RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve the success of management. Different regimens were examined. The present study purposed to compare the efficacy of fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin-docetaxel (FLOT) and docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimens. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study assessed the patients with locoregional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared. RESULTS: Demographic features were similar between the two groups, but the time period was different. The FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while the DCF group did not. Disease-free survival was longer in the FLOT than in the DCF group (median not reached - 13.94 months, respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs. 37.8 months), but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for the FLOT group and 40% for the DCF group (log-rank; p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: FLOT regimen was superior to DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). METHODS: A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. RESULTS: The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0-14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9-6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8-7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6-6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5-8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5-4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. CONCLUSION: Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Everolimo , Receptor ErbB-2/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Fulvestranto/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In recent years, many studies have proven that percutaneous thermal ablation is an effective second-line treatment method with low complication rates in early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma and lung metastases. Radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation are commonly used for this purpose. PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors affecting the success of the percutaneous thermal ablation treatment with technical success, complication rates, and long-term follow-up results in metastatic lung lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous ablation was performed for 70 metastatic lung lesions in 35 patients (22 men, 13 women; mean age = 61.34 years; age range = 41-75 years). Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 53/70 (75.7%) lesions and microwave ablation in 17/70 (24.3%) lesions. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 98.6%. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival of the patients were 33.9 months (range=25.6-42.1 months), 12 months (range=4.9-19.2 months), and 24.2 months (range=8.2-40.1 months), respectively. One- and two-year overall survival rates were 84% and 74%, respectively. Median progression-free survival times were 20.3 months and 11.4 months, respectively, according to the number of metastatic lung lesions being single and multiple, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.046). According to the number of lesions ≤3 and >3, the difference was also found statistically significant (P = 0.024) (14.3 months and 5.7 months, respectively). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment method in metastatic lung lesions. The number of lesions is the most important factor in predicting treatment success.
Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Pulmão , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Aim: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients with cancer receiving active systemic therapy. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted with 47 patients receiving active systemic therapy for cancer. CoronaVac was administered as two doses (3 µg/day) on days 0 and 28. Antibody level higher than 1 IU/ml was defined as 'immunogenicity.' Results: The immunogenicity rate was 63.8% (30/47) in the entire patient group, 59.5% (25/42) in those receiving at least one cytotoxic drug and 100% (five of five) in those receiving monoclonal antibody or immunotherapy alone. Age was an independent predictive factor for immunogenicity (odds ratio: 0.830; p = 0.043). Conclusion: More than half of cancer patients receiving active systemic therapy developed immunogenicity.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: COVID-19 will continue to disrupt the diagnosis-treatment process of cancer patients. Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Hospital has been considered as a 'non-pandemic' center ('clean') in Ankara, the capital city of Turkey. The other state hospitals that also take care of cancer patients in Ankara were defined as 'pandemic' centers. This study aimed to evaluate hospital admission changes and the precautionary measures in clean and pandemic centers during the pandemic. The effect of these measures and changes on COVID-19 spreading among cancer patients was also evaluated. METHODS: The patients admitted to the medical oncology follow-up, new diagnosis, or chemotherapy (CT) outpatient clinics during the first quarter of pandemic period (March 15-June 1, 2020) of each center were determined and compared with the admissions of the same frame of previous year (March 15-June 1, 2019). COVID-19 PCR test results in clean and pandemic centers were compared with each other. Telemedicine was preffered in the clean hospital to keep on follow-up of the cancer patients as 'noninfected'. RESULTS: In the clean hospital, COVID-19-infected patients that needed to be hospitalized were referred to pandemic hospitals. COVID-19 test positivity rate was eight-fold higher for outpatient clinic admissions in pandemic hospitals (p < 0.001). The number of patients admitted new diagnosis outpatient clinics in both clean and pandemic hospitals decreased significantly during the pandemic compared with the previous year. CONCLUSION: We consider that local strategic modifications and defining 'clean' hospital model during infectious pandemic may contribute to protect and treat cancer patients during pandemic.