Lessons learnt during 20 years of the Swedish strategic programme against antibiotic resistance.

Increasing use of antibiotics and rising levels of bacterial resistance to antibiotics are a challenge to global health and development. Successful initiatives for containing the problem need to be communicated and disseminated. In Sweden, a rapid spread of resistant pneumococci in the southern part of the country triggered the formation of the Swedish strategic programme against antibiotic resistance, also known as Strama, in 1995. The creation of the programme was an important starting point for long-term coordinated efforts to tackle antibiotic resistance in the country. This paper describes the main strategies of the programme: committed work at the local and national levels; monitoring of antibiotic use for informed decision-making; a national target for antibiotic prescriptions; surveillance of antibiotic resistance for local, national and global action; tracking resistance trends; infection control to limit spread of resistance; and communication to raise awareness for action and behavioural change. A key element for achieving long-term changes has been the bottom-up approach, including working closely with prescribers at the local level. The work described here and the lessons learnt could inform countries implementing their own national action plans against antibiotic resistance.

L'utilisation croissante d'antibiotiques et l'augmentation de la résistance bactérienne aux antibiotiques constituent un défi pour le développement et la santé mondiaux. Il est nécessaire de communiquer et de diffuser les initiatives qui parviennent à contenir ce problème. En Suède, la propagation rapide de pneumocoques résistants dans le sud du pays en 1995 a conduit à la formation du Programme stratégique suédois contre la résistance aux antibiotiques, également connu sous le nom de Strama. La création de ce programme a été un point de départ important pour coordonner des efforts sur le long terme afin de lutter contre la résistance aux antibiotiques dans le pays. Cet article décrit les principales stratégies du programme: engagement aux niveaux local et national; suivi de l'utilisation d'antibiotiques afin de prendre des décisions en connaissance de cause; objectif national de prescription d'antibiotiques; surveillance de la résistance aux antibiotiques pour agir au niveau local, national et mondial; observation des tendances de résistance; lutte contre les infections afin de limiter la progression de la résistance; communication afin d'inciter à l'action et au changement des comportements. L'adoption d'une démarche ascendante a été un élément clé pour favoriser les changements à long terme, notamment la collaboration étroite avec les prescripteurs au niveau local. Le travail qui est décrit ici et les enseignements tirés pourraient aider les pays à mettre en œuvre leur propre plan d'action national contre la résistance aux antibiotiques.

El creciente uso de antibióticos y el aumento de los niveles de resistencia bacteriana a los antibióticos son un desafío para la salud y el desarrollo mundiales. Es necesario comunicar y difundir iniciativas de éxito para contener el problema. En Suecia, una rápida propagación de neumococos resistentes en el sur del país desencadenó la formación del programa estratégico sueco contra la resistencia a los antibióticos, también conocido como Strama, en 1995. La creación del programa fue un importante punto de partida de los esfuerzos coordinados a largo plazo para combatir la resistencia a los antibióticos en el país. En este artículo se describen las principales estrategias del programa: labores dedicadas a nivel local y nacional, supervisión del uso de antibióticos para tomar decisiones fundamentadas, un objetivo nacional para las recetas de antibióticos, vigilancia de la resistencia a los antibióticos para la acción local, nacional y global; seguimiento de las tendencias de resistencia, control de las infecciones para reducir la propagación de la resistencia y comunicación para sensibilizar sobre las medidas y el cambio de comportamiento. Un elemento clave para conseguir cambios a largo plazo ha sido en enfoque ascendente, que incluye trabajar estrechamente con los médicos a nivel local. El trabajo aquí descrito y las lecciones aprendidas podrían ofrecer información a los países que implementan sus propios planes de medidas nacionales contra la resistencia a los antibióticos.

Repeated nationwide point-prevalence surveys of antimicrobial use in Swedish hospitals: data for actions 2003-2010.

This study sought to analyse antimicrobial pressure, indications for treatment, and compliance with treatment recommendations and to identify possible problem areas where inappropriate use could be improved through interventions by the network of the local Swedish Strategic Programme Against Antibiotic Resistance (Strama) groups. Five point-prevalence surveys were performed in between 49 and 72 participating hospitals from 2003 to 2010. Treatments were recorded for 19 predefined diagnosis groups and whether they were for community-acquired infection, hospital-acquired infection, or prophylaxis. Approximately one-third of inpatients were treated with antimicrobials. Compliance with guidelines for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia with narrow-spectrum penicillin was 17.0% during baseline 2003-2004, and significantly improved to 24.2% in 2010. Corresponding figures for quinolone use in uncomplicated cystitis in women were 28.5% in 2003-2004, and significantly improved, decreasing to 15.3% in 2010. The length of surgical prophylaxis improved significantly when data for a single dose and 1 day were combined, from 56.3% in 2003-2004 to 66.6% in 2010. Improved compliance was possibly the effect of active local feedback, repeated surveys, and increasing awareness of antimicrobial resistance. Strama groups are important for successful local implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in Sweden.

