinant inbred populations.

Several plant genetic maps presented in the literature are longer than expected from cytogenetic data. Here we compare F(2) and RI maps derived from a cross between the same two parental lines and show that excess heterozygosity contributes to map inflation. These maps have been constructed using a common set of dominant markers. Although not generally regarded as informative for F(2) mapping, these allowed rapid map construction, and the resulting data analysis has provided information not otherwise obvious when examining a population from only one generation. Segregation distortion, a common feature of most populations and marker systems, found in the F(2) but not the RI, has identified excess heterozygosity. A few markers with a deficiency of heterozygotes were found to map to linkage group V (chromosome 3), which is known to form rod bivalents in this cross. Although the final map length was longer for the F(2) population, the mapped order of markers was generally the same in the F(2) and RI maps. The data presented in this analysis reconcile much of the inconsistency between map length estimates from chiasma counts and genetic data.

Comparative mapping between Medicago sativa and Pisum sativum.

Comparative genome analysis has been performed between alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and pea (Pisum sativum), species which represent two closely related tribes of the subfamily Papilionoideae with different basic chromosome numbers. The positions of genes on the most recent linkage map of diploid alfalfa were compared to those of homologous loci on the combined genetic map of pea to analyze the degree of co-linearity between their linkage groups. In addition to using unique genes, analysis of the map positions of multicopy (homologous) genes identified syntenic homologs (characterized by similar positions on the maps) and pinpointed the positions of non-syntenic homologs. The comparison revealed extensive conservation of gene order between alfalfa and pea. However, genetic rearrangements (due to breakage and reunion) were localized which can account for the difference in chromosome number (8 for alfalfa and 7 for pea). Based on these genetic events and our increasing knowledge of the genomic structure of pea, it was concluded that the difference in genome size between the two species (the pea genome is 5- to 10-fold larger than that of alfalfa) is not a consequence of genome duplication in pea. The high degree of synteny observed between pea and Medicago loci makes further map-based cloning of pea genes based on the genome resources now available for M. truncatula a promising strategy.