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/organização & administração , COVID-19 , Hospitais/classificação , Controle de Infecções , Oncologia , Neoplasias , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Masculino , Oncologia/organização & administração , Oncologia/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Inovação Organizacional , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Telemedicina/métodos , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Due to variety of treatment alternatives for testicular tumours, parameters other than existing staging criteria are also needed. Most studies have revealed the correlation between cancer and inflammation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the value of preoperative inflammatory markers between early-stage testicular tumours and patients with advanced-stage, their relationship with tumour pathology and their importance in predicting stage. To calculate the differences between inflammatory markers, stage 1 tumours localized to the testis and advanced-stage tumours spread beyond the testis were classified into 2 groups according to tumour pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 112 patients undergoing inguinal orchiectomy in between 2008 and 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated by using the numbers of blood cell counts based systemic markers of inflammation. The differences between markers of inflammation were calculated by dividing tumours into 2 groups including early-stage and advanced- stage testicle tumours. RESULTS: According to the results of preoperative inflammatory markers in predicting the stage; in the seminoma group, the difference between the median NLR (2.37 vs. 4.39, p = 0.012), LMR (3.80 vs. 2.40, p = 0.018) and SII (612 vs. 1,127, p = 0.009) of stage 1 and advanced stage were statistically significant, while in the non-seminoma group, only the difference between median PLR (99 vs. 154, p = 0.002) of stage 1 and advanced stage was statistically significant. Sensitivity and specificity of predicting advanced stage according to cut-off values of markers were 69 and 75% in NLR (3.21), 83 and 75% in LMR, and 59 and 75% in SII in the seminoma group; on the other hand, in the non-seminoma group, the sensitivity, and specificity of predicting the advanced stage of PLR cut-off (104) were 71 and 88% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical use of inflammatory biomarkers in testicular tumours may represent an important step in understanding germ cell tumours biology and in supporting staging criteria and prognostic criteria.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Inflamação/sangue , Neoplasias Testiculares/sangue , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia , Adulto , Humanos , Inflamação/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Testiculares/complicações , Neoplasias Testiculares/imunologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Gemcitabine is among the standard first-line agents for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, as the median survival with gemcitabine monotherapy is 6 months, different combinations are being studied for better, prolonged survival. In this multicenter study, we aimed to compare the results of gemcitabine monotherapy with those of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as first-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Data of 664 patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer between January 2007 and December 2016 from seven oncology centers in Turkey were retrospectively evaluated, and 319 patients with gemcitabine alone (n=138) or gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (n=181) as first-line treatment were included. RESULTS: The median patient age was 62 years (range 42-79), being 60 years (42-75) in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm and 67 years (52-79) in gemcitabine alone arm. no complete response was observed in either arm, whereas partial response rates were 30.1% in gemcitabine/cisplatin arm and 15.3% in gemcitabine alone arm (p=0.001). median overall survival was 8 months (95% CI:7.7-10.2) and was significantly longer in the gemcitabine/cisplatin arm than in the gemcitabine alone arm (10 vs. 6 months, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: The cemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer yields significantly prolonged survival over gemcitabine monotherapy. In patients with favorable performance conditions, the combination therapy should be preferred.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , GencitabinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We examined the impact of adjuvant modalities on resected pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAC). METHODS: A total of 563 patients who were curatively resected for PAC were retrospectively analyzed between 2003 and 2013. RESULTS: Of 563 patients, 472 received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) alone, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) alone, and chemoradiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CRT-CT) were analyzed. Of the 472 patients, 231 were given CRT-CT, 26 were given CRT, and 215 were given CT. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12 and 19 months, respectively. When CT and CRT-CT groups were compared, there was no significant difference with respect to both RFS and OS, and also there was no difference in RFS and OS among CRT-CT, CT and CRT groups. To further investigate the impact of radiation on subgroups, patients were stratified according to lymph node status and resection margins. In node-positive patients, both RFS and OS were significantly longer in CRT-CT than CT. In contrast, there was no significant difference between groups when patients with node-negative disease or patients with or without positive surgical margins were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of radiation to CT has a survival benefit in patients with node-positive disease following pancreatic resection.