Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(15)2024 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39124059

RESUMO

This study evaluates the R3THA™ assessment protocol (R3THA-AP™), a technology-supported testing module for personalized rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy (CP). It focuses on the reliability and validity of the R3THA-AP in assessing hand and arm function, by comparing kinematic assessments with standard clinical assessments. Conducted during a 4-week summer camp, the study assessed the functional and impairment levels of children with CP aged 3-18. The findings suggest that R3THA is more reliable for children aged 8 and older, indicating that age significantly influences the protocol's effectiveness. The results also showed that the R3THA-AP's kinematic measurements of hand and wrist movements are positively correlated with the Box and Blocks Test Index (BBTI), reflecting hand function and dexterity. Additionally, the R3THA-AP's accuracy metrics for hand and wrist activities align with the Melbourne Assessment 2's Range of Motion (MA2-ROM) scores, suggesting a meaningful relationship between R3THA-AP data and clinical assessments of motor skills. However, no significant correlations were observed between the R3THA-AP and MA2's accuracy and dexterity measurements, indicating areas for further research. These findings validate the R3THA-AP's utility in assessing motor abilities in CP patients, supporting its integration into clinical practice.


Assuntos
Braço , Paralisia Cerebral , Mãos , Humanos , Paralisia Cerebral/reabilitação , Paralisia Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Criança , Adolescente , Mãos/fisiopatologia , Mãos/fisiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Braço/fisiopatologia , Braço/fisiologia , Pré-Escolar , Reabilitação Neurológica/métodos , Reabilitação Neurológica/instrumentação , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 23(5)2023 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36904860

RESUMO

We have developed the New Jersey Institute of Technology-Home Virtual Rehabilitation System (NJIT-HoVRS) to facilitate intensive, hand-focused rehabilitation in the home. We developed testing simulations with the goal of providing richer information for clinicians performing remote assessments. This paper presents the results of reliability testing examining differences between in-person and remote testing as well as discriminatory and convergent validity testing of a battery of six kinematic measures collected with NJIT-HoVRS. Two different groups of persons with upper extremity impairments due to chronic stroke participated in two separate experiments. Data Collection: All data collection sessions included six kinematic tests collected with the Leap Motion Controller. Measurements collected include hand opening range, wrist extension range, pronation-supination range, hand opening accuracy, wrist extension accuracy, and pronation-supination accuracy. The system usability was evaluated by therapists performing the reliability study using the System Usability Scale. When comparing the in-laboratory collection and the first remote collection, the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for three of the six measurements were above 0.900 and the other three were between 0.500 and 0.900. Two of the first remote collection/second remote collection ICCs were above 0.900, and the other four were between 0.600 and 0.900. The 95% confidence intervals for these ICC were broad, suggesting that these preliminary analyses need to be confirmed by studies with larger samples. The therapist's SUS scores ranged from 70 to 90. The mean was 83.1 (SD = 6.4), which is consistent with industry adoption. There were statistically significant differences in the kinematic scores when comparing unimpaired and impaired UE for all six measures. Five of six impaired hand kinematic scores and five of six impaired/unimpaired hand difference scores demonstrated correlations between 0.400 and 0.700 with UEFMA scores. Reliability for all measures was acceptable for clinical practice. Discriminant and convergent validity testing suggest that scores on these tests may be meaningful and valid. Further testing in a remote setting is necessary to validate this process.


Assuntos
Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Telerreabilitação , Humanos , Punho , Telerreabilitação/métodos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Extremidade Superior , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa