Effectiveness of Pulse Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Patients With Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Sham Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the 3-month effects of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (PEMF) in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). DESIGN: Planned analysis of a randomized controlled trial with 4- and 12-week follow-ups. SETTING: Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic, treatment unit. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 250 individuals screened for eligibility, participants with a diagnosis of SIS (N=80) were randomized to intervention or control groups. INTERVENTION: The first group received PEMF + exercise and the second group received sham PEMF + exercise 5 days a week for a total of 20 sessions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Constant Murley Score (CMS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Questionnaire, and shoulder muscle strength measurement with an isokinetic dynamometer. Evaluations were performed before treatment (T0), after treatment (T1), and 12th week (T2). RESULTS: Evaluation at T1 and T2 showed improvement in most parameters in both groups compared with baseline. In the comparison between the 2 groups at T1 and T2, more improvement was found in the PEMF group in most parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, PEMF was found to be superior to sham PEMF in terms of pain, ROM, functionality, and quality of life at the first and third months.

The effect of high intensity laser therapy in the management of painful calcaneal spur: a double blind, placebo-controlled study.

To evaluate the effect of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) in patients with calcaneal spur. The patients were randomized to receive either HILT + exercise (n = 21) (five times a week for a period of 3 weeks) or placebo HILT + exercise (n = 21) (five times a week for a period of 3 weeks). Pain severity (with visual analog scale (VAS) and with Roles and Maudsley score (RMS)), functionality (with Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)), plantar pressure measurement, and quality of life (with short form-36 (SF-36)) of the patients were evaluated at baseline, at 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. A significant improvement in the VAS (p < 0.001), RMS (p < 0.001), and most of the SF-36 subgroup scores (p < 0.05) and most of the FAOS subgroup scores (p < 0.05) at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment was achieved in both groups. Besides, there was no significant difference in VAS (p > 0.05) and RMS (p > 0.05) between the groups. FAOS symptoms (p = 0.022) and quality of life (p = 0.038) subgroups were higher in the placebo group at 12 weeks. Significant improvements were observed in dynamic pedographic measurements in the HILT group (p < 0.05), and dynamic measurement values were significantly higher in the HILT group compared to placebo group (p < 0.05). Although the evaluation parameters, except dynamic pedographic measurements, have improved in both groups, our study results showed no superiority of HILT over placebo. To conclude, when the main complaint is pain in patients, only exercise therapy can be an economical, practical, and reliable treatment.

Correction: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Traditional Motorized Traction and Non-surgical Spinal Decompression Therapy Added to Conventional Physiotherapy for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69610.].

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Traditional Motorized Traction and Non-surgical Spinal Decompression Therapy Added to Conventional Physiotherapy for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: There are a limited number of studies comparing traditional motorized traction and non-surgical spinal decompression with other treatment options such as conventional motor traction in the treatment of low back pain caused by lumbar discopathy. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these treatments. METHODS: The retrospective data of patients diagnosed with lumbar discopathy who underwent physical therapy in our clinic were reviewed. Demographic data, duration of their symptoms, physical examination findings, lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports, method and duration of treatment, and visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) results were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients met the inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 44.6±12.4 (range 21-65) years, 57.5% (n=92) were female, and 42.5% (n=68) were male. There were no differences between the conventional physiotherapy, motorized traction, and spinal decompression groups in terms of age, duration of symptoms, and the number of sessions (p>0.05). In all three groups, the mean scores of VAS and ODI were significantly decreased in the pre-and post-treatment comparisons (p<0.005). The rates of change in VAS and ODI were higher in the traction group and spinal decompression group compared to the conventional treatment (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: In patients with subacute and chronic lumbar discopathies, motorized traction and spinal decompression treatments added to conventional treatment were found to be more effective than conventional treatment alone. The results of spinal decompression and conventional motorized traction treatments appear to be similar.

