Arterial stiffness tested by pulse wave velocity and augmentation index for cardiovascular risk stratification in antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Arterial stiffness (ArS) has emerged as a predictor of future cardiovascular events in the general population. We aimed to assess ArS in patients with thrombotic APS versus diabetes mellitus (DM) and healthy controls (HC) and identify predictors of increased ArS in APS. METHODS: ArS was evaluated by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and augmentation index normalized to 75 beats/min (AIx@75) using the SphygmoCor device. Participants also underwent carotid/femoral ultrasound for atherosclerotic plaque detection. We used linear regression to compare ArS measures among groups and assess ArS determinants in the APS group. RESULTS: We included 110 patients with APS (70.9% female, mean age 45.4 years), 110 DM patients and 110 HC, all age/sex matched. After adjustment for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and plaque presence, APS patients exhibited similar cfPWV [ß = -0.142 (95% CI -0.514, 0.230), p = 0.454] but increased AIx@75 [ß = 4.525 (95% CI 1.372, 7.677), p = 0.005] compared with HC and lower cfPWV (p < 0.001) but similar AIx@75 (p = 0.193) versus DM patients. In the APS group, cfPWV was independently associated with age [ß = 0.056 (95% CI 0.034, 0.078), p < 0.001], mean arterial pressure (MAP) [ß = 0.070 (95% CI 0.043, 0.097), p < 0.001], atherosclerotic femoral plaques [ß = 0.732 (95% CI 0.053, 1.411), p = 0.035] and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I IgM positivity [ß = 0.696 (95% CI 0.201, 1.191), p = 0.006]. AIx@75 was associated with age [ß = 0.334 (95% CI 0.117, 0.551), p = 0.003], female sex [ß = 7.447 (95% CI 2.312, 12.581), p = 0.005] and MAP [ß = 0.425 (95% CI 0.187, 0.663), p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: APS patients exhibit elevated AIx@75 vs HC and similar to DM patients, indicating enhanced arterial stiffening in APS. Given its prognostic value, ArS evaluation may help to improve cardiovascular risk stratification in APS.

7-year follow-up atherosclerotic plaque progression in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome versus diabetes mellitus and healthy controls.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) carry a substantial burden of cardiovascular disease and subclinical atherosclerosis. We aimed to assess a 7-year follow-up atherosclerotic plaque progression in APS patients vs diabetes mellitus (DM) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Eighty-six patients with thrombotic APS, 86 with DM and 86 HC (all age- and sex-matched) who underwent a baseline ultrasound of carotid and femoral arteries were invited for a 7-year follow-up ultrasonography examination. We compared atherosclerosis progression among the three groups and examined determinants of plaque progression in APS patients. RESULTS: Sixty-four APS patients (75% females, 43.8% with primary APS), 58 patients with DM and 66 HC were included in the 7-year ultrasound re-evaluation. New plaque was detected in 51.6%, 36.2% and 25.8% of APS, DM and HC subjects, respectively. After adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and baseline plaque presence, APS patients showed a 3-fold (OR = 3.07, p= 0.007) higher risk for atherosclerosis progression vs HC and 2-fold (OR = 2.25, p= 0.047) higher risk than DM patients. In multivariate analysis in the APS group, plaque progression was independently associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) co-existence (OR = 7.78, p= 0.005) and number of CVRFs (OR = 3.02, p= 0.002), after adjusting for disease-related parameters and CVRF-related medications. Sustained low-density lipoprotein target attainment reduced plaque progression risk (OR = 0.34, p= 0.021). CONCLUSION: Half of APS patients develop new atherosclerotic plaques over a 7-year follow-up, having a three-times higher risk vs HC. Concomitant SLE and number of traditional CVRFs are associated with plaque progression, supporting the need for thorough CVRF assessment and control.