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative efficacy of taxane-based treatment and 5-FU-based treatment as second-line chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer patients, as measured by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Medical Oncology, Health Science University Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from January 2008 and December 2020. METHODOLOGY: Patients aged 18 years and older, diagnosed with gastric cancer, who received at least one line chemotherapy were included. Patients who received FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, and capecitabine in the second-line therapy were grouped as those who received 5-FU-based treatment, while those who received docetaxel and paclitaxel were grouped as those who received taxan-based treatment. The primary outcome measures, OS and PFS, were assessed and compared between the treatment groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients were included in this analysis, among whom 73 (42.4%) received second-line chemotherapy. Among the patients who received the second-line treatment, 50 (68.5%) were males. The median age of the cohort was 60 years (23-86), with 37 (50.7%) patients falling into the <60 age group. The overall response rates (ORR) were 8% (2/25) in the taxane group and 16.7% (8/48) in the 5-FU-based treatment group. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients receiving second-line therapy was 7.52 months (standard error: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.62-9.43). Specifically, the median OS was 5.16 months (standard error: 1.07; 95% CI: 3.07-7.25) in the taxane group and 8.02 months (standard error: 1.40; 95% CI: 5.28-10.75) in the group receiving 5-FU-based therapy (p=0.11). CONCLUSION: The superiority of chemotherapy regimens to each other could not be demonstrated. However, the second-line treatment demonstrated clear superiority over the best supportive care. Therefore, it is recommended that all patients with good performance status (PS) should be offered second-line treatment. KEY WORDS: Gastric cancer, Second-line chemotherapy, Taxanes, Treatment efficacy, 5-Fluorouracil.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gástricas , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objective: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) is an invasive procedure used in patients with obstructive jaundice in the progress of some malignancies, and its most common complication is infection. We aimed to evaluate the patients who underwent PTC regarding their cultures, prophylaxis, and antibiotics used for treatment. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients who underwent PTC and were followed up in a medical oncology outpatient clinic between 2010-2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients' data were obtained from the hospital record system (FONET), epicrisis forms, and patient progress files. Results: A total of 93 patients were included in the study. Prophylaxis was given in 50% of the cases. Complications developed in 68% of the cases after the intervention, and the infectious disease clinic consulted all. Blood cultures were obtained from 89% of the febrile patients; however, bile cultures were obtained only from 29%. The rate of resistant Gram-negative enteric bacteria in growing microorganisms was 52% (n=13). It was determined that 65% of the initiated empirical treatments were appropriate for the growth of microorganisms. Conclusion: The growth rate was significantly higher in blood cultures than in bile cultures. The lower growth rate in bile culture was attributed to the low number of bile cultures. There was no significant difference regarding the growth rate and drug resistance of the microorganisms. Therefore, we think giving antibiotics as treatment rather than prophylaxis is more appropriate. Taking cultures will ensure that patients receive appropriate antibiotic therapy for the causative agent.
RESUMO
Distant metastasis of laryngeal carcinoma occurs at the rate of 4%-12%, with the most common sites being the lungs, liver and bone. Acrometastasis occurs rarely in cases of laryngeal carcinoma; to date, only three cases of acrometastasis have been reported. Herein, we describe a 66-year male, who was followed up for metastatic laryngeal carcinoma and developed paronychia. Hot compress was applied, antibiotic treatment was administered, and fine-needle biopsy of the lesion was performed. The lesion did not regress despite the administration of a broad-spectrum antibiotic. The results of cytological examinations were consistent with squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Rarely occurring acrometastases indicate poor prognosis in cancer patients; expected survival is short and treatment is usually palliative. In such cases, finger amputation or local radiotherapy are recommended. Clinicians should be aware when treating metastatic laryngeal cancer that such atypical lesions as paronychia can be associated with the primary tumour. Key Words: Acrometastasis, Laryngeal carcinoma, Finger, Metastasis.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Laríngeas , Paroniquia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundário , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Dedos , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/terapia , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The relationship of the ABO blood group system with the immune response is known, but its relationship with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not been clearly investigated until now. