Ofatumumab as part of reduced intensity conditioning in high risk B-cell lymphoma patients: final long-term analysis from a prospective multicenter Phase-II Trial.

Curative potential of allogeneic transplantation (AlloSCT) in high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) could be enhanced by the integration of Ofatumumab (OFA), a 2nd generation anti-CD20 moAb, due to an antitumor effect and a role over graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In this phase II trial (NCT01613300), we investigated safety and effectiveness of OFA-based reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). High-risk B-cell NHL patients with chemorrefractory disease or post-autologous SCT relapse were eligible. OFA was added to a standard RIC regimen. Primary endpoint was grade 3-4 aGVHD rate, while secondary endpoints included CR and survival rates. Thirty-three patients were included (median age 51; diffuse large B-cell:68%, HLA-identical donor: 74%). No grade >2 OFA toxicity was observed. Acute GVHD affected 77% of patients (16% grade 3-4). Remarkably, GVHD achieved CR in 75% of patients after first-line treatment. Chronic GVHD, primarily mild or moderate, occurred in 54% of patients. NHL CR rate at day +100 was 81%. Relapses occurred in 7 patients after a median of 3 months. Causes of death were lymphoma progression (5), infections (10), and GVHD (2). At 24 months, progression-free and overall survival rates were 50.1 and 51.6% respectively. OFA-RIC regimen is safe and effective, though acute GVHD remains a significant complication. However, data suggest that OFA could mitigate its severity.

Real-World Experience with Isavuconazole in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Spain.

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) pose a significant complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Isavuconazole (ISV) is a new generation azole with a favourable adverse effect and interaction profile approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. We analyzed the indications, effectiveness, adverse event profile and drug interaction management of ISV in the real-world setting in adults who received allogeneic-HSCT (allo-HSCT) within the Spanish Group of HSCT and Cell Therapy (GETH-TC). We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of all consecutive adult allo-HSCT recipients (≥18 years) who received ISV either for IFI treatment or prophylaxis, from December 2017 to August 2021, in 20 centers within the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy (GETH-TC). A total of 166 adult allografted patients who received ISV from 2017 to 2021 were included. Median age was 48 years with 43% females. In 81 (49%) patients, ISV was used for treatment of IFI, and in 85 (51%) for prophylaxis. Median duration of ISV administration for IFI treatment was 57 days (range 31-126) and 86 days (range 33-196) for prophylaxis. Most frequent indication for treatment was invasive aspergillosis (78%), followed by mucormycosis (6%). Therapeutic success (45%) was the most frequent reason for ISV withdrawal. In the prophylaxis group, the resolution of IFI risk factors was the most frequent reason for withdrawal (62%). Six (7%) breakthrough IFI were reported. The majority of patients (80%) presented pharmacologic interactions. Twenty-one patients (13%) reported adverse events related to ISV, mainly liver biochemistry abnormalities, which led to ISV withdrawal in 7 patients (4%). ISV was effective and well tolerated for IFI treatment and prophylaxis, with a manageable interaction profile.

Decoding the historical tale: COVID-19 impact on haematological malignancy patients-EPICOVIDEHA insights from 2020 to 2022.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic heightened risks for individuals with hematological malignancies due to compromised immune systems, leading to more severe outcomes and increased mortality. While interventions like vaccines, targeted antivirals, and monoclonal antibodies have been effective for the general population, their benefits for these patients may not be as pronounced. Methods: The EPICOVIDEHA registry (National Clinical Trials Identifier, NCT04733729) gathers COVID-19 data from hematological malignancy patients since the pandemic's start worldwide. It spans various global locations, allowing comprehensive analysis over the first three years (2020-2022). Findings: The EPICOVIDEHA registry collected data from January 2020 to December 2022, involving 8767 COVID-19 cases in hematological malignancy patients from 152 centers across 41 countries, with 42% being female. Over this period, there was a significant reduction in critical infections and an overall decrease in mortality from 29% to 4%. However, hospitalization, particularly in the ICU, remained associated with higher mortality rates. Factors contributing to increased mortality included age, multiple comorbidities, active malignancy at COVID-19 onset, pulmonary symptoms, and hospitalization. On the positive side, vaccination with one to two doses or three or more doses, as well as encountering COVID-19 in 2022, were associated with improved survival. Interpretation: Patients with hematological malignancies still face elevated risks, despite reductions in critical infections and overall mortality rates over time. Hospitalization, especially in ICUs, remains a significant concern. The study underscores the importance of vaccination and the timing of COVID-19 exposure in 2022 for enhanced survival in this patient group. Ongoing monitoring and targeted interventions are essential to support this vulnerable population, emphasizing the critical role of timely diagnosis and prompt treatment in preventing severe COVID-19 cases. Funding: Not applicable.