Outcomes of COVID-19 re-infections: a single-center cohort of 167 patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

Data on COVID-19 re-infections in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) are lacking. We aimed to describe the course and outcomes of COVID-19 re-infections in these patients versus controls. In this single-center retrospective study, we included 167 consecutive SRD patients with at least one COVID-19 re-infection (mean age 47.3 years, females 70.7%). SRD patients were compared in terms of patient-perceived COVID-19 re-infection severity and hospitalizations/deaths with 167 age/sex-matched non-SRD controls. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess potential milder re-infection versus primary infection severity, adjusting for study group, demographics (age, sex), vaccination status, body mass index, smoking, and comorbidities. 23 and 7 out of 167 re-infected SRD patients experienced two and three re-infections, respectively, which were comparable to the re-infection rates in controls (two: 32; and three: 2) who also had comparable COVID-19 vaccination history (89% and 95% vaccinated, respectively). In the initial infection, patients with SRDs were hospitalized (7.2% versus 1.8%, p = 0.017), and had received antiviral treatment (16.1% versus 4.7%, p < 0.001) more frequently than controls. However, hospitalizations (1.8% vs 0.6%) and antiviral treatment (7.8% vs 3.5%) did not differ (p > 0.05) between patients and controls at the first re-infection, as well as during the second and third re-infection; no deaths were recorded. Perceived severity of re-infections was also comparable between patients and controls (p = 0.847) and among those on biologic DMARDs or not (p = 0.482). In multivariable analysis, neither SRDs presence nor demographics or comorbidities were associated with COVID-19 re-infection severity. COVID-19 re-infection severity (patient-perceived/hospitalizations/deaths) did not differ between SRDs and controls.

Glucocorticoid discontinuation rate and risk factors for relapses in a contemporary cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis.

The rates of relapses and therapy discontinuation in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the modern therapeutic era have not been defined. We aimed to evaluate the glucocorticoid (GC) discontinuation rate and the factors associated with relapses in a contemporary GCA cohort. Patient and treatment data were collected cross-sectionally at first evaluation and 2 years later (second evaluation), in a multicenter, prospective GCA cohort. Predictors of relapses were identified by logistic regression analyses. 243 patients with GCA were initially included (67% women, mean age at diagnosis: 72.1 years, median disease duration: 2 years) while 2 years later complete data for 160 patients were available and analyzed. All patients had received GCs at diagnosis (mean daily prednisolone dose: 40 mg) while during follow-up, 37% received non-biologic and 16% biologic agents, respectively. At second evaluation, 72% of patients were still on therapy (GCs: 58% and/or GC-sparing agents: 29%). Relapses occurred in 27% of patients during follow-up; by multivariable logistic regression analysis, large vessel involvement at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 4.22], a cardiovascular event during follow-up (OR = 4.60) and a higher initial GC daily dose (OR = 1.04), were associated with these relapses. In this large, real-life, contemporary GCA cohort, the rates of GC discontinuation and relapses were 40% and 27%, respectively. Large vessel involvement, a higher GC dose at diagnosis and new cardiovascular events during follow-up were associated with relapses.

Depression and anxiety in a real-world psoriatic arthritis longitudinal study: should we focus more on patients' perception?

OBJECTIVES: Longitudinal studies using validated tools to evaluate depression and anxiety in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are lacking. We aimed to estimate their course in PsA and to examine possible associations with disease-related parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: PsA patients attending two outpatient rheumatology clinics were consecutively enrolled (January 2019-June 2021, n=128). The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) was used at two sequential visits (mean±SD: 10±6 months) to prospectively assess depression (HADS-Depression) and anxiety (HADS-Anxiety) (cut-off scores ≥11). Associations with demographic, clinical, laboratory features and PROs for quality of life (QoL) (EQ-5D), functional status (HAQ-DI) and nocebo-behaviour (Q-No) were examined. 'Change' was the difference between values at the first and second visit. RESULTS: Prevalence of depression and anxiety at the first visit was 19.5% and 21.1%, respectively. Depression was associated with EQ-5D [OR (95% CI): 1.70 (1.02-2.59), p=0.019] and anxiety with EQ-5D [1.81 (1.20 to 2.72), p=0.005], nocebo-behaviour [1.19 (1.01-1.40), p=0.04] and current corticosteroid use [6.95 (1.75-27.59), p=0.006]. At the second visit, HADS-Depression and HADS-Anxiety scores were improved in 40.9% and 41.9% of patients, respectively. While no associations were found for HADS-Anxiety score change, changes in HADS-Depression score correlated with changes in subjective (tender joint count, r= 0.204, p=0.049; PtG, r= 0.236, p=0.023; patient pain assessment, r= 0.266, p=0.01) but not objective (swollen joint count, ESR, CRP) parameters of disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: In PsA, depression and anxiety are associated with worse PROs, including QoL. Subjective parameters of disease activity parallel course of depression.

