Postoperative Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroscopy: A Search for the Evidence.

CONTEXT: Hip arthroscopy has become an increasingly popular option for active individuals with recalcitrant hip pain. Conditions that may be addressed through hip arthroscopy include labral pathology, femoral acetabular impingement, capsular hyperlaxity, ligamentum teres tears, and the presence of intra-articular bodies. Although the body of literature examining operative procedures has grown, there is a paucity of evidence specifically on the efficacy of postoperative rehabilitation programs. To date, there are no systematic reviews that have evaluated the available evidence on postoperative rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the available evidence on postoperative rehabilitation programs after arthroscopy of the hip joint. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search of the PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases was conducted in January 2014 according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria and were either case series or case reports (level 4 evidence) that described a 4- or 5-phase postoperative rehabilitation program. The available evidence supports a postoperative period of restricted weight bearing and mobility; however, the specific interventions in the postoperative phases are variable with no comparison trials. CONCLUSION: This review identified a paucity of evidence on postoperative rehabilitation after hip arthroscopy. Existing reports are descriptive in nature, so the superiority of a particular approach cannot be determined. One can surmise from existing studies that a 4- to 5-stage program with an initial period of weight-bearing and mobility precautions is efficacious in regard to function, patient satisfaction, and return to competitive-level athletics. Clinicians may consider such a program as a general guideline but should individualize treatment according to the surgical procedure and surgeon guidelines. Future research should focus on comparative trials to determine the effect of specific postoperative rehabilitation designs.

A review of femoroacetabular impingement and hip arthroscopy in the athlete.

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly recognized as a pathological condition of the hip in athletes. Although it is not always symptomatic, the bone structure leading to FAI and its associated pathology can result in significant pain and performance decline in athletes. Recognition of athletes with symptomatic FAI is of the utmost importance, as prompt treatment is necessary in order to maintain desired sports activity levels and preserve joint function. This review explores the recent evidence on the evaluation, recognition, and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement, and discusses conservative management, postoperative rehabilitation, and treatment in the pediatric and master athlete populations.

Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated With Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain: A Revision.

The Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy (AOPT), formerly the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). This is an update to the 2014 Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated with Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain. The goals of the revision were to provide a concise summary of the contemporary evidence since publication of the original guideline and to develop new recommendations or revise previously published recommendations to support evidence-based practice. This current CPG covers pathoanatomical features, clinical course, prognosis, diagnosis, examination, and physical therapy interventions in the management of nonarthritic hip joint pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(7):CPG1-CPG70. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0302.

LENGTH CHANGE OF THE ILIOFEMORAL LIGAMENT DURING TESTS FOR ANTERIOR MICROINSTABILITY OF THE HIP JOINT: A CADAVERIC VALIDITY STUDY.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: There is little information to support the use of clinical tests to assess for microinstability of the hip joint. The purpose of this study was to use a string model to describe and compare length changes of the iliofemoral ligament in the test positions commonly used to assess hip ligament laxity. METHODS: Twelve hip joints from nine cadavers (4 male; 5 female) with lifespans of 57-84 years of age were studied. A string model representing the medial and lateral arms of the iliofemoral ligament was secured to the proximal and distal attachment points. The amount of length change of the string model was compared in four test positions: 1) external rotation, 2) hyperextension-external rotation 3) abduction-extension-external rotation, and 4) adduction--extension-external rotation. RESULTS: For the medial arm, the greatest change occurred in the adduction-extension-external rotation position (12.7mm). This was significantly greater than the external rotation (5.1mm; p=0.002) and abduction-extension-external rotation position (1.9mm; p<0.001). The lateral arm also had the greatest excursion in the adduction-extension-external rotation position (16.6mm). This length change was significantly greater than the external rotation position (8.6mm; p=0.002), the hyperextension-external rotation (11.1mm; p=0.047), and the abduction-extension-external rotation position (5.6mm; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Tests used for hip instability cause various levels of tension through the iliofemoral ligament. The combination of hip extension and external rotation increased the length change of string model and was maximized with hip adduction. The least amount of change occurred with the addition of hip abduction to extension and external rotation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians may use the information to help interpret tests for instability of the hip and may consider the combined position of hip extension, external rotation, and adduction to elucidate involvement of the iliofemoral femoral ligament. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b; Exploratory cohort study with good reference standards.

Hip Pain and Mobility Deficits-Hip Osteoarthritis: Revision 2017.

The Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The purpose of these revised clinical practice guidelines is to review recent peer-reviewed literature and make recommendations related to hip pain and mobility deficits. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(6):A1-A37. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0301.

Acetabular labral tears of the hip: examination and diagnostic challenges.