Posicionamiento y actitudes de manejo sobre la profilaxis antifúngica en el paciente hematológico (proyecto PROMIC) / Consensus opinion on antifungal prophylaxis in haematologic patients: Results of the PROMIC project

Introducción. La enfermedad fúngica invasora (EFI) es una importante causa de morbimortalidad en pacientes hematológicos. La profilaxis antifúngica (PAF) está indicada en muchos episodios de este grupo de pacientes. El objetivo de este trabajo fue alcanzar un consenso sobre el abordaje profiláctico de las EFI en el paciente hematológico con el fin de optimizar su manejo. Métodos. Un comité de expertos en hematología y enfermedades infecciosas planteó un cuestionario de 79 ítems con aspectos controvertidos sobre la profilaxis antifúngica en el paciente hematológico. El cuestionario fue evaluado en dos rondas por un panel de expertos siguiendo una metodología Delphi modificada. Resultados. El cuestionario fue respondido por 44 expertos en hematología y enfermedades infecciosas. Tras dos rondas de evaluación se consensuaron 48 ítems en el acuerdo (60,7%) y 19 en el desacuerdo (24%) por lo que hubo consenso en 67 de los 79 ítems planteados (84,8%). Se consensuaron los perfiles de pacientes candidatos a profilaxis y se dilucidaron cuestiones relacionadas con indicaciones, mecanismos de acción, espectro de actividad, toxicidad e interacciones de los antifúngicos. Se analizó particularmente la utilidad de micafungina como profilaxis de EFI. Se consensuó que micafungina es un antifúngico a considerar en este contexto. Puede presentar ventajas sobre otros antifúngicos por su seguridad y menor potencial de interacciones. Conclusiones. Se encontró un alto nivel de consenso en el manejo de la profilaxis de la EFI en el paciente hematológico. Este consenso ofrece indicaciones prácticas sobre su manejo óptimo y puede ayudar a determinar el perfil de los pacientes idóneos a recibir este tipo de intervención (AU)

Introduction. Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in haematological patients. Antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) is indicated for a number of clinical scenarios in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on IFD prophylaxis in haematological patients in order to optimize their management. Methods. A committee of experts in haematology and infectious diseases compiled a survey of 79 items with controversial aspects about antifungal prophylaxis in haematological patients. The survey was evaluated in two rounds by a panel of experts following a modified Delphi methodology. Results. Forty-four experts in haematology and infectious diseases answered the survey. After two evaluation rounds, consensus was reached in 67 of the 79 items (84.8%), specifically 48 items were consensually agreed on (60.7%) and 19 were disagreed on (24.0%). Consensus was reached on prophylaxis candidates profiles and questions related to indications, mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, toxicity and interactions of antifungal were elucidated. The usefulness of micafungin in IFD prophylaxis was particularly analysed. The consensus reached was that micafungin is an antifungal to be considered in this context as its safety profile and lower interaction potential may be advantageous. Conclusions. A broad consensus was found in the management of IFD prophylaxis in the haematological patient. This consensus provides practical indications about its optimal management and can help determine the profile of patients eligible for this type of intervention (AU)

Comparación de dos estrategias iniciales de movilización de sangre periférica de células madre para el trasplante autólogo en pacientes con linfoma y la infección por virus de inmunodeficiencia humana / Comparison of two initial mobilizing strategies of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma and human immunodeficiency virus infection

