First-cycle blood counts and subsequent neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay in early-stage breast cancer therapy.

PURPOSE: If patients could be ranked according to their projected need for supportive care therapy, then more efficient and less costly treatment algorithms might be developed. This work reports on the construction of a model of neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay that rank-orders patients according to their need for costly supportive care such as granulocyte growth factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case series and consecutive sample of patients treated for breast cancer were studied. Patients had received standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage nonmetastatic breast cancer and were treated by four medical oncologists. Using 95 patients and validated with 80 additional patients, development models were constructed to predict one or more of the following events: neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < or = 250/microL), dose reduction > or = 15% of that scheduled, or treatment delay > or = 7 days. Two approaches to modeling were attempted. The pretreatment approach used only pretreatment predictors such as chemotherapy regimen and radiation history; the conditional approach included, in addition, blood count information obtained in the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: The pretreatment model was unsuccessful at predicting neutropenia, dose reduction, or delay (c-statistic = 0.63). Conditional models were good predictors of subsequent events after cycle 1 (c-statistic = 0.87 and 0.78 for development and validation samples, respectively). The depth of the first-cycle ANC was an excellent predictor of events in subsequent cycles (P = .0001 to .004). Chemotherapy plus radiation also increased the risk of subsequent events (P = .0011 to .0901). Decline in hemoglobin (HGB) level during the first cycle of therapy was a significant predictor of events in the development study (P = .0074 and .0015), and although the trend was similar in the validation study, HGB decline failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: It is possible to rank patients according to their need of supportive care based on blood counts observed in the first cycle of therapy. Such rankings may aid in the choice of appropriate supportive care for patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Economic analysis of a randomized clinical trial to compare filgrastim-mobilized peripheral-blood progenitor-cell transplantation and autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) and autologous bone marrow (ABM) transplant (T) has documented survival benefits for relapsed Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Treatment costs associated with HDC and its supportive care have restricted its use both on and off clinical trial. In a prospective randomized clinical trial, filgrastim-mobilized PBPCT resulted in faster recovery of bone marrow function, with less hospitalization and supportive care than ABMT. This study was undertaken to analyze the costs of the two strategies using prospectively collected data from a randomized clinical trial that compared filgrastim-mobilized PBPCT versus ABMT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical results and resource utilization from a randomized clinical trial that compared filgrastim-mobilized PBPCT versus ABMT following carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) HDC for HD and NHL are presented. The trial was performed in six centers in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Belgium. Resource utilization data were used to project costs and Massay Cancer Center (MCC) in the United States incurred the cost of treating the cohort. Costs were projected to the United States, because the economic implications to United States centers are significant, costs of care vary markedly among countries but resource utilization on this trial did not, and a randomized trial is unlikely to be performed in the United States. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients with relapsed HD or NHL underwent HDC with BEAM. The PBPCT and ABMT groups had similar short-term survival after BEAM. PBPCT patients had a shorter hospitalization (median, 17 v 23 days; P = .002), neutrophil recovery (11 v 14 days; P = .005), platelet recovery to > or = 20 x 10(9)/L (16 v 23 days; P = .02), and days of platelet transfusions (6 v 10; P < .001). Estimated costs were $8,531 for ABM harvest and $5,760 for PBPC collection, including filgrastim mobilization. The total estimated average cost was $59,314 for each ABMT patient versus $45,792 for each PBPCT patient. Cost savings of $13,521 (23%) were due to shorter hospitalizations with less supportive care. CONCLUSION: PBPCT is as safe and more effective than ABMT for HD and NHL in the short term. PBPCT represents a significant cost savings due to lower autograft collection costs, shorter hospital stays, and less supportive care. The savings exceed the costs for filgrastim mobilization and PBPC collection. Actual savings will vary depending on local practice patterns, charges, and costs.

Predicted effect size of lisdexamfetamine treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in European adults: Estimates based on indirect analysis using a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are few approved therapies for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Europe. Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is an effective treatment for ADHD; however, no clinical trials examining the efficacy of LDX specifically in European adults have been conducted. Therefore, to estimate the efficacy of LDX in European adults we performed a meta-regression of existing clinical data. METHODS: A systematic review identified US- and Europe-based randomized efficacy trials of LDX, atomoxetine (ATX), or osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) in children/adolescents and adults. A meta-regression model was then fitted to the published/calculated effect sizes (Cohen's d) using medication, geographical location, and age group as predictors. The LDX effect size in European adults was extrapolated from the fitted model. Sensitivity analyses performed included using adult-only studies and adding studies with placebo designs other than a standard pill-placebo design. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 2832 identified articles met inclusion criteria. The model-estimated effect size of LDX for European adults was 1.070 (95% confidence interval: 0.738, 1.401), larger than the 0.8 threshold for large effect sizes. The overall model fit was adequate (80%) and stable in the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This model predicts that LDX may have a large treatment effect size in European adults with ADHD.

