Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Eixos temáticos
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Cancer ; 130(9): 2195-203, 2012 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21702044

RESUMO

The trifunctional antibody catumaxomab is a targeted immunotherapy for the intraperitoneal treatment of malignant ascites. In a Phase II/III trial in cancer patients (n = 258) with malignant ascites, catumaxomab showed a clear clinical benefit vs. paracentesis and had an acceptable safety profile. Human antimouse antibodies (HAMAs), which could be associated with beneficial humoral effects and prolonged survival, may develop against catumaxomab as it is a mouse/rat antibody. This post hoc analysis investigated whether there was a correlation between the detection of HAMAs 8 days after the fourth catumaxomab infusion and clinical outcome. HAMA-positive and HAMA-negative patients in the catumaxomab group and patients in the control group were analyzed separately for all three clinical outcome measures (puncture-free survival, time to next puncture and overall survival) and compared to each other. There was a strong correlation between humoral response and clinical outcome: patients who developed HAMAs after catumaxomab showed significant improvement in all three clinical outcome measures vs. HAMA-negative patients. In the overall population in HAMA-positive vs. HAMA-negative patients, median puncture-free survival was 64 vs. 27 days (p < 0.0001; HR 0.330), median time to next therapeutic puncture was 104 vs. 46 days (p = 0.0002; HR 0.307) and median overall survival was 129 vs. 64 days (p = 0.0003; HR 0.433). Similar differences between HAMA-positive and HAMA-negative patients were seen in the ovarian, nonovarian and gastric cancer subgroups. In conclusion, HAMA development may be a biomarker for catumaxomab response and patients who developed HAMAs sooner derived greater benefit from catumaxomab treatment.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Anti-Idiotípicos/sangue , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Ascite/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/imunologia , Ascite/sangue , Ascite/imunologia , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Humoral/imunologia , Imunoterapia/métodos , Camundongos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/sangue , Neoplasias Ovarianas/imunologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Paracentese/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/sangue , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneais/imunologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia , Ratos , Neoplasias Gástricas/sangue , Neoplasias Gástricas/imunologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Neurol Ther ; 4(2): 105-24, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26525537

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) is a rare autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction, clinically characterized by proximal muscle weakness and autonomic changes. LEMS is often associated with an underlying tumor (paraneoplastic form) but also occurs in the absence of cancer (idiopathic form). Treatment consists of immunomodulation (immunosuppression), anticancer treatment when carcinoma is present, and symptomatic treatment [acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and potassium channel blockers, e.g., amifampridine (3,4-diaminopyridine, i.e., 3,4-DAP), to improve neurotransmission]. Although there has long been information from case reports, several randomized controlled trials, and treatment guidelines, population data are still scarce. METHODS: The LEMS patient registry was launched in the European community in mid-2010 as a voluntary, multinational, observational, non-interventional program to collect structured empirical data on clinical course, treatment utilization, and safety and efficacy from the use of LEMS-specific treatments. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients have been enrolled [36 males, 32 females, 1 gender not reported; mean age 61.5 (27-84) years]. Eighteen patients (26%) were diagnosed with an associated carcinoma. At the time of enrollment, the majority of patients (65%) were receiving amifampridine [either compounded 3,4-DAP (22%) or 3,4-DAP phosphate, Firdapse(®) (43%)]. At enrollment, most patients demonstrate a profile of mild-to-moderate deficits in daily functioning but generally have good muscle strength, albeit with reduced deep tendon reflexes, frequent ataxia during walking, and signs of autonomic dysfunction including dry mouth, bladder dysfunction, and constipation. CONCLUSION: The LEMS European Union registry will continue to enroll patients and periodically report the accrued longitudinal data obtained on clinical assessments and laboratory findings, treatment practices, the safety and efficacy of treatment approaches, and long-term clinical outcomes. FUNDING: BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA, USA.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa