RESUMO
CONTEXT: Through the process of socialization, women and men are conditioned to behave and play different roles in society. While the African culture "rewards" women who have vaginal birth despite the cost to their health, the burden of reproductive decision-making is placed on the menfolk. However, these seem to be changing. AIMS: Our aim was to assess the beliefs and perceptions of pregnant women about cesarean section (CS), including their views regarding decision-making on the mode of delivery, in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. SETTINGS AND DESIGN:: A cross-sectional descriptive study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire was administered to 200 pregnant women, following an oral informed consent. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: : Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17 with descriptive statistics of frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: All the respondents believe that CS is done for the safety of the mother/baby. Thirteen percent reject the procedure for themselves no matter the circumstance. Joint decision-making was the view of two-thirds of the women. Majority of them will accept CS if their husbands consent. Younger women were of the view that husbands decide on the delivery mode (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Culture remains an impediment to CS uptake. Most women preferred joint decision-making on the mode of delivery.
Assuntos
Cesárea/psicologia , Tomada de Decisões , Parto Obstétrico/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Gestantes/psicologia , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Mães , Nigéria , Percepção , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
In order to evaluate pain perception among parturients in Enugu, South-east Nigeria, a cross-sectional questionnaire study of parturients who delivered vaginally in four health institutions in Enugu from 2 December 2005 to 21 January 2006 was administered. Data analysis was by means of percentages, means +/- SD, correlation coefficients, t-tests, chi2-tests, one-way ANOVA and other inferential statistics using the statistical package SPSS for MS Windows at the 95% confidence level. A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed, out of which 181 were correctly filled and returned for a response rate of 72.4%. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing maximal pain, the mean intensity of pain recorded by the respondents was 7.7 +/- 2.8. A total of 40 (22.1%) parturients received some pain relieving drug during their labour while 141 (77.9%) did not. Of the 40 women who received intra-partum analgesia, three women received pethidine, 17 (42.5%) received pentazocine, while 20 (50%) did not know the analgesic they received. Of the 141 respondents who did not receive intra-partum analgesia, 79 (56.0%) would have liked to have receive analgesia, while 62 (44.0%) would not. Of the 92 women who had their backs rubbed by companions during labour, 67 (72.8%) reported that this practice was helpful in relieving their labour pains, while 25 (27.2%) did not find it helpful. Of the 141 women who had a companion, 103 (73.0%) reported that this was helpful in relieving labour pains, while 38 (27.0%) reported no benefit. Antenatal care, place of residence, ethnicity, religion, marital status, occupational level, receiving intra-partum analgesia, type of analgesia received, having a companion during labour or receiving lectures on labour pains during the antenatal period had no significant impact on pain perception by the respondents (p > 0.05 for each of these variables). There was no significant correlation between pain scores and the respondents' ages and gestational age at delivery (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant positive correlation between the parturients' pain scores and their educational levels (r = 0.18, p = 0.018) and a significant negative correlation between pain scores and parity (r = -0.23, p = 0.009), with primigravidae having the highest perceived mean pain score compared with multiparas and grandmultiparas (7.5 +/- 2.3 vs 6.6 +/- 2.5 vs 6.3 +/- 2.1, p = 0.048). Additionally, those parturients who had their backs rubbed by a companion had a significantly higher mean perceived pain score than their counterparts whose backs were not rubbed (8.4 +/- 2.4 vs 6.8 +/- 2.9, p = 0.000). Parturients whose labours were either induced or augmented had a significantly higher perceived mean pain score than those who had spontaneous labour (8.9 +/- 2.5 vs 7.1 +/- 2.8, p = 0.001). It was concluded that parturients in Enugu, Eastern Nigeria, perceive labour as a very painful process with only a minority of them receiving any form of intra-partum analgesia. There is thus a large unmet need for pain relief among the parturients. Obstetric analgesia as is currently practiced in developed countries is long overdue in Nigeria.