Higher frequency but similar recurrence rate of uveitis episodes in axial spondylarthritis compared to psoriatic arthritis. A multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Data on risk factors predicting uveitis development in spondyloarthritis (SpA) is scarce. Our aim was to examine associations between demographic, clinical and/or laboratory characteristics of SpA with the occurrence and the course of uveitis, including ocular damage and recurrence rate. METHODS: Characteristics (at disease diagnosis and ever-present) from axSpA and Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients followed in 3 tertiary rheumatology-clinics were retrospectively recorded. Comparisons were made between patients with and without uveitis, as well as between those with uveitis-rate [episodes/year] above the median uveitis-rate in the whole cohort ("recurrent"-uveitis) and the remaining uveitis patients ("non-recurrent uveitis"). In multivariable models, age, gender and variables significantly different in univariate analyses were included. RESULTS: 264 axSpA and 369 PsA patients were enrolled. In axSpA, uveitis occurred in 11.7% and was associated with HLA-B27 (OR = 4.15, 95%CI 1.16-14.80, p = 0.028) and ever-present peripheral arthritis (OR = 3.05 (1.10-8.41, p = 0.031). In contrast, uveitis in PsA occurred only in 2.7% of patients and was associated with SpA family-history (OR = 6.35 (1.29-31.27), p = 0.023) axial disease at diagnosis (OR = 5.61 [1.01-28.69], p = 0.038) and disease duration (OR = 1.12 [1.04-1.21], p = 0.004). Median uveitis recurrence rate was comparable between axSpA and PsA (0.205 and 0.285 episodes/year, respectively). No associations were found between recurrent uveitis and demographic/clinical/laboratory characteristics. Ocular damage (e.g. synechiae) was seen in 16.1% of axSpA and 30% of PsA patients, all of them with recurrent uveitis. CONCLUSION: Uveitis occurred more commonly in axSpA than in PsA patients, while uveitis recurrence rate was similar. Permanent ocular damage may occur more often in PsA than axSpA.

Better outcomes of COVID-19 in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: Τo report outcomes of breakthrough COVID-19 in comparison with COVID-19 in unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs). METHODS: Patients with SRD with COVID-19 (vaccinated and unvaccinated) were included by their rheumatologists in a registry operated by the Greek Rheumatology Society in a voluntarily basis. Type, date and doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were recorded, and demographics, type of SRD, concurrent treatment, comorbidities and COVID-19 outcomes (hospitalisation, need for oxygen supplementation and death) were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. RESULTS: Between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2021, 195 patients with SRD with COVID-19 were included; 147 unvaccinated and 48 vaccinated with at least one dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Pfizer n=38 or AstraZeneca n=10). Among vaccinated patients, 29 developed breakthrough COVID-19 >14 days after the second vaccine dose (fully vaccinated), while 19 between the first and <14 days after the second vaccine dose (partially vaccinated). Despite no differences in demographics, SRD type, treatment or comorbidities between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients, hospitalisation and mortality rates were higher in unvaccinated (29.3% and 4.1%, respectively) compared with partially vaccinated (21% and 0%) or fully vaccinated (10.3% and 0%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccinated patients with SRD with breakthrough COVID-19 have better outcomes compared with unvaccinated counterparts with similar disease/treatment characteristics.

