Nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage on noncontrast head CT: An accuracy, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (NAPSAH) on Noncontrast Head CT (NCCT) between numerous raters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 45 NCCT of adult patients with SAH who also had a catheter angiography (CA) were independently evaluated by 48 diverse raters; 45 raters performed a second assessment one month later. For each case, raters were asked: 1) whether they judged the bleeding pattern to be perimesencephalic; 2) whether there was blood anterior to brainstem; 3) complete filling of the anterior interhemispheric fissure (AIF); 4) extension to the lateral part of the sylvian fissure (LSF); 5) frank intraventricular hemorrhage; 6) whether in the hypothetical presence of a negative CT angiogram they would still recommend CA. An automatic NAPSAH diagnosis was also generated by combining responses to questions 2-5. Reliability was estimated using Gwet's AC1 (κG), and the relationship between the NCCT diagnosis of NAPSAH and the recommendation to perform CA using Cramer's V test. Multi-rater accuracy of NCCT in predicting negative CA was explored. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability for the presence of NAPSAH was moderate (κG = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.47, 0.69), but improved to substantial when automatically generated (κG = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.81). The most reliable criteria were the absence of AIF filling (κG = 0.79) and extension to LSF (κG = 0.79). Mean intra-rater reliability was substantial (κG = 0.65). NAPSAH weakly correlated with CA decision (V = 0.50). Mean sensitivity and specificity were 58% (95%CI: 44%, 71%) and 83 % (95%CI: 72 %, 94%), respectively. CONCLUSION: NAPSAH remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The NCCT diagnosis was moderately reliable and its impact on clinical decisions modest.

Incidental venous thromboembolism detected by PET-CT in patients with cancer: prevalence and impact on survival rate.

INTRODUCTION: People with cancer are at increased risk of incidental venous thromboembolism (VTE) and PET-CT imaging is commonly used in this population. However, the prevalence of incidental VTE detected by PET-CT in patients with cancer and its impact on survival are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. 1331 consecutive adult patients with cancer who underwent PET-CT examination between 2009 and 2012 were included in the study (mean age: 57 ± 15 years). PET-CT reports were reviewed to identify patients with incidental VTE at the time of examination. Survival rates were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the association between incidental VTE and overall survival, after controlling for clinical variables. RESULTS: Incidental VTE was detected in 19 patients (1.4%). Patients with genitourinary malignancies, colorectal cancer and lung cancer had the highest rates of incidental VTE at PET-CT. At multivariate analysis, incidental VTE detected by PET-CT was associated with worse overall survival independently of patient age, hospitalization status at time of PET-CT examination, and the presence of metastatic disease (Hazard ratio=2.03; 95% confidence interval=1.08-3.81, p=0.028). CONCLUSION: Incidental VTE was detected in 1.4% of adult patients with cancer undergoing PET-CT imaging. Diagnosis of incidental VTE at PET-CT imaging was associated with worse overall survival in this population.