Infectious disease management in primary care: perceptions of GPs.

BACKGROUND: It is important to keep the level of antibiotic prescribing low to contain the development of resistant bacteria. This study was conducted to reveal new knowledge about how GPs think in relation to the prescribing of antibiotics - knowledge that could be used in efforts toward rational treatment of infectious diseases in primary care. The aim was to explore and describe the variations in GPs' perceptions of infectious disease management, with special reference to antibiotic prescribing. METHODS: Twenty GPs working at primary care centres in a county in south-west Sweden were purposively selected based on the strategy of including GPs with different kinds of experience. The GPs were interviewed and perceptions among GPs were analysed by a phenomenographic approach. RESULTS: Five qualitatively different perceptions of infectious disease management were identified. They were: (A) the GP must help the patient to achieve health and well-being; (B) the management must meet the GP's perceived personal, professional and organisational demands; (C) restrictive antibiotic prescribing is time-consuming; (D) restrictive antibiotic prescribing can protect the effectiveness of antibiotics; and (E) patients benefit personally from restrictive antibiotic prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Restrictive antibiotic prescribing was considered important in two perceptions, was not an issue as such in two others, and was considered in one perception although the actual prescribing was greatly influenced by the interaction between patient and GP. Accordingly, to encourage restrictive antibiotic prescribing several aspects must be addressed. Furthermore, different GPs need various kinds of support. Infectious disease management in primary care is complex and time-consuming, which must be acknowledged in healthcare organisation and planning.

The European surveillance of antimicrobial consumption (ESAC) point-prevalence survey of antibacterial use in 20 European hospitals in 2006.

BACKGROUND: Point-prevalence surveys have been used to document antimicrobial use in hospitals for >20 years. However, published surveys are inconsistent with respect to population, indication, and the details of therapy that were included. We aimed to standardize a method for surveillance of antibacterial use in hospitals from different health care systems and to identify targets for quality improvement. METHODS: We adapted a Web-based reporting system from STRAMA, the Swedish Strategic Programme against antibiotic resistance. One hospital from each of 20 countries took part in the survey, which was completed during 2 calendar weeks during 1 April 2006 through 31 May 2006. The survey included all inpatient beds for adults and children and identified all patients who were receiving systemic antibacterial treatments on the day of survey and all patients who had received antibacterial prophylaxis for surgery on the previous day. RESULTS: On the day of survey there were 11,571 inpatients in the 20 participating hospitals, of whom 30.1% were receiving antibacterial treatment (range, 19%-59%). The most common anatomic sites of infection for which antibacterials were prescribed were respiratory tract (24%); skin, bone, and joint (18%); intra-abdominal organs (16%); and urinary tract (11%). The following 3 quality indicators were identified: indication documented in case notes (64%), prophylaxis for surgery not continued for >24 h (60%), and therapy for community-acquired pneumonia not including third-generation cephalosporins or quinolones (78.5%). CONCLUSION: A Web-based method for a point-prevalence survey was successfully piloted in 20 hospitals across Europe and offers a standardized instrument that can identify targets for quality improvement.

Management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated in hospital in Sweden.

To investigate the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated in hospital in Sweden, a multicentre retrospective cohort study was performed with medical record review of 982 patients (mean age 63 y) at 17 departments of infectious diseases at hospitals in Sweden. Information on antimicrobial therapy, demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, physical examination findings, and laboratory and microbiological test results were recorded. Outcome measures were in-hospital mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). Cultures were obtained from blood in 80% and from sputum in 22% of the patients. A microbiological aetiology was determined for 23% of the patients, with Streptococcus pneumoniae as the dominating agent (9%). The initial antibiotic treatment was mostly given intravenously (78%). Penicillin (50%) or a cephalosporin (30%) was the most common choice. Both of these drugs were usually given as a single agent. The overall mortality was 3.5% and the mean LOS was 6.4 d. Thus, the outcome was favourable despite the empirical antibiotic treatment having a narrow spectrum compared with the broader approach recommended in most recent guidelines on the management of CAP. These findings suggest that a majority of patients who are hospitalized with moderately severe pneumonia can be treated initially with penicillin alone.