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the relationship between different blood groups and nivolumab treatment response in patients with advanced malignant melanoma was investigated. METHODS: The data of patients who used nivolumab for advanced malignant melanoma between April 2018 and April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included in the study. In the progression-free survival (PFS) analysis according to blood groups, it was 3.9 months, 16.1 months, 20.0 months and 3.0 months for A, B, AB and O, respectively (p= 0.1). Overall survival (OS) analysis according to blood groups was 5.1 months, 25.0 months, 20.0 months and 9.3 months for A, B, AB and O, respectively (p= 0.1). The B antigen group (B or AB) had significantly longer PFS and OS than the non-B antigen group (A or O) (16.1 vs. 3.5 months for PFS, respectively, p= 0.03; 20.0 vs. 7.4 months for OS, respectively, p= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of B antigen provides a significant advantage in terms of survival in patients using ICIs for advanced melanoma.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Melanoma , Sistema ABO de Grupos Sanguíneos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Melanoma/patologia , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Melanoma Maligno CutâneoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the genetic causes of colorectal cancers (CRCs); and to determine the genotype-phenotype correlation. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Medical Genetics, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research, Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, between January 2018 and January 2020. METHODOLOGY: 59 cancer susceptibility genes of 41 patients, included in the study and diagnosed with CRC, were examined using next generation sequencing (NGS) technique. Statistical analysis of the possible relationships among the mutation carrier status of the patients and the parameters of gender, age at diagnosis, and family cancer history, were performed. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis of all CRC patients was 48.7 years (range 28-74). Mutations in MLH1, MSH6, CHEK2, PMS2 and MUTYH genes were detected in 10 patients (24.4%). The mean age at diagnosis of CRC was 46.2 years in those who carried the mutation, while it was 49.5 years in those without. Carriers and non-mutation carriers, when compared in terms of age at diagnosis, gender, family cancer history, no significant difference was observed. CONCLUSION: Genes that may cause susceptibility to cancer may play a role in the etiopathogenesis of the CRC. NGS-based multigene panels allow these genes to be detected in the patient and to identify an inherited cancer syndrome. Key Words: Colorectal cancer, Lynch syndrome, Hereditary cancer, Gene, Next generation sequencing.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose , Síndromes Neoplásicas Hereditárias , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , TurquiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is a predominant prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. Number of lymph nodes removed surgically was demonstrated to correlate with staging accuracy and oncological outcomes. However, number of lymph nodes removed depends on uncontrolled variables. Therefore, a more reliable prognostic indicator is needed. Calculation of ratio of positive lymph nodes to total number of removed lymph nodes may be an appealing solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 156 Stage III colorectal cancer patients whom underwent surgery between 2008 and 2015. Patients' demographic characteristics, tumor grade, location, vascular-perineural invasion status, number of removed lymph nodes, and ratio of positive lymph nodes to number of removed lymph nodes were recorded. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation coefficient while Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression model were performed for the prediction of survival and multivariate analysis, respectively. RESULTS: Number of removed lymph nodes did not correlate with survival, but it was inversely correlated with number of positive lymph nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that ratio of removed positive lymph nodes to the total number of lymph nodes was a significant prognostic factor for survival for a ratio equal or above 0.31 was a poor prognostic indicator (108 months vs. 34 months, hazard ratio: 4.24 [95% confidence interval: 2.15-8.34]; P < 0.019). Tumor characteristics failed to demonstrate any prognostic value. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) is an important prognostic factor for Stage III colorectal cancer. Although 0.31 can be taken as threshold for "PLNR," prospective trials including larger patient groups are needed to validate its role as a prognostic indicator.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Excisão de Linfonodo/mortalidade , Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Razão entre Linfonodos , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant treatment is a widely accepted approach for locally advanced rectum cancer. Efforts to explore a surrogate endpoint for clinical trials revealed a new prognostic scoring system which is named as neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR) in patients who received neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 88 patients who met inclusion criteria were included in the study. The optimal cutoff value of the NAR score was 17.6 with 71% sensitivity and 63% specificity. Patients with NAR score > 17.6 (n: 48, 54%) were defined as the high-risk group and those with NAR score ≤ 17.6 (n: 40, 56%) as the low-risk group. RESULT: Survival analysis according to the NAR score group (low-risk vs high-risk) revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between groups regarding OS and DFS. The median OS for high-risk patients was 27.3 months (95% CI, 15.0-39.6); it was 76.6 months (47.3-106.0) for low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). The median DFS was 15.1 months (11.8-18.4) for high-risk patients; it was 44.3 months (95% CI, 4.1-84.6) in the low-risk group (p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: As a result, we interpreted our findings as supporting data about the utility of NAR score not only as a surrogate endpoint for the clinical trial of rectal cancer but also as a prognostic marker in patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant treatment.