Quality of life effects of alprostadil therapy for erectile dysfunction: results of a trial in Europe and South Africa.

OBJECTIVES: Quality of life (QOL) data were used to evaluate the effects of self-administered intracavernosal injection of alprostadil for erectile dysfunction, when used for up to 18 months during a 13 country Phase III clinical trial. METHODS: The Duke Health Profile was used to measure patients' physical and psychosocial QOL at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Changes from baseline were measured using paired t-tests, with additional analyses by cause of dysfunction, starting dosage, and prior treatment. RESULTS: Patients displayed significant improvements in mental and social health and self-esteem at six months (P < 0.01, n = 570), with greater improvements at 12 and 18 months. Anxiety and depression measures also improved significantly at 12 and 18 months, as did the summary general health score. Worse pain scores were observed in the first year but not at 18 months. Those with a starting dosage of 10-20 micrograms, those with psychogenic causes of dysfunction, and those with no prior treatment for erectile dysfunction generally showed the greatest improvements. CONCLUSION: In this study, the clinical improvements in erectile function due to intracavernosal alprostadil therapy were complemented by QOL improvements, particularly in the mental health, of many patients.

Insurance incentives for ambulatory surgery.

This study is an attempt to address both the extent to which surgical procedures on an outpatient basis substitute cost-effectively for inpatient procedures, and whether or not an insurance policy's financial incentives increase the volume of outpatient surgical procedures. In particular, given an insurance product of a given composition: What is the probability that the insured will have surgery? and if a surgery does take place, what is the probability that it will occur in an outpatient setting? Finally, the article assesses the implication of such products on the total cost of care by quantifying the insurance plans along two parameters, the relative user price for outpatient versus inpatient surgery and the absolute price for the inpatient surgery. The results indicate that insurance policies that offer relatively lower out-of-pocket payments for ambulatory surgery do not increase the probability that surgery will be done in the ambulatory setting. However, higher out-of-pocket payments for surgery, regardless of site, do reduce the surgery rate. There are other patient and market characteristics, especially the availability of freestanding surgery firms, that do influence the location of surgery.

On-line medical command in theory and practice.

Paramedics are often required to use on-line medical command (OLMC) when they provide advanced life support. We evaluated the efficacy of OLMC use under this broad patient inclusion rule and limited paramedic discretion. OLMC was associated with an average of an eight-minute longer on-scene time, and an infrequent rate of physician-directed deviation from written treatment protocols (3.7% of all OLMC calls). Of the system's advanced life support patients, 6.1% experienced changes in their prehospital health status, reflected in changes in the patient's level of consciousness. OLMC use was associated with improved health status in 5.5% of patients compared with 3.2% for those treated without OLMC (P = .1). The health status of 1.3% of the patients treated with OLMC deteriorated. This was not significantly different from the 1.1% of patients treated without OLMC whose status deteriorated. We suggest that targeted OLMC use with expanded paramedic discretion may improve the efficacy of OLMC. Further controlled comparative studies of OLMC efficacy under targeted OLMC use versus broad patient inclusion rules are needed.

Quality of life effects of alprostadil therapy for erectile dysfunction.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the quality of life effects of self-administered intracavernosal injection of alprostadil sterile powder for erectile dysfunction when used by patients for up to 18 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and self-reported measurements were used to assess physiological and psychological status at baseline, and at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months for 579 patients who entered the self-injection phase of an open label, flexible dose clinical trial. Quality of life was measured using the Center for Marital and Sexual Health Sexual Functioning Questionnaire, which focuses on the psychosocial and physical dimensions of erectile dysfunction; the Brief Symptom Inventory, which measures mental health, and the Duke Health Profile, which measures general quality of life. The primary evaluations were quality of life changes from baseline to post-initiation periods and reasons for treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: The Center for Marital and Sexual Health Sexual Functioning Questionnaire displayed improvements at all post-initiation periods in 10 questions (p < 0.001, Student's paired t-tests) grouped into scales representing frequency of sexual activity, erection, orgasm and satisfaction domains. On the Brief Symptom Inventory interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety and depression as well as global scores improved (p < 0.001). Overall mental health as measured by the Duke Health Profile also improved (p < 0.01) between baseline and 6 months. The reasons most frequently cited for treatment discontinuation were nonfirm erections and injection site pain. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical improvements in erectile function due to alprostadil therapy were associated with improvements in sexual activity, sexual satisfaction and overall mental health.

Empirical criteria for the selection of quality-of-life instruments for the evaluation of peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

We propose a method for selecting quality-of-life instruments for use in phase III trials using the convergent validity of patient responses collected in phase I and II clinical trials. Two generic and two disease-specific instruments were administered to patients with breast cancer undergoing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and transplantation. They included the visual analog scale from the EuroQoL EQ5D instrument, the SF-36, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-QLQ-C30, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy instrument. No single instrument was found to have superior convergent validity in all domains, but the EORTC-QLQ-C30 seemed to perform better than the SF-36.