Atherosclerosis progression in antiphospholipid syndrome is comparable to diabetes mellitus: a 3 year prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune thrombophilia leading to life-threatening cardiovascular events. Cross-sectional data support that APS is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis, but this has not been confirmed in prospective studies. We aimed to compare the rate of atherosclerosis progression over a 3 year period between patients with APS, diabetes mellitus (DM) and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: Eighty-six patients with APS [43 with primary APS (PAPS), 43 with SLE-related APS (SLE-APS)] and an equal number of age- and sex-matched patients with DM and HCs who underwent a baseline US of the carotid and femoral arteries were invited for a 3 year follow-up evaluation for atherosclerotic plaque progression. Multivariate analysis was performed for the assessment of determinants of plaque progression after adjustment for disease-related and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Seventy-four APS patients (74.3% female, 38 with PAPS), 58 DM patients and 73 HCs were included. APS patients exhibited a 3.3-fold higher risk of new atherosclerotic plaque formation compared with HCs (P = 0.031), similar to that in DM [odds ratio (OR) 3.45, P = 0.028]. In APS patients, plaque development risk was higher in SLE-APS vs PAPS (OR 7.75, P = 0.038) and was independently associated with the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors as expressed by the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation risk (OR 2.31, P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: APS is characterized by accelerated rates of subclinical atherosclerosis to a degree comparable to DM, which is more pronounced in SLE-APS patients. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors are major determinants of this risk, warranting aggressive management as in other disorders with high cardiovascular risk.

Axial psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: same or different? A real-world study with emphasis on comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES: Axial involvement affects 25-70% of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, depending on the criteria used for its definition. Efforts are underway to clarify the similarities and differences between axial-PsA and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We aimed to compare, in a real-world setting, axial-PsA and AS, in terms of demographic, radiologic and clinical (musculoskeletal and extra-articular) characteristics, with a focus on comorbidities. METHODS: All AS (New York criteria, n=128) and PsA patients (CASPAR criteria, n=78) with axial involvement who were regularly followed-up in the outpatients' rheumatology clinics from two tertiary hospitals (December 2018-July 2020) were included. Demographic, radiologic and clinical characteristics were recorded and compared between the two groups. For comorbidities (coronary disease, cerebrovascular accidents, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, depression, osteoporosis, and malignancies), adjustments were made for relevant confounders. RESULTS: AS patients were younger (p=0.05) and were diagnosed at a younger age (p=0.002), more frequently of male gender (p=0.04), had lower BMI (p=0.006) and they were more frequently HLA-B27-positive (p=0.006). In AS patients, peripheral arthritis, dactylitis and nail involvement were less common (p=0.001 for all), in contrast to eye (p=0.001) and bowel involvement (p=0.004). Frequency of radiologic abnormalities in the spine was similar between the two groups while sacroiliitis was more often bilateral in AS and unilateral in axial-PsA. Comorbidities, including cardiovascular-related ones, were comparable between AS and axial-PsA, apart from depression which was more frequent in axial-PsA (p=0.07 in logistic regression). CONCLUSIONS: AS and axial-PsA have certain clinical and radiologic differences. Comorbidities were comparable, while depression was more common in axial-PsA.

The second decade of anti-TNF-a therapy in clinical practice: new lessons and future directions in the COVID-19 era.