Fundamento y objetivo: Varios estudios han demostrado la viabilidad de trasplante de células madre autólogas (ASCT) en pacientes con linfoma y el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). La infección por VIH se ha descrito como un factor de riesgo para la movilización de los pobres. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados de dos estrategias de movilización de las células madre sanguíneas periféricas (CMSP) en pacientes con linfoma y la infección por VIH en siete hospitales españoles. Pacientes y métodos: Las variables recogidas fueron: características demográficas, clínicas y biológicas, quimioterapias anteriores y los resultados, así como las estrategias de movilización de (clasificados en dos grupos: 1) G-CSF, y 2) el G-CSF de quimioterapia +). Resultados: Entre enero de 2000 y mayo de 2010, 42 pacientes con linfoma y la infección por VIH fueron remitidos para ASCT. La tasa de éxito en la movilización (colección> 1,60 × 10 6 células CD34 / kg) con el primer régimen fue del 67%, sin diferencias entre los pacientes movilizados con G-CSF o con G-CSF + quimioterapia (16 [72%] y 12 [60%], respectivamente, p = 0,382). El estado del linfoma en el momento de la movilización fue el único factor para la movilización de éxito (20/22 pacientes [91%] en remisión completa [RC] movilizado adecuadamente frente a 5/12 [58%] en remisión parcial [RP], p = 0,038). Conclusiones: En los pacientes con linfoma y la infección por el VIH, la movilización con G-CSF fue tan eficaz como la movilización con quimioterapia seguida de G-CSF. El estadio de la enfermedad antes de la movilización fue el principal factor de riesgo para el éxito de la movilización, con mejores resultados en los pacientes movilizados en remisión del linfoma (AU)

Background and objective: Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with lymphoma and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. HIV infection has been described as a risk factor for poor mobilization. The aim of this study was to compare the results of two mobilization strategies of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with lymphoma and HIV infection in seven Spanish hospitals. Patients and methods: The following variables were collected: demographic, clinical and biological features, previous chemotherapies and outcomes, as well as mobilization's strategies (classified in two groups: 1) G-CSF, and 2) G-CSF + chemotherapy). Results: Between January 2000 and May 2010, 42 patients with lymphoma and HIV infection were referred for ASCT. The rate of successful mobilization (collection >1.60 × 106 CD34 cells/kg) with the first regimen was 67%, with no differences between those patients mobilized with G-CSF or with G-CSF + chemotherapy (16 [72%] and 12 [60%], respectively; p=0.382). The status of the lymphoma at the time of mobilization was the only factor for successful mobilization (20/22 patients [91%] in complete remission [CR] mobilized adequately versus 5/12 [58%] in partial remission [PR]; p=0.038). Conclusions: In patients with lymphoma and HIV infection, mobilization with G-CSF was as effective as mobilization with chemotherapy followed by G-CSF. The stage of disease prior to the mobilization was the main risk factor for the success of mobilization, with better results in patients mobilized in remission of the lymphoma (AU)

Tratamiento antifúngico empírico en pacientes seleccionados con fiebre persistente y neutropenia / Empirical antifungal therapy in selected patients with persistent fever and neutropenia

El tratamiento antifúngico empírico (TAE) en los pacientes con neutropenia tiene como objetivo principal mejorar el mal pronóstico de los pacientes con infección fúngica invasora, mediante el tratamiento precoz de la misma. La Sociedad Americana de Enfermedades Infecciosas recomienda iniciar el TAE en los pacientes con fiebre después de 5-7 días de tratamiento antibacteriano y en los que la resolución de la neutropenia no es inminente. Sin embargo, el TAE no ha demostrado mayor eficacia que el placebo, no obtiene mejores resultados que el tratamiento antifúngico dirigido, su efectividad es mínima, no es inocuo y, con la mayoría de los antifúngicos, es muy poco eficiente. Por todas estas razones consideramos que la citada recomendación del TAE no está justificada. En su lugar proponemos la realización del TAE en pacientes seleccionados por criterios clínicos y factores de riesgo (AU)

Empirical antifungal treatment (EAT) in neutropenia is mainly aimed at improving the poor prognosis of patients with invasive fungal infection through early treatment. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends initiating EAT in patients with persistent fever after 5-7 days of antibacterial treatment, and in those in whom remission of neutropenia is not imminent. Nevertheless, EAT has not been shown to be more effective than a placebo, it does not show better results than directed antifungal treatment, its effectiveness is minimal, it is not innocuous, and it is not very efficient with the use of most antifungal agents. All considered, we believe that the aforementioned recommendation for EAT treatment is unjustified. In its place we propose the application of EAT in patients selected on the basis of clinical criteria and risk factors (AU)

Inmunoablación y trasplante de progenitores hematopoyéticos en las enfermedades autoinmunes / Immunosuppression and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases

No disponible