Clinical Efficiency of High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A 12-Week Follow-up, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to research the clinical effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy combined with exercise on pain, quality of life, and disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy and compared it with that of placebo and exercise alone. DESIGN: Ninety participants with cervical radiculopathy were randomized into the following three groups: high-intensity laser therapy + exercise ( n = 30), placebo + exercise ( n = 30), and exercise only ( n = 30). Pain, cervical range of motion, disability, and quality of life (36-item Short Form Health Survey) were assessed at baseline and weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients (66.7% female) was 48.9 ± 9.3 yrs. Pain intensity in the arm and neck, neuropathic and radicular pain levels, disability, and several parameters of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey showed an improvement in the short and medium term in all three groups. These improvements were greater in the high-intensity laser therapy + exercise group than in the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity laser therapy + exercise was much more effective in improving medium-term radicular pain, quality of life, and functionality in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Thus, high-intensity laser therapy should be considered for the management of cervical radiculopathy. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. CME OBJECTIVES: At the conclusion of this article, readers will be able to: (1) Define cervical radicular pain and its clinical presentation, and explain the main pathomechanism in cervical radiculopathy (CR); (2) Describe the effects of laser administration on neuropathic pain; and (3) Discuss the clinical significance of coadministration of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) with exercise (HILT + EX) in CR. LEVEL: Advanced. ACCREDITATION: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Effect of Robotic Rehabilitation on Hand Functions and Quality of Life in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the impact of robotic hand rehabilitation on hand function and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: Children with cerebral palsy aged 7-16 yrs were divided into robotic rehabilitation ( n = 9) or conventional rehabilitation ( n = 10) groups for hand rehabilitation of 30 sessions. The primary outcomes were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity and Box and Block Test. The secondary outcomes were the Manual Ability Classification System, modified Ashworth scale, hand grasp and finger strengths, ABILHAND-Kids, Functional Independence Measure for Children, and PedsQL Quality of Life Inventory-CP Module. RESULTS: In the robotic rehabilitation group, a significant improvement was found in all parameters after treatment ( P < 0.05), except for the Functional Independence Measure ( P = 0.081). In the conventional rehabilitation group, there was significant improvement after treatment in the modified Ashworth scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity, hand grasp strength, Box and Block Test, ABILHAND-Kids, and PedsQL Quality of Life Inventory-CP Module ( P < 0.05). Before and after treatment, all outcome parameters in the groups were similar ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic hand rehabilitation is effective in improving motor function, manual dexterity, spasticity, and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. However, it was not demonstrated to be superior to conventional rehabilitation.

Evaluation of finger strength and spasticity in hemiplegic patients using hand-finger robotic device: A validity and reliability study.

We aimed to investigate the validity, reliability, and clinical relevance of Amadeo hand-finger robotic rehabilitation system measurements for evaluating spasticity and strength in hemiplegic patients. In total, 161 participants (107 hemiplegic patients and 54 sex- and age-matched healthy controls) were included in this study. Spasticity was evaluated using the Modified Ashworth Scale, hand motor functions were evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Hand Subscale, and hand grip and pinch strength were evaluated using the Jamar hand grip and pinch dynamometer. The Amadeo (Tyromotion) hand-finger robotic rehabilitation system was used to evaluate finger spasticity and strength of the participants. A statistically significant difference was found between the median values of the Modified Ashworth Scale (both clinical and robotic evaluation results) and the mean values of hand flexor and extensor strength measured with the robotic device in patients compared to healthy subjects (P < .01). Statistically, excellent agreement was obtained between the clinical and robotic test-retest results of the scale (P < .01) (intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC = .98-.99; ICC = .98-.99, respectively). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the clinical and robotic device results of the Modified Ashworth Scale (r = .72; P < .01). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the hand strength values measured with the robotic device, Jamar grip, pinch, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment Hand Subscale scores (P < .01) in the patient group. Hand finger spasticity and strength measurements of the Amadeo hand-finger robotic rehabilitation system were valid, reliable, and clinically correlated in stroke patients.

Effects of water-based and land-based exercises on walking and balance functions of patients with hemiplegia.

BACKGROUND: After the stroke, a number of changes occur in the neuromuscular system functions. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the water based exercise (WBE) program applied in combination with the land-based exercises (LBE) compared to LBE alone contributes to the stroke patients' motor functions, walking, balance functions and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: In total, 60 patients participated in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. WBE therapy (3/week) + LBE (2/week) combination was applied to the patients in the study group (n = 30) for six weeks. LBE was applied to the control group (n = 30) 5/week for six weeks. Patients were evaluated before and after the treatment. Functional independence measurement, Berg balance scale, timed up and go test, and short form (SF) -36 assessment questionnaire were performed. RESULTS: Posttreatment results showed significant improvements in all of the parameters (except SF - 36 pain parameter) in both groups. The improvement in the vitality parameter of SF-36 was higher in the study group (p < 0.05), and improvement in the BBS was significantly higher in the LBE group than the WBE group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Applying WBE together with the LBE (except SF-36 vitality sub-parameter) in patients with hemiplegia did not make any additional contribution to the application of LBE alone.