Since the late 1990s, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (anti-TNFs) have revolutionized the therapy of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) affecting the gut, joints, skin and eyes. Although the therapeutic armamentarium in IMIDs is being constantly expanded, anti-TNFs remain the cornerstone of their treatment. During the second decade of their application in clinical practice, a large body of additional knowledge has accumulated regarding various aspects of anti-TNF-α therapy, whereas new indications have been added. Recent experimental studies have shown that anti-TNFs exert their beneficial effects not only by restoring aberrant TNF-mediated immune mechanisms, but also by de-activating pathogenic fibroblast-like mesenchymal cells. Real-world data on millions of patients further confirmed the remarkable efficacy of anti-TNFs. It is now clear that anti-TNFs alter the physical course of inflammatory arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, leading to inhibition of local and systemic bone loss and to a decline in the number of surgeries for disease-related complications, while anti-TNFs improve morbidity and mortality, acting beneficially also on cardiovascular comorbidities. On the other hand, no new safety signals emerged, whereas anti-TNF-α safety in pregnancy and amid the COVID-19 pandemic was confirmed. The use of biosimilars was associated with cost reductions making anti-TNFs more widely available. Moreover, the current implementation of the "treat-to-target" approach and treatment de-escalation strategies of IMIDs were based on anti-TNFs. An intensive search to discover biomarkers to optimize response to anti-TNF-α treatment is currently ongoing. Finally, selective targeting of TNF-α receptors, new forms of anti-TNFs and combinations with other agents, are being tested in clinical trials and will probably expand the spectrum of TNF-α inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for IMIDs.

COVID-19 vaccine safety and nocebo-prone associated hesitancy in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate and type of adverse effects (AEs) and the frequency of disease flares after COVID-19 vaccination and to assess the reasons for vaccination hesitancy (non-vaccination) in SRD patients. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted of SRD patients consecutively enrolled (15/06/2021-1/7/2021). Participants were asked about the type of AEs and disease flare after vaccination. Reasons for vaccination hesitancy were recorded. Univariate and mutivariable analyses examined associations of demographic, clinical and other features, with occurrence of AEs, disease flare and non-vaccination. For the latter, association with negative vaccination behaviour (not influenza vaccinated for the last 2 years) and nocebo-prone behaviour (denoting AEs attributed to negative expectations [Q-No questionnaire]) was also tested. RESULTS: 561 out of 580 contacted patients were included in the study. 441/561 (78.6%) patients were vaccinated [90% (Pfizer, Moderna), 10% (Astra-Zeneca)]. AEs were reported by 148/441 (33.6%), with rates being comparable between the three vaccines. AEs were more common in females and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [OR, 95% CI; females: 2.23 (1.30-3.83); COPD: 3.31 (1.24-8.83)]. Disease flare was reported in 9/441 (2%) patients. For those unvaccinated, fear that the vaccine would be harmful (53.3%), could cause disease flare (24.2%) and/or could cause thrombosis (21.7%) were the main reasons to do so. Multivariable analysis identified as independent variables for non-vaccination: nocebo-prone behaviour (OR; 95% CI, 3.88; 1.76-8.55), negative vaccination behaviour (6.56; 3.21-13.42) and previous COVID-19 infection (2.83; 1.13-7.05). Higher educational status was protective (0.49; 0.26-0.92). CONCLUSION: No new safety signals for COVID-19 vaccination were observed. Vaccination campaign should target SRD patients with nocebo-prone and negative influenza vaccination behaviour.

Hypogammaglobulinemia after rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis is not rare and is related with good response: 13 years real-life experience.

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab (RTX) use in the treatment of RA can be complicated by decrease in IgG, IgM or IgA levels (hypogammaglobulinemia-HGG). The aim of this study was to define the frequency of HGG in RA patients treated with RTX and to identify associations between its occurrence and patients' characteristics, disease outcomes and serious infections rate. METHODS: RA patients treated with RTX in two rheumatology centers from January 2007 to January 2020 were retrospectively examined. Demographical, clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded at baseline and at last visit. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (84.3% females) with a mean age of 63.2 years were enrolled. They had baseline DAS28(CRP) of 5.2 (1.1) and received a median (range) of 8 (2-20) RTX cycles. A total of 43.4%, 24.1% and 31.3% developed 'any HGG', 'low IgG' and 'low IgM', respectively. Lower baseline IgG and IgM levels were predictors of 'low IgG' and 'low IgM' occurrence, respectively. Patients who developed 'low IgM' exhibited lower DAS28(CRP) and increased rates of remission and low disease activity compared with those with normal IgM levels. Patients who maintained normal IgG were receiving methotrexate more frequently. No differences were observed in serious infections rate among subgroups. CONCLUSION: HGG occurred in 43% of RTX-treated patients. Patients who developed low IgG or low IgM had lower baseline levels than those who did not. Concomitant DMARD and corticosteroid therapy was not associated with HGG. Low IgM, but not low IgG, development was associated with better disease outcomes. HGG was not associated with an increased incidence of serious infections.