The purpose of this clinical commentary is to provide an evidence-based review of the examination process and diagnostic challenges associated with acetabular labral tears of the hip. Once considered an uncommon entity, labral tears have recently received wider recognition as a source of symptoms and functional limitation. Information regarding acetabular labral tears and their association to capsular laxity, femoral acetabular impingement (FAI), dysplasia of the acetabulum, and chondral lesions is emerging. Physical therapists should understand the anatomical structures of the hip and recognize how the clinical presentation of labral tears is difficult to view isolated from other hip articular pathologies. Clinical examination should consider lumbopelvic and extra-articular pathologies in addition to intra-articular pathologies when assessing for the source of symptoms and functional limitation. If a labral tear is suspected, further diagnostic testing may be indicated. Although up-and-coming evidence suggests that information obtained from patient history and clinical examination can be useful, continued research is warranted to determine the diagnostic accuracy of our examination techniques.

The hip joint: arthroscopic procedures and postoperative rehabilitation.

Recent technological improvements have resulted in a greater number of surgical options available for individuals with hip joint pathology. These options are particularly pertinent to the relatively younger and more active population. The diagnosis and treatment of acetabular labral tears have become topics of particular interest. Improvements in diagnostic capability and surgical technology have resulted in an increased number of arthroscopic procedures being performed to address acetabular labral tears and associated pathology. Associated conditions include capsular laxity, femoral-acetabular impingement, and chondral lesions. Arthroscopic techniques include labral tear resection, labral repair, capsular modification, osteoplasty, and microfracture procedures. Postoperative rehabilitation following arthroscopic procedures of the hip joint carries particular concerns regarding range of motion, weight-bearing precautions, and initiation of strength activities. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols that have been typically used for surgeries such as total hip arthroplasty are often not sufficient for the population of patients undergoing arthroscopic procedures of the hip joint. Postoperative rehabilitation should be based upon the principles of tissue healing as well as individual patient characteristics. As arthroscopic procedures to address acetabular labral tears and associated pathology evolve, physical therapists have the opportunity to play a significant role through the development of corresponding rehabilitation protocols.

The clinical presentation of individuals with femoral acetabular impingement and labral tears: A narrative review of the evidence.

Femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) has emerged as one of the more commonly recognized intraarticular hip pathologies and is often accompanied with a labral tear. The understanding of the clinical characteristics of individuals with symptomatic FAI has evolved over the past several years due to emerging research. As research progresses, there is often a gap in translating the current evidence to clinical practice. This manuscript presents the latest evidence underpinning the clinical presentation of FAI and labral tears. Evidence is presented within the context of bridging the latest research and clinical practice.

Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy: an evolving process.

The utilization of hip arthroscopy to treat non-arthritic pain in athletes continues to grow in popularity. Though numerous protocols have been described in the literature, there is no current evidence-based consensus regarding the postoperative management of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Intraoperative findings determine the specific surgical procedure and subsequently play a role in postoperative rehabilitation. Current protocols are primarily based on tissue healing properties, patient tolerance, and clinician experience. General recommendations regarding range-of-motion initiation, weight bearing progression, and strength activities exist. Though relatively uncommon, postoperative complications have been described. Clinicians should be aware of factors, both surgical and rehabilitation-related, that may affect a patient's postoperative progression. In order to assess patients' postoperative improvement, clinicians must utilize outcome measures that effectively assess the functional status level of active individuals following hip arthroscopy. The development of criteria-based programs may improve the consistency of rehabilitation and potentially aid in providing patients a safe, efficient return to athletics.

Post-operative guidelines following hip arthroscopy.

Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy can vary significantly. Existing programs have been developed as a collaborative effort between physicians and rehabilitation specialists. The evolution of protocol advancement has relied upon feedback from patients, therapists and observable outcomes. Although reports of the first femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgeries were reported in the 1930's, it was not until recently that more structured, physiologically based guidelines have been developed and executed. Four phases have been developed in this guideline based on functional and healing milestones achieved which allow the patient to progress to the next level of activity. The goal of Phase I, the protective phase, is to progressively regain 75% of full range of motion (ROM) and normalize gait while respecting the healing process. The primary goal of Phase II is for the patient to gain function and independence in daily activities without discomfort. Rehabilitation goals include uncompensated step up/down on an 8 inch box, as well as, adequate pelvic control during low demand exercises. Phase III goals strive to accomplish pain free, non-compensated recreational activities and higher demand work functions. Manual muscle testing (MMT) grading of 5/5 should be achieved for all hip girdle musculature and an ability to dynamically control body weight in space. Phase IV requires the patient be independent with home and gym programs and be asymptomatic and pain free following workouts. Return to running may be commenced at the 12 week mark, but the proceeding requirements must be achieved. Athletes undergoing the procedure may have an accelerated timetable, based on the underlying pathology. Recognizing the patient's pre-operative health status and post-operative physical demands will direct both the program design and the program timetable.

Rehabilitation after arthroscopic decompression for femoroacetabular impingement.

The use of arthroscopic technology to address pathologic conditions of the hip joint has become a topic of growing interest in the orthopedic community. Addressing femoroacetabular impingement through this method has generated additional attention. As surgical options evolve, rehabilitation protocols must meet the challenge of providing a safe avenue of recovery, yet meeting the goal of returning to high levels of functioning. Current rehabilitation concepts should be based on the growing body of evidence, knowledge of tissue healing properties, and clinical experience.