Intraoperative three-dimensional versus two-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular assessment.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) technology is now widely used intraoperatively in cardiac surgery. Left ventricular (LV) measurements with 3D transthoracic echocardiography correlate better with cardiac magnetic resonance measurements compared with traditional two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography. In this study, we compared intraoperative 3D TEE against 2D TEE regarding quantitative indices of LV function. METHODS: We performed 2D TEE and 3D TEE examinations on 156 patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. Two-dimensional TEE images of midesophageal 4-, 2-chamber, and long-axis views were acquired. LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated by Simpson's method. Three-dimensional full-volume images were recorded to calculate by a semiautomated procedure LV volumes (indexed to body surface area) and EF. 3D and 2D LV dimensions and function, image quality, time for acquisition/analyses, and reproducibility were compared by the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. Pairwise differences between 3D and 2D data were compared using 95% prediction intervals (PIs) and Bland-Altman methodology. 3D volumes were also plotted against 2D volumes in scatter plots using a 3-zone error grid. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between 3D and 2D in the estimation of EF (P = 0.227; median pairwise difference, -0.4% [95% PIs, -8.6% to 8.8%]). 3D LV indexed end-diastolic volumes (iEDVs) and end-systolic volumes (iESVs) were larger than 2D iEDVs (P < 0.001; median pairwise difference, 3.3 mL/m [95% PIs, -9.4 to 14.1 mL/m] and iESV: P < 0.001; median pairwise difference, 1.4 mL/m [95% PIs, -5.2 to 10.1 mL/m]). In the vast majority of cases (98.8% of cases for iEDV and 92.8% of cases for iESV), the difference between 2D and 3D TEE indexed volumes did not alter classification into normal, mildly to moderately dilated, or severely dilated volumes, as demonstrated by the 3-zone error grid analysis. Acquisition of 3D TEE image and analysis were not feasible in 4 patients (2.5%) for whom a quantitative 2D assessment of the LV was also impossible. 3D and 2D quality image was similar (P = 0.206). There was no difference in 3D versus 2D acquisition time (P = 0.805; pairwise difference = 2 seconds [95% PIs, -20 to 35 seconds]), but 3D analysis required more time (P < 0.001; pairwise difference = 117 seconds [95% PIs, 66 to 197 seconds]). Differences in repeated 3D versus 2D indexed volumes were not statistically significant, both considering interobserver reproducibility (iEDV: P = 0.125; pairwise difference, 0.26 ± 1.76 mL [95% PIs, -3.58 to 3.73 mL] and iESV: P = 0.126; pairwise difference, -0.16 ± 1.67 mL [95% PIs, -3.96 to 3.69 mL]) and intraobserver reproducibility (iEDV: P = 0.975; pairwise difference, -0.02 ± 1.20 mL [95% PIs, -2.32 to 2.08 mL] and iESV: P = 0.228; pairwise difference, -0.19 ± 1.13 mL [95% PIs, -2.47 to 2.53 mL]). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative 3D TEE quantification of LV global function, image acquisition time, and reproducibility was not statistically different when compared with 2D TEE. It was however associated with calculation of larger LV volumes and a longer analysis time. Nevertheless, the 3-zone error grid analysis of the LV indexed volumes showed that the difference between 3D and 2D measurements does not affect the LV classification as normal, mildly to moderately dilated, or severely dilated.

Outbreak of Query fever among Argentinean special police unit officers during a United Nations mission in Prizren, South Kosovo.

After an outbreak of Query fever (Q fever) in an Argentinean special police unit, 115 officers were investigated to evaluate the risk of infection with Coxiella burnetii after having been exposed to contaminated dust originating from a nearby barn harboring infected sheep. All officers were serologically tested and the medical history of potential risk factors was performed. The percentage of officers showing acute Q-fever seroconversion was found to be 51.3%. Forty-two individuals showed clinical symptoms, among them, 28 patients underwent medical care. No relevant risk factor was found. In areas of an unknown epidemiological situation, patients with unclear respiratory infections should be serologically tested for C. burnetii to offer the correct treatment and avoid possible chronic cases. Attention has to be drawn to choosing the site of a camp so as to protect troops from possible infectious disease. During a U.N. mission in Kosovo, we observed a Q-fever outbreak among the Argentinean special police unit. Our investigation was initiated to evaluate the incidence of C. burnetii infection and Q-fever manifestations in an entire population sharing the same exposure risk and to develop suitable measures to interrupt transmission.

Clinical utility of routine use of continuous transesophageal echocardiography monitoring during transvenous lead extraction procedure.

BACKGROUND: Data on the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedures are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the routine use of TEE during transvenous lead extraction. METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2014, TLE of 241 leads in 168 patients (mean age 70 ± 13 years, 129 male, left ventricular ejection fraction 37% ± 13%) was performed. Indication for TLE was lead dysfunction (56.5%), upgrade (27.0%), infection (13%), or other (3.1%). TLE techniques combined a mechanical approach amended by laser technique if required. Extraction procedures were performed with patients under general anesthesia with continuous invasive arterial blood pressure and TEE monitoring. RESULTS: TEE was possible in all except 1 patient. TEE images in different projections were acquired and stored before and immediately after extraction of each lead. TLE was complete for 236 of 241 leads (97.9%); 4 distal lead tips (1.7%) remained in situ, and 1 dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electrode (0.4%) could not be removed. New TEE findings after TLE were observed in 7 of 161 cases (4.3%): pericardial effusion (mild in 4 [2.5%] and severe in 1 [0.6%]) and worsening of tricuspid valve insufficiency (2 patients [1.2%]). The only case of severe pericardial effusion occurred after laceration of the superior vena cava, which required immediate rescue surgery (0.6%, confidence interval 0.01-3.3). In all other cases, TEE findings did not entail immediate diagnostic or therapeutic measures. CONCLUSION: New TEE findings produced during TLE necessitating immediate therapeutic measures occurred in only 0.6% of cases, suggesting the limited utility of routine continuous TEE monitoring during TLE.