Incidence, risk factors and validation of the RABBIT score for serious infections in a cohort of 1557 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Predicting serious infections (SI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is crucial for the implementation of appropriate preventive measures. Here we aimed to identify risk factors for SI and to validate the RA Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk score in real-life settings. METHODS: A multi-centre, prospective, RA cohort study in Greece. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatments and comorbidities were documented at first evaluation and one year later. The incidence of SI was recorded and compared with the expected SI rate using the RABBIT risk score. RESULTS: A total of 1557 RA patients were included. During follow-up, 38 SI were recorded [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.3/100 patient-years]. Patients who developed SI had longer disease duration, higher HAQ at first evaluation and were more likely to have a history of previous SI, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. By multivariate analysis, longer disease duration (IRR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.005, 1.1), history of previous SI (IRR: 4.15; 95% CI: 1.7, 10.1), diabetes (IRR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.06, 6.14), chronic lung disease (IRR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.35, 7.27) and daily prednisolone dose ≥10 mg (IRR: 4.77; 95% CI: 1.47, 15.5) were independent risk factors for SI. Using the RABBIT risk score in 1359 patients, the expected SI incidence rate was 1.71/100 patient-years, not different from the observed (1.91/100 patient-years; P = 0.97). CONCLUSION: In this large real-life, prospective study of RA patients, the incidence of SI was 2.3/100 patient-years. Longer disease duration, history of previous SI, comorbidities and high glucocorticoid dose were independently associated with SI. The RABBIT score accurately predicted SI in our cohort.

Zoledronic acid is effective in the management of migratory osteoporosis unresponsive to conservative treatment and risedronate: A case report.

We describe a case of a 55-year-old woman with migratory osteoporosis (MO) which initially presented as pain with bone marrow edema (BME) evident in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the left ankle and was managed with non-weight-bearing (NWB). The patient was already treated with per os risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis. After significant initial improvement, pain and BME relapsed in the left ankle and additionally expanded to insult the foot, while 3 months later the left hip was also affected. Since the combination of NWB, analgesics and risedronate had failed to control the disease, a single infusion of 5mg zoledronic acid (ZA) was administered. One month later the pain in all affected sites was disappeared and BME resolved as shown by MRI performed 3.5 months following ZA infusion. The patient, eventually, returned to her daily routine. This case underlines the effectiveness of ZA in MO and the need for more aggressive treatment in this disease.

Increased influenza vaccination rates in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

To assess non-compliance and potential changes in seasonal flu vaccination coverage before and during the Covid-19 pandemic in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Consecutive patients with ARDs followed-up in 2 tertiary hospitals were telephone-interviewed (December 12-30, 2020) regarding seasonal flu vaccination during the 2019/20 and 2020/21 time periods. Self-reported disease flares that occurred after flu vaccination, as well as reasons for non-vaccination were recorded. One thousand fifteen patients were included. The rate of flu vaccination increased from 76% before to 83% during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.0001). The rate of self-reported disease flares was < 1% among vaccinated patients. Reasons for not vaccination in both periods, respectively, included: 'was not recommended by their rheumatologists' (35.0vs.12.2%, p < 0.0001), 'did not feel that they would have any benefit' (36.9 vs. 32.6%), felt unsafe to do so (27.5 vs. 30.2%), or other reasons (18.9 vs. 23.8%). By multivariate analysis, age [OR = 1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.04)] vs. [1.04 (95% CI 1.02-1.05)] and treatment with biologics [OR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.22-2.24) vs. [1.68 (95% CI 1.19-2.38)] were independent factors associated with vaccination in both periods. These findings, although are temporally encouraging, emphasize the need for continuous campaigns aiming at increasing patients' and physicians' awareness about the benefits of vaccination.