Assuntos
Prognóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Neoplasias Retais , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer is the third leading diagnosis accounting for nearly 10% of all new cancers worldwide. The distinct features among BRAF mutant colorectal cancers make these tumor groups hard to treat for oncologists. The median overall survival (OS) of these types of cancers is reported to be 9 to 14 months. METHODS: The study was declared on the Turkish Oncology Study Group Conference and approved. The patients' data was received from the centers who confirmed to participate. The BRAF-mutated patients were included in the study. The demographic features (age, gender, etc.), type of mutation, tumor localizations, histology, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, metastasis patterns chemotherapeutic agents and progression, and death times were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Sixteen patients had concurrent KRAS mutations, while 7 had NRAS mutations. Most of the patients received doublet chemotherapies in combination with anti-VEGF agents in the first and second line of the treatment. There was a significant difference in OS according to the stage which showed a decreased survival in stage IV patients at the time of diagnosis. Concurrent KRAS mutation resulted in increased OS. The median OS was 47 and 24 months favoring the KRAS mutant group. The patients whose primary tumor operated had better survival when compared with other patients. The median OS of the operated group was 47 months, while the non-operated group was 24 months. Liver metastasis was related to worse prognosis at the time of diagnosis in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In our study we found a high concurrent RAS mutation ratio in a BRAF mutant patient group which was different from prior studies. The concurrent mutations resulted in a favorable outcome in terms of OS which is also different from the current knowledge. More prospective studies are needed especially BRAF-mutated patient population and especially with concurrent RAS mutations.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/mortalidade , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Genes ras , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Compostos Organoplatínicos/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and survival of MCC cases in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients diagnosed with MCC between 1999 and 2018 at twenty different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics and adjuvant and metastatis treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median age of totally 89 patients was 70 (26-93). The most common primary location was lower limbs (n = 29, 32.5%). Immunohistochemically, CK20 positivity was present in 59 patients (66.3%). Only two patients had secondary malignancy. The majority of the patients (n = 76, 85.4%) were diagnosed at the localized stage. Surgery was performed for all patients in the early stage, and adjuvant radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy was applied to 52.6% (n = 40) of nonmetastatic patients. The median follow-up was 29 months. Recurrence developed in 21 (27.6%) of the 76 patients who presented with local or regional disease. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.1% and 5-year DFS was 62.0% for localized stage. The 5-year DFS was similar for patients receiving adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or sequential chemoradiotherapy) and without adjuvant therapy (P > 0.05). Two-year overall survival in patients who presented with localized disease was 71.3% and 18.5% in metastatic patients (P < 0.001). In the metastatic stage, platinum/etoposide combination was the most preferred combination regimen. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line chemotherapy was 7 months (95% confidence interval: 3.5-10.5 months; standart error: 1.78). CONCLUSIONS: Although MCC is rare in Turkey, the incidence is increasing. Gender, CK20 status, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and adjuvant treatment were not associated with recurrence.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/prevenção & controle , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Turquia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Introduction Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment in stage III colon cancer. Oxaliplatin may cause sinusoidal damage and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) in the liver. Clinical reflections of SOS are splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of splenomegaly development in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and thrombocytopenia incidence rates related to this condition. Materials and methods Files of 50 patients having received fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) regimen for stage 3 colon cancer between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Spleen volumes (SV) of the patients were calculated using pre-and post-chemotherapy tomographic examinations. A 50% increase in the SV after chemotherapy (SV ≥1.5 change) was accepted as chemotherapy-associated splenomegaly. The patients were divided into two groups as having or not having splenomegaly after chemotherapy. Complete blood count was evaluated prior to each treatment cycle, and on the third month of treatment, termination was used for thrombocyte values. Results Splenomegaly was determined in 50% of the patients. Cumulative oxaliplatin dosage was found higher in those who developed splenomegaly (p = 0.003). Chemotherapy dose reduction was higher in patients who did not develop splenomegaly (p = 0.015). Thrombocytopenia was confirmed higher in patients who developed splenomegaly compared to those who did not (p = 0.047). Lower thrombocyte counts were found in the complete blood count of the patients having developed splenomegaly which was performed during and 3 months after chemotherapy when compared to those that did not develop splenomegaly (p-values, respectively, as 0.005, 0.038). Upon multivariate logistic regression analysis, cumulative oxaliplatin dose was the single independent factor related to splenomegaly (OR: 7.55 (1.90-31.61); p = 0.004). Conclusion Thrombocytopenia was confirmed to be higher in colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant mFOLFOX6 and developing splenomegaly during the post-treatment period. Moreover, splenomegaly was shown to be associated with the cumulative oxaliplatin doses received. Thrombocytopenia seen in patients receiving oxaliplatin for colon cancer should be a warning in terms of splenomegaly and SOS development.