Intraduodenal sarcoma recurrence of retroperitoneal origin: an unusual cause for a duodenal obstruction.

Soft tissue sarcomas are uncommon tumors, and intraduodenal soft tissue sarcoma manifestation is even more rare. Only three cases of intraduodenal sarcomas have been reported in the literature thus far. Here, we report a case of an intraduodenal recurrence of a retroperitoneal sarcoma causing bowel obstruction. This unusual recurrence pattern likely relates to the patient's previous resection and radiation treatment, and highlights the benefits, limitations and follow-up strategies after multimodality treatment.

Interpretive disparity among pathologists in breast sentinel lymph node evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemical staining on breast sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is controversial. METHODS: Twenty-five SLN cases were reviewed by 10 pathologists (three academic, seven private) including 5 negative by both hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry, 11 micrometastases (<2 mm) negative by H&E but positive by immunohistochemistry, and 8 micrometastases and 1 macrometastasis (>2 mm) positive for both H&E and immunohistochemistry. Answers included "positive," "negative," and "indeterminate" for each slide. RESULTS: The mean number of incorrect responses was 6.6 for immunohistochemistry and 5 for H&E. Twelve percent of cases were correct by all 10 pathologists; 80% of positive IHC cases had at least one pathologist score it incorrectly. As tumor cells decrease in number, incorrect responses increase. When tumor cells numbered less than 10, more than 30% of pathologists answered incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: As tumor cells decrease in number pathologists' ability to recognize them decreases. We propose adding "indeterminate" to "positive" and "negative" when tumor cells number less than 10.

Utility of routine immunofluorescence staining for C4d in cardiac transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Immunofluorescence staining of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) specimens to detect the complement fragment C4d is used to diagnose antibody-mediated rejection. However, data are limited regarding the utility of routine staining for C4d in clinical care. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of adult cardiac transplant recipients who underwent > or = 2 EMBs with immunofluorescence C4d staining at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center since September 2006. C4d staining was performed by the immunohistochemistry laboratory and interpreted by the members of the surgical pathology department, in conjunction with interpretation of the routine hematoxylin and eosin staining. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were routinely assessed at the time of clinical rejection. RESULTS: Of 67 patients, specimens were positive for C4d (C4d+) in 14 and negative for C4d (C4d-) in 53. The frequency of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in these 2 groups was 57% (8 of 14, designated C4d+/ACR+) vs 11% (6 of 53, designated C4d-/ACR+; p < 0.001). Significantly more patients with a positive C4d specimen had a positive retrospective donor specific crossmatch, presence of DSA after transplantation, and depressed graft function (p < 0.01 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Positive C4d immunofluorescence staining on EMB specimens was associated with ACR, reduced allograft function, a positive retrospective crossmatch, and the presence of DSA after transplantation. The latter 2 observations support the contention that C4d deposition is a marker of antibody-mediated rejection. Routine evaluation of C4d staining is feasible in the clinical setting and may identify variable patterns of rejection.