Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 9: 745-51, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26089651

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient nonadherence to cardiac medications following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with increased risk of recurrent events. However, the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction and poor health literacy among ACS patients and their association with medication nonadherence are poorly understood. METHODS: We assessed rates of cognitive dysfunction and poor health literacy among participants of a clinical trial that tested the effectiveness of an intervention to improve medication adherence in patients hospitalized with ACS. Of 254 patients, 249 completed the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, Revised (REALM-R) survey, an assessment of risk for poor literacy, and the St Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam, a tool assessing for neurocognitive deficits, during ACS hospitalization. We assessed if SLUMS or REALM-R scores were associated with medication adherence. RESULTS: Based on SLUMS score, 14% of patients were categorized as having dementia, and 52% with mild neurocognitive disorder (MNCD). Based on REALM-R score of ≤6, 34% of patients were categorized as at risk for poor health literacy. There was no association between poor health literacy and medication nonadherence. Of those with MNCD, 35.5% were nonadherent, compared to 17.5% with normal cognitive function and 6.7% with dementia. In multivariable analysis, cognitive dysfunction was associated with medication nonadherence (P=0.007), mainly due to an association between MNCD and nonadherence (odds ratio =12.2, 95% confidence interval =1.9 to 243; P=0.007). Cognitive status was not associated with adherence in patients randomized to the intervention. CONCLUSION: Cognitive dysfunction and risk for poor health literacy are common in patients hospitalized with ACS. We found an association between MNCD and medication nonadherence in the usual care group but not in the intervention group. These findings suggest efforts to screen for MNCD are needed during ACS hospitalization to identify patients at risk for nonadherence and who may benefit from an adherence intervention.

2.
Am J Cardiol ; 93(4): 453-5, 2004 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14969621

RESUMO

Thrombocytopenia is recognized as a potential adverse effect in patients treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We monitored platelet counts at baseline and at 10 minutes and at 1, 8, and 24 hours after initiation of therapy with either abciximab (n = 74) or eptifibatide (n = 26) in a series of 100 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000 m(3) occurred in 11 patients treated with abciximab (15%) and in none of those treated with eptifibatide. The inhibition of platelet adhesion to fibrinogen-coated material by abciximab and eptifibatide was similar, indicating that the reduction in platelet count with abciximab is unrelated to inhibition of platelet function.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/efeitos adversos , Peptídeos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Complexo Glicoproteico GPIIb-IIIa de Plaquetas/antagonistas & inibidores , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Abciximab , Análise de Variância , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Eptifibatida , Feminino , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab das Imunoglobulinas/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Adesividade Plaquetária , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Plaquetas , Trombocitopenia/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo
3.
JAMA Intern Med ; 174(2): 186-93, 2014 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24247275

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Adherence to cardioprotective medication regimens in the year after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is poor. OBJECTIVE: To test a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to cardiac medications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this randomized clinical trial, 253 patients from 4 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers located in Denver (Colorado), Seattle (Washington); Durham (North Carolina), and Little Rock (Arkansas) admitted with ACS were randomized to the multifaceted intervention (INT) or usual care (UC) prior to discharge. INTERVENTIONS: The INT lasted for 1 year following discharge and comprised (1) pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and tailoring; (2) patient education; (3) collaborative care between pharmacist and a patient's primary care clinician and/or cardiologist; and (4) 2 types of voice messaging (educational and medication refill reminder calls). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome of interest was proportion of patients adherent to medication regimens based on a mean proportion of days covered (PDC) greater than 0.80 in the year after hospital discharge using pharmacy refill data for 4 cardioprotective medications (clopidogrel, ß-blockers, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors [statins], and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers [ACEI/ARB]). Secondary outcomes included achievement of blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level targets. RESULTS Of 253 patients, 241 (95.3%) completed the study (122 in INT and 119 in UC). In the INT group, 89.3% of patients were adherent compared with 73.9% in the UC group (P = .003). Mean PDC was higher in the INT group (0.94 vs 0.87; P< .001). A greater proportion of intervention patients were adherent to clopidogrel (86.8% vs 70.7%; P = .03), statins (93.2% vs 71.3%; P < .001), and ACEI/ARB (93.1% vs 81.7%; P = .03) but not ß-blockers (88.1% vs 84.8%; P = .59). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of patients who achieved BP and LDL-C level goals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A multifaceted intervention comprising pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and tailoring, patient education, collaborative care between pharmacist and patients' primary care clinician and/or cardiologist, and voice messaging increased adherence to medication regimens in the year after ACS hospital discharge without improving BP and LDL-C levels. Understanding the impact of such improvement in adherence on clinical outcomes is needed prior to broader dissemination of the program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00903032.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Alta do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Seguimentos , Relações Interprofissionais , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 5(4): 571-6, 2012 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22811499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adherence to cardioprotective medications in the year after acute coronary syndrome hospitalization is generally poor and is associated with increased risk of rehospitalization and mortality. Few interventions have specifically targeted this high-risk patient population to improve medication adherence. We hypothesize that a multifaceted patient-centered intervention could improve adherence to cardioprotective medications. METHODS AND RESULTS: To evaluate this intervention, we propose enrolling 280 patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome event into a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. The intervention comprises 4 main components: (1) pharmacist-led medication reconciliation and tailoring; (2) patient education; (3) collaborative care between pharmacist and primary care provider/cardiologist; and (4) 2 types of voice messaging (educational and medication refill reminder calls). Patients in the intervention arm will visit with the study pharmacist ≈1 week post-hospital discharge. The pharmacist will work with the patient and collaborate with providers to reconcile medication issues. Voice messages will augment the educational process and remind patients to refill their cardioprotective medications. The study will compare the intervention versus usual care for 12 months. The primary outcome of interest is adherence using the ReComp method. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include achievement of targets for blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein, and reduction in the combined cardiovascular end points of myocardial infarction hospitalization, coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality. Finally, we will also evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared with usual care. CONCLUSIONS: If the intervention is effective in improving medication adherence and demonstrating a lower cost, the intervention has the potential to improve cardiovascular outcomes in this high-risk patient population.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Adesão à Medicação , Alta do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Projetos de Pesquisa , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/economia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Comportamento Cooperativo , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Alta do Paciente/economia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/organização & administração , Readmissão do Paciente , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Estudos Prospectivos , Sistemas de Alerta , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa