Diagnostic challenges of renal medullary carcinoma and the role for cytologic assessment: Case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a diagnostically challenging, aggressive primary renal malignancy associated with abysmal survival. Delays in diagnosis contribute to most patients having diffusely metastatic disease at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: We present the case of a 13-year-old African American male with sickle cell trait who presented with a renal mass and hematuria. Evaluation included imaging, fluid cultures, and cytologic assessment. RESULTS: Patient was diagnosed with RMC based on cytologic assessment of sub-centimeter fluid collections aspirated from the left kidney at the time of cortical biopsy for suspected renal mass. The additional fluid aspiration in conjunction with renal biopsy was an atypical but crucial step in early diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Cytomorphologic evaluation of fluid biospecimens is not currently part of the standard work-up for patients with renal masses but, when available, can provide crucial information that reduces time to diagnosis. Prompt symptom recognition and treatment initiation may improve patient outcomes.

VEGF blockade enables oncolytic cancer virotherapy in part by modulating intratumoral myeloid cells.

Understanding the host response to oncolytic viruses is important to maximize their antitumor efficacy. Despite robust cytotoxicity and high virus production of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) in cultured human sarcoma cells, intratumoral (ITu) virus injection resulted in only mild antitumor effects in some xenograft models, prompting us to characterize the host inflammatory response. Virotherapy induced an acute neutrophilic infiltrate, a relative decrease of ITu macrophages, and a myeloid cell-dependent upregulation of host-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Anti-VEGF antibodies, bevacizumab and r84, the latter of which binds VEGF and selectively inhibits binding to VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) but not VEGFR1, enhanced the antitumor effects of virotherapy, in part due to decreased angiogenesis but not increased virus production. Neither antibody affected neutrophilic infiltration but both partially mitigated virus-induced depletion of macrophages. Enhancement of virotherapy-mediated antitumor effects by anti-VEGF antibodies could largely be recapitulated by systemic depletion of CD11b(+) cells. These data suggest the combined effect of oHSV virotherapy and anti-VEGF antibodies is in part due to modulation of a host inflammatory reaction to virus. Our data provide strong preclinical support for combined oHSV and anti-VEGF antibody therapy and suggest that understanding and counteracting the innate host response may help enable the full antitumor potential of oncolytic virotherapy.