Protocol for venoarterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to reduce morbidity and mortality following bilateral lung TransPlantation: the ECMOToP randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplantation (LTx) aims at improving survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage lung diseases. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used as intraoperative support for LTx, despite no precise guidelines for its initiation. We aim to evaluate two strategies of VA-ECMO initiation in the perioperative period in patients with obstructive or restrictive lung disease requiring bilateral LTx. In the control 'on-demand' arm, high haemodynamic and respiratory needs will dictate VA-ECMO initiation; in the experimental 'systematic' arm, VA-ECMO will be pre-emptively initiated. We hypothesise a 'systematic' strategy will increase the number of ventilatory-free days at day 28. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a multicentre randomised controlled trial in parallel groups. Adult patients with obstructive or restrictive lung disease requiring bilateral LTx, without a formal indication for pre-emptive VA-ECMO before LTx, will be included. Patients with preoperative pulmonary hypertension with haemodynamic collapse, ECMO as a bridge to transplantation, severe hypoxaemia or hypercarbia will be secondarily excluded. In the systematic group, VA-ECMO will be systematically implanted before the first pulmonary artery cross-clamp. In the on-demand group, VA-ECMO will be implanted intraoperatively if haemodynamic or respiratory indices meet preplanned criteria. Non-inclusion, secondary exclusion and VA-ECMO initiation criteria were validated by a Delphi process among investigators. Postoperative weaning of ECMO and mechanical ventilation will be managed according to best practice guidelines. The number of ventilator-free days at 28 days (primary endpoint) will be compared between the two groups in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints encompass organ failure occurrence, day 28, day 90 and year 1 vital status, and adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The sponsor is the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. The ECMOToP protocol version 2.1 was approved by Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VIII. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05664204.

Association of Sepsis With Neurologic Outcomes of Adult Patients Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygnenation.

OBJECTIVES: Neurologic outcomes of patients under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may be worsened by secondary insults of systemic origin. We aimed to assess whether sepsis, commonly observed during ECMO support, is associated with brain injury and outcomes. DESIGN: Single-center cohort study of the "exposed-non-exposed" type on consecutive adult patients treated by VA-ECMO. SETTING: Medical ICU of a university hospital, France, 2013-2020. PATIENTS: Patients with sepsis at the time of VA-ECMO cannulation ("sepsis" group) were compared with patients without sepsis ("no sepsis" group). The primary outcome measure was poor functional outcome at 90 days, defined by a score greater than or equal to 4 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS), indicating severe disability or death. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included ("sepsis," n = 128; "no sepsis," n = 68), of whom 87 (44.4%) had presented cardiac arrest before VA-ECMO cannulation. A poor functional outcome (mRS ≥ 4) was observed in 99 of 128 patients (77.3%) of the "sepsis" group and 46 of 68 patients (67.6%) of the "no sepsis" group (adjusted logistic regression odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% CI, 0.58-2.47; inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) OR 1.24; 95% CI, 0.79-1.95). Subsequent analyses performed according to pre-ECMO cardiac arrest status suggested that sepsis was independently associated with poorer functional outcomes in the subgroup of patients who had experienced pre-ECMO cardiac arrest (adjusted logistic regression OR 3.44; 95% CI, 1.06-11.40; IPTW OR 3.52; 95% CI, 1.68-7.73), whereas no such association was observed in patients without pre-ECMO cardiac arrest (adjusted logistic regression OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.27-1.69; IPTW OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42-1.35). Compared with the "no sepsis" group, "sepsis" patients presented a significant increase in S100 calcium-binding protein beta concentrations at day 1 (0.94 µg/L vs. 0.52 µg/L, p = 0.03), and more frequent EEG alterations (i.e., severe slowing, discontinuous background, and a lower prevalence of sleep patterns), suggesting brain injury. CONCLUSION: We observed a detrimental role of sepsis on neurologic outcomes in the subgroup of patients who had experienced pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, but not in other patients.